[David Woodhouse - Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 02:57:08PM +]
|
| On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 17:50 +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
| >
| >
| > so what i would do now? i could post updated patch *without* that
| > splitted line, should I?
|
| And with the if (rc == 0) thing fixed too. Yes please.
|
| --
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 17:50 +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>
>
> so what i would do now? i could post updated patch *without* that
> splitted line, should I?
And with the if (rc == 0) thing fixed too. Yes please.
--
dwmw2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
[David Woodhouse - Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 02:37:24PM +]
|
| On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 15:37 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
| > * David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| >
| > > On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 15:05 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
| > > > not to make a big issue out of this, but when was the last
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 15:37 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 15:05 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > not to make a big issue out of this, but when was the last time you
> > > tried to grep this way:
> > >
> > > grep -E
* David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 15:05 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > not to make a big issue out of this, but when was the last time you
> > tried to grep this way:
> >
> > grep -E "audit_rate_limit=[0-9]+ audit_backlog" */*.c
>
> Not precisely that, but
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 15:05 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> not to make a big issue out of this, but when was the last time you
> tried to grep this way:
>
> grep -E "audit_rate_limit=[0-9]+ audit_backlog" */*.c
Not precisely that, but I've certainly had greps fail because people
have split up
* Jörn Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - "audit: audit_lost=%d audit_rate_limit=%d
> > audit_backlog_limit=%d\n",
> > + "audit: audit_lost=%d audit_rate_limit=%d "
> > + "audit_backlog_limit=%d\n",
> >
[Tomas Carnecky - Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 01:10:28PM +0100]
> Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>> [=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Engel_ - Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:29:57PM +0100]
>> | On Thu, 3 January 2008 14:19:25 +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>> | > @@ -232,7 +232,8 @@ void audit_log_lost(const char *message)
>> | >
Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
[=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Engel_ - Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:29:57PM +0100]
| On Thu, 3 January 2008 14:19:25 +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
| > @@ -232,7 +232,8 @@ void audit_log_lost(const char *message)
| >
| > if (print) {
| > printk(KERN_WARNING
| > -
[=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Engel_ - Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:29:57PM +0100]
| On Thu, 3 January 2008 14:19:25 +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
| > @@ -232,7 +232,8 @@ void audit_log_lost(const char *message)
| >
| > if (print) {
| > printk(KERN_WARNING
| > - "audit:
On Thu, 3 January 2008 14:19:25 +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> @@ -232,7 +232,8 @@ void audit_log_lost(const char *message)
>
> if (print) {
> printk(KERN_WARNING
> -"audit: audit_lost=%d audit_rate_limit=%d
> audit_backlog_limit=%d\n",
> +
On Thu, 3 January 2008 14:19:25 +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
@@ -232,7 +232,8 @@ void audit_log_lost(const char *message)
if (print) {
printk(KERN_WARNING
-audit: audit_lost=%d audit_rate_limit=%d
audit_backlog_limit=%d\n,
+
[=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Engel_ - Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:29:57PM +0100]
| On Thu, 3 January 2008 14:19:25 +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
| @@ -232,7 +232,8 @@ void audit_log_lost(const char *message)
|
| if (print) {
| printk(KERN_WARNING
| - audit:
[Tomas Carnecky - Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 01:10:28PM +0100]
Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
[=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Engel_ - Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:29:57PM +0100]
| On Thu, 3 January 2008 14:19:25 +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
| @@ -232,7 +232,8 @@ void audit_log_lost(const char *message)
| | if
Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
[=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Engel_ - Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:29:57PM +0100]
| On Thu, 3 January 2008 14:19:25 +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
| @@ -232,7 +232,8 @@ void audit_log_lost(const char *message)
|
| if (print) {
| printk(KERN_WARNING
| -
* Jörn Engel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- audit: audit_lost=%d audit_rate_limit=%d
audit_backlog_limit=%d\n,
+ audit: audit_lost=%d audit_rate_limit=%d
+ audit_backlog_limit=%d\n,
atomic_read(audit_lost),
* David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 15:05 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
not to make a big issue out of this, but when was the last time you
tried to grep this way:
grep -E audit_rate_limit=[0-9]+ audit_backlog */*.c
Not precisely that, but I've certainly
[David Woodhouse - Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 02:37:24PM +]
|
| On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 15:37 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
| * David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 15:05 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
|not to make a big issue out of this, but when was the last time you
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 15:37 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 15:05 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
not to make a big issue out of this, but when was the last time you
tried to grep this way:
grep -E audit_rate_limit=[0-9]+
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 17:50 +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
so what i would do now? i could post updated patch *without* that
splitted line, should I?
And with the if (rc == 0) thing fixed too. Yes please.
--
dwmw2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel
[David Woodhouse - Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 02:57:08PM +]
|
| On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 17:50 +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
|
|
| so what i would do now? i could post updated patch *without* that
| splitted line, should I?
|
| And with the if (rc == 0) thing fixed too. Yes please.
|
| --
|
21 matches
Mail list logo
