On Mar 11, 2015 4:32 AM, "Borislav Petkov" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 07:03:24AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > The comment in the signal code says that apps can save/restore other
> > segments on their own. It's true that apps can *save* SS on their
> > own, but there's no way for
On Mar 11, 2015 4:32 AM, Borislav Petkov b...@alien8.de wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 07:03:24AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
The comment in the signal code says that apps can save/restore other
segments on their own. It's true that apps can *save* SS on their
own, but there's no way
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 07:03:24AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> The comment in the signal code says that apps can save/restore other
> segments on their own. It's true that apps can *save* SS on their
> own, but there's no way for apps to restore it: SYSCALL effectively
> resets SS to
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 07:03:24AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
The comment in the signal code says that apps can save/restore other
segments on their own. It's true that apps can *save* SS on their
own, but there's no way for apps to restore it: SYSCALL effectively
resets SS to __USER_DS,
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Well, the patch looks "obviously fine" to me, but this is all I can say.
>
> I mean, I simply can't understand this __pad0/ifdef(CONFIG_X86_32), it
> looks as if ->ss was specially excluded for unknown reason from the very
> beginning.
I
Well, the patch looks "obviously fine" to me, but this is all I can say.
I mean, I simply can't understand this __pad0/ifdef(CONFIG_X86_32), it
looks as if ->ss was specially excluded for unknown reason from the very
beginning.
On 03/10, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> > ---
[cc: Oleg, Borislav]
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 7:03 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> The comment in the signal code says that apps can save/restore other
> segments on their own. It's true that apps can *save* SS on their
> own, but there's no way for apps to restore it: SYSCALL effectively
> resets
[cc: Oleg, Borislav]
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 7:03 AM, Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
The comment in the signal code says that apps can save/restore other
segments on their own. It's true that apps can *save* SS on their
own, but there's no way for apps to restore it: SYSCALL
Well, the patch looks obviously fine to me, but this is all I can say.
I mean, I simply can't understand this __pad0/ifdef(CONFIG_X86_32), it
looks as if -ss was specially excluded for unknown reason from the very
beginning.
On 03/10, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
---
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Oleg Nesterov o...@redhat.com wrote:
Well, the patch looks obviously fine to me, but this is all I can say.
I mean, I simply can't understand this __pad0/ifdef(CONFIG_X86_32), it
looks as if -ss was specially excluded for unknown reason from the very
10 matches
Mail list logo
