Re: [PATCH 4.20 282/352] fs/proc/base.c: use ns_capable instead of capable for timerslack_ns

2019-02-12 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 07:02:06PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Greg Kroah-Hartman writes: > > > 4.20-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me > > know. > > No objection. But I think of this as a feature addition rather than a > fix for something. As a feature

Re: [PATCH 4.20 282/352] fs/proc/base.c: use ns_capable instead of capable for timerslack_ns

2019-02-11 Thread Serge E. Hallyn
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 07:02:06PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Greg Kroah-Hartman writes: > > > 4.20-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me > > know. > > No objection. But I think of this as a feature addition rather than a > fix for something. As a feature

Re: [PATCH 4.20 282/352] fs/proc/base.c: use ns_capable instead of capable for timerslack_ns

2019-02-11 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Greg Kroah-Hartman writes: > 4.20-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me > know. No objection. But I think of this as a feature addition rather than a fix for something. As a feature that we now allow something we previously did not does this qualify for a backport