Re: [PATCH 9/9] trace: Replace hardcoding of 19 with MAX_NICE.

2014-02-24 Thread Dongsheng Yang
On 02/24/2014 06:46 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 05:05:36PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote: Hi Peter. It seems the all other patches in this set were all applied to tip except this one. What is the problem with the [9/9]? Is there any thing I can do? The problem is that

Re: [PATCH 9/9] trace: Replace hardcoding of 19 with MAX_NICE.

2014-02-24 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 05:05:36PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote: > Hi Peter. > It seems the all other patches in this set were all applied to tip > except this one. > What is the problem with the [9/9]? Is there any thing I can do? The problem is that it never actually made it to my inbox;

Re: [PATCH 9/9] trace: Replace hardcoding of 19 with MAX_NICE.

2014-02-24 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 05:05:36PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote: Hi Peter. It seems the all other patches in this set were all applied to tip except this one. What is the problem with the [9/9]? Is there any thing I can do? The problem is that it never actually made it to my inbox; could

Re: [PATCH 9/9] trace: Replace hardcoding of 19 with MAX_NICE.

2014-02-24 Thread Dongsheng Yang
On 02/24/2014 06:46 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 05:05:36PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote: Hi Peter. It seems the all other patches in this set were all applied to tip except this one. What is the problem with the [9/9]? Is there any thing I can do? The problem is that

Re: [PATCH 9/9] trace: Replace hardcoding of 19 with MAX_NICE.

2014-02-22 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 05:05:36PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote: > Hi Peter. > It seems the all other patches in this set were all applied to tip > except this one. > What is the problem with the [9/9]? Is there any thing I can do? I might have just missed it; fail on my end. I'll try and sort

Re: [PATCH 9/9] trace: Replace hardcoding of 19 with MAX_NICE.

2014-02-22 Thread Dongsheng Yang
Hi Peter. It seems the all other patches in this set were all applied to tip except this one. What is the problem with the [9/9]? Is there any thing I can do? Thanx On 02/11/2014 03:34 PM, Dongsheng Yang wrote: Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang cc: Steven Rostedt cc: Frederic Weisbecker

Re: [PATCH 9/9] trace: Replace hardcoding of 19 with MAX_NICE.

2014-02-22 Thread Dongsheng Yang
Hi Peter. It seems the all other patches in this set were all applied to tip except this one. What is the problem with the [9/9]? Is there any thing I can do? Thanx On 02/11/2014 03:34 PM, Dongsheng Yang wrote: Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang yangds.f...@cn.fujitsu.com cc: Steven Rostedt

Re: [PATCH 9/9] trace: Replace hardcoding of 19 with MAX_NICE.

2014-02-22 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 05:05:36PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote: Hi Peter. It seems the all other patches in this set were all applied to tip except this one. What is the problem with the [9/9]? Is there any thing I can do? I might have just missed it; fail on my end. I'll try and sort it