Re: Oops with 4GB memory setting in 2.4.0 stable

2001-01-16 Thread Urban Widmark
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Rainer Mager wrote: Hi all, I have a 100% reproducable bug in all of the 2.4.0 kernels including the latest stable one. The issue is that if I compile the kernel to support 4GB RAM (I have 1 GB) and then try to access a samba mount I get an oops. This I'll have a

Re: Bug in swapfs (2.4.0-ac9)

2001-01-16 Thread Christoph Rohland
Hi Gregor, On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Gregor Jasny wrote: I think I've found a bug in swapfs: fstab: swapfs /dev/shmswapfs defaults 0 0 swapfs /tmpswapfs defaults 0 0 When I hit enter on a tar.gz file in Midnight Commander nothing happens. If I do a umonut /tmp

Re: [linux-lvm] Re: *** ANNOUNCEMENT *** LVM 0.9.1 beta1 available at www.sistina.com

2001-01-16 Thread Patrick Caulfield
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 05:06:16PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 06:43:23PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote: Anton, you write: Have a look at 2.4, arch/sparc64/kernel/ioctl32.c Yuk. Would it be possible to clean up the ioctl interface so we dont need such

2.4.0-ac6, 'rm' stalls in wait_on_buffer

2001-01-16 Thread David Ford
Has this issue been addressed? When I delete something large..say a mozilla cvs tree, rm will stall for about 10-30 seconds every few minutes in wait_on_buffer. It's an IDE drive, nothing fancy on the system, it's a standard pII w/ 256 megs, about 50megs free. 'sync' also stalls similarly.

Re: [patch] sendpath() support, 2.4.0-test3/-ac9

2001-01-16 Thread Ingo Molnar
On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, dean gaudet wrote: just for kicks i've implemented sendpath() support. _syscall4 (int, sendpath, int, out_fd, char *, path, off_t *, off, size_t, size) hey so how do you implement transmit timeouts with sendpath() ? (i.e. drop the client after 30 seconds of no

Re: 2.4.0 bug: file /proc/dri 4 times in ls listing

2001-01-16 Thread Tigran Aivazian
Hi Bobo, To fix this just link in only the support that corresponds to your hardware. The design of dri is such that (one could paraphrase) each driver-specific part includes its own copy of what should be "driver-independent shared dri_core engine" (e.g. proc handling stuff). Fixing this

Re: a linux qos mailing list

2001-01-16 Thread bert hubert
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 07:24:42PM -0500, J.D. Hollis wrote: Is there a linux qos mailing list? 2 of them. There is the diffserv list, [EMAIL PROTECTED] should find it, and for more general questions on advanced routing traffic control, see http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing, which mentions the LARTC

Re: 2.4.0 bug: file /proc/dri 4 times in ls listing

2001-01-16 Thread Tigran Aivazian
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Tigran Aivazian wrote: Fixing this requires either a new filesystem type (drifs) or (simpler!) redesigning dri to separate common things into a separate dri_core thing shared amongst them. just for completeness -- there is the 3rd option -- one could just fix the hack

Re: [PATCH] plan9 partition support

2001-01-16 Thread imel96
hi, i read the man page more carefully, it says that the partition table is really just a textual partition table. the __u32 came from bsd partition table code i copied. i also fixed the doc. the 9fat always has the same starting sector

'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()]

2001-01-16 Thread Ingo Molnar
On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote: _syscall4 (int, sendpath, int, out_fd, char *, path, off_t *, off, size_t, size) You want to do a non-blocking send, so that you don't block on the socket, and do some simple multiplexing in your server. And "sendpath()" cannot do that without

Re: Caches, page coloring, virtual indexed caches, and more

2001-01-16 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Anton Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: At least for sparc it's already supported. Right now I don't feel like looking into the 2.4 solution but checkout srmmu_vac_update_mmu_cache in the 2.2 kernel. I killed that hack now that we align all shared mmaps to the same virtual

Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?

2001-01-16 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! TWO observations: - Given Linux's non-pre-emptability of the kernel i get the feeling that sendfile could starve other user space programs. Imagine trying to send a 1Gig file on 10Mbps pipe in one shot. Hehe, try sigkilling process doing that transfer. Last time I tried it it did not

Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?

2001-01-16 Thread Felix von Leitner
Thus spake Albert D. Cahalan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Rather than combining open() with sendfile(), it could be combined with stat(). Since the syscall would be new anyway, it could skip the normal requirement about returning the next free file descriptor in favor of returning whatever can be

Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()]

2001-01-16 Thread Andi Kleen
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 10:48:34AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: this is a safe, very fast [ O(1) ] object-permission model. (it's a variation of a former idea of yours.) A process can pass object fingerprints and kernel pointers to other processes too - thus the other process can access the

Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()]

2001-01-16 Thread Ingo Molnar
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Andi Kleen wrote: On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 10:48:34AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: this is a safe, very fast [ O(1) ] object-permission model. (it's a variation of a former idea of yours.) A process can pass object fingerprints and kernel pointers to other processes too

Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()]

2001-01-16 Thread Andi Kleen
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 12:26:12PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Andi Kleen wrote: On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 10:48:34AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: this is a safe, very fast [ O(1) ] object-permission model. (it's a variation of a former idea of yours.) A process can

2.4.0+aic7xxx doesn't boot, 2.2.17 OK

2001-01-16 Thread Igor Mozetic
Intel C440GX+ with on-board Adaptec AIC-7896 fails to boot 2.4.0: SCSI bus is being reset for host 0 channel 0 SCSI host 0 channel 0 reset (pid 0) timed out - trying harder ... ad infinitum ... In contrast, this is what I get from the 2.2.17 boot: (scsi0) Adaptec AIC-7896/7 Ultra2 SCSI host

O_ANY [was: Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was:sendpath()]]

2001-01-16 Thread Ingo Molnar
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Andi Kleen wrote: the 'allocate first free file descriptor number' rule for normal Unix files? Not sure I follow. You mean dup2() ? I'm sure you know this: when there are thousands of files open already, much of the overhead of opening a new file comes from the

Re: modules, insmod and multiple object files

2001-01-16 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Achim Herrmann] main.o was created using language "C": gcc -c main.c -o main.o and hwaccess.o was created using assembler: nasm -f elf hwaccess.asm -o hwaccess.o Is there a possibility to combine these two object files, so that I have a module which is loadable by insmod? I'm not very

Re: O_ANY [was: Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was:sendpath()]]

2001-01-16 Thread Ingo Molnar
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Ingo Molnar wrote: struct lazy_filedesc { int fd; struct file *file; } in fact "struct file" can (ab)used for this, no need for new structures or new fields. Eg. file-f_flags contains the cached descriptor-information.

Re: O_ANY [was: Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()]]

2001-01-16 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Ingo Molnar] - probably the most radical solution is what i suggested, to completely avoid the unique-mapping of file structures to an integer range, and use the address of the file structure (and some cookies) as an identification. Careful, these must cast to non-negative integers, without

[Patch] shmem fixes for 2.4.1-pre7

2001-01-16 Thread Christoph Rohland
Hi Linus, Here is a patch against 2.4.1-pre7 which 1) Adds prototype for shmem_lock to mm.h 2) Again brings the fixes for the accounting. I still think it should be applied. Greetings Christoph diff -uNr 1-pre7/include/linux/mm.h m1-pre7/include/linux/mm.h ---

Re: O_ANY [was: Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()]]

2001-01-16 Thread Andi Kleen
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 01:04:22PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: - a less radical solution would be to still map file structures to an integer range (file descriptors) and usage-maintain files per processes, but relax the 'allocate first non-allocated integer in the range' rule. I'm not sure

Re: Oops with 4GB memory setting in 2.4.0 stable

2001-01-16 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 16 Jan 01 at 9:40, Urban Widmark wrote: On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Rainer Mager wrote: Hi all, I have a 100% reproducable bug in all of the 2.4.0 kernels including the latest stable one. The issue is that if I compile the kernel to support 4GB RAM (I have 1 GB) and then try to access

Re: O_ANY [was: Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was:sendpath()]]

2001-01-16 Thread Ingo Molnar
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Peter Samuelson wrote: [Ingo Molnar] - probably the most radical solution is what i suggested, to completely avoid the unique-mapping of file structures to an integer range, and use the address of the file structure (and some cookies) as an identification.

Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?

2001-01-16 Thread Ingo Molnar
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Felix von Leitner wrote: I don't know how Linux does it, but returning the first free file descriptor can be implemented as O(1) operation. only if special allocation patters are assumed. Otherwise it cannot be a generic O(1) solution. The first-free rule adds an

Re: 2.4.0+aic7xxx doesn't boot, 2.2.17 neither

2001-01-16 Thread Julien Gaulmin
In linux-kernel, you wrote: Intel C440GX+ with on-board Adaptec AIC-7896 fails to boot 2.4.0: SCSI bus is being reset for host 0 channel 0 SCSI host 0 channel 0 reset (pid 0) timed out - trying harder ... ad infinitum ... In contrast, this is what I get from the 2.2.17 boot: I've got the

Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?

2001-01-16 Thread Ingo Molnar
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Felix von Leitner wrote: I don't know how Linux does it, but returning the first free file descriptor can be implemented as O(1) operation. to put it more accurately: the requirement is to be able to open(), use and close() an unlimited number of file descriptors with

Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?

2001-01-16 Thread Felix von Leitner
Thus spake Ingo Molnar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): I don't know how Linux does it, but returning the first free file descriptor can be implemented as O(1) operation. to put it more accurately: the requirement is to be able to open(), use and close() an unlimited number of file descriptors with

Re: O_ANY [was: Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()]]

2001-01-16 Thread Mitchell Blank Jr
Ingo Molnar wrote: - probably the most radical solution is what i suggested, to completely avoid the unique-mapping of file structures to an integer range, and use the address of the file structure (and some cookies) as an identification. IMO... gross. We do pretty much this exact thing in

devices.txt missing some info about OSS devices

2001-01-16 Thread David Balazic
Hi! The devices.txt file included in recent 2.4.x kernels and the one at http://www.lanana.org/docs/device-list/devices.txt lacks infos about /dev/dspX and /dev/audioX , where X is 2 or more. I had to dig into the audio driver sources to figure out that the minor number is X * 16 + 3 for

problem mounting root under 2.4.0

2001-01-16 Thread Chris Jones
I'm unable to boot a 2.4.0 kernel on a system that's been running 2.2.18. It fails early in boot with the following messages: request-module[block-major-8]: Root fs not mounted VFS: Cannot open root device "801" or 08:01 Please append a correct "root=" boot option Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to

Re: ip_conntrack: maximum limit of 16368 entries exceeded

2001-01-16 Thread Sven Koch
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, rtviado wrote: I got this in my logs: ip_conntrack: maximum limit of 16368 entries exceeded what does this mean, I know i can change the limits in /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max, but I want to know what this is for. This means that iptable is tracking more than

Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?

2001-01-16 Thread jamal
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Pavel Machek wrote: TWO observations: - Given Linux's non-pre-emptability of the kernel i get the feeling that sendfile could starve other user space programs. Imagine trying to send a 1Gig file on 10Mbps pipe in one shot. Hehe, try sigkilling process doing that

Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?

2001-01-16 Thread Jamie Lokier
Felix von Leitner wrote: I cheated. I was only talking about open(). close() is of course more expensive then. Other than that: where does the requirement come from? Can't we just use a free list where we prepend closed fds and always use the first one on open()? That would even increase

Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()]

2001-01-16 Thread Jamie Lokier
Ingo Molnar wrote: struct native_file { unsigned long master_fingerprint[8]; unsigned long file_fingerprint[8]; struct file file; }; 'fingerprints' are 256 bit, true random numbers. master_fingerprint is global to the kernel and is

Process hung in D state with 2.2.18

2001-01-16 Thread Udo A. Steinberg
Hello, I've got a sendmail 8.1.11 process hanging in D state with 2.2.18. ps -eo fname,tty,pid,stat,pcpu,nwchan,wchan reveals the following: PID STAT %CPU WCHAN WIDE-WCHAN-COLUMN COMMAND 16176 D 0.0 1f4c28 down_failed sendmail: startup with ... Is this likely a bug in the

[Patch2] shmem fixes for 2.4.1-pre7

2001-01-16 Thread Christoph Rohland
On 16 Jan 2001, Christoph Rohland wrote: Here is a patch against 2.4.1-pre7 which 1) Adds prototype for shmem_lock to mm.h 2) Again brings the fixes for the accounting. I still think it should be applied. And of course the prototype should be extern... Greetings

Re: O_ANY [was: Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()]]

2001-01-16 Thread Felix von Leitner
Thus spake Ingo Molnar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): if you read my (radical) proposal, the identification is based on a kernel pointer and a 256-bit random integer. So non-negative integers are not needed. (file-IO system-calls would be modified to detect if 'Unix file descriptors' or pointers to

Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?

2001-01-16 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! TWO observations: - Given Linux's non-pre-emptability of the kernel i get the feeling that sendfile could starve other user space programs. Imagine trying to send a 1Gig file on 10Mbps pipe in one shot. Hehe, try sigkilling process doing that transfer. Last time I tried it

Oops 0000

2001-01-16 Thread Stephan Henningsen
Hi there, I am sending your a bunch(!) of logs I think all cast some light over what ever is wrong with my brand machine. Since I got it up running, it has been crashing now and then. It is an AMD T-Bird 900MHz (running at 100MHz x 9 -- not overclocked or begin tortured in similar ways),

Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?

2001-01-16 Thread David L. Parsley
Felix von Leitner wrote: close (0); close (1); close (2); open ("/dev/console", O_RDWR); dup (); dup (); So it's not actually part of POSIX, it's just to get around fixing legacy code? ;-) This makes me wonder... If the kernel only kept a queue of the three smallest

Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?

2001-01-16 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 10:05:06AM -0500, David L. Parsley wrote: Felix von Leitner wrote: close (0); close (1); close (2); open ("/dev/console", O_RDWR); dup (); dup (); So it's not actually part of POSIX, it's just to get around fixing legacy code? ;-)

Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix

2001-01-16 Thread Michael Rothwell
"James H. Cloos Jr." wrote: Michael Please read and comment! :) There should be some discussion on what to do about filenames which contain colons in such a setup. Moving a file w/ a colon from a fs which does not support named streams to one which does should DTRT; exactly what TRT is

nfs client problem in kernel 2.4.0

2001-01-16 Thread Mogens Kjaer
Hello, I have a problem using the nfs client in kernel 2.4.0 My server is an SGI running IRIX 6.5.8 This tiny program, t1.c, displays the problem: #include stdio.h #include dirent.h main() { DIR *dp; struct dirent *de; dp=opendir("."); while((de=readdir(dp))!=NULL) {

Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?

2001-01-16 Thread David L. Parsley
Jakub Jelinek wrote: This makes me wonder... If the kernel only kept a queue of the three smallest unused fd's, and when the queue emptied handed out whatever it liked, how many things would break? I suspect this would cover a lot of bases... First it would break Unix98 and other

Re: nfs client problem in kernel 2.4.0

2001-01-16 Thread Trond Myklebust
" " == Mogens Kjaer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: getdents64(3, /* 6 entries */, 65536) = 160 lseek(3, 1547825467, SEEK_SET) = 1547825467 ... getdents64(3, /* 1 entries */, 65536) = 32 I'll bet it's the lseek that's screwing things up again. IIRC IRIX has an export

lock_kernel() ?

2001-01-16 Thread Armin Schindler
Hi all, I'm writing a driver which uses also kernel_threads and file operations (/dev and /proc). I was not able yet to find out why and when to use [un]lock_kernel() Can someone please give me a hint where to find some infos in using lock_kernel() for 2.2 and 2.4. What exactly is/must be

Re: Doc bug? Is Sangoma S514 PCI WAN card supported?

2001-01-16 Thread Nenad Corbic
"Michael D. Crawford" wrote: Under 2.4.0-ac4 I find lots of mentions of the Sangoma S514 PCI Multiprotocol Wide Area Networking card in drivers/net/wan/sdla* But in Documentation/Configure.help under CONFIG_VENDOR_SANGOMA I only see mention of the S502E(A), S503 and S508. These same

Re: nfs client problem in kernel 2.4.0

2001-01-16 Thread Trond Myklebust
" " == Mogens Kjaer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: getdents64(3, /* 6 entries */, 65536) = 160 lseek(3, 1547825467, SEEK_SET) = 1547825467 ... getdents64(3, /* 1 entries */, 65536) = 32 BTW: there does in any case seem to be a bug in your version of glibc. getdents64() is returning

qlogicfc.c hard lockups in 2.4.0

2001-01-16 Thread Rob Landley
I've got a 20 drive raid0 set up off of two asus fiber channel controllers using the qlogicfc.c driver. (I think it's a variant of ISP2200.) Dual pentium 866 SMP machine, apparently stable under NT. Half a gig of ram, booting off of a different drive (hanging off of an LSI1010 scsi controller

Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order?

2001-01-16 Thread Arjan van de Ven
In article 1355693A51C0D211B55A00105ACCFE64E9518C@ATL_MS1 you wrote: we need some kind of signature being written in the drive, which the kernel will use for determining the boot drive and later re-order drives, if required. Like the ext2 labels? (man e2label) Greetings, Arjan van de Ven

[PATCH] maestro3 oops + fix (for ac9!)

2001-01-16 Thread Andres Salomon
The maestro3 driver in ac9 oopses, due to trying to deref an unitialized pointer. Here's the oops: ksymoops 2.3.7 on i686 2.4.1-pre7. Options used -v /boot/vmlinuz (specified) -k /proc/ksyms (default) -l /proc/modules (default) -o /lib/modules/2.4.1-pre7/ (default) -m

Re: 2.4.0+aic7xxx doesn't boot, 2.2.17 OK

2001-01-16 Thread Anders Peter Fugmann
I saw the exact same problem on my Adaptec scsi controller. I initially solved the problem setting the data transfer rate from 80Mb/s to 40MB/s, but I see that yours is already 40MB/s, so this is not an option for you. Later I saw an announcement from Justin T. Gibbs, who, I beleive, is

Re: matroxfb on 2.4.0 / PCI: Failed to allocate...

2001-01-16 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 15 Jan 01 at 19:22, Chad Miller wrote: I worry about some PCI initialization output (from dmesg): # PCI: Probing PCI hardware # Unknown bridge resource 0: assuming transparent # PCI: Using IRQ router VIA [1106/0686] at 00:07.0 # PCI: Cannot allocate resource region 0 of device 01:00.0

Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order?

2001-01-16 Thread David Balazic
David Woodhouse wrote : [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: we need some kind of signature being written in the drive, which the kernel will use for determining the boot drive and later re-order drives, if required. Is someone handling this already? It should be possible to read

[PATCH] PCI-Devices and ServerWorks chipset

2001-01-16 Thread Adam Lackorzynski
The patch below (against vanilla 2.4.0) makes Linux recognize PCI-Devices sitting in another PCI bus than 0 (or 1). This was tested on a Netfinity 7100-8666 using a ServerWorks chipset. 00:00.0 Host bridge: ServerWorks CNB20HE (rev 21) 00:00.1 Host bridge: ServerWorks CNB20HE (rev 01) 00:00.2

Re: 2.4.0-x features ?

2001-01-16 Thread John Fremlin
"Albert D. Cahalan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 1) top (procps-2.0.7) gives me the messages : 'bad data in /proc/uptime' 'bad data in /proc/loadavg' cat /proc/uptime 1435.30 904.74 cat /proc/loadavg 0.01 0.21 0.29 1/17 19444 What is wrong ? You probably have locale settings

Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order?

2001-01-16 Thread Honza Pazdziora
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001 16:51:38 GMT, Venkatesh Ramamurthy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Venkatesh Ramamurthy] Just think an end-user fuguring out this Asking him to change PCI slots and trying it out. My point is the end user should not worry about all this. All he does is plugs a new

RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order?

2001-01-16 Thread Bryan Henderson
If we can truly go for label based mounting and lilo'ing this would solve the problem. From a layering point of view, it makes a lot more sense to me for the label (or signature or whatever) for this purpose to be in the partition table than inside the filesystem. The parts of the system that

RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order?

2001-01-16 Thread Venkatesh Ramamurthy
From a layering point of view, it makes a lot more sense to me for the label (or signature or whatever) for this purpose to be in the partition table than inside the filesystem. The parts of the system that assign devices their identities already know about that part of the disk.

Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()]

2001-01-16 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Ingo Molnar wrote: yep, correct. But take a look at the trick it does with file descriptors, i believe it could be a useful way of doing things. It basically privatizes a struct file, without inserting it into the enumerated file descriptors. This shows that 'native

[patch] swapfs fixes against and comments on ac9

2001-01-16 Thread Christoph Rohland
Hi Alan, Here comes a patch for swapfs which has all my fixes against -ac9. It does the following: - Fix IPC_LOCK (also in 2.4.1-pre7) - Do accounting right (Also send to Linus) - memparse returns unsigned long long (Also send to Linus) - Fix the unresolved symbols w/o CONFIG_SWAPFS - Introduce

Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order?

2001-01-16 Thread David Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: [Venkatesh Ramamurthy] Your name is already in the headers of the mail you sent. There's no need to repeat it. The LILO boot loader and the LILO command line utility should be changed for this. Is anybody doing this? - There are patches available for the

APM, ACPI, WOL, Oh My!

2001-01-16 Thread Alex Deucher
Is there something special that linux vendors do to make their machines power off when they are shutdown? I've used both redhat and mandrake supplied 2.4.x SMP kernels, and all of them manage to turn off the machine when I shutdown. I realize that apm is not supported in smp mode, but the have

kernel BUG with 2.4.1-pre7 reiserfs

2001-01-16 Thread Jakob Borg
Hi, I recently got this in my logs after moving /home to reiserfs. It is a plain 2.4.1-pre7 SMP system (.config attached). Jan 16 19:15:02 narayan kernel: journal_begin called without kernel lock held Jan 16 19:15:02 narayan kernel: kernel BUG at journal.c:423! Jan 16 19:15:02 narayan kernel:

Re: matroxfb on 2.4.0 / PCI: Failed to allocate...

2001-01-16 Thread Chad Miller
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 05:56:34PM +, Petr Vandrovec wrote: What does 'lspci -v' say? Hi, Petr. I'm sorry for the verbosity, all. Here it is: #00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8371 [KX133] (rev 02) #Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 0 #Memory at

Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order?

2001-01-16 Thread Timur Tabi
** Reply to message from Eddie Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 16 Jan 2001 12:24:49 -0500 That is not totally true. There are two problems here, one is where you have different controllers in your system and the other is where you have multiples of the same controller. What you list

[patch2] swapfs fixes against ac9

2001-01-16 Thread Christoph Rohland
Hi Alan, On 16 Jan 2001, Christoph Rohland wrote: Hi Alan, Here comes a patch for swapfs which has all my fixes against -ac9. It does the following: - Fix IPC_LOCK (also in 2.4.1-pre7) - Do accounting right (Also send to Linus) - memparse returns unsigned long long (Also send to Linus)

Re: matroxfb on 2.4.0 / PCI: Failed to allocate...

2001-01-16 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 16 Jan 01 at 13:22, Chad Miller wrote: On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 05:56:34PM +, Petr Vandrovec wrote: What does 'lspci -v' say? #00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8371 [KX133 AGP] (prog-if 00 \ #[Normal decode]) #Flags: bus master, 66Mhz, medium devsel, latency 0

Re: kernel BUG with 2.4.1-pre7 reiserfs

2001-01-16 Thread Linus Torvalds
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jakob Borg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I recently got this in my logs after moving /home to reiserfs. It is a plain 2.4.1-pre7 SMP system (.config attached). Jan 16 19:15:02 narayan kernel: journal_begin called without kernel lock held Jan 16 19:15:02 narayan

More information on reiserfs bug

2001-01-16 Thread Jakob Borg
Hi again, It seems the problem occurs every time i start fetchmail... Attached are ksymoops output and .config (if i remember this time). If there is anything else I can do to help debug this, just tell me. Regards, -- Jakob Borgmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (personal)

Re: APM, ACPI, WOL, Oh My!

2001-01-16 Thread Alex Deucher
Mark Hahn wrote: mode, but the have the option apm=poweroff in my lilo.conf and with the apm=power-off. I'm looking at modern kernels, of course (2.4+). power_off is a valid alternative. at one time, the magic string was smp-power-off. Whoops, I should reread my emails before I

Re: kernel BUG with 2.4.1-pre7 reiserfs

2001-01-16 Thread Jakob Borg
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 10:36:43AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: I seem to remember more possibly useful information scrolling by my screen, but it seems to not have made it to the logs, and I will shut down and fsck the filesystem now... It really needs the stack-trace to debug this sanely

SCSI partitions

2001-01-16 Thread ed
Does anyone remember the reason why SCSI drives were limited to 15 partitions? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Locking problem in 2.2.18/19-pre7? (fs/inode.c and fs/dcache.c)

2001-01-16 Thread tytso
HJ Lu recently pointed me at a potential locking problem try_to_free_inodes(), and when I started proding at it, I found what appears to be another set of SMP locking issues in the dcache code. (But if that were the case, why aren't we seeing huge numbers of complaints? So I'm wondering if I'm

Re: More information on reiserfs bug

2001-01-16 Thread Chris Mason
On Tuesday, January 16, 2001 07:38:58 PM +0100 Jakob Borg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi again, It seems the problem occurs every time i start fetchmail... Attached are ksymoops output and .config (if i remember this time). If there is anything else I can do to help debug this, just tell me

Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order?

2001-01-16 Thread Matthew D. Pitts
Guys, And this is a problem that has plagues all PC operating systems, but has never been a problem on the Macintosh. Why? Because the Mac was designed to handle this problem, but the PC never was. Quite true on this point. The Mac never enumerates its devices like the PC does (no C: D:

Re: kernel BUG with 2.4.1-pre7 reiserfs

2001-01-16 Thread Chris Mason
On Tuesday, January 16, 2001 07:58:37 PM +0100 Jakob Borg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 10:36:43AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: I seem to remember more possibly useful information scrolling by my screen, but it seems to not have made it to the logs, and I will shut

Re: kernel BUG with 2.4.1-pre7 reiserfs

2001-01-16 Thread Jakob Borg
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 02:18:43PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote: When you mount the FS it tells you which version it is, please include that info as well. I am rebooting with the patch from you (Chris) in about 30 seconds. This is the output from reiserfs when booting: reiserfs: checking

Re: problem mounting root under 2.4.0

2001-01-16 Thread Chris Jones
Chris Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] I suspect the problem is related to loading the aic7xxx.o module, but the relevant messages have scrolled off the top of the screen. I tried setting the VGA mode to extended to give me 50 lines of output, but even though "lilo -q -v" shows

Re: QUESTION: Network hangs with BP6 and 2.4.x kernels, hardware related?

2001-01-16 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Frank de Lange wrote: [I've cut syslog junk away for clarity -- you could just do `dmesg -s 32768'.] before network hang === [...] NR Log Phy Mask Trig IRR Pol Stat Dest Deli Vect: [...] 13 0FF 0F 010 1 01199 [...] printing

2.4.1-pre7 raid5syncd oops

2001-01-16 Thread junio
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0003 c01ccf91 *pde = Oops: 0002 CPU:0 EIP:0010:[c01ccf91] Using defaults from ksymoops -t elf32-i386 -a i386 EFLAGS: 00010086 eax: ebx: c1490400 ecx: cfdeb000 edx: cfeed13c esi: cfdeb000

Re: Locking problem in 2.2.18/19-pre7? (fs/inode.c and fs/dcache.c)

2001-01-16 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 11:04:45AM -0800, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: HJ Lu recently pointed me at a potential locking problem try_to_free_inodes(), and when I started proding at it, I found what appears to be another set of SMP locking issues in the dcache code. (But if that were the case, why

Re: SCSI partitions

2001-01-16 Thread Brian Gerst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone remember the reason why SCSI drives were limited to 15 partitions? Because of the limitations of having 8-bit major/minor device numbers. -- Brian Gerst - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

PROBLEM: 2.4.1-pre7 hard freeze

2001-01-16 Thread root
PROBLEM: 2.4.1-pre7 hard freeze [1.] One line summary of the problem: Hard freeze [2.] Full description of the problem/report: Hard freeze while working on the console. 2.2.18 runs without any problem on this computer. [3.] Keywords (i.e., modules, networking, kernel): kernel [4.] Kernel

[PATCH] rrunner.c

2001-01-16 Thread Val Henson
This patch for the RoadRunner HIPPI driver includes: * Fix crash on null dereference in rr_interrupt due to firmware bug * Fix crash on null dereference in rr_interrupt with better link ON/OFF handling * Fix crash due to NIC continuing to DMA after HALT (requires firmware = 2.0.67) Plus

Ethernet Bonding Performance under kernel 2.4.0

2001-01-16 Thread Jonathan Earle
Hi all, I've a system comprosed of two PIII machines, equipped with Znyx 346Q 4port ethernet cards (tulip driver) which I'd like to connect together in a bonded configuration. For various reasons, we require 2.4.0 kernels on our machines - currently we are using 2.4.0-test9. The setup is

Does reiserfs really meet the Linux-2.4.x patch submission policy?

2001-01-16 Thread André Dahlqvist
Hi Linus I was very surprised when I checked my local kernel.org mirror this morning, and noticed that the latest 2.4.1 pre-patch had grown to ~180 kb in size. I was even more surprised when I realized that the inclusion of reiserfs was the reason for this. While I am certainly happy for the

Re: bug (isdn-subsystem?) in 2.4.0

2001-01-16 Thread Ronny Buchmann
Kai Germaschewski wrote: On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Ronny Buchmann wrote: i have the following problem with kernel 2.4.0 (also with -ac6): kernel BUG at slab.c:1095! invalid operand: CPU: 0 I could reproduce the problem, the appended patch fixes it here. Linus, could you please

Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order?

2001-01-16 Thread Christopher Friesen
Timur Tabi wrote: And this is a problem that has plagues all PC operating systems, but has never been a problem on the Macintosh. Why? Because the Mac was designed to handle this problem, but the PC never was. The Mac never enumerates its devices like the PC does (no C: D: etc, no

Name of SCSI Device

2001-01-16 Thread Carles Pina i Estany
Hi, When we install a IDE hard disk drive, and configure as Master and connect on Primary IDE Interface, this disk WILL BE ALWAYS hda. We can install other hard disks (e.g. hdb, hdc...) but the disk that it is connected as hda, will not change. If we install a SCSI hard disk drive, with ID3,

[BUG] Panic in smp_call_function_interrupt

2001-01-16 Thread Jean-Marc Saffroy
Hello, When I discovered the nice "smp affinity" feature, I gave it a try on our old SMP testbed (quad P100 with 2 Adaptec AIC-7870 SCSI adapters). And by chance, I discovered that the following command causes an oops (after a couple of seconds), even without any kind of smp affinity :

Failure to mount INITRD on a 1GB or 2GB machine w/ 4GB bigmem enabled. (2.4.0)]

2001-01-16 Thread Adam Scislowicz
Using the 2.4.0 kernel and a kernel compiled with support for 4GB of memory, mounting of the initial ramdisk fails when 1GB or more of memory is installe dint he system. There is no OOPS, it simply says, unable to mount root vfs, I ma thinking the INITRD system cant handle the offset's involved

Re: Oops with 4GB memory setting in 2.4.0 stable

2001-01-16 Thread Urban Widmark
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Petr Vandrovec wrote: smb_get_dircache looks suspicious to me, as it can try to map unlimited number of pages with kmap. And kmaps are not unlimited resource... You have 512 kmaps, but one SMBFS cache page can contain about 504 pages... So two smbfs cached directories

Update on RTS/CTS serial problem with 2.4.0

2001-01-16 Thread Richard B. Johnson
I previously reported a problem trying to disable hardware flow-control of serial ports in the Linux kernel 2.4.0. This problem did not exist in Linux version 2.2.18. This problem occurs when the initial console has been redirected out to a serial port as is the case with one of our embedded

Re: Does reiserfs really meet the Linux-2.4.x patch submission policy?

2001-01-16 Thread Linus Torvalds
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], =?us-ascii?Q?Andr=E9?= Dahlqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don't get me wrong, I am personally really excited that reiserfs was included. I just thought that you basically wanted 2.4.1 to be "boring". Reiserfs inclusion in 2.4.1 was basically the plan for the very

Re: HP Pavilion 8290 HANGS on boot 2.4/2.4-test9

2001-01-16 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! Is there a safe way to add debug information like simple string prints in arch/i386/boot/compressed/head.s and in arch/i386/kernel/head.S so that I can see at the console where the boot process hangs? Time for another version of my VIDEO_CHAR patch.] What abourt early_printk? Works

oops 2.2.18

2001-01-16 Thread octave klaba
Hi, on 2.2.17 2.2.18 we have this kernel panic: it begins with: no vm86_info: BAD ksymoops 2.3.7 on i686 2.2.18RAID. Options used -V (default) -k /proc/ksyms (default) -l /proc/modules (default) -o /lib/modules/2.2.18RAID/ (default) -m /usr/src/linux/System.map

G400 behavior different, 2.2.18-2.4.0 (was: matroxfb on 2.4.0 / PCI: Failed to allocate...)

2001-01-16 Thread Chad Miller
(CC'd to lkml) On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 07:31:33PM +, Petr Vandrovec wrote: There is something wrong with your hardware. First region for G400 should be 32MB, not 16MB (even if you have 16MB G400, which I doubt). Ooo! Here's an edited diff of 'lspci -v' under 2.2.18 versus 2.4.0:

  1   2   3   4   5   >