Re: status of kernel memory debugging?

> UML is still too strange for valgrind, despite progress on both sides > (valgrind accepting more strange things and UML becoming less > strange). > > I tried grinding UML a month or so ago, and its use of clone was a > sticking point. > I think I read your remark, yes. Thanks for the update; I

Re: status of kernel memory debugging?

On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 01:23:27PM +0200, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > Reading through some old LKML threads I see that there has been talk of > valgrinding a UML image, but the outcome appears inconclusive. Could someone > please update me on the status of memory debugging in the kernel,

Re: status of kernel memory debugging?

UML is still too strange for valgrind, despite progress on both sides (valgrind accepting more strange things and UML becoming less strange). I tried grinding UML a month or so ago, and its use of clone was a sticking point. I think I read your remark, yes. Thanks for the update; I hoped