Roman,
I know this has come up before, but wasn't sure if any recent
enhancements to Kconfig have resolved this issue.
We have a set of board choices in PPC land that are 'config' options.
We want to make sure the user selects at least one of them (or force
at least one of them to be
Roman,
I know this has come up before, but wasn't sure if any recent
enhancements to Kconfig have resolved this issue.
We have a set of board choices in PPC land that are 'config' options.
We want to make sure the user selects at least one of them (or force
at least one of them to be
On Feb 18, 2007, at 1:25 PM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
Sure, on powerpc for some of the embedded sub-architectures you
can only
select a single board to build for. For a lot of people this is
sufficient,
however we are moving towards a world where you can easily build
in support
for
On Feb 18, 2007, at 1:25 PM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
Sure, on powerpc for some of the embedded sub-architectures you
can only
select a single board to build for. For a lot of people this is
sufficient,
however we are moving towards a world where you can easily build
in support
for
> >
> > Sure, on powerpc for some of the embedded sub-architectures you can only
> > select a single board to build for. For a lot of people this is sufficient,
> > however we are moving towards a world where you can easily build in support
> > for multiple boards into a single kernel.
> >
> >
Hi,
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > Could you please be more specific about the problem you're trying to
> > solve, instead of how you're trying to solve it?
> > A real example would help a lot to understand the actual problem.
>
> Sure, on powerpc for some of the embedded
Hi,
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Kumar Gala wrote:
Could you please be more specific about the problem you're trying to
solve, instead of how you're trying to solve it?
A real example would help a lot to understand the actual problem.
Sure, on powerpc for some of the embedded sub-architectures
Sure, on powerpc for some of the embedded sub-architectures you can only
select a single board to build for. For a lot of people this is sufficient,
however we are moving towards a world where you can easily build in support
for multiple boards into a single kernel.
I'd like to
On Feb 16, 2007, at 4:23 AM, Roman Zippel wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Kumar Gala wrote:
I was wondering if there was some way to make a Kconfig menu
either be just a
menu or a choice depending on another bool being set or not.
What I'm trying to accomplish is if CONFIG_ONLY_HAVE_ONE
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Kumar Gala wrote:
> I was wondering if there was some way to make a Kconfig menu either be just a
> menu or a choice depending on another bool being set or not.
>
> What I'm trying to accomplish is if CONFIG_ONLY_HAVE_ONE is set I want it so
> you can only select on
>
> Now is there some way to not have to duplicate the 'config choices
> between if ONLY_HAVE_ONE and if !ONLY_HAVE_ONE
>
> To use your example I want to do:
>
> config ONLY_HAVE_ONE
> prompt "only have one?"
> boolean
>
> if ONLY_HAVE_ONE
> config VAL_FIRST
> bool "First
Now is there some way to not have to duplicate the 'config choices
between if ONLY_HAVE_ONE and if !ONLY_HAVE_ONE
To use your example I want to do:
config ONLY_HAVE_ONE
prompt only have one?
boolean
if ONLY_HAVE_ONE
config VAL_FIRST
bool First value
config
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Kumar Gala wrote:
I was wondering if there was some way to make a Kconfig menu either be just a
menu or a choice depending on another bool being set or not.
What I'm trying to accomplish is if CONFIG_ONLY_HAVE_ONE is set I want it so
you can only select on option,
On Feb 16, 2007, at 4:23 AM, Roman Zippel wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Kumar Gala wrote:
I was wondering if there was some way to make a Kconfig menu
either be just a
menu or a choice depending on another bool being set or not.
What I'm trying to accomplish is if CONFIG_ONLY_HAVE_ONE
On Feb 15, 2007, at 4:33 PM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 01:18:52PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
I was wondering if there was some way to make a Kconfig menu either
be just a menu or a choice depending on another bool being set or
not.
What I'm trying to accomplish is if
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 01:18:52PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
> I was wondering if there was some way to make a Kconfig menu either
> be just a menu or a choice depending on another bool being set or not.
>
> What I'm trying to accomplish is if CONFIG_ONLY_HAVE_ONE is set I
> want it so you can
I was wondering if there was some way to make a Kconfig menu either
be just a menu or a choice depending on another bool being set or not.
What I'm trying to accomplish is if CONFIG_ONLY_HAVE_ONE is set I
want it so you can only select on option, however if
CONFIG_ONLY_HAVE_ONE is not set
I was wondering if there was some way to make a Kconfig menu either
be just a menu or a choice depending on another bool being set or not.
What I'm trying to accomplish is if CONFIG_ONLY_HAVE_ONE is set I
want it so you can only select on option, however if
CONFIG_ONLY_HAVE_ONE is not set
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 01:18:52PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
I was wondering if there was some way to make a Kconfig menu either
be just a menu or a choice depending on another bool being set or not.
What I'm trying to accomplish is if CONFIG_ONLY_HAVE_ONE is set I
want it so you can only
On Feb 15, 2007, at 4:33 PM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 01:18:52PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
I was wondering if there was some way to make a Kconfig menu either
be just a menu or a choice depending on another bool being set or
not.
What I'm trying to accomplish is if
20 matches
Mail list logo
