On Saturday, 21 April 2007 02:02, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:16:54AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > > Dave Jones wrote:
> > > > > Andi, I think. I've got his firstfloor.org patches applied to this
> > kernel.
> > > >
> > > > Ah, I
On Saturday, 21 April 2007 02:02, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:16:54AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
Andi, I think. I've got his firstfloor.org patches applied to this
kernel.
Ah, I saw you patched in CFS
Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:16:54AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > Dave Jones wrote:
> > > > Andi, I think. I've got his firstfloor.org patches applied to this
> kernel.
> > >
> > > Ah, I saw you patched in CFS too, and thought it may be related.
> > >
> >
>
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:16:54AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Dave Jones wrote:
> > > Andi, I think. I've got his firstfloor.org patches applied to this
> > kernel.
> >
> > Ah, I saw you patched in CFS too, and thought it may be related.
> >
>
> Well, I have
Dave Jones wrote:
> > Andi, I think. I've got his firstfloor.org patches applied to this kernel.
>
> Ah, I saw you patched in CFS too, and thought it may be related.
>
Well, I have CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT enabled, and it still works.
Maybe there's something in Andi's queue which is making it
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 08:28:10AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Dave Jones wrote:
> > -BUG: at arch/i386/kernel/sched-clock.c:170 init_sched_clock()
> > - [] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30
> > - [] show_trace+0x12/0x14
> > - [] dump_stack+0x16/0x18
> > - [] init_sched_clock+0x58/0x9b
>
Dave Jones wrote:
> -BUG: at arch/i386/kernel/sched-clock.c:170 init_sched_clock()
> - [] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30
> - [] show_trace+0x12/0x14
> - [] dump_stack+0x16/0x18
> - [] init_sched_clock+0x58/0x9b
> - [] init+0x14b/0x241
> - [] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
> - ===
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 10:33:39PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Dave Jones wrote:
> > Hmm, given you hit the hpet problems and I didn't I think our X60's
> > aren't quite so similar. Mine is the one with the swivelly touchscreen
> > tablet-pc mode. I understand they made a regular
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 10:33:39PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
Hmm, given you hit the hpet problems and I didn't I think our X60's
aren't quite so similar. Mine is the one with the swivelly touchscreen
tablet-pc mode. I understand they made a regular 'laptop'
Dave Jones wrote:
-BUG: at arch/i386/kernel/sched-clock.c:170 init_sched_clock()
- [c01091b5] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30
- [c010980c] show_trace+0x12/0x14
- [c01098cb] dump_stack+0x16/0x18
- [c0468dbd] init_sched_clock+0x58/0x9b
- [c0461502] init+0x14b/0x241
- [c0108d97]
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 08:28:10AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
-BUG: at arch/i386/kernel/sched-clock.c:170 init_sched_clock()
- [c01091b5] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30
- [c010980c] show_trace+0x12/0x14
- [c01098cb] dump_stack+0x16/0x18
- [c0468dbd]
Dave Jones wrote:
Andi, I think. I've got his firstfloor.org patches applied to this kernel.
Ah, I saw you patched in CFS too, and thought it may be related.
Well, I have CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT enabled, and it still works.
Maybe there's something in Andi's queue which is making it work?
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:16:54AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
Andi, I think. I've got his firstfloor.org patches applied to this
kernel.
Ah, I saw you patched in CFS too, and thought it may be related.
Well, I have CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT enabled,
Dave Jones wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:16:54AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
Andi, I think. I've got his firstfloor.org patches applied to this
kernel.
Ah, I saw you patched in CFS too, and thought it may be related.
Well, I have
Dave Jones wrote:
> Hmm, given you hit the hpet problems and I didn't I think our X60's
> aren't quite so similar. Mine is the one with the swivelly touchscreen
> tablet-pc mode. I understand they made a regular 'laptop' X60 too,
> is that the one you have perhaps?
>
Yes, mine is a normal
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 10:15:48PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Dave Jones wrote:
> > Do you have the backlight code enabled ?
> > I'm guessing not.
> >
>
> Hm, think so. backlight controls work, via both
> /proc/acpi/ibm/backlight and /sys/class/backlight/*/brightness.
>
> $
Dave Jones wrote:
> Do you have the backlight code enabled ?
> I'm guessing not.
>
Hm, think so. backlight controls work, via both
/proc/acpi/ibm/backlight and /sys/class/backlight/*/brightness.
$ ls -l /sys/class/backlight/
total 0
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Apr 19 22:13 acpi_video0
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 09:57:15PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Subject: ThinkPad X60: resume no longer works (PCI related?)
> > workaround: booting with "hpet=disable"
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/13/3
> > Submitter : Dave
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Subject: ThinkPad X60: resume no longer works (PCI related?)
> workaround: booting with "hpet=disable"
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/13/3
> Submitter : Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Adrian Bunk wrote:
Subject: ThinkPad X60: resume no longer works (PCI related?)
workaround: booting with hpet=disable
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/13/3
Submitter : Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeremy Fitzhardinge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Caused-By : PCI
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 09:57:15PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Adrian Bunk wrote:
Subject: ThinkPad X60: resume no longer works (PCI related?)
workaround: booting with hpet=disable
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/13/3
Submitter : Dave Jones [EMAIL
Dave Jones wrote:
Do you have the backlight code enabled ?
I'm guessing not.
Hm, think so. backlight controls work, via both
/proc/acpi/ibm/backlight and /sys/class/backlight/*/brightness.
$ ls -l /sys/class/backlight/
total 0
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Apr 19 22:13 acpi_video0
drwxr-xr-x 2
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 10:15:48PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
Do you have the backlight code enabled ?
I'm guessing not.
Hm, think so. backlight controls work, via both
/proc/acpi/ibm/backlight and /sys/class/backlight/*/brightness.
$ ls -l
Dave Jones wrote:
Hmm, given you hit the hpet problems and I didn't I think our X60's
aren't quite so similar. Mine is the one with the swivelly touchscreen
tablet-pc mode. I understand they made a regular 'laptop' X60 too,
is that the one you have perhaps?
Yes, mine is a normal laptop
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 07:48:55AM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
> > When the backlight doesn't come on, for some reason, nothing else
> > runs. Capslock works, so it's at least partially alive, but even
> > doing..
> >
> > echo mem > /sys/power/state ; echo foo >/bar ; sync
> >
> >
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 23:34 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 10:26:43AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
>
> > > > > > CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT=y
> > > > > > CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=n
> > > > >
> > > > > That also gets me a dead display. Backlight doesn't turn back on.
> > > >
>
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 23:34 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 10:26:43AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT=y
CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=n
That also gets me a dead display. Backlight doesn't turn back on.
Anything under
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 07:48:55AM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
When the backlight doesn't come on, for some reason, nothing else
runs. Capslock works, so it's at least partially alive, but even
doing..
echo mem /sys/power/state ; echo foo /bar ; sync
results in no
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 10:26:43AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > > > > CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT=y
> > > > > CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=n
> > > >
> > > > That also gets me a dead display. Backlight doesn't turn back on.
> > >
> > > Anything under /sys/class/backlight?
> >
> > Entries from
On Monday, 16 April 2007 02:37, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
>
> If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
> of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
> of you caused a
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 03:55 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:32:02PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 03:23 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:54:07PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
> > >
> > > > CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:32:02PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 03:23 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:54:07PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
> >
> > > CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO depends on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE, which, in turn is
> > > enabled
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 03:23 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:54:07PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
>
> > CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO depends on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE, which, in turn is
> > enabled by FB_BACKLIGHT. So we can narrow it down further, can you try?
> >
> >
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:54:07PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
> CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO depends on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE, which, in turn is
> enabled by FB_BACKLIGHT. So we can narrow it down further, can you try?
>
> CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT=y
> CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=n
That also gets me a dead
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 02:29 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:16:37AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 08:54:46PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:37:23AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > >
> > > > Subject: ThinkPad X60:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:16:37AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 08:54:46PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:37:23AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> > > Subject: ThinkPad X60: resume no longer works (PCI related?)
> > >
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:16:37AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 08:54:46PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:37:23AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Subject: ThinkPad X60: resume no longer works (PCI related?)
workaround:
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 02:29 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:16:37AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 08:54:46PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:37:23AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Subject: ThinkPad X60: resume no longer
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:54:07PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO depends on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE, which, in turn is
enabled by FB_BACKLIGHT. So we can narrow it down further, can you try?
CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT=y
CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=n
That also gets me a dead
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 03:23 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:54:07PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO depends on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE, which, in turn is
enabled by FB_BACKLIGHT. So we can narrow it down further, can you try?
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:32:02PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 03:23 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:54:07PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO depends on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE, which, in turn is
enabled by
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 03:55 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:32:02PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 03:23 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:54:07PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO depends on
On Monday, 16 April 2007 02:37, Adrian Bunk wrote:
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 10:26:43AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT=y
CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=n
That also gets me a dead display. Backlight doesn't turn back on.
Anything under /sys/class/backlight?
Entries from ibm_acpi. I rmmod'd that,
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> I'm not sure why I thought you two ran into the same regression.
>
> So "hpet=disable" worked for Jeremy but not for you, IOW: you two were
> running into different regressions?
>
> @Jeremy:
> If this is true, is your HPET related related regression still present
> in -rc7?
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 08:54:46PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:37:23AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > Subject: ThinkPad X60: resume no longer works (PCI related?)
> > workaround: booting with "hpet=disable"
> > References :
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:37:23AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Subject: ThinkPad X60: resume no longer works (PCI related?)
> workaround: booting with "hpet=disable"
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/13/3
> Submitter : Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:37:23AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Subject: ThinkPad X60: resume no longer works (PCI related?)
workaround: booting with hpet=disable
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/13/3
Submitter : Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeremy
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 08:54:46PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:37:23AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Subject: ThinkPad X60: resume no longer works (PCI related?)
workaround: booting with hpet=disable
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/13/3
Adrian Bunk wrote:
I'm not sure why I thought you two ran into the same regression.
So hpet=disable worked for Jeremy but not for you, IOW: you two were
running into different regressions?
@Jeremy:
If this is true, is your HPET related related regression still present
in -rc7?
I need to
50 matches
Mail list logo