Re: Fwd: Re: [2.6.24 patch] restore ARMv6 OProfile support

2008-01-15 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > Furthermore, on ARM, the OPROFILE_ARMV6, OPROFILE_MPCORE and > OPROFILE_ARM11_CORE are all "bool , default y" (equivalent to the > preferred def_bool y). Ahh, I didn't notice that. If so, yes, it doesn't matter at all whether it's inside the me

Re: Fwd: Re: [2.6.24 patch] restore ARMv6 OProfile support

2008-01-15 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
* Sam Ravnborg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 02:07:20PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > * Linus Torvalds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > > > > > > > Well, it goes along the lines of the patch I suggested as

Re: Fwd: Re: [2.6.24 patch] restore ARMv6 OProfile support

2008-01-15 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 02:07:20PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > * Linus Torvalds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > > > > > Well, it goes along the lines of the patch I suggested as a reply to > > > Adrian, with these differences : > > >

Re: Fwd: Re: [2.6.24 patch] restore ARMv6 OProfile support

2008-01-15 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
* Linus Torvalds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > > > Well, it goes along the lines of the patch I suggested as a reply to > > Adrian, with these differences : > > > > - I still source the kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation file. > > - I put back th

Re: Fwd: Re: [2.6.24 patch] restore ARMv6 OProfile support

2008-01-15 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > Well, it goes along the lines of the patch I suggested as a reply to > Adrian, with these differences : > > - I still source the kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation file. > - I put back the missing OPROFILE options directly in arch/arm/Kconfig > > T

Re: Fwd: Re: [2.6.24 patch] restore ARMv6 OProfile support

2008-01-15 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 05:49:48PM +, Russell King wrote: >... > So blackfin also needs fixing. I don't know if blackfin people are > aware of this. They are: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/28/100 > Russell King cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly

Re: Fwd: Re: [2.6.24 patch] restore ARMv6 OProfile support

2008-01-15 Thread Russell King
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 08:24:34AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Russell King wrote: > > > > I don't particularly like stuffing the options into some random place > > in the architectures Kconfig file when they should stay along side the > > instrumentation configuratio

Re: Fwd: Re: [2.6.24 patch] restore ARMv6 OProfile support

2008-01-15 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
* Linus Torvalds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Russell King wrote: > > > > I don't particularly like stuffing the options into some random place > > in the architectures Kconfig file when they should stay along side the > > instrumentation configuration entries. > > Well

Re: Fwd: Re: [2.6.24 patch] restore ARMv6 OProfile support

2008-01-15 Thread Russell King
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 08:24:34AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > So does something like this work for people? Just tested it and the right Kconfig symbols get set again - thanks. -- Russell King Linux kernel2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: -- To unsubscribe fr

Re: Fwd: Re: [2.6.24 patch] restore ARMv6 OProfile support

2008-01-15 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But as mentioned, it's totally untested and I don't have (or really > want to have) a cross-compiling environment. And I don't care *that* > much. I just want something we can all live with. > > So does something like this work for people? > arch

Re: Fwd: Re: [2.6.24 patch] restore ARMv6 OProfile support

2008-01-15 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Russell King wrote: > > I don't particularly like stuffing the options into some random place > in the architectures Kconfig file when they should stay along side the > instrumentation configuration entries. Well, I have to say that I don't particularly like obviously arch

Re: Fwd: Re: [2.6.24 patch] restore ARMv6 OProfile support

2008-01-15 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
* Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:45:26AM +, Russell King wrote: > > I never got a response on my message, but I have just receieved: > > > > | Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:05:00 +0100 > > | From: Joerg Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > | To: ARM Linux Mailing Lis

Re: Fwd: Re: [2.6.24 patch] restore ARMv6 OProfile support

2008-01-15 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:45:26AM +, Russell King wrote: > I never got a response on my message, but I have just receieved: > > | Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:05:00 +0100 > | From: Joerg Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | To: ARM Linux Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | Subject: 2.6.24-rc7 : oprof

Re: Fwd: Re: [2.6.24 patch] restore ARMv6 OProfile support

2008-01-15 Thread Russell King
I never got a response on my message, but I have just receieved: | Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:05:00 +0100 | From: Joerg Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | To: ARM Linux Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Subject: 2.6.24-rc7 : oprofile on MPCore broken | | Hello, | | just tried to use oprofile on 2.6.24

Fwd: Re: [2.6.24 patch] restore ARMv6 OProfile support

2007-12-28 Thread Russell King
Sorry, hit the wrong key. 'T' and 'Y' are too close together. (mutt) - Forwarded message from Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 19:57:24 + From: Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,