On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 04:28:14PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Yes, I think we should continue moving stuff out of tools/perf/ and
> into a place that can be shared with other tools/ living codebases.
>
> Doing so will of course help tools that live elsewhere, outside the
> kernel
Em Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 05:18:02PM +0200, Borislav Petkov escreveu:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:58:31AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Yeap, guess its the most sensible to do given how things went so far.
> >
> > Please submit patches when you fix things on code copied from
> >
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:58:31AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Yeap, guess its the most sensible to do given how things went so far.
>
> Please submit patches when you fix things on code copied from
> tools/perf/ and generally when improving it.
Sure.
Btw, should I still be working
Em Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 04:50:31PM +0200, Robert Richter escreveu:
> On 30.06.14 12:01:15, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Well, do you have it as a standalong program? If so, you can put it in
> > a repo somewhere and we can start hacking away and playing with it. If
> > not, we will have to copy the
On 30.06.14 12:01:15, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Well, do you have it as a standalong program? If so, you can put it in
> a repo somewhere and we can start hacking away and playing with it. If
> not, we will have to copy the perf code *into* the RAS daemon first so
> that we can have a separate
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:39:39AM +0200, Jean Pihet wrote:
> That makes perfect sense since:
> - we need the RAS daemon implementation soon (not just before the
> final blackdown ;-),
Yeah :-)
> - for other tools to exist (like RAS daemon) we need to split out the
> perf code in small units.
Hi Boris,
-- added Fu Wei in the loop --
On 30 June 2014 09:07, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 01:28:19AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> Ok, cool. So guys, can we apply this one so that I can continue with the
>> next round?
>
> Ok, I had this crazy idea recently:
>
> How
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 01:28:19AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Ok, cool. So guys, can we apply this one so that I can continue with the
> next round?
Ok, I had this crazy idea recently:
How about we copy the perf tool code we need for the RAS daemon and
start hacking on it in a separate
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 01:28:19AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
Ok, cool. So guys, can we apply this one so that I can continue with the
next round?
Ok, I had this crazy idea recently:
How about we copy the perf tool code we need for the RAS daemon and
start hacking on it in a separate repo,
Hi Boris,
-- added Fu Wei in the loop --
On 30 June 2014 09:07, Borislav Petkov b...@alien8.de wrote:
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 01:28:19AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
Ok, cool. So guys, can we apply this one so that I can continue with the
next round?
Ok, I had this crazy idea recently:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:39:39AM +0200, Jean Pihet wrote:
That makes perfect sense since:
- we need the RAS daemon implementation soon (not just before the
final blackdown ;-),
Yeah :-)
- for other tools to exist (like RAS daemon) we need to split out the
perf code in small units. This
On 30.06.14 12:01:15, Borislav Petkov wrote:
Well, do you have it as a standalong program? If so, you can put it in
a repo somewhere and we can start hacking away and playing with it. If
not, we will have to copy the perf code *into* the RAS daemon first so
that we can have a separate source
Em Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 04:50:31PM +0200, Robert Richter escreveu:
On 30.06.14 12:01:15, Borislav Petkov wrote:
Well, do you have it as a standalong program? If so, you can put it in
a repo somewhere and we can start hacking away and playing with it. If
not, we will have to copy the perf
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:58:31AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Yeap, guess its the most sensible to do given how things went so far.
Please submit patches when you fix things on code copied from
tools/perf/ and generally when improving it.
Sure.
Btw, should I still be working on
Em Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 05:18:02PM +0200, Borislav Petkov escreveu:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:58:31AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Yeap, guess its the most sensible to do given how things went so far.
Please submit patches when you fix things on code copied from
tools/perf/ and
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 04:28:14PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Yes, I think we should continue moving stuff out of tools/perf/ and
into a place that can be shared with other tools/ living codebases.
Doing so will of course help tools that live elsewhere, outside the
kernel sources
16 matches
Mail list logo
