Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the asm-generic tree

2019-02-19 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 12:19 PM Hugo Lefeuvre wrote: > > > I'm not sending a pull request for this if it breaks any architectures, > > so I think we need to fix them all, and I suppose we also have to > > change all architectures in the same patch that changes the architecture > > independent

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the asm-generic tree

2019-02-19 Thread Hugo Lefeuvre
> I'm not sending a pull request for this if it breaks any architectures, > so I think we need to fix them all, and I suppose we also have to > change all architectures in the same patch that changes the architecture > independent declaration, so it doesn't break intermittently. > > At this

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the asm-generic tree

2019-02-19 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 8:45 AM Hugo Lefeuvre wrote: > > Hi Stephen, Arnd, > > > After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > > allnoconfig) failed like this: > > ... > > Caused by commit > > > > 8e074c243ed3 ("iomap: add missing const to ioread*/iowrite addr arg") >

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the asm-generic tree

2019-02-18 Thread Hugo Lefeuvre
Hi Stephen, Arnd, > After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > allnoconfig) failed like this: > ... > Caused by commit > > 8e074c243ed3 ("iomap: add missing const to ioread*/iowrite addr arg") I have prepared a patch addressing this issue, and am currently

linux-next: build failure after merge of the asm-generic tree

2019-02-18 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Arnd, After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allnoconfig) failed like this: arch/powerpc/kernel/iomap.c:18:14: error: conflicting types for 'ioread8' unsigned int ioread8(void __iomem *addr) ^~~ In file included from

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the asm-generic tree

2018-03-16 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:47 PM, Bin Liu wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 09:13:55AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi Arnd, >> >> After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (arm >> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: >> >>

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the asm-generic tree

2018-03-16 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:47 PM, Bin Liu wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 09:13:55AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi Arnd, >> >> After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (arm >> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: >> >> drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c: In function

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the asm-generic tree

2018-03-15 Thread Bin Liu
Hi, On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 09:13:55AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Arnd, > > After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c: In function 'musb_rx_reinit': > drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c:577:10:

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the asm-generic tree

2018-03-15 Thread Bin Liu
Hi, On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 09:13:55AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Arnd, > > After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c: In function 'musb_rx_reinit': > drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c:577:10:

linux-next: build failure after merge of the asm-generic tree

2018-03-15 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Arnd, After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (arm multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c: In function 'musb_rx_reinit': drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c:577:10: error: 'struct musb' has no member named 'double_buffer_not_ok' if

linux-next: build failure after merge of the asm-generic tree

2018-03-15 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Arnd, After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (arm multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c: In function 'musb_rx_reinit': drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c:577:10: error: 'struct musb' has no member named 'double_buffer_not_ok' if

Re: [kbuild-all] linux-next: build failure after merge of the asm-generic tree

2015-10-15 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Fengguang, On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 22:45:32 +0800 Fengguang Wu wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 01:37:34PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 07:32:27 +0800 kbuild test robot > > wrote: > > > > > > [auto build test ERROR on v4.3-rc5 -- if it's inappropriate base,

Re: [kbuild-all] linux-next: build failure after merge of the asm-generic tree

2015-10-15 Thread Fengguang Wu
Hi Stephen, On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 01:37:34PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 07:32:27 +0800 kbuild test robot wrote: > > > > [auto build test ERROR on v4.3-rc5 -- if it's inappropriate base, please > > suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base] > > I

Re: [kbuild-all] linux-next: build failure after merge of the asm-generic tree

2015-10-15 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Fengguang, On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 22:45:32 +0800 Fengguang Wu wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 01:37:34PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 07:32:27 +0800 kbuild test robot > > wrote: > > > > > > [auto build test ERROR on v4.3-rc5

Re: [kbuild-all] linux-next: build failure after merge of the asm-generic tree

2015-10-15 Thread Fengguang Wu
Hi Stephen, On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 01:37:34PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 07:32:27 +0800 kbuild test robot wrote: > > > > [auto build test ERROR on v4.3-rc5 -- if it's inappropriate base, please > > suggest rules for selecting the more suitable

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the asm-generic tree

2015-10-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi, On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 07:32:27 +0800 kbuild test robot wrote: > > [auto build test ERROR on v4.3-rc5 -- if it's inappropriate base, please > suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base] I think you should just ignore any patches from me that have "linux-next:" in the subject line as

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the asm-generic tree

2015-10-14 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Stephen, [auto build test ERROR on v4.3-rc5 -- if it's inappropriate base, please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Stephen-Rothwell/linux-next-build-failure-after-merge-of-the-asm-generic-tree/20151015-065548 config: i386

linux-next: build failure after merge of the asm-generic tree

2015-10-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Arnd, After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: drivers/acpi/osl.c:46:47: fatal error: asm-generic/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h: No such file or directory #include ^ Caused by commit

linux-next: build failure after merge of the asm-generic tree

2015-10-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Arnd, After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: drivers/acpi/osl.c:46:47: fatal error: asm-generic/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h: No such file or directory #include ^ Caused by commit

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the asm-generic tree

2015-10-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi, On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 07:32:27 +0800 kbuild test robot wrote: > > [auto build test ERROR on v4.3-rc5 -- if it's inappropriate base, please > suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base] I think you should just ignore any patches from me that have "linux-next:" in the

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the asm-generic tree

2015-10-14 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Stephen, [auto build test ERROR on v4.3-rc5 -- if it's inappropriate base, please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Stephen-Rothwell/linux-next-build-failure-after-merge-of-the-asm-generic-tree/20151015-065548 config: i386

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the asm-generic tree

2014-11-19 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wednesday 19 November 2014 18:54:14 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Arnd, > > After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (sparc > defconfig) failed like this: > > In file included from include/linux/io.h:22:0, > from include/linux/irq.h:23, >

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the asm-generic tree

2014-11-19 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wednesday 19 November 2014 18:54:14 Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi Arnd, After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (sparc defconfig) failed like this: In file included from include/linux/io.h:22:0, from include/linux/irq.h:23, from

linux-next: build failure after merge of the asm-generic tree

2014-11-18 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Arnd, After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (sparc defconfig) failed like this: In file included from include/linux/io.h:22:0, from include/linux/irq.h:23, from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:12, from

linux-next: build failure after merge of the asm-generic tree

2014-11-18 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Arnd, After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (sparc defconfig) failed like this: In file included from include/linux/io.h:22:0, from include/linux/irq.h:23, from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:12, from

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the asm-generic tree

2014-09-30 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday 30 September 2014 08:31:16 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Arnd, > > On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 13:14:45 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > Thanks, applied on top with Stephen's full report in the commit > > message and your Ack. > > I look at your tree today, and its empty ... just checking

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the asm-generic tree

2014-09-30 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday 30 September 2014 08:31:16 Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi Arnd, On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 13:14:45 +0200 Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote: Thanks, applied on top with Stephen's full report in the commit message and your Ack. I look at your tree today, and its empty ... just checking

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the asm-generic tree

2014-09-29 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Arnd, On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 13:14:45 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > Thanks, applied on top with Stephen's full report in the commit > message and your Ack. I look at your tree today, and its empty ... just checking that you didn't forget to push or something. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the asm-generic tree

2014-09-29 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Arnd, On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 13:14:45 +0200 Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote: Thanks, applied on top with Stephen's full report in the commit message and your Ack. I look at your tree today, and its empty ... just checking that you didn't forget to push or something. -- Cheers, Stephen

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the asm-generic tree

2014-09-26 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday 26 September 2014 11:53:33 Will Deacon wrote: > > From: Stephen Rothwell > > Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 19:57:03 +1000 > > Subject: [PATCH] sparc: io: fix for asm-generic: io: implement relaxed > > accessor macros as conditional wrappers > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell > > --- >

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the asm-generic tree

2014-09-26 Thread Will Deacon
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:02:51AM +0100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (sparc > defconfig) failed like this: > > In file included from /scratch/sfr/next/include/linux/clocksource.h:19:0, > from

linux-next: build failure after merge of the asm-generic tree

2014-09-26 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Arnd, After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (sparc defconfig) failed like this: In file included from /scratch/sfr/next/include/linux/clocksource.h:19:0, from /scratch/sfr/next/arch/sparc/include/asm/timer_32.h:11, from

linux-next: build failure after merge of the asm-generic tree

2014-09-26 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Arnd, After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (sparc defconfig) failed like this: In file included from /scratch/sfr/next/include/linux/clocksource.h:19:0, from /scratch/sfr/next/arch/sparc/include/asm/timer_32.h:11, from

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the asm-generic tree

2014-09-26 Thread Will Deacon
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:02:51AM +0100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (sparc defconfig) failed like this: In file included from /scratch/sfr/next/include/linux/clocksource.h:19:0, from

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the asm-generic tree

2014-09-26 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday 26 September 2014 11:53:33 Will Deacon wrote: From: Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 19:57:03 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] sparc: io: fix for asm-generic: io: implement relaxed accessor macros as conditional wrappers Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell