On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 12:19 PM Hugo Lefeuvre wrote:
>
> > I'm not sending a pull request for this if it breaks any architectures,
> > so I think we need to fix them all, and I suppose we also have to
> > change all architectures in the same patch that changes the architecture
> > independent
> I'm not sending a pull request for this if it breaks any architectures,
> so I think we need to fix them all, and I suppose we also have to
> change all architectures in the same patch that changes the architecture
> independent declaration, so it doesn't break intermittently.
>
> At this
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 8:45 AM Hugo Lefeuvre wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen, Arnd,
>
> > After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > allnoconfig) failed like this:
> > ...
> > Caused by commit
> >
> > 8e074c243ed3 ("iomap: add missing const to ioread*/iowrite addr arg")
>
Hi Stephen, Arnd,
> After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allnoconfig) failed like this:
> ...
> Caused by commit
>
> 8e074c243ed3 ("iomap: add missing const to ioread*/iowrite addr arg")
I have prepared a patch addressing this issue, and am currently
Hi Arnd,
After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allnoconfig) failed like this:
arch/powerpc/kernel/iomap.c:18:14: error: conflicting types for 'ioread8'
unsigned int ioread8(void __iomem *addr)
^~~
In file included from
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:47 PM, Bin Liu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 09:13:55AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Arnd,
>>
>> After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (arm
>> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>>
>>
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:47 PM, Bin Liu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 09:13:55AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Arnd,
>>
>> After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (arm
>> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c: In function
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 09:13:55AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c: In function 'musb_rx_reinit':
> drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c:577:10:
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 09:13:55AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c: In function 'musb_rx_reinit':
> drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c:577:10:
Hi Arnd,
After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c: In function 'musb_rx_reinit':
drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c:577:10: error: 'struct musb' has no member named
'double_buffer_not_ok'
if
Hi Arnd,
After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c: In function 'musb_rx_reinit':
drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c:577:10: error: 'struct musb' has no member named
'double_buffer_not_ok'
if
Hi Fengguang,
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 22:45:32 +0800 Fengguang Wu wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 01:37:34PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 07:32:27 +0800 kbuild test robot
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > [auto build test ERROR on v4.3-rc5 -- if it's inappropriate base,
Hi Stephen,
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 01:37:34PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 07:32:27 +0800 kbuild test robot wrote:
> >
> > [auto build test ERROR on v4.3-rc5 -- if it's inappropriate base, please
> > suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]
>
> I
Hi Fengguang,
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 22:45:32 +0800 Fengguang Wu wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 01:37:34PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 07:32:27 +0800 kbuild test robot
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > [auto build test ERROR on v4.3-rc5
Hi Stephen,
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 01:37:34PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 07:32:27 +0800 kbuild test robot wrote:
> >
> > [auto build test ERROR on v4.3-rc5 -- if it's inappropriate base, please
> > suggest rules for selecting the more suitable
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 07:32:27 +0800 kbuild test robot wrote:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on v4.3-rc5 -- if it's inappropriate base, please
> suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]
I think you should just ignore any patches from me that have
"linux-next:" in the subject line as
Hi Stephen,
[auto build test ERROR on v4.3-rc5 -- if it's inappropriate base, please
suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Stephen-Rothwell/linux-next-build-failure-after-merge-of-the-asm-generic-tree/20151015-065548
config: i386
Hi Arnd,
After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/acpi/osl.c:46:47: fatal error: asm-generic/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h: No
such file or directory
#include
^
Caused by commit
Hi Arnd,
After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/acpi/osl.c:46:47: fatal error: asm-generic/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h: No
such file or directory
#include
^
Caused by commit
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 07:32:27 +0800 kbuild test robot wrote:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on v4.3-rc5 -- if it's inappropriate base, please
> suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]
I think you should just ignore any patches from me that have
"linux-next:" in the
Hi Stephen,
[auto build test ERROR on v4.3-rc5 -- if it's inappropriate base, please
suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Stephen-Rothwell/linux-next-build-failure-after-merge-of-the-asm-generic-tree/20151015-065548
config: i386
On Wednesday 19 November 2014 18:54:14 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (sparc
> defconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from include/linux/io.h:22:0,
> from include/linux/irq.h:23,
>
On Wednesday 19 November 2014 18:54:14 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Arnd,
After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (sparc
defconfig) failed like this:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:22:0,
from include/linux/irq.h:23,
from
Hi Arnd,
After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (sparc
defconfig) failed like this:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:22:0,
from include/linux/irq.h:23,
from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:12,
from
Hi Arnd,
After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (sparc
defconfig) failed like this:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:22:0,
from include/linux/irq.h:23,
from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:12,
from
On Tuesday 30 September 2014 08:31:16 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 13:14:45 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, applied on top with Stephen's full report in the commit
> > message and your Ack.
>
> I look at your tree today, and its empty ... just checking
On Tuesday 30 September 2014 08:31:16 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Arnd,
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 13:14:45 +0200 Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
Thanks, applied on top with Stephen's full report in the commit
message and your Ack.
I look at your tree today, and its empty ... just checking
Hi Arnd,
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 13:14:45 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> Thanks, applied on top with Stephen's full report in the commit
> message and your Ack.
I look at your tree today, and its empty ... just checking that you
didn't forget to push or something.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Hi Arnd,
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 13:14:45 +0200 Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
Thanks, applied on top with Stephen's full report in the commit
message and your Ack.
I look at your tree today, and its empty ... just checking that you
didn't forget to push or something.
--
Cheers,
Stephen
On Friday 26 September 2014 11:53:33 Will Deacon wrote:
> > From: Stephen Rothwell
> > Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 19:57:03 +1000
> > Subject: [PATCH] sparc: io: fix for asm-generic: io: implement relaxed
> > accessor macros as conditional wrappers
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell
> > ---
>
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:02:51AM +0100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (sparc
> defconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from /scratch/sfr/next/include/linux/clocksource.h:19:0,
> from
Hi Arnd,
After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (sparc
defconfig) failed like this:
In file included from /scratch/sfr/next/include/linux/clocksource.h:19:0,
from /scratch/sfr/next/arch/sparc/include/asm/timer_32.h:11,
from
Hi Arnd,
After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (sparc
defconfig) failed like this:
In file included from /scratch/sfr/next/include/linux/clocksource.h:19:0,
from /scratch/sfr/next/arch/sparc/include/asm/timer_32.h:11,
from
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:02:51AM +0100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
After merging the asm-generic tree, today's linux-next build (sparc
defconfig) failed like this:
In file included from /scratch/sfr/next/include/linux/clocksource.h:19:0,
from
On Friday 26 September 2014 11:53:33 Will Deacon wrote:
From: Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 19:57:03 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] sparc: io: fix for asm-generic: io: implement relaxed
accessor macros as conditional wrappers
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell
35 matches
Mail list logo