Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] acpica: Correct parameter type to acpi_evaluate_dsm

2015-12-13 Thread Jerry Hoemann
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 03:07:22AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 2:54 AM, Jerry Hoemann wrote: > > The ACPI spec speicifies that arguments "Revision ID" and > > "Function Index" to a _DSM are type "Integer." Type Integers > > are 64 bit quantities. > > > > The

Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] acpica: Correct parameter type to acpi_evaluate_dsm

2015-12-13 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 2:54 AM, Jerry Hoemann wrote: > The ACPI spec speicifies that arguments "Revision ID" and > "Function Index" to a _DSM are type "Integer." Type Integers > are 64 bit quantities. > > The function evaluate_dsm specifies these types as simple "int" > which are 32 bits.

Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] acpica: Correct parameter type to acpi_evaluate_dsm

2015-12-13 Thread Jerry Hoemann
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 03:07:22AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 2:54 AM, Jerry Hoemann wrote: > > The ACPI spec speicifies that arguments "Revision ID" and > > "Function Index" to a _DSM are type "Integer." Type Integers > > are 64 bit

Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] acpica: Correct parameter type to acpi_evaluate_dsm

2015-12-13 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 2:54 AM, Jerry Hoemann wrote: > The ACPI spec speicifies that arguments "Revision ID" and > "Function Index" to a _DSM are type "Integer." Type Integers > are 64 bit quantities. > > The function evaluate_dsm specifies these types as simple "int" >