Hi Jan,
On (11/04/16 00:28), Jan Kara wrote:
[..]
> > I'm still not entirely sure if I want to split async pintk and printk
> > deadlock rework. these things want to come together, for a number of
> > reasons. or, at least, push the async printk before printk deadlock
> > rework.
>
> Yep, please
On Fri 04-11-16 03:01:31, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> fix a typo
>
> On (11/04/16 02:31), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> [..]
> > #4 console semaphore
> > discussion outcome:
> > we agreed that we can do better here and that it makes sense to do
> IOW, console
fix a typo
On (11/04/16 02:31), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
[..]
> #4 console semaphore
> discussion outcome:
> we agreed that we can do better here and that it makes sense to do
IOW, console semaphore thing
can be improv
[Cc linux-kernel]
Hello,
On (11/02/16 10:06), Joe Perches wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> Can you please post notes for whatever is proposed here somewhere?
we covered 4 topics:
#1 deadlocks and recursion in printk
discussion outcome:
I published an updated printk_safe patch last week (addresses re
4 matches
Mail list logo
