Re: [v4.14-rt][report] arm: run: stress-ng --class os --all 0 -t 5m

Hi Grygorii, On 12/20/2017 01:33 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > I've run test few times - can't see "WARNING: possible circular locking > dependency detected" > any more. Below warning happened once. > > [ 3091.593894] [ cut here ] > [ 3091.593909] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID:

Re: [v4.14-rt][report] arm: run: stress-ng --class os --all 0 -t 5m

Hi Grygorii, On 12/20/2017 01:33 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > I've run test few times - can't see "WARNING: possible circular locking > dependency detected" > any more. Below warning happened once. > > [ 3091.593894] [ cut here ] > [ 3091.593909] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID:

Re: [v4.14-rt][report] arm: run: stress-ng --class os --all 0 -t 5m

On 12/19/2017 02:27 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2017-12-18 20:01:05 [-0600], Grygorii Strashko wrote: >> Hi All, > Hi, > >> Below results of running stress-ng --class os --all 0 -t 5m on TI am57xx-evm >> (SMP, 2 cpu) >>

Re: [v4.14-rt][report] arm: run: stress-ng --class os --all 0 -t 5m

On 12/19/2017 02:27 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2017-12-18 20:01:05 [-0600], Grygorii Strashko wrote: >> Hi All, > Hi, > >> Below results of running stress-ng --class os --all 0 -t 5m on TI am57xx-evm >> (SMP, 2 cpu) >>

Re: [v4.14-rt][report] arm: run: stress-ng --class os --all 0 -t 5m

On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:33:10 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2017-12-19 10:28:39 [-0500], Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:04:18 +0100 > > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The above just seems

Re: [v4.14-rt][report] arm: run: stress-ng --class os --all 0 -t 5m

On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:33:10 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2017-12-19 10:28:39 [-0500], Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:04:18 +0100 > > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The above just seems wrong. local_irq_disable() should imply > > > >

Re: [v4.14-rt][report] arm: run: stress-ng --class os --all 0 -t 5m

On 2017-12-19 10:28:39 [-0500], Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:04:18 +0100 > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > > > > > The above just seems wrong. local_irq_disable() should imply > > > local_bh_disable(), as it doesn't let softirqs run either. > >

Re: [v4.14-rt][report] arm: run: stress-ng --class os --all 0 -t 5m

On 2017-12-19 10:28:39 [-0500], Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:04:18 +0100 > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > > > > > The above just seems wrong. local_irq_disable() should imply > > > local_bh_disable(), as it doesn't let softirqs run either. > > > > Where does

Re: [v4.14-rt][report] arm: run: stress-ng --class os --all 0 -t 5m

On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:04:18 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > > The above just seems wrong. local_irq_disable() should imply > > local_bh_disable(), as it doesn't let softirqs run either. > > Where does local_irq_disable() imply this? If it doesn't

Re: [v4.14-rt][report] arm: run: stress-ng --class os --all 0 -t 5m

On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:04:18 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > > The above just seems wrong. local_irq_disable() should imply > > local_bh_disable(), as it doesn't let softirqs run either. > > Where does local_irq_disable() imply this? If it doesn't explicitly do so, it probably

Re: [v4.14-rt][report] arm: run: stress-ng --class os --all 0 -t 5m

On 2017-12-19 10:02:02 [-0500], Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 09:27:40 +0100 > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c > > index c2c344fda487..3971fa0c7194 100644 > > --- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c > >

Re: [v4.14-rt][report] arm: run: stress-ng --class os --all 0 -t 5m

On 2017-12-19 10:02:02 [-0500], Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 09:27:40 +0100 > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c > > index c2c344fda487..3971fa0c7194 100644 > > --- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c > > +++

Re: [v4.14-rt][report] arm: run: stress-ng --class os --all 0 -t 5m

On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 09:27:40 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c > index c2c344fda487..3971fa0c7194 100644 > --- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c > +++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c > @@ -1952,6 +1952,7 @@ int

Re: [v4.14-rt][report] arm: run: stress-ng --class os --all 0 -t 5m

On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 09:27:40 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c > index c2c344fda487..3971fa0c7194 100644 > --- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c > +++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c > @@ -1952,6 +1952,7 @@ int hrtimers_dead_cpu(unsigned int scpu)

Re: [v4.14-rt][report] arm: run: stress-ng --class os --all 0 -t 5m

On 2017-12-18 20:01:05 [-0600], Grygorii Strashko wrote: > Hi All, Hi, > Below results of running stress-ng --class os --all 0 -t 5m on TI am57xx-evm > (SMP, 2 cpu) > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git > branch: linux-4.14.y-rt > commit: d3d9904 v4.14.6-rt7 > -

Re: [v4.14-rt][report] arm: run: stress-ng --class os --all 0 -t 5m

On 2017-12-18 20:01:05 [-0600], Grygorii Strashko wrote: > Hi All, Hi, > Below results of running stress-ng --class os --all 0 -t 5m on TI am57xx-evm > (SMP, 2 cpu) > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git > branch: linux-4.14.y-rt > commit: d3d9904 v4.14.6-rt7 > -

[v4.14-rt][report] arm: run: stress-ng --class os --all 0 -t 5m

Hi All, Below results of running stress-ng --class os --all 0 -t 5m on TI am57xx-evm (SMP, 2 cpu) git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git branch: linux-4.14.y-rt commit: d3d9904 v4.14.6-rt7 - only config changes applied. one "WARNING: possible circular locking

[v4.14-rt][report] arm: run: stress-ng --class os --all 0 -t 5m

Hi All, Below results of running stress-ng --class os --all 0 -t 5m on TI am57xx-evm (SMP, 2 cpu) git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git branch: linux-4.14.y-rt commit: d3d9904 v4.14.6-rt7 - only config changes applied. one "WARNING: possible circular locking