Hi,
On Tuesday 28 August 2018 06:52 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 15:55-20180827, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> * Kishon Vijay Abraham I [180827 03:06]:
>>> Hi Tony,
>>>
>>> On Monday 20 August 2018 08:01 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Kishon Vijay Abraham I [180808 06:35]:
> On Tuesday 05 June
Hi,
On Tuesday 28 August 2018 06:52 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 15:55-20180827, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> * Kishon Vijay Abraham I [180827 03:06]:
>>> Hi Tony,
>>>
>>> On Monday 20 August 2018 08:01 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Kishon Vijay Abraham I [180808 06:35]:
> On Tuesday 05 June
On 15:55-20180827, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Kishon Vijay Abraham I [180827 03:06]:
> > Hi Tony,
> >
> > On Monday 20 August 2018 08:01 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > * Kishon Vijay Abraham I [180808 06:35]:
> > >> On Tuesday 05 June 2018 07:35 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > >>> Really need 64-bit
On 15:55-20180827, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Kishon Vijay Abraham I [180827 03:06]:
> > Hi Tony,
> >
> > On Monday 20 August 2018 08:01 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > * Kishon Vijay Abraham I [180808 06:35]:
> > >> On Tuesday 05 June 2018 07:35 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > >>> Really need 64-bit
* Kishon Vijay Abraham I [180827 03:06]:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On Monday 20 August 2018 08:01 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Kishon Vijay Abraham I [180808 06:35]:
> >> On Tuesday 05 June 2018 07:35 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> >>> Really need 64-bit addresses and sizes? Use ranges to limit the
> >>>
* Kishon Vijay Abraham I [180827 03:06]:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On Monday 20 August 2018 08:01 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Kishon Vijay Abraham I [180808 06:35]:
> >> On Tuesday 05 June 2018 07:35 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> >>> Really need 64-bit addresses and sizes? Use ranges to limit the
> >>>
Hi Tony,
On Monday 20 August 2018 08:01 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Kishon Vijay Abraham I [180808 06:35]:
>> On Tuesday 05 June 2018 07:35 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> Really need 64-bit addresses and sizes? Use ranges to limit the
>>> address space if possible.
>>
>> We now have address-cells
Hi Tony,
On Monday 20 August 2018 08:01 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Kishon Vijay Abraham I [180808 06:35]:
>> On Tuesday 05 June 2018 07:35 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> Really need 64-bit addresses and sizes? Use ranges to limit the
>>> address space if possible.
>>
>> We now have address-cells
* Kishon Vijay Abraham I [180808 06:35]:
> On Tuesday 05 June 2018 07:35 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > Really need 64-bit addresses and sizes? Use ranges to limit the
> > address space if possible.
>
> We now have address-cells as <1>,
>
* Kishon Vijay Abraham I [180808 06:35]:
> On Tuesday 05 June 2018 07:35 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > Really need 64-bit addresses and sizes? Use ranges to limit the
> > address space if possible.
>
> We now have address-cells as <1>,
>
* Sekhar Nori [180615 13:41]:
>
> How well we can reuse individual interconnect segments is something I
> have to think about / experiment. Will have to be wary of any "short
> paths" or "cross connections".
These short paths and cross connections are almost certainly just
additional ranges
* Sekhar Nori [180615 13:41]:
>
> How well we can reuse individual interconnect segments is something I
> have to think about / experiment. Will have to be wary of any "short
> paths" or "cross connections".
These short paths and cross connections are almost certainly just
additional ranges
Hi Rob,
On Tuesday 05 June 2018 07:35 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 1:05 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> The AM654 SoC is a lead device of the K3 Multicore SoC architecture
>> platform, targeted for broad market and industrial control with aim to
>> meet the complex processing
Hi Rob,
On Tuesday 05 June 2018 07:35 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 1:05 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> The AM654 SoC is a lead device of the K3 Multicore SoC architecture
>> platform, targeted for broad market and industrial control with aim to
>> meet the complex processing
Hi Tony,
On Friday 15 June 2018 10:31 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Nishanth Menon [180614 13:07]:
>> On 12:38-20180614, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> From A53 view, a more accurate view might be - from an interconnect
>> view of the world (still simplified - i have ignored the sub bus
>> segments in
Hi Tony,
On Friday 15 June 2018 10:31 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Nishanth Menon [180614 13:07]:
>> On 12:38-20180614, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> From A53 view, a more accurate view might be - from an interconnect
>> view of the world (still simplified - i have ignored the sub bus
>> segments in
* Nishanth Menon [180614 13:07]:
> On 12:38-20180614, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > Some comments on the ranges below.
>
> Thanks for reviewing in detail (I understand we are in the middle of
> merge window, so thanks for the extra effort).
>
> >
> > * Nishanth Menon [180607 16:41]:
> > > + soc0:
* Nishanth Menon [180614 13:07]:
> On 12:38-20180614, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > Some comments on the ranges below.
>
> Thanks for reviewing in detail (I understand we are in the middle of
> merge window, so thanks for the extra effort).
>
> >
> > * Nishanth Menon [180607 16:41]:
> > > + soc0:
On 12:38-20180614, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Some comments on the ranges below.
Thanks for reviewing in detail (I understand we are in the middle of
merge window, so thanks for the extra effort).
>
> * Nishanth Menon [180607 16:41]:
> > + soc0: soc0 {
> > + compatible = "simple-bus";
On 12:38-20180614, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Some comments on the ranges below.
Thanks for reviewing in detail (I understand we are in the middle of
merge window, so thanks for the extra effort).
>
> * Nishanth Menon [180607 16:41]:
> > + soc0: soc0 {
> > + compatible = "simple-bus";
Hi,
Some comments on the ranges below.
* Nishanth Menon [180607 16:41]:
> + soc0: soc0 {
> + compatible = "simple-bus";
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> + ranges;
I suggest you leave out the soc0, that's not real. Just make
Hi,
Some comments on the ranges below.
* Nishanth Menon [180607 16:41]:
> + soc0: soc0 {
> + compatible = "simple-bus";
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> + ranges;
I suggest you leave out the soc0, that's not real. Just make
On 14:05-20180605, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 1:05 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
[...]
> > + soc0: soc0 {
> > + compatible = "simple-bus";
> > + #address-cells = <2>;
> > + #size-cells = <2>;
> > + ranges;
>
> Really
On 14:05-20180605, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 1:05 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
[...]
> > + soc0: soc0 {
> > + compatible = "simple-bus";
> > + #address-cells = <2>;
> > + #size-cells = <2>;
> > + ranges;
>
> Really
* Rob Herring [180605 14:08]:
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 1:05 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > + soc0: soc0 {
> > + compatible = "simple-bus";
> > + #address-cells = <2>;
> > + #size-cells = <2>;
> > + ranges;
>
> Really need 64-bit
* Rob Herring [180605 14:08]:
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 1:05 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > + soc0: soc0 {
> > + compatible = "simple-bus";
> > + #address-cells = <2>;
> > + #size-cells = <2>;
> > + ranges;
>
> Really need 64-bit
On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 1:05 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> The AM654 SoC is a lead device of the K3 Multicore SoC architecture
> platform, targeted for broad market and industrial control with aim to
> meet the complex processing needs of modern embedded products.
>
> Some highlights of this SoC
On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 1:05 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> The AM654 SoC is a lead device of the K3 Multicore SoC architecture
> platform, targeted for broad market and industrial control with aim to
> meet the complex processing needs of modern embedded products.
>
> Some highlights of this SoC
28 matches
Mail list logo
