* Hiroshi Shimamoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@@ -170,14 +170,13 @@ void cpu_idle(void)
current_thread_info()-status |= TS_POLLING;
/* endless idle loop with no priority at all */
while (1) {
+ tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick();
while (!need_resched())
[ CCing Magnus Damm and Ian Campbell ]
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 08:14:23PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 10:57:47AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
This patch add an architecture specific struct arch_kimage into struct
kimage. Three pointers to page table pages used by kexec are
Andrew Morton wrote:
Doing this in a piecemeal through-a-pinhole fashion won't work very well
and is a bit risky.
Yes, agree, that's also my feeling.
--
Pierre Peiffer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
On Wed, Jan 09 2008, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
Here's the latest version of dm-loop, for comparison.
To try it out,
ln -s dmsetup dmlosetup
and supply similar basic parameters to losetup.
(using dmsetup version 1.02.11 or higher)
Why oh why does dm always insist to reinvent everything?
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 10:45:13PM +, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 11:46:03PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
struct inode *inode = file-f_dentry-d_inode;
And oops if that's not defined?
For file_operations which we talk about here it always is defined.
Block_device is a
On Thu, Jan 10 2008, Nick Piggin wrote:
On Wednesday 09 January 2008 19:52, Jens Axboe wrote:
So how does it work? Instead of punting IO to a thread and passing it
through the page cache, we instead attempt to send the IO directly to the
filesystem block that it maps to.
You told
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Ingo, you could/should probably fold this into Masami's kprobe
unification patch.
commit 17735e04f7f18bea4dcbe4daa31c34acac55b332
Author: Masami Hiramatsu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed Jan 9 13:30:50 2008 +0100
kprobes code for x86
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 12:42:25PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
So how does it work? Instead of punting IO to a thread and passing it
through the page cache, we instead attempt to send the IO directly to the
filesystem block that it maps to.
You told Christoph that just using direct-IO from
Am Donnerstag, 10. Januar 2008 schrieb Fengguang Wu:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 03:30:46PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
Joerg,
Can you try the attached patches? Thank you.
I cannot reliably reproduce the bug yet.
Please ignore the first patch and only apply the two debugging
patches. They
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 10:42:08PM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
Subject: Add a simple backtrace test module
From: Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
During the work on the x86 32 and 64 bit backtrace code I found it useful
to have a simple test module to test a process and irq context
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 11:51:48PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
+++ b/fs/ufs/super.c
@@ -131,6 +131,8 @@ static void ufs_print_super_stuff(struct super_block
*sb,
printk(KERN_INFO cs_nffree(Num of free frags): %llu\n,
(unsigned long long)
On Thu, Jan 10 2008, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09 2008, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
Here's the latest version of dm-loop, for comparison.
To try it out,
ln -s dmsetup dmlosetup
and supply similar basic parameters to losetup.
(using dmsetup version 1.02.11 or higher)
Why oh why
On Wed, Jan 09 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So how does it work? Instead of punting IO to a thread and passing it
through the page cache, we instead attempt to send the IO directly to the
Great -- something like this was needed for a long time.
- The
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 09:37:53AM +0100, Joerg Platte wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 10. Januar 2008 schrieb Fengguang Wu:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 03:30:46PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
Joerg,
Can you try the attached patches? Thank you.
I cannot reliably reproduce the bug yet.
Please
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 08:40:41AM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 11:51:48PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
+++ b/fs/ufs/super.c
@@ -131,6 +131,8 @@ static void ufs_print_super_stuff(struct super_block
*sb,
printk(KERN_INFO cs_nffree(Num of free
On Thu, Jan 10 2008, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
loop maintains a prio tree of known
extents in the file (populated lazily on demand, as needed).
Just a quick question (I haven't looked closely at the code): how come
you are using a prio tree for extents? I don't think they could be
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 03:03:03AM +0300, Anton Salikhmetov wrote:
...
I guess a third possible time (if we want to minimize the number of
updates) would be when natural syncing of the file data to disk, by
other things in the VM, would be about to clear the I_DIRTY_PAGES
flag on the
Hi everybody - Happy New Year to you all!
OK, updated to git rc7 yesterday - I now see this in syslog:
Driver 'sd' needs updating - please use bus_type methods
The warning never appeared in RC6, and all google reveals are other
peoples logs that are posted about other issues.
Do I need to
On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 09:43 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
On Thursday, 10 January 2008 00:21:46 Yi Yang wrote:
Subject: ACPI: convert procfs to sysfs for /proc/acpi/wakeup
From: Yi Yang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/proc/acpi/wakeup is deprecated but it has to exist because
we haven't a sysfs
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:45:27 +0800
Bryan Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, Blackfin BF54x on-chip SDIO host controller is supposed to
support 1-bit and 4-bit MMC or SD. But in the real platform, when MMC
works at 4-bit mode there will be a FIFO underrun error
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 09:44:57AM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
IMHO this shouldn't be done in the loop driver anyway. Filesystems have
their own effricient extent lookup trees (well, at least xfs and btrfs
do), and we should leverage that instead of reinventing it.
Completely agree, it's
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Marc Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Documentation/arm/Sharp-LH/IOBarrier |2 +-
drivers/mtd/devices/doc2000.c |2 +-
include/asm-arm/arch-realview/irqs.h |2 +-
Andi Kleen wrote:
Here's a proposal for some useful code transformations the kernel janitors
could do as opposed to running checkpatch.pl.
Most ioctl handlers still running implicitely under the big kernel
lock (BKL). But long term Linux is trying to get away from that. There is a
new
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 17:42:24 +1100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Alex Dubov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sony MemoryStick cards are used in many products manufactured by Sony. They
are available both as storage and as IO expansion cards. Currently, only
MemoryStick Pro storage cards are supported via
On Thu, Jan 10 2008, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 09:44:57AM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
IMHO this shouldn't be done in the loop driver anyway. Filesystems have
their own effricient extent lookup trees (well, at least xfs and btrfs
do), and we should leverage that
* Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 10:42:08PM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
Subject: Add a simple backtrace test module
From: Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
During the work on the x86 32 and 64 bit backtrace code I found it
useful to have a
I have been unable to reproduce your problem here, and I notice you have
the proprietary, highly invasive and closed-source Nvidia driver
installed in your kernel.
Can you try using the nv or vesa (unaccelerated) Xorg drivers and
reproduce the problem that way?
If you *do* reproduce the
* Miklos Szeredi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FASTCALL is defined empty in -mm, but UML is not compiled with
-mregparm=3 and so this breaks things (I noticed problems with
rwsem_down_write_failed).
Tried recompiling UML with -mregparm=3, but that resulted in a strange
failure
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:04:29AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
yeah, agreed, we'll clean this all up, and move the other testcode there
too, ok? There's rcutorture, lock-selftests, rt-tester,
kprobes-smoke-test and now backtracetest.
Arjan might as well want to use the opportunity and break
* Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
During the work on the x86 32 and 64 bit backtrace code I found it
useful to have a simple test module to test a process and irq context
backtrace. Since the existing backtrace code was buggy, I figure it
might be useful to have such a test
Can you explain the rationale behind that running on the BKL? What type of
It used to always run with the BKL because everything used to
and originally nobody wanted to review all ioctl handlers in tree to see if
they can run with more fine grained locking. A lot probably can though.
things
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 10:56:02 +0900, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
J.A. Magallón wrote:
HI all...
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 14:19:16 -0800 (PST), Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It's been two weeks since rc6, but let's face it, with xmas and new years
(and birthdays) in
Andi,
finally managed to get the time to review your CPA patchset, and i
fundamentally agree with most of the detail changes done in it. But here
are a few structural high-level observations:
- firstly, there's no rationale given. So we'll change ioremap()/etc.
from doing a cflush-range
* Miklos Szeredi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. Patch works, but needed to add asmregparm to the definitions
as well, plus added default define into linux/linkage.h (updated
patch below).
thanks, applied.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 08:37 +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Peter, any chance you could chime in here?
I have this patch to add swap_out/_in methods. I expect we can loosen
the requirement for swapcache pages and change the name a little.
previously posted here:
* Matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been unable to reproduce your problem here, and I notice you have
the proprietary, highly invasive and closed-source Nvidia driver
installed in your kernel.
Can you try using the nv or vesa (unaccelerated) Xorg drivers and
reproduce the
finally managed to get the time to review your CPA patchset, and i
fundamentally agree with most of the detail changes done in it. But here
are a few structural high-level observations:
- firstly, there's no rationale given. So we'll change ioremap()/etc.
from doing a cflush-range
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 02:39:23PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
On Jan 9, 2008 2:37 PM, Dave Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 9, 2008 2:13 PM, Dave Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 09:32:48AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
On Jan 9, 2008 6:48 AM, Greg KH [EMAIL
Hi Alasdair,
On Wednesday 09 January 2008 14:40, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
Device-mapper for example in dm_blk_ioctl(), has no need for BKL so
drops it immediately, but it does need the inode parameter, so it is
unable to switch as things stand.
So what stops you from changing to
On Thu, Jan 10 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 08:37 +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Peter, any chance you could chime in here?
I have this patch to add swap_out/_in methods. I expect we can loosen
the requirement for swapcache pages and change the name a little.
On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 10:49 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 08:37 +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Peter, any chance you could chime in here?
I have this patch to add swap_out/_in methods. I expect we can loosen
the
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:31:26AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
Andi,
finally managed to get the time to review your CPA patchset, and i
fundamentally agree with most of the detail changes done in it. But here
are a few structural high-level observations:
I have a few changes and will post
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 07:44:03PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
finally managed to get the time to review your CPA patchset, and i
fundamentally agree with most of the detail changes done in it. But here
are a few structural high-level observations:
- firstly, there's no rationale given.
It seems the correct solution would be not to hijack __cpuinit
(as your patch does), but to create a new annotation.
The rationale is that after suspend the CPU has to be reinitialized.
That is because it is essentially like a reboot. All the previous
CPU state is gone.
It doesn't need to
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 07:43:43PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Thursday 03 January 2008 19:14:38 Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 04:42:29PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
This avoids the requirement to mark a lot of initialization functions not
__cpuinit just for resume from
Andi Kleen wrote:
Can you explain the rationale behind that running on the BKL? What type
of
It used to always run with the BKL because everything used to
and originally nobody wanted to review all ioctl handlers in tree to see if
they can run with more fine grained locking. A lot probably
On Thu, Jan 10 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 10:49 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 08:37 +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Peter, any chance you could chime in here?
I have this patch to add
Hi Matt,
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Matt Mackall wrote:
Huh, that's a fairly negligible change on your system. Is that with or
without the earlier patch? That doesn't appear to change much here.
Guess I'll have to clean up my stats patch and send it to you.
Ok, if I apply both of the patches, I get
Am Donnerstag, 10. Januar 2008 schrieb Fengguang Wu:
problem, because the iowait problem disappeared today after the regular
Debian update. I'll try to install the old package versions to make it
show up again. Maybe that helps to debug it.
Thank you. I'm running sid, ext2 as rootfs now
* Dave Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- firstly, there's no rationale given. So we'll change ioremap()/etc.
from doing a cflush-range instruction instead of a WBINVD. But why?
WBINVD isnt particular fast (takes a few msecs), but why is that a
problem? Drivers dont do
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Matt Mackall wrote:
slob: split free list by size
[snip]
Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Matt Mackall wrote:
slob: fix free block merging at head of subpage
We weren't merging freed blocks at the beginning of the free list.
Fixing this showed a 2.5% efficiency improvement in a userspace test
harness.
[snip]
Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To
So if I write my own driver and have never heard of ioctls running on BKL
before I can rather be sure that I just can change the interface of the ioctl
function, put it in unlocked_ioctl and are fine? Cool.
If you know the BKL is not needed in your code you should use unlocked_ioctl
correct.
* Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WBINVD isnt particular fast (takes a few msecs), but why is that a
problem? Drivers dont do high-frequency ioremap-ing. It's
typically only done at driver/device startup and that's it.
Actually graphics drivers can do higher frequency
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 11:04:43AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WBINVD isnt particular fast (takes a few msecs), but why is that a
problem? Drivers dont do high-frequency ioremap-ing. It's
typically only done at driver/device startup and
Hi, Dan,
Thanks so much for your help!
Since the fixups were straightforward I went ahead and pulled
this patch
out of -mm and rebased it on my async-tx patch queue for
2.6.25. Could
you double check the result, I have only compile tested it?
git pull
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 06:16:02PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Please confirm the attached patch fixes the oops. I'll separate it into
two patches and forward them to Greg. But bluetooth code also needs to
be updated such that it moves the refcommX device before killing the
connection
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:58:57AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
It seems the correct solution would be not to hijack __cpuinit
(as your patch does), but to create a new annotation.
The rationale is that after suspend the CPU has to be reinitialized.
That is because it is essentially like a
On Jan 10, 2008 7:55 PM, Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 07:44:03PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
finally managed to get the time to review your CPA patchset, and i
fundamentally agree with most of the detail changes done in it. But here
are a few structural
On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 11:02 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 10:49 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 08:37 +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Peter, any chance
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 07:59:36AM +0800, Yi Yang wrote:
Maybe this is a good idea, but i don't know the relationships between
acpi devices, devices, pci devices and pnp devices. If we can merge all
these things together, that will be a great job.
Let's not merge this yet, then, otherwise
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oleg Nesterov wrote:
On 12/08, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Oleg Nesterov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ptrace_stop() decrements -group_stop_count to participate in group stop.
This looks very wrong to me, the task can in fact decrement this counter
Thanks for the reply,
the patch doesn't work witch the patch utility, so I did it manually, hope this
was rigth:
static void aes_crypt_copy(const u8 *in, u8 *out, u32 *key, struct cword *cword)
{
u8 tmp[AES_BLOCK_SIZE * 2]
__attribute__
* Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's also unfortunately still one outstanding bug (triggeredb y
some recent changes) on 32bit that makes the self test suite not pass
currently.
ok. I'd expect there to be a whole lot of bugs triggered in this area.
We have to shape it in a way
Harvey Harrison wrote:
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Ingo, you could/should probably fold this into Masami's kprobe
unification patch.
The original code had these whitespace, because (I think)
kretprobe_trampoline_holder()
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 08:20:26PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
This is only possible as long as we know all the parts involved, for
example on AMD we have problems with that
over-eager prefetching so for drivers on AMD chipsets we have to do
something else more than likely using
2008/1/10, Jakob Oestergaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 03:03:03AM +0300, Anton Salikhmetov wrote:
...
I guess a third possible time (if we want to minimize the number of
updates) would be when natural syncing of the file data to disk, by
other things in the VM, would be
Hi Matt,
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
I'll double check the results for SLUB next but it seems obvious that your
patches are a net gain for SLOB and should be applied. One problem though
with SLOB seems to be that its memory efficiency is not so stable. Any
ideas why that is?
* Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WBINVD isnt particular fast (takes a few msecs), but why is
that a problem? Drivers dont do high-frequency ioremap-ing.
It's typically only done at driver/device startup and that's
it.
Actually graphics drivers can do higher
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 07:54:38AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
...
it's a 2.6.24.1 candidate i believe. We trigger plenty of various
crashes during x86.git maintenance and others hit various crashes in
-mm, so by the time .1 is released we'll have it in .25 and can backport
it. Most
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 11:43:51AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
- firstly, there's no rationale given. So we'll change ioremap()/etc.
from doing a cflush-range instruction instead of a WBINVD. But why?
- WBINVD is a very nasty operation. I was talking to some CPU people
and they
Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
Harvey Harrison wrote:
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Ingo, you could/should probably fold this into Masami's kprobe
unification patch.
The original code had these whitespace, because (I think)
Stephen Smalley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you have a SELinux: policy loaded with handle_unknown=allow
message in your /var/log/messages, then new classes/perms that are not
yet known to the policy will be allowed by default, so the operation
will be permitted by the kernel.
I don't. How
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 11:57:26AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
WBINVD isnt particular fast (takes a few msecs), but why is
that a problem? Drivers dont do high-frequency ioremap-ing.
It's typically only done at driver/device startup and that's
it.
Actually
Hello lkml,
I have problem with my computer: I have motherboard with AMD690G chipset
and nVidia VGA card. But I cannot set BIOS, to assign for VGA unique
IRQ. VGA card is sharing IRQ with two ohci_hcd (USB 1.1 controllers).
But when I want use for X proprietary nvidia driver, X didn't work with
But your patch does:
+config PM_CPUINIT
+ bool
+ depends on PM
That is because arch/x86/power/cpu.c where this happens is currently
obj-$(CONFIG_PM)+= cpu.o
If it was changed to CONFIG_something else then yes that dependency
should be changed too.
-Andi
--
To
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 12:15:15PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
But your patch does:
+config PM_CPUINIT
+ bool
+ depends on PM
That is because arch/x86/power/cpu.c where this happens is currently
obj-$(CONFIG_PM)+= cpu.o
If it was changed to
Jan Marek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there a way to change IRQ for VGA (or for ohci_hcd instead of VGA)
directly in Linux?
Linux normally cannot change the interrupts assigned by the BIOS
because it often requires chipset specific knowledge.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
CC'ed linux-scsi and James,
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 08:51:50 +
Nick Warne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody - Happy New Year to you all!
OK, updated to git rc7 yesterday - I now see this in syslog:
Driver 'sd' needs updating - please use bus_type methods
The warning never
Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
Don't use udev then. Good old static dev works fine if you have a fixed
set of devices.
It doesn't, with the unpredictable SCSI mapping insanity.
That what LABEL und UUID-Support in mount is for.
You label the filesystems (e2label for ext2 and ext3)
The following series of patches create and populate the toplevel tests/
directory. This will henceforth be the place where all in-kernel tests
live.
All patches against 2.6.24-rc6-mm1
Ananth
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 01:49:15AM -0800, Daniel Phillips wrote:
So what stops you from changing to unlocked_ioctl for the main device
mapper ctl_ioctl?
Nothing - patches to do this are queued for 2.6.25:
On Thursday 10 January 2008 12:26:07 Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 12:15:15PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
But your patch does:
+config PM_CPUINIT
+ bool
+ depends on PM
That is because arch/x86/power/cpu.c where this happens is currently
This patch series adds support for the touchscreen controllers provided
by Wolfson Microelectronics WM97xx series chips in both polled and
streaming modes.
These drivers have been maintained out of tree since 2003. During that
time the driver the primary maintainer was Liam Girdwood and a number
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Mike Arthur [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Stanley Cai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Rodolfo Giometti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Mike Arthur [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Stanley Cai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Rodolfo Giometti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
MAINTAINERS|9 ++
drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig | 52
drivers/input/touchscreen/Makefile | 17 +++
3 files changed,
From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Move the lkdtm infrastructure to tests/
Signed-off-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/misc/lkdtm.c | 345 --
drivers/misc/Makefile |1
lib/Kconfig.debug | 15
From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here is a quick and naive smoke test for kprobes. This is intended to
just verify if some unrelated change broke the *probes subsystem. It is
self contained, architecture agnostic and isn't of any great use by itself.
This needs to be built in
* Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is very real though are the hard limitations of MTRRs. So i'd
rather first like to see a clean PAT approach (which all other
modern OSs have already migrated to in the past 10 years)
That's mostly orthogonal. Don't know why you bring it up
From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Move the synchro-test infrastructure to tests/
Signed-off-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
kernel/synchro-test.c | 526 --
kernel/Makefile |1
lib/Kconfig.debug
From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Move the rtmutex-tester infrastructure to tests/
Signed-off-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
kernel/rtmutex-tester.c | 442
kernel/Makefile |1
lib/Kconfig.debug
From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Create a toplevel tests/ directory to house in-kernel subsystem specific
tests.
PS: I am not sure if I've gotten the Makefile change right.
Signed-off-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Makefile |3 +++
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:22:55 +0800
Bryan Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At page 4-3 of ADSP-BF54x Blackfin(R) Processor Peripheral Hardware
Reference, there is a table which guide us the SDH controller does not
support 4-bit mode MMC card. Please found the table picture in the
attachment or
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:29:22 +1100
Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday January 8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...and only have lockd exit when the last reference is dropped.
The problem is this:
When a lock that a client is blocking on comes free, lockd does
this in
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Mike Arthur [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Stanley Cai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Rodolfo Giometti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Mike Arthur [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Stanley Cai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Rodolfo Giometti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
* Harvey Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@@ -148,11 +148,7 @@ static void write_debugctlmsr(struct task_struct *child,
unsigned long val)
if (child != current)
return;
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
- wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR, val);
-#else
* Harvey Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
get_segment_eip has similarities to convert_rip_to_linear(), and is
used in a similar context. Move get_segment_eip to step.c to allow
easier consolidation.
thanks, applied.
Ingo, you may want to fold this into my previous patch:
x86: begin
* Harvey Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Ingo, you could/should probably fold this into Masami's kprobe
unification patch.
i applied this as a separate patch - better for whitespace changes to
not be mixed into unification patches.
1 - 100 of 1050 matches
Mail list logo
