On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 4:30 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c: In function 'xgpio_remove':
> drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c:275:2: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'pm_runtime_disable' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 275 | pm_runtime_disable(>dev);
>
Hi all,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c: In function 'xgpio_remove':
drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c:275:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'pm_runtime_disable' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 1:38 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this:
Oops!
> I have applied the following patch for today:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell
> Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 21:29:30 +1000
> Subject:
Hi all,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this:
In file included from include/asm-generic/gpio.h:13,
from include/linux/gpio.h:62,
from include/linux/of_gpio.h:16,
from
Hi all,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c: In function 'gpmc_probe_generic_child':
drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c:2174:9: error: type of formal parameter 4 is
incomplete
0);
^
Caused by
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
ERROR: "irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy" [drivers/gpio/gpio-lpc18xx.ko] undefined!
Caused by commit
5ddabfe8d3de ("gpio: lpc18xx: add GPIO pin interrupt controller support")
I have used the
2017-11-13 20:33 GMT+09:00 Stephen Rothwell :
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 16:20:38 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
>> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>>
>>
2017-11-13 20:33 GMT+09:00 Stephen Rothwell :
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 16:20:38 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
>> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-uniphier.c:324:14: error: initialization from
Hi all,
On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 16:20:38 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-uniphier.c:324:14: error: initialization from incompatible
> pointer type
Hi all,
On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 16:20:38 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-uniphier.c:324:14: error: initialization from incompatible
> pointer type
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> On Fri, 3 Nov 2017 08:50:31 +0100 Linus Walleij
> wrote:
>>
>> I applied this patch to the GPIO tree, I guess it is the right thing
>> to do at this point.
>
> Umm, you can't
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> On Fri, 3 Nov 2017 08:50:31 +0100 Linus Walleij
> wrote:
>>
>> I applied this patch to the GPIO tree, I guess it is the right thing
>> to do at this point.
>
> Umm, you can't really validly apply my merge fix patch to the
Hi Linus,
On Fri, 3 Nov 2017 08:50:31 +0100 Linus Walleij
wrote:
>
> I applied this patch to the GPIO tree, I guess it is the right thing
> to do at this point.
Umm, you can't really validly apply my merge fix patch to the gpio tree
without merging in part of the tip
Hi Linus,
On Fri, 3 Nov 2017 08:50:31 +0100 Linus Walleij
wrote:
>
> I applied this patch to the GPIO tree, I guess it is the right thing
> to do at this point.
Umm, you can't really validly apply my merge fix patch to the gpio tree
without merging in part of the tip tree (it will generate, at
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 6:20 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-uniphier.c:324:14: error: initialization from incompatible
> pointer type
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 6:20 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-uniphier.c:324:14: error: initialization from incompatible
> pointer type
Hi Stephen,
2017-11-02 14:20 GMT+09:00 Stephen Rothwell :
> Hi Linus,
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-uniphier.c:324:14: error: initialization from incompatible
> pointer type
Hi Stephen,
2017-11-02 14:20 GMT+09:00 Stephen Rothwell :
> Hi Linus,
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-uniphier.c:324:14: error: initialization from incompatible
> pointer type
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-uniphier.c:324:14: error: initialization from incompatible
pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
.activate = uniphier_gpio_irq_domain_activate,
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-uniphier.c:324:14: error: initialization from incompatible
pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
.activate = uniphier_gpio_irq_domain_activate,
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> It looks like those '(' ')' chars are not what they seem ...
No the owls are not what they seem. I went in and fixed the
unicode weirdness, thanks!
Pretty hard to see this one since I can't see it.
Yours,
Linus
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> It looks like those '(' ')' chars are not what they seem ...
No the owls are not what they seem. I went in and fixed the
unicode weirdness, thanks!
Pretty hard to see this one since I can't see it.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
On Wed, 21 Jun 2017 16:09:34 +1000
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c: In function 'dwapb_irq_set_type':
>
On Wed, 21 Jun 2017 16:09:34 +1000
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c: In function 'dwapb_irq_set_type':
> drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c:291:2: error: stray '\357'
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c: In function 'dwapb_irq_set_type':
drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c:291:2: error: stray '\357' in program
if (type != IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH)
^
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c: In function 'dwapb_irq_set_type':
drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c:291:2: error: stray '\357' in program
if (type != IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH)
^
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 7:39 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> orion5x_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c:1062: undefined reference to
> `__devm_regmap_init_mmio_clk'
>
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 7:39 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> orion5x_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c:1062: undefined reference to
> `__devm_regmap_init_mmio_clk'
> drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c:1078: undefined
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
orion5x_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c:1062: undefined reference to
`__devm_regmap_init_mmio_clk'
drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c:1078: undefined reference to
`__devm_regmap_init_mmio_clk'
Caused by commit
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
orion5x_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c:1062: undefined reference to
`__devm_regmap_init_mmio_clk'
drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c:1078: undefined reference to
`__devm_regmap_init_mmio_clk'
Caused by commit
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 6:11 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/tty/serial/st-asc.c: In function 'asc_set_termios':
> drivers/tty/serial/st-asc.c:578:12:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 6:11 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/tty/serial/st-asc.c: In function 'asc_set_termios':
> drivers/tty/serial/st-asc.c:578:12: error: implicit
Hi Lee,
On Wed, 8 Feb 2017 08:48:54 + Lee Jones wrote:
>
> On Wed, 08 Feb 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > Hi Linus,
>
> I believe this patch would need to go in via Greg's tree.
Except his tree does not have the rename and extra arguments for
Hi Lee,
On Wed, 8 Feb 2017 08:48:54 + Lee Jones wrote:
>
> On Wed, 08 Feb 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > Hi Linus,
>
> I believe this patch would need to go in via Greg's tree.
Except his tree does not have the rename and extra arguments for
devm_get_gpiod_from_child(), so it can't
On Wed, 8 Feb 2017 08:48:54 +
Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Feb 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > Hi Linus,
>
> I believe this patch would need to go in via Greg's tree.
>
> (see below)
>
> > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> >
On Wed, 8 Feb 2017 08:48:54 +
Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Feb 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > Hi Linus,
>
> I believe this patch would need to go in via Greg's tree.
>
> (see below)
>
> > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > multi_v7_defconfig) failed
On Wed, 08 Feb 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
I believe this patch would need to go in via Greg's tree.
(see below)
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/tty/serial/st-asc.c: In function 'asc_set_termios':
>
On Wed, 08 Feb 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
I believe this patch would need to go in via Greg's tree.
(see below)
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/tty/serial/st-asc.c: In function 'asc_set_termios':
>
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/tty/serial/st-asc.c: In function 'asc_set_termios':
drivers/tty/serial/st-asc.c:578:12: error: implicit declaration of function
'devm_get_gpiod_from_child'
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/tty/serial/st-asc.c: In function 'asc_set_termios':
drivers/tty/serial/st-asc.c:578:12: error: implicit declaration of function
'devm_get_gpiod_from_child'
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 6:36 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c: In function '_gpiochip_irqchip_add':
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:1622:62: error: macro
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 6:36 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c: In function '_gpiochip_irqchip_add':
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:1622:62: error: macro "WARN_ON" passed 3
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c: In function '_gpiochip_irqchip_add':
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:1622:62: error: macro "WARN_ON" passed 3 arguments, but
takes just 1
"%s: Ignoring %d default
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c: In function '_gpiochip_irqchip_add':
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:1622:62: error: macro "WARN_ON" passed 3 arguments, but
takes just 1
"%s: Ignoring %d default
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-f7188x.c: In function 'f7188x_gpio_set_single_ended':
drivers/gpio/gpio-f7188x.c:331:26: error: implicit declaration of function
'gpio_data_mode'
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-f7188x.c: In function 'f7188x_gpio_set_single_ended':
drivers/gpio/gpio-f7188x.c:331:26: error: implicit declaration of function
'gpio_data_mode'
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 4:22 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_gpio.c: In function 'ppc4xx_gpio_set':
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_gpio.c:93:26:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 4:22 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_gpio.c: In function 'ppc4xx_gpio_set':
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_gpio.c:93:26: error: unused variable
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_gpio.c: In function 'ppc4xx_gpio_set':
arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_gpio.c:93:26: error: unused variable 'mm_gc'
[-Werror=unused-variable]
struct
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_gpio.c: In function 'ppc4xx_gpio_set':
arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_gpio.c:93:26: error: unused variable 'mm_gc'
[-Werror=unused-variable]
struct
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 4:48 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65218.c: In function 'tps65218_gpio_request':
>
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 4:48 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65218.c: In function 'tps65218_gpio_request':
> drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65218.c:74:26: error: 'struct
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65218.c: In function 'tps65218_gpio_request':
drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65218.c:74:26: error: 'struct gpio_chip' has no member
named 'desc'
unsigned long flags =
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65218.c: In function 'tps65218_gpio_request':
drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65218.c:74:26: error: 'struct gpio_chip' has no member
named 'desc'
unsigned long flags =
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 3:16 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>> I have used the gpio tree from next-20160128 for today.
>
> I am still getting this error.
Sorry for slow attendance :(
Fixed it now, I hope.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 3:16 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>> I have used the gpio tree from next-20160128 for today.
>
> I am still getting this error.
Sorry for slow attendance :(
Fixed it now, I hope.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Hi Linus,
On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 12:45:57 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c: In function 'mpc8xxx_gpio_save_regs':
> drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c:57:21: error: implicit
Hi Linus,
On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 12:45:57 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c: In function 'mpc8xxx_gpio_save_regs':
>
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c: In function 'mpc8xxx_gpio_save_regs':
drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c:57:21: error: implicit declaration of function
'in_be32' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c: In function 'mpc8xxx_gpio_save_regs':
drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c:57:21: error: implicit declaration of function
'in_be32' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Hi Linus,
On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 00:58:34 +0100 Linus Walleij
wrote:
>
> Pushed now, I was waiting for the autobuilders to munch it first.
> Sorry for the delay :(
No worries, I have refetched it.
BTW, its good that the autobuilders have had a go at it :-)
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 10:08:58 +0100 Linus Walleij
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Robert Jarzmik
>> wrote:
>> > Stephen Rothwell writes:
>> >
>> >> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (lots without
>>
Hi Linus,
On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 10:08:58 +0100 Linus Walleij
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Robert Jarzmik
> wrote:
> > Stephen Rothwell writes:
> >
> >> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (lots without
> >> CONFIG_OF) failed like this:
> >>
> >>
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Stephen Rothwell writes:
>
>> Hi Linus,
>>
>> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (lots without
>> CONFIG_OF) failed like this:
>>
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-pxa.c: In function 'pxa_gpio_probe':
>>
Hi Linus,
On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 10:08:58 +0100 Linus Walleij
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Robert Jarzmik
> wrote:
> > Stephen Rothwell writes:
> >
> >> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next
Hi Linus,
On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 00:58:34 +0100 Linus Walleij
wrote:
>
> Pushed now, I was waiting for the autobuilders to munch it first.
> Sorry for the delay :(
No worries, I have refetched it.
BTW, its good that the autobuilders have had a go at it :-)
--
Cheers,
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 10:08:58 +0100 Linus Walleij
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Robert Jarzmik
>> wrote:
>> > Stephen Rothwell
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Stephen Rothwell writes:
>
>> Hi Linus,
>>
>> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (lots without
>> CONFIG_OF) failed like this:
>>
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-pxa.c: In function
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> Hi Linus,
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (lots without
> CONFIG_OF) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-pxa.c: In function 'pxa_gpio_probe':
> drivers/gpio/gpio-pxa.c:648:12: error: 'pxa_irq_domain_ops' undeclared (first
> use in this
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (lots without
CONFIG_OF) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-pxa.c: In function 'pxa_gpio_probe':
drivers/gpio/gpio-pxa.c:648:12: error: 'pxa_irq_domain_ops' undeclared (first
use in this function)
Caused by commit
384ca3c6a28d
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 14:37:55 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
>> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c: In
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (lots without
CONFIG_OF) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-pxa.c: In function 'pxa_gpio_probe':
drivers/gpio/gpio-pxa.c:648:12: error: 'pxa_irq_domain_ops' undeclared (first
use in this function)
Caused by commit
384ca3c6a28d
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 14:37:55 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
>> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>>
>>
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> Hi Linus,
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (lots without
> CONFIG_OF) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-pxa.c: In function 'pxa_gpio_probe':
> drivers/gpio/gpio-pxa.c:648:12: error: 'pxa_irq_domain_ops' undeclared
Hi Linus,
On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 14:37:55 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c: In function 'nsp_gpio_probe':
> drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c:699:4:
Hi Linus,
On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 14:37:55 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c: In function 'nsp_gpio_probe':
>
Wednesday, December 16, 2015 9:08 AM
To: Linus Walleij
Cc: linux-n...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Yendapally Reddy
Dhananjaya Reddy
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconf
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c: In function 'nsp_gpio_probe':
drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c:699:4: error: implicit declaration of
function 'set_irq_flags'
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c: In function 'nsp_gpio_probe':
drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c:699:4: error: implicit declaration of
function 'set_irq_flags'
Wednesday, December 16, 2015 9:08 AM
To: Linus Walleij
Cc: linux-n...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Yendapally Reddy
Dhananjaya Reddy
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconf
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/broonie/next/x86_64_allmodconfig'
/home/broonie/next/next/sound/soc/soc-ac97.c: In function
'snd_soc_ac97_init_gpio':
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/broonie/next/x86_64_allmodconfig'
/home/broonie/next/next/sound/soc/soc-ac97.c: In function
'snd_soc_ac97_init_gpio':
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-etraxfs.c: In function 'etraxfs_gpio_irq_request_resources':
> drivers/gpio/gpio-etraxfs.c:300:2: error: 'ret'
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-etraxfs.c: In function 'etraxfs_gpio_irq_request_resources':
drivers/gpio/gpio-etraxfs.c:300:2: error: 'ret' undeclared (first use in this
function)
ret =
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-etraxfs.c: In function 'etraxfs_gpio_irq_request_resources':
drivers/gpio/gpio-etraxfs.c:300:2: error: 'ret' undeclared (first use in this
function)
ret =
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-etraxfs.c: In function 'etraxfs_gpio_irq_request_resources':
>
Em Tue, 18 Aug 2015 14:23:26 +0200
Uwe Kleine-König escreveu:
> Hello Linus,
>
> I forgot to add you (and also Stephen) to Cc for my slightly different
> patch. You can find it at https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/30908/.
>
> I just sent you and Stephen a bounce if you want to comment.
My
Hello Linus,
I forgot to add you (and also Stephen) to Cc for my slightly different
patch. You can find it at https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/30908/.
I just sent you and Stephen a bounce if you want to comment.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/media/i2c/tc358743.c: In function 'tc358743_probe_of':
> drivers/media/i2c/tc358743.c:1786:22: error: too few
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/media/i2c/tc358743.c: In function 'tc358743_probe_of':
drivers/media/i2c/tc358743.c:1786:22: error: too few arguments to function
'devm_gpiod_get'
state->reset_gpio =
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/media/i2c/tc358743.c: In function 'tc358743_probe_of':
drivers/media/i2c/tc358743.c:1786:22: error: too few arguments to function
'devm_gpiod_get'
state-reset_gpio =
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/media/i2c/tc358743.c: In function 'tc358743_probe_of':
drivers/media/i2c/tc358743.c:1786:22: error:
Hello Linus,
I forgot to add you (and also Stephen) to Cc for my slightly different
patch. You can find it at https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/30908/.
I just sent you and Stephen a bounce if you want to comment.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe
Em Tue, 18 Aug 2015 14:23:26 +0200
Uwe Kleine-König u.kleine-koe...@pengutronix.de escreveu:
Hello Linus,
I forgot to add you (and also Stephen) to Cc for my slightly different
patch. You can find it at https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/30908/.
I just sent you and Stephen a bounce if
Hi Chanwoo,
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 09:19:12 +0900 Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On 08/13/2015 08:02 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Uwe,
> >
> > On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 22:16:42 +0200 Uwe Kleine-König
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 06:10:45PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell
Hi Stephen,
On 08/13/2015 08:02 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Uwe,
>
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 22:16:42 +0200 Uwe Kleine-König
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 06:10:45PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>>> allyesconfig)
Hi Uwe,
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 22:16:42 +0200 Uwe Kleine-König
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 06:10:45PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > allyesconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c:211:25: error:
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 06:10:45PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c:211:25: error: too few arguments to function
> 'devm_gpiod_get_optional'
>
Hi Uwe,
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 22:27:58 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 10:21:07 +0200 Uwe Kleine-König
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 06:10:45PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > >
Hi Uwe,
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 10:21:07 +0200 Uwe Kleine-König
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 06:10:45PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > allyesconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c:211:25: error:
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo