On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:40:04AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Maxime Ripard
> > We do have one board where we have a pin (let's say GPIO14 of the bank
> > A) that enables a regulator that will provide VCC the bank B.
> I think it's a hog in this case though, not
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 03:29:46PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> > On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Maxime Ripard
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >> The only thing I'd like to have would be that
On Sat, Dec 06, 2014 at 09:08:36PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Maxime Ripard
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 11:49:19PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> >> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Maxime Ripard
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Dec 0
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 11:49:19PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Maxime Ripard
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 11:15:38PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
wrote:
> Hi Alexandre,
>
>> On Dec 4, 2014, at 17:10 , Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Alexandre,
>>>
On Dec 4, 2014, at 16:58 , Alexandre Courbot wrote:
On Thu,
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 11:49:19PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Maxime Ripard
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 11:15:38PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:12 AM, Maxime Ripard
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Dec 02, 201
Hi Alexandre,
> On Dec 4, 2014, at 17:10 , Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
> wrote:
>> Hi Alexandre,
>>
>>> On Dec 4, 2014, at 16:58 , Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
>>> wrote:
Hi Alexa
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
wrote:
> Hi Alexandre,
>
>> On Dec 4, 2014, at 16:58 , Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Alexandre,
>>>
On Dec 4, 2014, at 16:41 , Alexandre Courbot wrote:
On Thu,
Hi Alexandre,
> On Dec 4, 2014, at 16:58 , Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
> wrote:
>> Hi Alexandre,
>>
>>> On Dec 4, 2014, at 16:41 , Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
>>> wrote:
Hi Alexa
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> It looks like I missed some part of it.
>
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 11:15:38PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> > GPIO hogging needs to be the ideal solution for that, since we can
>> > just enforce the GPIO14 value as the dri
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
wrote:
> Hi Alexandre,
>
>> On Dec 4, 2014, at 16:41 , Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Alexandre,
>>>
>>> I tried to stay away while things are being fleshed out but…
>>>
On
Hi again,
It looks like I missed some part of it.
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 11:15:38PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> > GPIO hogging needs to be the ideal solution for that, since we can
> > just enforce the GPIO14 value as the driver is probed, which provides
> > the guarantee that any driver u
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 11:15:38PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:12 AM, Maxime Ripard
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 03:29:46PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:13 PM, A
Hi Alexandre,
> On Dec 4, 2014, at 16:41 , Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
> wrote:
>> Hi Alexandre,
>>
>> I tried to stay away while things are being fleshed out but…
>>
>>> On Dec 4, 2014, at 16:15 , Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed,
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
wrote:
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> I tried to stay away while things are being fleshed out but…
>
>> On Dec 4, 2014, at 16:15 , Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:12 AM, Maxime Ripard
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 03:29:46PM
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 11:15:38PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:12 AM, Maxime Ripard
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 03:29:46PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 1:36 AM,
Hi Alexandre,
I tried to stay away while things are being fleshed out but…
> On Dec 4, 2014, at 16:15 , Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:12 AM, Maxime Ripard
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 03:29:46PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Alex
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:12 AM, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 03:29:46PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> > On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Maxime Ripard
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >> The only thing I'd like to have would be that
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 03:29:46PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Maxime Ripard
> > wrote:
>
> >> The only thing I'd like to have would be that the request here would
> >> be non-exclusive, so that a late
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Maxime Ripard
> wrote:
>> The only thing I'd like to have would be that the request here would
>> be non-exclusive, so that a later driver would still be allowed later
>> on to request that GPIO later on a
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Benoit Parrot wrote:
>>> > + }
>>> > +
>>> > + if (tmp > MAX_PHANDLE_ARGS) {
>>> > + desc = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>>> > + goto out;
>>> > + }
>>> > +
>>> > +
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 1:22 AM, Benoit Parrot wrote:
> Alexandre Courbot wrote on Fri [2014-Nov-28 16:30:01
> +0900]:
>> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Benoit Parrot wrote:
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > + if (tmp > MAX_PHANDLE_ARGS) {
>> > + desc = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>> > +
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 04:30:01PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> > +/**
>> > + * do_gpio_hog - Given node is a GPIO hog configuration, handle it
>> > + * @np:device node to get GPIO from
>> > + *
>> > + * This is o
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Benoit Parrot wrote:
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > + if (tmp > MAX_PHANDLE_ARGS) {
>> > + desc = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>> > + goto out;
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > + gg_data.gpiospec.args_count = tmp;
>> > + gg_data.gpiospec.np
Maxime Ripard wrote on Mon [2014-Dec-01
17:36:39 +0100]:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 04:30:01PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> > > +/**
> > > + * do_gpio_hog - Given node is a GPIO hog configuration, handle it
> > > + * @np:device node to get GPIO from
> > > + *
> > > +
Alexandre Courbot wrote on Fri [2014-Nov-28 16:30:01 +0900]:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Benoit Parrot wrote:
> > Based on Boris Brezillion's work this is a reworked patch
> > of his initial GPIO hogging mechanism.
> > This patch provides a way to initally configure specific GPIO
> > when
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 04:30:01PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * do_gpio_hog - Given node is a GPIO hog configuration, handle it
> > + * @np:device node to get GPIO from
> > + *
> > + * This is only used by of_gpiochip_add to request/set GPIO initial
> > + *
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Benoit Parrot wrote:
> Based on Boris Brezillion's work this is a reworked patch
> of his initial GPIO hogging mechanism.
> This patch provides a way to initally configure specific GPIO
> when the gpio controller is probed.
>
> The actual DT scanning to collect the
28 matches
Mail list logo
