Re: Linux 2.2 - BSD/OS 4.1 ARP incompatibility

2000-09-04 Thread Matthew Kirkwood
On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Alan Cox wrote: I see the point, but it bites sufficiently often that I don't understand why there is no interesting in improving this behaviour. For a large number of scenarios it makes vastly more sense. Please forgive my obtuseness, but I am unable to conceive of

Re: Linux 2.2 - BSD/OS 4.1 ARP incompatibility

2000-09-04 Thread Andi Kleen
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 10:57:44AM +0100, Matthew Kirkwood wrote: With both interfaces up, it's impossible to apply anti-martian rules to the interfaces, since it's hard to predict which card will answer an ARP request. /proc/sys/net/ipv4/.../hidden So when lightning fries the

Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz

2000-09-04 Thread Werner Almesberger
Philipp Rumpf wrote: isn't that what the version string (/proc/version at runtime, start_sys in the bzImage) is for ? Hmm yes, that should be good enough. Most architectures can boot ELF images -- defining section names for .config.gz and the version string in the ELF file can be done in an

Re: iptables-1.1.1 and test7

2000-09-04 Thread Rusty Russell
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write: Hey, I've been trying to get iptables to compile and run with kernel 2.4.0-test7 with absolutly no luck. I have tried patching it with both the patch that comes with the iptables-1.1.1.tar.bz2 and the patches on CVS. Could someone tell me which

Hangup: Promise ATA100 (PDC20267) and Quantum disk

2000-09-04 Thread Lars Knudsen
Hi, I have have serious problems using a specific Quantum disk connected to a Promise ATA/100 controller. The disk causing problems is the QUANTUM FIREBALLlct10 30. The disk simply locks up the machine solid during boot at the point where it should report its IRQ (normally 'ide2 at

Re: Suggestion for laptop suspension

2000-09-04 Thread Richard Stallman
Filling memory to zero does not help for my laptop. Perhaps it is weird. But this particular obscure model of laptop is not important. The thing is to handle most laptops, to make suspending faster for most users, and to build it in by default so that it works "out of the box" on most

Re: Long uptime (~1 yr) = broken load averages (2.2.12)

2000-09-04 Thread Jorge Nerin
Neal H Walfield wrote: Hello, I am running Linux 2.2.12: neal@colo:~$ cat /proc/version Linux version 2.2.12 (root@gondor) (gcc version 2.95.1 19990816 (release)) #1 Sun Sep 12 00:22:57 EST 1999 Starting twelve days ago the load average has increased by one every twenty-four hours.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Withdrawl of Open Source NDS Project/NTFS/M2FS forLinux

2000-09-04 Thread David Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I'm sure that once the FSF is willing to step up, there will be lots of supporters and sponsors to finance this. Far smaller companies have _already_ got away with not only violating the Linux kernel's GPL, but blatantly encouraging their customers to do so. Why

Re: test7: kernel BUG at /usr/src/linux/include/linux/nfs_fs.h:164!

2000-09-04 Thread David Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: nfs_file_cred() - nfs_create_request() - nfs_update_request() - nfs_updatepage() - nfs_commit_write() - generic_file_write() - nfs_file_write() - write(2). Fscked credentials during write(2) on NFS... Is this known and fixed, or just known? -- dwmw2 - To

[RAPIDLY MOVING OFF-TOPIC] GPL and binary only drivers [once again] [was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Withdrawl of Open Source NDS Project/NTFS/M2FS forLinux]

2000-09-04 Thread Henning P . Schmiedehausen
Hi, On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 12:18:10PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I'm sure that once the FSF is willing to step up, there will be lots of supporters and sponsors to finance this. Far smaller companies have _already_ got away with not only violating the

Re: zero-copy TCP

2000-09-04 Thread Jamie Lokier
Alan Cox wrote: struct page of course). Note that it doesn't matter if another thread, and this includes truncate/write in another thread, clobbers the page data. That's just the normal effect of two concurrent writers to the same memory. Oh it does matter. You might send out a page

Re: Linux 2.2 - BSD/OS 4.1 ARP incompatibility

2000-09-04 Thread Alan Cox
Please forgive my obtuseness, but I am unable to conceive of one (beyond checking that your routing is symmetrical :-) Multiple virtual hosts, routing for tunnels - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Withdrawl of Open Source NDS Project/NTFS/M2FS forLinux

2000-09-04 Thread Alan Cox
Far smaller companies have _already_ got away with not only violating the Linux kernel's GPL, but blatantly encouraging their customers to do so. Wakey wakey. Unless I am misreading this Andre gave/sold them code he wrote all of for task file. Why should we believe that anyone's actually

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Withdrawl of Open Source NDS Project/NTFS/M2FS forLinux

2000-09-04 Thread Thomas Kraetzig
Dear David, Dear GPL defenders, As former engineering manager at IGEL I woud like to give you some additional information to the situation as far as IGEL is concerned. The German former company IGEL GmbH does not exist any more and belongs now to Infomatec AG (http://www.infomatec.de).

Re: Linux 2.2 - BSD/OS 4.1 ARP incompatibility

2000-09-04 Thread David Luyer
(Alan Cox) (Matt Kirkwood) Please forgive my obtuseness, but I am unable to conceive of one (beyond checking that your routing is symmetrical :-) Multiple virtual hosts, routing for tunnels And how is this in any way broken by arp-ing from the first interface address (in terms of

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Withdrawl of Open Source NDS Project/NTFS/M2FS forLinux

2000-09-04 Thread Alan Cox
Unfortunately we can't do much about M-System's low level code because we are bound by the NDA. We have a good relationship to M-Systems. Perhaps we can convince them to publish their code as well, but I can't promise that. That side has been dealt with actually. (drivers/mtp/doc2000.c) /*

[bug] test8-preX crashes X on APM resume Re: [Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details]

2000-09-04 Thread David Ford
Alan Cox wrote: My server is in the tested/good list w/ orbs. Aren't you following your own advice about properly setting up your MTA to allow good guys and stop bad guys in accord with ORBS DNS? I get too much junk to care about it. Alan How are we supposed to properly contact

Re: Long uptime (~1 yr) = broken load averages (2.2.12)

2000-09-04 Thread Rogier Wolff
Neal H Walfield wrote: On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 10:34:39AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does a top show you any processes running heavy on the box No, it is 99% idle. ps -auxww |grep D will show you several (12) processes stuck in "D" state. Which those are provides a

Re: zero-copy TCP

2000-09-04 Thread Jamie Lokier
Linus Torvalds wrote: (The "invalidate on write" is the sane way of doing SMP cache coherency, which is probably why. Trying to have shared dirty cache-lines is just not a viable option in the end). With DMA from a device -- "snoop and update" still results in only one owner of the dirty

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Withdrawl of Open Source NDS Project/NTFS/M2FS forLinux

2000-09-04 Thread Al
That's B.S. The GPL is a Copyright license; it applies whether or not it is in the kernel. Microsoft (or anyone else for that matter) can't take your code and use it without consent. The GPL is one way of giving consent, with certain strings attached. But they can take the ideas and methods

Re: thread rant

2000-09-04 Thread Stephen C. Tweedie
Hi, On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 09:41:03PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Alexander Viro wrote: unlink() and the last munmap()/exit() will get rid of it... yep - and this isnt possible with traditional SysV shared memory, and isnt possible with traditional SysV semaphores.

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Withdrawl of Open Source NDS Project/NTFS/M2FS forLinux

2000-09-04 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
But they can take the ideas and methods demonstrated by the code in the patch. Its not that they are going to take what he wrote and run patch against their code. They can take a good idea, sit a skilled programmer in a room and adapt the concepts without a bit of a problem. I call this a

Re: zero-copy TCP

2000-09-04 Thread Jes Sorensen
"Richard" == Richard Gooch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Richard Andrew Morton writes: All of them except the 3c905 provide hardware Rx and Tx checksumming of IP, TCP and UDP headers. No 64 bit addressing support. Richard And does the driver support it? Has anyone benchmarked the Richard

Re: zero-copy TCP

2000-09-04 Thread Jes Sorensen
"Ingo" == Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ingo On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Andi Kleen wrote: I did the same for fragment RX some months ago (simple fragment lists that were copy-checksummed to user space). Overall it is probably better to use a kiovec, because that can be more easily used in

Re: zero-copy TCP

2000-09-04 Thread Jes Sorensen
"Jamie" == Jamie Lokier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jamie Nice point! Only valid for TCP UDP though. Jamie When people want _real_ low latency, they don't use TCP or UDP, Jamie and they certainly don't put data checksums at the start. They Jamie still aim for zero copies. That pass, even

Re: Suggestion for laptop suspension

2000-09-04 Thread Richard Gooch
Richard Stallman writes: Filling memory to zero does not help for my laptop. Perhaps it is weird. But this particular obscure model of laptop is not important. The thing is to handle most laptops, to make suspending faster for most users, and to build it in by default so that it works

Re: zero-copy TCP

2000-09-04 Thread Richard Gooch
Jes Sorensen writes: "Richard" == Richard Gooch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Richard Andrew Morton writes: All of them except the 3c905 provide hardware Rx and Tx checksumming of IP, TCP and UDP headers. No 64 bit addressing support. Richard And does the driver support it? Has anyone

Re: test8-pre2 fs corruption?

2000-09-04 Thread Rik van Riel
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Paul Jakma wrote: On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Thomas Molina wrote: Odd. I started seeing mailbox corruption the day before the first post showed up here. Since it was only one list (BUGTRAQ) and I'm still at weird. currently my pine crashes on me when i close my bugtraq

Re: zero-copy TCP

2000-09-04 Thread Stephen C. Tweedie
Hi, On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 07:29:56PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Andi Kleen wrote: I did the same for fragment RX some months ago (simple fragment lists that were copy-checksummed to user space). Overall it is probably better to use a kiovec, because that can be

Re: [RFC] my current kernel todo list

2000-09-04 Thread David Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: - convert drivers to new PCI API Don't bother with drivers/char/applicom.c - I've already done it, just waiting to borrow the hardware again to test it. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to

Re: [RFC] my current kernel todo list

2000-09-04 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 04:52:59PM +0100, David Woodhouse escreveu: [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: - convert drivers to new PCI API Don't bother with drivers/char/applicom.c - I've already done it, just waiting to borrow the hardware again to test it. Ok, up to now I've only did this for

Re: Suggestion for laptop suspension

2000-09-04 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! Filling memory to zero does not help for my laptop. Perhaps it is weird. But this particular obscure model of laptop is not important. The thing is to handle most laptops, to make suspending faster for most users, and to build it in by default so that it works "out of the box" on

Re: test8-pre2 fs corruption?

2000-09-04 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Rik van Riel wrote: On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Paul Jakma wrote: On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Thomas Molina wrote: Odd. I started seeing mailbox corruption the day before the first post showed up here. Since it was only one list (BUGTRAQ) and I'm still at weird. currently my

Re: Large File support and blocks.

2000-09-04 Thread Rik van Riel
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote: On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 09:16:23AM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote: With all the talk about bugs and slowness on a 386/486/586 -- does anyone think those platforms will have multi-T disks hooked up to them? Yes. They are already doing it, and the

Re: www.crucial.com won't talk to 2.4.0-test7 system

2000-09-04 Thread Adam
does anyone has so far came out with a standard "form"/letter I can just forward to offending site? It seems another "guilty" site is www.borland.com, while I would like to let them know, I not too eager nor have time right now to come up with a well written rational letter explaining the

Re: NWFS [PATCH] File organization 2.2.18 and 2.4.0-7

2000-09-04 Thread Christoph Hellwig
"Jeff V. Merkey" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I at present have the NWFS utilities and File System drivers as single source base. Obviously, the way your tree is organized, the file system driver proper should be in the kernel tree and the file system utitilies somewhere else. Yes. Where

Re: [RFC] my current kernel todo list

2000-09-04 Thread Tigran Aivazian
On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: now the driver init sequence is not serialized anymore, so races are possible since when? In 2.4.0-test8-pre2 mod-init and mod-cleanup are called under global kernel lock. As for static drivers they are initialised from either

Re: test8-pre2 fs corruption?

2000-09-04 Thread Alexander Viro
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: showed up here. Since it was only one list (BUGTRAQ) and I'm still at weird. currently my pine crashes on me when i close my bugtraq folder. Ohh, so I'm not the only one having trouble reading bugtraq lately? ;) I'm

Re: test8-pre2 fs corruption?

2000-09-04 Thread Meelis Roos
RvR Ohh, so I'm not the only one having trouble reading bugtraq RvR lately? ;) Yep. And to make things even more (or less?) confusing: it's happening to me too but on _SOLARIS_, not Linux!!! I'm just now checking my mailbox for a offending letter as I suspect a pine bug. mutt is fine. --

Allocating my own skbuff data

2000-09-04 Thread Adrian Cox
I'm working on network drivers emulating ethernet over a PCI backplane. For receives I need packet data located in a region of memory visible to the backplane. I also want this data to be referenced by an skb, without the expense of an extra memcpy. This region of memory will be somewhere between

Re: test8-pre2 fs corruption?

2000-09-04 Thread Matthew Kirkwood
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: Odd. I started seeing mailbox corruption the day before the first post showed up here. Since it was only one list (BUGTRAQ) and I'm still at weird. currently my pine crashes on me when i close my bugtraq folder. Ohh, so

Re: why am i seeing a ~60-second network connection delay with 2.4.0test*?

2000-09-04 Thread John Kennedy
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 08:04:49AM +0200, Martin MaD Douda wrote: I'm using 2.4-test since it was born and never saw this behavior. Could you please strace and ltrace your ping so we can see where it waits? Can't find source for ltrace, but I have strace. Ping seems to be spending its

Re: zero-copy TCP

2000-09-04 Thread Jes Sorensen
"Richard" == Richard Gooch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Richard I thought you said some of the GigE drivers supported this? Richard Or were you just saying that the GigE cards were some of the Richard few which supported scatter/gather DMA and IP checksumming? The latter. Jes - To unsubscribe

Re: zero-copy TCP

2000-09-04 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Jamie Lokier wrote: Linus Torvalds wrote: Basically any copy = 4 cache lines is "free" compared to trying to be clever. We're obviously interested in larger packets than 128 bytes. "obviously"? Take a look at some common traffic. Yes, even in servers. Small

Two VM problems for the 2.4 TODO list

2000-09-04 Thread Stephen C. Tweedie
Hi Ted, To be fixed for 2.4: 1) Non-atomic pte updates The page aging code and mprotect both modify existing ptes non-atomically. That can stomp on the VM hardware on other CPUs setting the dirty bit on mmaped pages when using threads. 2.2 is vulnerable too. 2) RSS locking

Re: [RFC] my current kernel todo list

2000-09-04 Thread Tigran Aivazian
Hi Arnaldo, That is a very decent list you have got there. How about to add to it: - go through all filesystems and convert them from using mark_buffer_dirty(bh, [0,1]) to just mark_buffer_dirty(bh) since the flag is now ignored and all buffers are flushed at equal intervals. Also, change the

Re: stallion.c patch for devfs

2000-09-04 Thread Richard Gooch
Russell Coker writes: I made the following patch for the stallion non-intelligent driver based on cut/paste from serial.c. I have tested it and it works, the directories /dev/tte and /dev/cue are correctly created when the module is inserted. Could this please be put in to 2.4.0-test8?

Re: Linux 2.2 - BSD/OS 4.1 ARP incompatibility

2000-09-04 Thread David Luyer
just try "traceroute -s 111.111.111.111 d.e.f.2" What shows this simple test? arp who-has d.e.f.2 tell a.b.c.1 or arp who-has d.e.f.2 tell d.e.f.1 When I tried traceroute -s d.e.f.1 d.e.f.2, it worked, the first time the Linux box in question talked to the BSD/OS in

Re: test8-pre2 fs corruption?

2000-09-04 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Thanks! I really should read every single letter on BUGTRAQ, not on linux-kernel ;) On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Thomas Molina wrote: Readers of BUGTRAQ probably have already seen the message indicating some of us have been seeing library problems, not fs corruption. At least those of us with

Re: [RAPIDLY MOVING OFF-TOPIC] GPL and binary only drivers [onceagain] [was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Withdrawl of Open Source NDS Project/NTFS/M2FSforLinux]

2000-09-04 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Henning P . Schmiedehausen wrote: [snip] If I give you a binary-only module which can either be loaded as a driver or, maybe with some glue code, linked into the kernel and some instructions how to do this, I am _not_at_all_ in violation of any GPL. Because I distribute

Re: [RFC] my current kernel todo list

2000-09-04 Thread Alexander Viro
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote: Hi Arnaldo, That is a very decent list you have got there. How about to add to it: - go through all filesystems and convert them from using mark_buffer_dirty(bh, [0,1]) to just mark_buffer_dirty(bh) since the flag is now ignored and all

Re: [RFC] my current kernel todo list

2000-09-04 Thread Tigran Aivazian
Alexander, I did think of automating it but seeing fat (I am sure you saw it as well) made me think that it is safer to do it by hand. for fat, it is not the second argument but the first from the end (it has three), so your macro approach is somewhat broken. Actually, kernel is such a critical

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Withdrawl of Open Source NDS Project/NTFS/M2FS forLinux

2000-09-04 Thread Andre Hedrick
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Mark Hahn wrote: You and several others know that I stink at describing a complex point regardless that I understand it completely. I am just glad that you hung in there long enough for me to get the point across. Andre, as far as I can tell, this "complex point" is

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Withdrawl of Open Source NDS Project/NTFS/M2FS forLinux

2000-09-04 Thread Andre Hedrick
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: Andre wrote: Linux rejected the code because it does not understand nor does anyone have the desire to learn what it does. Since it is not in the kernel there is no GPL issue. Upon Microsoft's adpotion of the model they will That's B.S.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Withdrawl of Open Source NDS Project/NTFS/M2FS forLinux

2000-09-04 Thread Andre Hedrick
On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Alan Cox wrote: This it will have to wait for 2.5, but everyone needs to get off the issue that it is a filter and understand that it is a command completion pre-handler. I hope that you finally understand the point and we do not have to fight again, next will be to

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Withdrawl of Open Source NDS Project/NTFS/M2FS forLinux

2000-09-04 Thread Andre Hedrick
On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Alan Cox wrote: Linux rejected the code because it does not understand nor does anyone have the desire to learn what it does. Since it is not in the kernel there is no GPL issue. Upon Microsoft's adpotion of the model they will If its your code there isnt anyway.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Withdrawl of Open Source NDS Project/NTFS/M2FS forLinux

2000-09-04 Thread Michael H. Warfield
Andre, On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 10:30:13PM -0700, Andre Hedrick wrote: [...] WOOHOO, you remember Way to go Alan You and several others know that I stink at describing a complex point regardless that I understand it completely. I am just glad that you hung in there long

Re: [RFC] my current kernel todo list

2000-09-04 Thread Tigran Aivazian
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Alexander Viro wrote: Erm... You do realize that "by hands" is "by editor commands", don't you? Notice that it is not a global search and replace - you see the instance, you decide whether to change it with the long sequence of editor commands or with the short one. Yes,

Re: stallion.c patch for devfs - fixed version checking

2000-09-04 Thread Russell Coker
On Mon, 04 Sep 2000, Richard Gooch wrote: Russell Coker writes: I made the following patch for the stallion non-intelligent driver based on cut/paste from serial.c. I have tested it and it works, the directories /dev/tte and /dev/cue are correctly created when the module is inserted. Could

Re: stallion.c patch for devfs - fixed version checking

2000-09-04 Thread Richard Gooch
Russell Coker writes: --Boundary-=_nWlrBbmQBhCDarzOwKkYHIDdqSCD Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Yuk! MIME! On Mon, 04 Sep 2000, Richard Gooch wrote: That sounds logical, I have attached a patch that does that change and changes serial.c (the code I copied from)

eepro driver broke in 2.2.16... (at least for me!)

2000-09-04 Thread hayward
Hello, I just upgraded to the 2.2.16 kernel (from 2.2.14) and compiled a new kernel. I immediately started having problems with my eepro/10 card. It would run for a short period of time, then die on me. If I reloaded the module, it would run for a short period of time then die again. My

Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating Rik's VMnow?

2000-09-04 Thread Chris Mason
On 9/3/00, 3:20:01 AM, Alexander Viro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote regarding Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating Rik's VM now?: On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: Not at all. In fact, I'd prefer it that way, because this same thing is obviously going to be useful

Linux 2.2.17

2000-09-04 Thread Alan Cox
Ok Linux 2.2.17 official is now out. This is the same as 2.2.17pre20 without the -pre20 id string This is the version waiting Linus. Its in the queue for holy penguin pee so either it will get peed on or I will get abuse from Linus depending whether he likes it or not 8) In the mean time I'm

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Withdrawl of Open Source NDS Project/NTFS/M2FS forLinux

2000-09-04 Thread Mike A. Harris
On 4 Sep 2000, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: I am sorry to here of this, but I know what you mean about microsoft. My and co-worker's code for doing full taskfile access under linux was rejected here but is being used in MicroSoft Whistler 2001. They are quick to grab the very best of

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Withdrawl of Open Source NDS Project/NTFS/M2FS forLinux

2000-09-04 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Al wrote: it is in the kernel. Microsoft (or anyone else for that matter) can't take your code and use it without consent. The GPL is one way of giving consent, with certain strings attached. But they can take the ideas and methods demonstrated by the code in the patch.

[SEMI-OT] ReiserFS devel mailing list?

2000-09-04 Thread Mike A. Harris
Anyone out there know how to get on the reiserFS devel mailing list? I was on the namesys pages, but they have wonderful microsoft code on them or java or something so that you can't actually _use_ their mailing list subscription thing if you don't run java or whatever. Certainly doesn't work

[RFC] [Patch] Sony APM battery status fix

2000-09-04 Thread Dave Zarzycki
The following change to the apm_get_power_status function makes my Sony Vaio SR7K report sane battery life expectations. From surfing the web, I believe this problem happens on other recent Sony laptops (outside of the SR series). I'm thinking about making this fix run-time selectable via a

Re: Linux 2.2 - BSD/OS 4.1 ARP incompatibility

2000-09-04 Thread Ricky Beam
(OK, I've read enough of this crap.) On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, David Luyer wrote: I'm seeing a problem between Linux 2.2 and BSD/OS 4.1 in the situation on one of our backbones. Why is it the people placed in charge of networks usually have no clue how they work? (don't answer that.) [broken

Multiple test_if_zero

2000-09-04 Thread Philipp Matthias Hahn
Hello! Just a note: The patch to test8-pre3 contains 2 definitions of a function to test is a memory-block is zero: fs/buffer.c: int mem_is_zero(char *p, unsigned len) fs/ext2/inode.c: static inline int all_zeroes(u32 *p, u32 *q) driver/usb/hid.c: static __inline__ int search(__s32 *array,

UPDATE: [Re: eepro driver broke in 2.2.16... (at least for me!)]

2000-09-04 Thread hayward
I just downloaded the 2.2.17 kernel. This problem seems to be resolved in that version of the eepro driver. Thanks for the new kernel, Alan, Brian Hayward On Mon, 4 Sep 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I just upgraded to the 2.2.16 kernel (from 2.2.14) and compiled a new kernel. I

Re: What the Heck? [Fwd: Returned mail: User unknown]

2000-09-04 Thread Ricky Beam
On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Horst von Brand wrote: "Albert D. Cahalan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: The rr.com service is expanding across the US. It is a cable service recently bought by ATT. It serves areas without ISDN or DSL, so the only alternative is a POTS modem. The rr.com service is much cheaper

Re: why am i seeing a ~60-second network connection delay with2.4.0test*?

2000-09-04 Thread Ricky Beam
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, John Kennedy wrote: Ping seems to be spending its time in a sendto()/poll() loop: sendto(3, "U\3Z\241\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\2\0\1\206\240\0\0\0\2\0\0\0\3\0"..., 56, 0, {sin_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(111), sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}}, 16) = 56 poll([{fd=3,

Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz

2000-09-04 Thread Philipp Rumpf
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 12:24:02PM +0200, Werner Almesberger wrote: Philipp Rumpf wrote: Most architectures can boot ELF images -- defining section names for .config.gz and the version string in the ELF file can be done in an architecture-independent fashion. Yep, then add some magic

Should O_NONBLOCK be copied from listening socket to accepting socket?

2000-09-04 Thread Michael Shields
Is it required that the O_NONBLOCK flag be copied from a listening socket to an accepted socket? Dan Bernstein believes this is a bug. Pavel Kankovsky writes: What happens when x-tcpstate == 1 (i.e. waiting for the first byte of TCP request length), x-io-revents == 0 (i.e. not ready for

Problems with Athlon

2000-09-04 Thread Imrich Vrabel
Hi, I would have liked to install RH 6.2 on the Athlon (700MHz) computer. The installation from local CD was very easy, however, after reboot I received some error messages. My questions are: 1. What exctly does a "Disabling CPUID Serial Number ... general protection fault: 000" mean?

[patch] Updated affs to use new mark_buffers_dirty interface

2000-09-04 Thread Rasmus Andersen
Hi. (I hope you are the code maintainer for affs. Your name is in the affs files.) I have changed the interface to mark_buffer_dirty (as per Tigran Aivazian's suggestion). This impacts affs as per the following patch. diff -u --recursive -X misc/dontdiff linux-240test8-pre2/fs/affs/amigaffs.c

[patch] Updated bfs to use new mark_buffers_dirty interface

2000-09-04 Thread Rasmus Andersen
Hi. I have changed the interface to mark_buffer_dirty (as per your suggestion to Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo). This impacts bfs as per the following patch. diff -u --recursive -X misc/dontdiff linux-240test8-pre2/fs/bfs/dir.c linux/fs/bfs/dir.c --- linux-240test8-pre2/fs/bfs/dir.cThu Aug 24

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Withdrawl of Open Source NDS Project/NTFS/M2FS forLinux

2000-09-04 Thread Andre Hedrick
Hans, We talked at LWE '99 about this issue. As you can see that this is getting to be a bigger mess as I predicted more than a year ago. As you explained to me that IGEL had verbal terms of agreement that the code returned to M-Systems was returned with a GPL license in it placed by IGEL.

[patch] Updated hpfs to use new mark_buffers_dirty interface

2000-09-04 Thread Rasmus Andersen
Hi. I have changed the interface to mark_buffer_dirty (as per Tigran Aivazian's suggestion). This impacts hpfs as per the following patch. diff -u --recursive -X misc/dontdiff linux-240test8-pre2/fs/hpfs/anode.c linux/fs/hpfs/anode.c --- linux-240test8-pre2/fs/hpfs/anode.c Tue Oct 19 22:52:52

Re: [PATCH] 2.2.18pre2: AGP and the i810

2000-09-04 Thread Alan Cox
You need it for some new video cards (for example those cheap intel i810 boards that are becoming extremely common). I got my i810 to work on Debian (kernel 2.0.34) without agpgart by setting a switch in the driver code. That limits you to 1Mb of video ram I believe - To unsubscribe

Re: Hangup: Promise ATA100 (PDC20267) and Quantum disk

2000-09-04 Thread Andre Hedrick
"QUANTUM FIREBALLlct10 30" Just add this ti the pdc_quirks_list and see if it fixes the problem. It is an nIEN problem. Cheers, On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Lars Knudsen wrote: Hi, I have have serious problems using a specific Quantum disk connected to a Promise ATA/100 controller. The disk

Re: What the Heck? [Fwd: Returned mail: User unknown]

2000-09-04 Thread Jes Sorensen
"Ricky" == Ricky Beam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ricky On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Horst von Brand wrote: Much more of a reason to get them to clean up their act! Ricky Excuse me? How the hell do you expect them to "clean up their Ricky act" when their "dialup" users are the problem? Are you gonna

[OFFTOPIC] Re: What the Heck? [Fwd: Returned mail: User unknown]

2000-09-04 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Alan Cox wrote: Then they need more competant admins. It isnt _hard_ to transproxy outgoing smtp traffic via a spamtrapper that checks for valid src/destination and headers. I can't believe that you are suggesting this. The moment you being to start encouraging

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Withdrawl of Open Source NDS Project/NTFS/M2FS forLinux

2000-09-04 Thread Rik van Riel
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote: I was under the understanding a "patch" to something GPL, means the "patch" is also GPL. If the patch was not GPL, and it patches GPL code, then it itself is in violation of the GPL. The fact that the patch is a "derivative work" of the original

Re: [patch] Updated ext2 to use new mark_buffers_dirty interface

2000-09-04 Thread Alexander Viro
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Rasmus Andersen wrote: Hi. (I think I have seen you name mentioned as (co-)maintainer of ext2. Hence this mail.) I have changed the interface to mark_buffer_dirty (as per Tigran Aivazian's suggestion). This impacts ext2 as per the following patch. Umm... Since

[patch] All the fs patches resulting from updating mark_buffer_dirty

2000-09-04 Thread Rasmus Andersen
Hi. I have changed the interface to mark_buffer_dirty (as per Tigran Aivazian's suggestion). This impacts a lot of places in the kernel (trivially), noticeably the file systems. The URL below points a big patch for all these changes. (I have been advised against the fine granularity of the

Re: [patch] Updated bfs to use new mark_buffers_dirty interface

2000-09-04 Thread Tigran Aivazian
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Rasmus Andersen wrote: Hi. I have changed the interface to mark_buffer_dirty (as per your suggestion to Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo). This impacts bfs as per the following patch. Rasmus, thanks of course, but this idea _only_ makes sense if you produce a big patch that

Re: [patch] Updated ext2 to use new mark_buffers_dirty interface

2000-09-04 Thread Tigran Aivazian
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Rasmus Andersen wrote: Hi. (I think I have seen you name mentioned as (co-)maintainer of ext2. Hence this mail.) I have changed the interface to mark_buffer_dirty (as per Tigran Aivazian's suggestion). This impacts ext2 as per the following patch. Lest Stephen

Re: GPL violations: make it harder

2000-09-04 Thread Elmer Joandi
Andre Hedrick wrote: There is overproduction of generic-purpose software in world and of course lots of companies are going to bancrupt soon, but if you continue this way, GPL is going the same way... Do not follow the thought, sorry. The Novell stuff. Sorry to say, but who needs it in

Re: Should O_NONBLOCK be copied from listening socket to acceptingsocket?

2000-09-04 Thread Chris Evans
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Alan Cox wrote: Is it required that the O_NONBLOCK flag be copied from a listening socket to an accepted socket? Dan Bernstein believes this is a bug. My posix 1003.1g draft leaves it undefined. It is possible that SuS clarifies this. Unless he can cite a SuS

Re: [bug] test8-preX crashes X on APM resume Re: [Fwd: Returnedmail: see transcript for details]

2000-09-04 Thread Mo McKinlay
On a side note, is there anyone/anyplace willing to allow relaying for my server? One by one all the networks around here are falling under the ORBS netblock blacklist and I'm not going to go through any more expense for myself, company, or LUG when we are perfectly legitimate,

Re: [patch] All the fs patches resulting from updating mark_buffer_dirty

2000-09-04 Thread Stephen C. Tweedie
Hi, On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 11:29:56PM +0200, Rasmus Andersen wrote: I have changed the interface to mark_buffer_dirty (as per Tigran Aivazian's suggestion). This impacts a lot of places in the kernel (trivially), noticeably the file systems. The URL below points a big patch for all

test8-pre4: Ooops at boot time

2000-09-04 Thread Harald Dunkel
Hi folks, as written earlier, I have several problems at boot time. This is the output of 'dmesg | ksymoops': ksymoops 2.3.4 on i586 2.4.0-test8. Options used -V (default) -k /proc/ksyms (default) -l /proc/modules (default) -o /lib/modules/2.4.0-test8/ (default) -m

[unpatch] ide cd-audio broken in 2.2.17preN (N = 2)

2000-09-04 Thread Nathan Myers
The IDE CD audio driver is broken in the 2.2.17pre series, since 2.2.17pre2. I have attached below the patch fragment that causes the problem, and the console error messages that appear. Backing out the one change fixes CD audio playback in 2.2.17pre20, on this machine. This is on an

Re: zero-copy TCP

2000-09-04 Thread Dan Kegel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Few month ago, I gathered precice data and posted it on lk-ml. In our experiment, I used four 100Base cards, the Web-Bench gained nearly 5% performance by the patch. The CPU load reached over 95%. I want to show the reference to experiments results, But

Re: [unpatch] ide cd-audio broken in 2.2.17preN (N = 2)

2000-09-04 Thread Jens Axboe
On Mon, Sep 04 2000, Nathan Myers wrote: The IDE CD audio driver is broken in the 2.2.17pre series, since 2.2.17pre2. I have attached below the patch fragment that causes the problem, and the console error messages that appear. Backing out the one change fixes CD audio playback in

Re: Large File support and blocks.

2000-09-04 Thread Albert D. Cahalan
Rik van Riel writes: On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote: On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 09:16:23AM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote: With all the talk about bugs and slowness on a 386/486/586 -- does anyone think those platforms will have multi-T disks hooked up to them? Note: no "686"

Re: Large File support and blocks.

2000-09-04 Thread Alan Cox
Ugh... yes, but not with an 80386, i486, Pentium, Pentium-MMX, 5x86, Crusoe, WinChip, K6, K6-2, or 6x86. Also not with XT disks or anything off the EISA, VLB, and MCA busses. Lots of people are building terabyte sized arrays on K6 type boxes. A PII or Athlon is just overkill for the job Alan

Re: [PATCH] 2.4.0-test7 to Enable Variable Block Chaining

2000-09-04 Thread Neil Brown
On Saturday September 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Linus, The attached patch is submitted to enable variable sector size block chaining via ll_rw_block() in the I/O subsystem layer. Jeff904a905,907 / // This code is being commented out to allow support for variable chained //

Re: NFS client option to force 16-bit ugid.

2000-09-04 Thread Michael Eisler
My home directory lives on a SunOS 4.1.4 server, which helpfully expands 16-bit UIDs to 32 bits as signed quantities, not unsigned. So any uid above 32768 gets 0x added to it. Doesn't http://sunsolve.Sun.COM/pub-cgi/retrieve.pl?type=0doc=fpatches/102394 fix this on the 4.1.4

<    1   2   3   4   >