Re: [PATCH] Remove support for score architecture

2013-09-05 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 08:41:43AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > On 08/30/2013 09:00:35 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > >The web site associated with the score architecture in MAINTAINERS > >is non-functional and available for sale. The last Ack from one > >of the maintainers was in December 2012. The mai

Re: [PATCH] Remove support for score architecture

2013-09-05 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/30/2013 09:00:35 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: The web site associated with the score architecture in MAINTAINERS is non-functional and available for sale. The last Ack from one of the maintainers was in December 2012. The main maintainer's last commit was in 2011. The last maintainer pull reque

Re: [PATCH] Remove support for score architecture

2013-09-03 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 09/02/2013 09:54 PM, Liqin Chen wrote: 2013/9/3 Guenter Roeck mailto:li...@roeck-us.net>> On 09/02/2013 08:18 AM, Lennox Wu wrote: Before we start the development of the S+core, Sunplus had licensed ARM and MIPS. We develop S+core for other reason such as the price.

Re: [PATCH] Remove support for score architecture

2013-09-03 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 12:54:06PM +0800, Liqin Chen wrote: > 2013/9/3 Guenter Roeck > > > On 09/02/2013 08:18 AM, Lennox Wu wrote: > > > >> Before we start the development of the S+core, Sunplus had licensed > >> ARM and MIPS. We develop S+core for other reason such as the price. > >> Some produ

Re: [PATCH] Remove support for score architecture

2013-09-02 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 09/02/2013 08:18 AM, Lennox Wu wrote: Before we start the development of the S+core, Sunplus had licensed ARM and MIPS. We develop S+core for other reason such as the price. Some products on the web of Sunplus adopt S+core , for example the SPV7050.(http://w3.sunplus.com/products/spv7050.asp)

Re: [PATCH] Remove support for score architecture

2013-09-02 Thread Al Viro
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:18:17PM +0800, Lennox Wu wrote: > Before we start the development of the S+core, Sunplus had licensed > ARM and MIPS. We develop S+core for other reason such as the price. > Some products on the web of Sunplus adopt S+core , for example > the SPV7050.(http://w3.sunplus.co

Re: [PATCH] Remove support for score architecture

2013-09-02 Thread Lennox Wu
Before we start the development of the S+core, Sunplus had licensed ARM and MIPS. We develop S+core for other reason such as the price. Some products on the web of Sunplus adopt S+core , for example the SPV7050.(http://w3.sunplus.com/products/spv7050.asp) These products could still be bought from t

Re: [PATCH] Remove support for score architecture

2013-09-01 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 09/01/2013 09:13 PM, Lennox Wu wrote: Dear all, Indeed, Sunplus S+core is not a popular architecture and there is no standalone to be sold so you should not find related news on the Internet. However, the s+core is adopted by our SoCs and these SoCs are indeed adopted by some companies, we h

Re: [PATCH] Remove support for score architecture

2013-08-31 Thread Al Viro
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 08:55:16PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > Maybe this removal request is a bit early, but architecture support seems > > to have vanished entirely. At the very least this puts interested parties > > (if there are any) on notice. > > AFAICT, this is the least maintained arc

Re: [PATCH] Remove support for score architecture

2013-08-31 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Saturday 31 August 2013, Guenter Roeck wrote: > The web site associated with the score architecture in MAINTAINERS > is non-functional and available for sale. The last Ack from one > of the maintainers was in December 2012. The main maintainer's last > commit was in 2011. The last maintainer pul