Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 27 (sunxi clk & mfd)

On Mon, 01 Apr 2019, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 10:36:24PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Lee, > > > > On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 11:27:32 +0100 Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 28 Mar 2019, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > > I reported that a while ago (x86_64

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 27 (sunxi clk & mfd)

On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 10:36:24PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Lee, > > On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 11:27:32 +0100 Lee Jones wrote: > > > > On Thu, 28 Mar 2019, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > I reported that a while ago (x86_64 allmodconfig after the merge of the > > > sunxi tree). Apparently

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 27 (sunxi clk & mfd)

Hi Lee, On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 11:27:32 +0100 Lee Jones wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Mar 2019, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > I reported that a while ago (x86_64 allmodconfig after the merge of the > > sunxi tree). Apparently there is a fix out there but it hasn't been > > applied yet. > > Where is the

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 27 (sunxi clk & mfd)

On Thu, 28 Mar 2019, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Randy, > > On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 13:32:26 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > on i386 or x86_64: > > > > WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for MFD_SUN6I_PRCM > > Depends on [n]: HAS_IOMEM [=y] && ARCH_SUNXI > > Selected by [y]: > >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 27 (sunxi clk & mfd)

Hi Randy, On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 13:32:26 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > > on i386 or x86_64: > > WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for MFD_SUN6I_PRCM > Depends on [n]: HAS_IOMEM [=y] && ARCH_SUNXI > Selected by [y]: > - CLK_SUNXI_PRCM_SUN8I [=y] && COMMON_CLK [=y] && CLK_SUNXI [=y]

linux-next: Tree for Mar 27

Hi all, Changes since 20190326: The bpf-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree. The sound-asoc tree lost its build failure but gained another for which I reverted 3 commits. The drm-intel tree gained a build failure for which I reverted some comits. Non-merge commits (relative to

linux-next: Tree for Mar 27

Hi all, Changes since 20180326: The powerpc tree gained conflicts against the powerpc-fixes tree. The vfs tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit. The pci tree lost its build failure. The device-mapper tree gained a build failure for which I added a merge fix patch.

linux-next: Tree for Mar 27

Hi all, Changes since 20180326: The powerpc tree gained conflicts against the powerpc-fixes tree. The vfs tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit. The pci tree lost its build failure. The device-mapper tree gained a build failure for which I added a merge fix patch.

linux-next: Tree for Mar 27

Hi all, Changes since 20170324: The gfs2 tree gained conflicts against the net tree. The kspp tree gained a conflict against the drm-misc tree. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 4906 5492 files changed, 403174 insertions(+), 90419 deletions(-)

linux-next: Tree for Mar 27

Hi all, Changes since 20170324: The gfs2 tree gained conflicts against the net tree. The kspp tree gained a conflict against the drm-misc tree. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 4906 5492 files changed, 403174 insertions(+), 90419 deletions(-)

linux-next: Tree for Mar 27

Hi all, Changes since 20160324: Undropped tree: overlayfs The overlayfs lost its conflicts against the ext4 tree. The nvdimm tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20160324. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 520 452 files changed, 10923 insertions(+), 3613

linux-next: Tree for Mar 27

Hi all, Changes since 20160324: Undropped tree: overlayfs The overlayfs lost its conflicts against the ext4 tree. The nvdimm tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20160324. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 520 452 files changed, 10923 insertions(+), 3613

linux-next: Tree for Mar 27

Hi all, Changes since 20150326: Thr arm64 tree has caused overnight build failures so I reverted 3 commits. The powerpc-mpe tree lost its build failure. The vfs tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch. The dt-rh tree gained a conflict against the mips tree. The

linux-next: Tree for Mar 27

Hi all, Changes since 20150326: Thr arm64 tree has caused overnight build failures so I reverted 3 commits. The powerpc-mpe tree lost its build failure. The vfs tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch. The dt-rh tree gained a conflict against the mips tree. The

linux-next: Tree for Mar 27

Hi all, This tree still fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. Changes since 20140325: The powerpc tree still had its build failure. The staging tree gained a conflict against the net-next tree. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 11008 9412 files changed, 451457

linux-next: Tree for Mar 27

Hi all, This tree still fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. Changes since 20140325: The powerpc tree still had its build failure. The staging tree gained a conflict against the net-next tree. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 11008 9412 files changed, 451457

linux-next: Tree for Mar 27

Hi all, Changes since 20130326: The vl4-dvb tree still had its build failure for which I disabled a staging driver. The net-next tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree. The block tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch. The usb tree gained a build failure for which I

linux-next: Tree for Mar 27

Hi all, Changes since 20130326: The vl4-dvb tree still had its build failure for which I disabled a staging driver. The net-next tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree. The block tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch. The usb tree gained a build failure for which I