Alan Cox writes:
> On Llu, 2005-01-17 at 14:29, Egbert Eich wrote:
> > OK, sounds promising. The changed Xserver pieces are in HEAD of the
> > X.Org tree. I'll see that I make the necessary adjustments to have
> > a soft detection if you can give me a version number of the kernel
> > which wi
On Llu, 2005-01-17 at 14:29, Egbert Eich wrote:
> OK, sounds promising. The changed Xserver pieces are in HEAD of the
> X.Org tree. I'll see that I make the necessary adjustments to have
> a soft detection if you can give me a version number of the kernel
> which will have the new features.
Send
Alan Cox writes:
> On Llu, 2005-01-17 at 09:07, Egbert Eich wrote:
> > Can you point me to these reports?
> > I tested with a couple chipsets here and didn't find any problems.
>
> I'll take a dig. The ones I've got are for 2.4 so relate to old code.
>
> > We could check for the kernel ver
On Llu, 2005-01-17 at 09:07, Egbert Eich wrote:
> Can you point me to these reports?
> I tested with a couple chipsets here and didn't find any problems.
I'll take a dig. The ones I've got are for 2.4 so relate to old code.
> We could check for the kernel version. This could be done during build
[Please leave me in Cc: as I'm not subscribed to this list]
Alan Cox writes:
> On Maw, 2005-01-11 at 14:28, Egbert Eich wrote:
> > I'm fully aware that in the long run we will need to look into a new
> > driver model for graphics where no two instances fight over who gets
> > register access.
5 matches
Mail list logo