On 12/18/2015 02:50 PM, pi3orama wrote:
>> Could it be that $(srcdir) somehow is not correct? I exchanged
>>
>>feature_dir := $(srctree)/tools/build/feature
>> to
>>feature_dir := /home/wagi/src/linux/tools/build/feature
>>
>
> Can you remember the patch set I skipped?
>
>
发自我的 iPhone
> 在 2015年12月18日,下午8:55,Daniel Wagner 写道:
>
>> On 12/18/2015 12:03 PM, Wangnan (F) wrote:
>> That's good. This is not a magic.
>
> That is what you say! :)
>
>> I guess something in your top makefile
>> causes this feature check failure. I sent a patch on feature checker to
>>
On 12/18/2015 12:03 PM, Wangnan (F) wrote:
> That's good. This is not a magic.
That is what you say! :)
> I guess something in your top makefile
> causes this feature check failure. I sent a patch on feature checker to
> you.
> It will appear as [1] soon. Could you please apply it and try again?
On 2015/12/18 16:49, Daniel Wagner wrote:
On 12/18/2015 04:04 AM, Wangnan (F) wrote:
On 2015/12/17 21:46, Daniel Wagner wrote:
On 12/17/2015 11:09 AM, Wangnan (F) wrote:
On 2015/12/17 16:29, Daniel Wagner wrote:
On 12/17/2015 08:03 AM, Daniel Wagner wrote:
Patch number 2 didn't apply
On 12/18/2015 04:04 AM, Wangnan (F) wrote:
> On 2015/12/17 21:46, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>> On 12/17/2015 11:09 AM, Wangnan (F) wrote:
>>> On 2015/12/17 16:29, Daniel Wagner wrote:
On 12/17/2015 08:03 AM, Daniel Wagner wrote:
Patch number 2 didn't apply cleanly.
>>> When you see this,
On 12/18/2015 04:04 AM, Wangnan (F) wrote:
> On 2015/12/17 21:46, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>> On 12/17/2015 11:09 AM, Wangnan (F) wrote:
>>> On 2015/12/17 16:29, Daniel Wagner wrote:
On 12/17/2015 08:03 AM, Daniel Wagner wrote:
Patch number 2 didn't apply cleanly.
>>> When you see this,
On 2015/12/18 16:49, Daniel Wagner wrote:
On 12/18/2015 04:04 AM, Wangnan (F) wrote:
On 2015/12/17 21:46, Daniel Wagner wrote:
On 12/17/2015 11:09 AM, Wangnan (F) wrote:
On 2015/12/17 16:29, Daniel Wagner wrote:
On 12/17/2015 08:03 AM, Daniel Wagner wrote:
Patch number 2 didn't apply
On 12/18/2015 12:03 PM, Wangnan (F) wrote:
> That's good. This is not a magic.
That is what you say! :)
> I guess something in your top makefile
> causes this feature check failure. I sent a patch on feature checker to
> you.
> It will appear as [1] soon. Could you please apply it and try again?
On 12/18/2015 02:50 PM, pi3orama wrote:
>> Could it be that $(srcdir) somehow is not correct? I exchanged
>>
>>feature_dir := $(srctree)/tools/build/feature
>> to
>>feature_dir := /home/wagi/src/linux/tools/build/feature
>>
>
> Can you remember the patch set I skipped?
>
>
发自我的 iPhone
> 在 2015年12月18日,下午8:55,Daniel Wagner 写道:
>
>> On 12/18/2015 12:03 PM, Wangnan (F) wrote:
>> That's good. This is not a magic.
>
> That is what you say! :)
>
>> I guess something in your top makefile
>> causes this feature check failure. I sent a patch
On 2015/12/17 21:46, Daniel Wagner wrote:
On 12/17/2015 11:09 AM, Wangnan (F) wrote:
On 2015/12/17 16:29, Daniel Wagner wrote:
On 12/17/2015 08:03 AM, Daniel Wagner wrote:
Patch number 2 didn't apply cleanly.
Because I have another patch in my local tree which also modifis bpf
Makefile:
On 12/17/2015 11:09 AM, Wangnan (F) wrote:
> On 2015/12/17 16:29, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>> On 12/17/2015 08:03 AM, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>> Patch number 2 didn't apply cleanly.
>
> Because I have another patch in my local tree which also modifis bpf
> Makefile:
>
>
On 2015/12/17 16:29, Daniel Wagner wrote:
On 12/17/2015 08:03 AM, Daniel Wagner wrote:
On 12/17/2015 07:51 AM, Wangnan (F) wrote:
On 2015/12/17 14:38, Daniel Wagner wrote:
On 12/17/2015 06:23 AM, Wang Nan wrote:
Since we already have libbpf in tools/lib, we don't need to maintain
another
On 12/17/2015 08:03 AM, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> On 12/17/2015 07:51 AM, Wangnan (F) wrote:
>> On 2015/12/17 14:38, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>>> On 12/17/2015 06:23 AM, Wang Nan wrote:
Since we already have libbpf in tools/lib, we don't need to maintain
another bpf loader and operations
On 12/17/2015 08:03 AM, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> On 12/17/2015 07:51 AM, Wangnan (F) wrote:
>> On 2015/12/17 14:38, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>>> On 12/17/2015 06:23 AM, Wang Nan wrote:
Since we already have libbpf in tools/lib, we don't need to maintain
another bpf loader and operations
On 2015/12/17 16:29, Daniel Wagner wrote:
On 12/17/2015 08:03 AM, Daniel Wagner wrote:
On 12/17/2015 07:51 AM, Wangnan (F) wrote:
On 2015/12/17 14:38, Daniel Wagner wrote:
On 12/17/2015 06:23 AM, Wang Nan wrote:
Since we already have libbpf in tools/lib, we don't need to maintain
another
On 12/17/2015 11:09 AM, Wangnan (F) wrote:
> On 2015/12/17 16:29, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>> On 12/17/2015 08:03 AM, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>> Patch number 2 didn't apply cleanly.
>
> Because I have another patch in my local tree which also modifis bpf
> Makefile:
>
>
On 2015/12/17 21:46, Daniel Wagner wrote:
On 12/17/2015 11:09 AM, Wangnan (F) wrote:
On 2015/12/17 16:29, Daniel Wagner wrote:
On 12/17/2015 08:03 AM, Daniel Wagner wrote:
Patch number 2 didn't apply cleanly.
Because I have another patch in my local tree which also modifis bpf
Makefile:
On 12/17/2015 07:51 AM, Wangnan (F) wrote:
> On 2015/12/17 14:38, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>> On 12/17/2015 06:23 AM, Wang Nan wrote:
>>> Since we already have libbpf in tools/lib, we don't need to maintain
>>> another bpf loader and operations library in samples/bpf.
>>>
>>> In patchset:
>>>
>>>
On 2015/12/17 14:38, Daniel Wagner wrote:
Hi,
On 12/17/2015 06:23 AM, Wang Nan wrote:
Since we already have libbpf in tools/lib, we don't need to maintain
another bpf loader and operations library in samples/bpf.
In patchset:
Patch 1/10 - 7/10 improves libbpf, add missing features to
Hi,
On 12/17/2015 06:23 AM, Wang Nan wrote:
> Since we already have libbpf in tools/lib, we don't need to maintain
> another bpf loader and operations library in samples/bpf.
>
> In patchset:
>
> Patch 1/10 - 7/10 improves libbpf, add missing features to support
> samples,
>
> Patch 8/10
Hi,
On 12/17/2015 06:23 AM, Wang Nan wrote:
> Since we already have libbpf in tools/lib, we don't need to maintain
> another bpf loader and operations library in samples/bpf.
>
> In patchset:
>
> Patch 1/10 - 7/10 improves libbpf, add missing features to support
> samples,
>
> Patch 8/10
On 2015/12/17 14:38, Daniel Wagner wrote:
Hi,
On 12/17/2015 06:23 AM, Wang Nan wrote:
Since we already have libbpf in tools/lib, we don't need to maintain
another bpf loader and operations library in samples/bpf.
In patchset:
Patch 1/10 - 7/10 improves libbpf, add missing features to
On 12/17/2015 07:51 AM, Wangnan (F) wrote:
> On 2015/12/17 14:38, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>> On 12/17/2015 06:23 AM, Wang Nan wrote:
>>> Since we already have libbpf in tools/lib, we don't need to maintain
>>> another bpf loader and operations library in samples/bpf.
>>>
>>> In patchset:
>>>
>>>
24 matches
Mail list logo