>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/798575/
>
> I submitted your patch
Thanks for your constructive feedback.
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/798850/
> and a fix to ps3vram_probe() with the other patches in my queue.
I find it nice that you picked this change opportunity up after
a bit of
SF Markus Elfring writes:
I didn't consider one would be triggered by the kzalloc failure.
>>>
>>> Do you reconsider any special system settings for further
>>> software evolution then?
>>
>> Sorry, I don't quite understand your question.
>
> Do you try to configure the Linux error reportin
On 08/07/2017 12:04 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>> I think your original patch is OK,
>
> How does this feedback fit to the initial response “Not Applicable”?
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/798575/
I submitted your patch and a fix to ps3vram_probe() with
the other patches in my queue. Tha
>>> I didn't consider one would be triggered by the kzalloc failure.
>>
>> Do you reconsider any special system settings for further
>> software evolution then?
>
> Sorry, I don't quite understand your question.
Do you try to configure the Linux error reporting to any special needs?
> I think y
On 08/07/2017 11:34 AM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>> I didn't consider one would be triggered by the kzalloc failure.
>
> Do you reconsider any special system settings for further
> software evolution then?
Sorry, I don't quite understand your question.
I think your original patch is OK, and I wo
>> Do you find the default allocation failure report insufficient?
>
> The default is OK.
Thanks for this information.
> I didn't consider one would be triggered by the kzalloc failure.
Do you reconsider any special system settings for further
software evolution then?
Regards,
Markus
On 08/07/2017 09:27 AM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>>> Omit an extra message for a memory allocation failure in this function.
>>>
>>> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>>
>> NACK
>>
>> When a user asks me for help I would certainly like to get
>> 'Could not allocate cache ta
>> Omit an extra message for a memory allocation failure in this function.
>>
>> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> NACK
>
> When a user asks me for help I would certainly like to get
> 'Could not allocate cache tags' as apposed to nothing,
Do you find the default all
On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 08:10 -0700, Geoff Levand wrote:
> On 08/07/2017 03:52 AM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Omit an extra message for a memory allocation failure in this function.
> NACK
>
> When a user asks me for help I would certainly like to get
> 'Could not allocate cache tags' as apposed
On 08/07/2017 03:52 AM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring
> Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 12:37:01 +0200
>
> Omit an extra message for a memory allocation failure in this function.
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
NACK
When a user asks me for help I would cer
From: Markus Elfring
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 12:37:01 +0200
Omit an extra message for a memory allocation failure in this function.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Link:
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/LCJ16-Refactor_Strings-WSang_0.pdf
Signe
11 matches
Mail list logo
