On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Heinz J. Mauelshagen wrote:
> > OK, good. I guess that means that the lvmutils (even the
> > patched version in the RPM) are heavily broken ...
>
> As i mentioned before: i wasn't able to reproduce your problem on any of
> my systems. It work just fine with 0.8final and in
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 11:55:03AM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 11:32:06AM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > > Have you checked if the CONTENT of the snapshot is indeed
> > > the right LV and not the other one?
> >
> > laser:~
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Heinz J. Mauelshagen wrote:
OK, good. I guess that means that the lvmutils (even the
patched version in the RPM) are heavily broken ...
As i mentioned before: i wasn't able to reproduce your problem on any of
my systems. It work just fine with 0.8final and in 0.9 as
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 11:55:03AM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Andrea, could you send me the patches you use to make your
> LVM utilities work? Then we'll be able to put together at
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/i386/7.0/suse/zq1/lvm.spm
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 11:32:06AM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > Have you checked if the CONTENT of the snapshot is indeed
> > the right LV and not the other one?
>
> laser:~ # mke2fs /dev/vg1/lv1 &>/dev/null
> laser:~ # mount /dev/vg1/lv1 /mnt
>
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 11:32:06AM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Have you checked if the CONTENT of the snapshot is indeed
> the right LV and not the other one?
laser:~ # mke2fs /dev/vg1/lv1 &>/dev/null
laser:~ # mount /dev/vg1/lv1 /mnt
laser:~ # >/mnt/ciao
laser:~ # ls /mnt
. .. ciao
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> For some irrelevant reason I always test snapshotting on a LV with minor
> number > 1 and the kernel side definitely works with 2.2.18pre17aa1:
>
> laser:/home/andrea # ls -l /dev/vg1/lv*
> brw-r- 1 root root 58, 0 Oct 27 2000
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
For some irrelevant reason I always test snapshotting on a LV with minor
number 1 and the kernel side definitely works with 2.2.18pre17aa1:
laser:/home/andrea # ls -l /dev/vg1/lv*
brw-r- 1 root root 58, 0 Oct 27 2000
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 11:32:06AM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
Have you checked if the CONTENT of the snapshot is indeed
the right LV and not the other one?
laser:~ # mke2fs /dev/vg1/lv1 /dev/null
laser:~ # mount /dev/vg1/lv1 /mnt
laser:~ # /mnt/ciao
laser:~ # ls /mnt
. .. ciao lost+found
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 11:32:06AM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
Have you checked if the CONTENT of the snapshot is indeed
the right LV and not the other one?
laser:~ # mke2fs /dev/vg1/lv1 /dev/null
laser:~ # mount /dev/vg1/lv1 /mnt
laser:~ #
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 11:55:03AM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
Andrea, could you send me the patches you use to make your
LVM utilities work? Then we'll be able to put together at
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/i386/7.0/suse/zq1/lvm.spm
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Rik writes:
> it looks like the LVM snapshotting in 2.4 doesn't allow you
> to create snapshots from anything else than the _first_ LV
> in the VG...
>
> It looks like somewhere in either the utilities or the
> kernel, the argument of which LV to snapshot gets mangled...
> Oh, I'm using version
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 09:10:06PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> With LVM from 2.2.18aa kernels (I dont exactly remember which one)
Ok, nothing relevant is recently changed there so it should be an userspace
issue.
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 11:37:07PM +, Heinz J. Mauelshagen wrote:
>
> Hi Rik,
>
> I can't reproduce it on my box.
>
> Could you provide a "lvcreate -d" output of what you did to help
> me to dig into that one.
>
> Did somebody else out there face the same 0.8final snapshot weirdness?
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 06:34:48PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
> >
> > > it looks like the LVM snapshotting in 2.4 doesn't allow you
> > > to create snapshots from anything else than the _first_ LV
> >
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 06:34:48PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> > it looks like the LVM snapshotting in 2.4 doesn't allow you
> > to create snapshots from anything else than the _first_ LV
> > in the VG...
>
> OK, I reproduced it in 2.2 as well ...
Hi Rik,
I can't reproduce it on my box.
Could you provide a "lvcreate -d" output of what you did to help
me to dig into that one.
Did somebody else out there face the same 0.8final snapshot weirdness?
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 04:36:37PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Hi Heinz,
>
> it looks
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
> it looks like the LVM snapshotting in 2.4 doesn't allow you
> to create snapshots from anything else than the _first_ LV
> in the VG...
OK, I reproduced it in 2.2 as well ... ;(
> I have run both the following command lines (after lvremoving
> snap1,
Hi Heinz,
it looks like the LVM snapshotting in 2.4 doesn't allow you
to create snapshots from anything else than the _first_ LV
in the VG...
I have run both the following command lines (after lvremoving
snap1, of course) and both of them give as a result that the
LV /dev/test_vg/swap ends up
Hi Heinz,
it looks like the LVM snapshotting in 2.4 doesn't allow you
to create snapshots from anything else than the _first_ LV
in the VG...
I have run both the following command lines (after lvremoving
snap1, of course) and both of them give as a result that the
LV /dev/test_vg/swap ends up
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 06:34:48PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
it looks like the LVM snapshotting in 2.4 doesn't allow you
to create snapshots from anything else than the _first_ LV
in the VG...
OK, I reproduced it in 2.2 as well ... ;(
Which
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 06:34:48PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
it looks like the LVM snapshotting in 2.4 doesn't allow you
to create snapshots from anything else than the _first_ LV
in the VG...
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 11:37:07PM +, Heinz J. Mauelshagen wrote:
Hi Rik,
I can't reproduce it on my box.
Could you provide a "lvcreate -d" output of what you did to help
me to dig into that one.
Did somebody else out there face the same 0.8final snapshot weirdness?
Yes. I have
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 09:10:06PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
With LVM from 2.2.18aa kernels (I dont exactly remember which one)
Ok, nothing relevant is recently changed there so it should be an userspace
issue.
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
24 matches
Mail list logo
