Nick,
Please don't top-post. I've fixed it up ...
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 01:35:24PM -0400, Nick Krause wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 01:22:13AM -0400, Nick Krause wrote:
> >> Here are my logs of the builds attached with warnings if
Nick,
Please don't top-post. I've fixed it up ...
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 01:35:24PM -0400, Nick Krause wrote:
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Theodore Ts'o ty...@mit.edu wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 01:22:13AM -0400, Nick Krause wrote:
Here are my logs of the builds attached with
I do known what they mean. It's good work for a long time
that isn't getting worked on therefore it seems good for
me to work on.
Cheers Nick
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 13:35 -0400, Nick Krause wrote:
>> On the other hand there seems to be too many
On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 13:35 -0400, Nick Krause wrote:
> On the other hand there seems to be too many FIXMEs in the main
> kernel for one person to fix.
A quick grep for FIXMEs (also including the "XXX" pattern, which
basically means the same thing) triggers over 7000 hits. Even with a
(rather
That's fine I don't mind cleaning up the warning or not using Bugzilla.
On the other hand there seems to be too many FIXMEs in the main
kernel for one person to fix. In addition all the arm configs that were
failing for linux next to compile that didn't succeed are succeeded as
of now. That seems
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 01:22:13AM -0400, Nick Krause wrote:
> Here are my logs of the builds attached with warnings if they succeed
> for now failing arm configs
> according to the tests here,
fs/direct-io.c: In function ‘__blockdev_direct_IO’:
fs/direct-io.c:1011:12: warning: ‘to’ may be used
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 01:22:13AM -0400, Nick Krause wrote:
Here are my logs of the builds attached with warnings if they succeed
for now failing arm configs
according to the tests here,
fs/direct-io.c: In function ‘__blockdev_direct_IO’:
fs/direct-io.c:1011:12: warning: ‘to’ may be used
That's fine I don't mind cleaning up the warning or not using Bugzilla.
On the other hand there seems to be too many FIXMEs in the main
kernel for one person to fix. In addition all the arm configs that were
failing for linux next to compile that didn't succeed are succeeded as
of now. That seems
On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 13:35 -0400, Nick Krause wrote:
On the other hand there seems to be too many FIXMEs in the main
kernel for one person to fix.
A quick grep for FIXMEs (also including the XXX pattern, which
basically means the same thing) triggers over 7000 hits. Even with a
(rather
I do known what they mean. It's good work for a long time
that isn't getting worked on therefore it seems good for
me to work on.
Cheers Nick
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl wrote:
On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 13:35 -0400, Nick Krause wrote:
On the other hand there seems
Here are my logs of the builds attached with warnings if they succeed
for now failing arm configs
according to the tests here,
http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/9/. I didn't do
arm-randconfig
through
Cheers Nick
P.S. If it's hard to read please let me known :)
Logs
Description: Binary
Here are my logs of the builds attached with warnings if they succeed
for now failing arm configs
according to the tests here,
http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/9/. I didn't do
arm-randconfig
through
Cheers Nick
P.S. If it's hard to read please let me known :)
Logs
Description: Binary
12 matches
Mail list logo
