Currently sdhci-arasan 5.1 can support enhanced strobe function,
but considering the potential requirement in the future for other
version IP, we don't limit it just for "arasan,sdhci-5.1". Add
cap-enhanced-strobe in DT to enable the function if we'r sure our
controller can support it.
Enhanced strobe stuff currently is beyond the scope
of Secure Digital Host Controller Interface. So we can't
find a register here to enable/disable it. We experct
variant drivers to finish the details according to their
vendor settings.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c |
On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 10:29 +0800, jeffrey.lin wrote:
> This patch is porting Raydium I2C touch driver. Developer can enable raydium
> touch driver by modifying define "CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_RM_TS".
trivial comments:
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/raydium_i2c_ts.c
>
Currently sdhci-arasan 5.1 can support enhanced strobe function,
but considering the potential requirement in the future for other
version IP, we don't limit it just for "arasan,sdhci-5.1". Add
cap-enhanced-strobe in DT to enable the function if we'r sure our
controller can support it.
Hello Ulf and Adrian,
This RFC patch is going to support enhanced strobe function
for emmc version 5.1+ introduced by JEDEC recently.
Firstly,from the former discussion of sdhci, I write these code
inspired by Adrian's patch[0] for variant drivers to overwrite the
callback in order not to add
This patch introduce cap-enhanced-strobe for platforms which
want to enable enhanced strobe function from DT if the mmc host
controller claims to support enhanced strobe.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt | 1 +
Hi Josh,
Just a couple of quick comments ...
On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 18:39:37 -0600 Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
> diff --git a/tools/objtool/Makefile b/tools/objtool/Makefile
> index c4f0713..e4a6bd5 100644
> --- a/tools/objtool/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/objtool/Makefile
I was
This patch introduce cap-enhanced-strobe for platforms which
want to enable enhanced strobe function from DT if the mmc host
controller claims to support enhanced strobe.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt | 1 +
drivers/mmc/core/host.c
Hi Josh,
Just a couple of quick comments ...
On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 18:39:37 -0600 Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
> diff --git a/tools/objtool/Makefile b/tools/objtool/Makefile
> index c4f0713..e4a6bd5 100644
> --- a/tools/objtool/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/objtool/Makefile
I was wondering if this would be
Hello Ulf and Adrian,
This RFC patch is going to support enhanced strobe function
for emmc version 5.1+ introduced by JEDEC recently.
Firstly,from the former discussion of sdhci, I write these code
inspired by Adrian's patch[0] for variant drivers to overwrite the
callback in order not to add
One of my machines is an A10 Kaveri desktop, with a good old VGA
connection to the monitor. I've only just started trying to boot
any 4.5 kernel on it, but with 4.5.0-rc6 and now linus's tree from a
few hours ago (4.5.0-rc6-00018-gf983cd3) I get a blank screen, with
no video signal, as soon as it
One of my machines is an A10 Kaveri desktop, with a good old VGA
connection to the monitor. I've only just started trying to boot
any 4.5 kernel on it, but with 4.5.0-rc6 and now linus's tree from a
few hours ago (4.5.0-rc6-00018-gf983cd3) I get a blank screen, with
no video signal, as soon as it
On 03.03.2016 11:14, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Krzysztof,
>
> On 03/02/2016 09:21 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 03.03.2016 02:30, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>
> +wdt->wdt_device.min_timeout = 1;
> +wdt->wdt_device.max_timeout =
On 03.03.2016 11:14, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Krzysztof,
>
> On 03/02/2016 09:21 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 03.03.2016 02:30, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>
> +wdt->wdt_device.min_timeout = 1;
> +wdt->wdt_device.max_timeout =
This patch is porting Raydium I2C touch driver. Developer can enable raydium
touch driver by modifying define "CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_RM_TS".
Signed-off-by: jeffrey.lin
---
drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig | 12 +
drivers/input/touchscreen/Makefile | 1
This patch is porting Raydium I2C touch driver. Developer can enable raydium
touch driver by modifying define "CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_RM_TS".
Signed-off-by: jeffrey.lin
---
drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig | 12 +
drivers/input/touchscreen/Makefile | 1 +
3.2.77-rt112-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Yang Shi
When running -rt kernel with both PREEMPT_OFF_HIST and LOCKDEP enabled,
the below error is reported:
[ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
4.4.1-rt6 #1
3.2.77-rt112-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Yang Shi
When running -rt kernel with both PREEMPT_OFF_HIST and LOCKDEP enabled,
the below error is reported:
[ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
4.4.1-rt6 #1 Not tainted
3.2.77-rt112-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
---
localversion-rt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/localversion-rt b/localversion-rt
index
3.2.77-rt112-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
preempt_disable() invokes preempt_count_add() which saves the caller in
current->preempt_disable_ip. It uses CALLER_ADDR1 which does
3.2.77-rt112-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
With interrupts off it makes no sense to do the long path since we can't
leave the CPU anyway. Also we might end up in a recursion
3.2.77-rt112-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Clark Williams
RT has dropped support of rcu_bh, comment out in rcutorture.
Signed-off-by: Clark Williams
Signed-off-by: Sebastian
3.2.77-rt112-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
We unlock the lock while the interrupts are off. This isn't a problem
now but will get because the migrate_disable() + enable are
3.2.77-rt112-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
With interrupts off it makes no sense to do the long path since we can't
leave the CPU anyway. Also we might end up in a recursion with lockdep.
3.2.77-rt112-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Clark Williams
RT has dropped support of rcu_bh, comment out in rcutorture.
Signed-off-by: Clark Williams
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner
3.2.77-rt112-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
We unlock the lock while the interrupts are off. This isn't a problem
now but will get because the migrate_disable() + enable are not
symmetrical in regard
3.2.77-rt112-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
---
localversion-rt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/localversion-rt b/localversion-rt
index
3.2.77-rt112-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
preempt_disable() invokes preempt_count_add() which saves the caller in
current->preempt_disable_ip. It uses CALLER_ADDR1 which does not look for its
Dear RT Folks,
This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.2.77-rt112-rc1.
Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too.
The -rc release will be uploaded to kernel.org and will be deleted when
the final release is out. This is just a review release (or release
Dear RT Folks,
This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.2.77-rt112-rc1.
Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too.
The -rc release will be uploaded to kernel.org and will be deleted when
the final release is out. This is just a review release (or release
3.2.77-rt112-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Atleast on X86 we die a recursive death
|CPU: 3 PID: 585 Comm: bash Not tainted 4.4.1-rt4+ #198
|Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC
3.2.77-rt112-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Atleast on X86 we die a recursive death
|CPU: 3 PID: 585 Comm: bash Not tainted 4.4.1-rt4+ #198
|Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS
On 03/03/2016 10:11 AM, kbuild test robot wrote:
Hi Gu,
[auto build test ERROR on tip/x86/core]
[also build test ERROR on v4.5-rc6 next-20160302]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improving the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
On 03/03/2016 10:11 AM, kbuild test robot wrote:
Hi Gu,
[auto build test ERROR on tip/x86/core]
[also build test ERROR on v4.5-rc6 next-20160302]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improving the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
Hi,
On 03/03/2016 10:08 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:42 AM, Zhu Guihua wrote:
[Problem]
cpuid <-> nodeid mapping is firstly established at boot time. And workqueue
caches
the mapping in wq_numa_possible_cpumask in wq_numa_init() at
Hi,
On 03/03/2016 10:08 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:42 AM, Zhu Guihua wrote:
[Problem]
cpuid <-> nodeid mapping is firstly established at boot time. And workqueue
caches
the mapping in wq_numa_possible_cpumask in wq_numa_init() at boot time.
When doing node
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2016 02:36:26 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
>
>> > OK, applied, but let Steven and the x86 folks see it.
>
> The below patch looks fine to me. Anything else I should look at?
No,
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2016 02:36:26 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
>
>> > OK, applied, but let Steven and the x86 folks see it.
>
> The below patch looks fine to me. Anything else I should look at?
No, that was it, thanks!
Hello Krzysztof,
On 03/02/2016 09:21 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 03.03.2016 02:30, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
[snip]
+wdt->wdt_device.min_timeout = 1;
+wdt->wdt_device.max_timeout = s3c2410wdt_max_timeout(wdt->clock);
Can the frequency of clock change? E.g. with
Hello Krzysztof,
On 03/02/2016 09:21 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 03.03.2016 02:30, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
[snip]
+wdt->wdt_device.min_timeout = 1;
+wdt->wdt_device.max_timeout = s3c2410wdt_max_timeout(wdt->clock);
Can the frequency of clock change? E.g. with
Hi Peter,
Patch 10/46 to 14/46 were sent separately to you and modified
follow your suggestion. Do you have further comment on it?
Thank you.
On 2016/2/29 23:39, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 09:31:58AM +, Wang Nan escreveu:
Add new ioctl() to pause/resume
Hi Peter,
Patch 10/46 to 14/46 were sent separately to you and modified
follow your suggestion. Do you have further comment on it?
Thank you.
On 2016/2/29 23:39, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 09:31:58AM +, Wang Nan escreveu:
Add new ioctl() to pause/resume
Hi Gu,
[auto build test ERROR on tip/x86/core]
[also build test ERROR on v4.5-rc6 next-20160302]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improving the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Zhu-Guihua/Make-cpuid-nodeid-mapping-persistent
Hi Gu,
[auto build test ERROR on tip/x86/core]
[also build test ERROR on v4.5-rc6 next-20160302]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improving the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Zhu-Guihua/Make-cpuid-nodeid-mapping-persistent
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:42 AM, Zhu Guihua wrote:
> [Problem]
>
> cpuid <-> nodeid mapping is firstly established at boot time. And workqueue
> caches
> the mapping in wq_numa_possible_cpumask in wq_numa_init() at boot time.
>
> When doing node online/offline,
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:42 AM, Zhu Guihua wrote:
> [Problem]
>
> cpuid <-> nodeid mapping is firstly established at boot time. And workqueue
> caches
> the mapping in wq_numa_possible_cpumask in wq_numa_init() at boot time.
>
> When doing node online/offline, cpuid <-> nodeid mapping is
>
On Thu, 3 Mar 2016 02:36:26 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
> > OK, applied, but let Steven and the x86 folks see it.
The below patch looks fine to me. Anything else I should look at?
-- Steve
> >
> >>>
> >>> > ---
> >>> > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c | 7 +++
>
On Thu, 3 Mar 2016 02:36:26 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
> > OK, applied, but let Steven and the x86 folks see it.
The below patch looks fine to me. Anything else I should look at?
-- Steve
> >
> >>>
> >>> > ---
> >>> > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c | 7 +++
> >>> > 1 file
Hi Guodong,
On 2016/3/3 9:33, Guodong Xu wrote:
With this, user can add a 'resets' property into dw_mmc dts
node, and when driver probe and parse_dt, it will call
reset APIs to reset dw_mmc host controller.
Please also refer to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/reset.txt
I have no hard
Hi Guodong,
On 2016/3/3 9:33, Guodong Xu wrote:
With this, user can add a 'resets' property into dw_mmc dts
node, and when driver probe and parse_dt, it will call
reset APIs to reset dw_mmc host controller.
Please also refer to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/reset.txt
I have no hard
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c:115:15-21: ERROR:
application of sizeof to pointer
sizeof when applied to a pointer typed expression gives the size of
the pointer
Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/misc/noderef.cocci
CC: Giuseppe Cavallaro
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c:115:15-21: ERROR:
application of sizeof to pointer
sizeof when applied to a pointer typed expression gives the size of
the pointer
Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/misc/noderef.cocci
CC: Giuseppe Cavallaro
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu
Hi Andy,
This series patches ware verified on my github with RK3368 evb and
RK30236 board.
https://github.com/Caesar-github/rockchip/tree/for-reboot-mode-tests
在 2016年03月01日 20:09, Andy Yan 写道:
This driver parse the reboot commands like "reboot loader"
and "reboot recovery" to get a boot
Hi Andy,
This series patches ware verified on my github with RK3368 evb and
RK30236 board.
https://github.com/Caesar-github/rockchip/tree/for-reboot-mode-tests
在 2016年03月01日 20:09, Andy Yan 写道:
This driver parse the reboot commands like "reboot loader"
and "reboot recovery" to get a boot
Hi Thomas, Ingo, hpa,
Would you please help to review the X86 part of this patch-set ?
Thanks,
Zhu
On 03/03/2016 09:42 AM, Zhu Guihua wrote:
[Problem]
cpuid <-> nodeid mapping is firstly established at boot time. And workqueue
caches
the mapping in wq_numa_possible_cpumask in wq_numa_init()
Hi Thomas, Ingo, hpa,
Would you please help to review the X86 part of this patch-set ?
Thanks,
Zhu
On 03/03/2016 09:42 AM, Zhu Guihua wrote:
[Problem]
cpuid <-> nodeid mapping is firstly established at boot time. And workqueue
caches
the mapping in wq_numa_possible_cpumask in wq_numa_init()
Hi Dmitry,
Is there any update on this patch?
Looking forward to your response.
Thanks,
Dudley
> -Original Message-
> From: Dudley Du [mailto:d...@cypress.com]
> Sent: 2016?1?14? 13:41
> To: dmitry.torok...@gmail.com; eugene...@gmail.com
> Cc: Dudley Du; ble...@google.com;
Hi Dmitry,
Is there any update on this patch?
Looking forward to your response.
Thanks,
Dudley
> -Original Message-
> From: Dudley Du [mailto:d...@cypress.com]
> Sent: 2016?1?14? 13:41
> To: dmitry.torok...@gmail.com; eugene...@gmail.com
> Cc: Dudley Du; ble...@google.com;
On 03/01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This flag is a no-op now. Remove usage of the flag.
>
> Cc: Andi Shyti
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
On 03/01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This flag is a no-op now. Remove usage of the flag.
>
> Cc: Andi Shyti
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative
On 03/01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This flag is a no-op now. Remove usage of the flag.
>
> Cc: Sudeep Holla
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux
On 03/01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This flag is a no-op now. Remove usage of the flag.
>
> Cc: Sudeep Holla
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
On 03/01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This flag is a no-op now. Remove usage of the flag.
>
> Cc: Philipp Zabel
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux
On 03/01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This flag is a no-op now. Remove usage of the flag.
>
> Cc: Philipp Zabel
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
On 03/01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This flag is a no-op now. Remove usage of the flag.
>
> Cc: Sören Brinkmann
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux
On 03/01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This flag is a no-op now. Remove usage of the flag.
>
> Cc: Uwe Kleine-König
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a
On 03/01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This flag is a no-op now. Remove usage of the flag.
>
> Cc: Sören Brinkmann
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
On 03/01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This flag is a no-op now. Remove usage of the flag.
>
> Cc: Uwe Kleine-König
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
On 03/01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This flag is a no-op now. Remove usage of the flag.
>
> Cc: Ulf Hansson
> Cc: Linus Walleij
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is
Do you mean detecting device name string as in /dev/...?
Just checked latest virtio_blk code, it's dynamic but not using
anything specific to experimental range. I guess we're fine here but
Yu can confirm.
Thanks,
jin
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
On 03/01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This flag is a no-op now. Remove usage of the flag.
>
> Cc: Ulf Hansson
> Cc: Linus Walleij
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Do you mean detecting device name string as in /dev/...?
Just checked latest virtio_blk code, it's dynamic but not using
anything specific to experimental range. I guess we're fine here but
Yu can confirm.
Thanks,
jin
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02,
On 03/01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This flag is a no-op now. Remove usage of the flag.
>
> Cc: Tero Kristo
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation
On 03/01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This flag is a no-op now. Remove usage of the flag.
>
> Cc: Tero Kristo
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
On 03/01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This flag is a no-op now. Remove usage of the flag.
>
> Cc: Rhyland Klein
> Cc: Thierry Reding
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
On 03/01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This flag is a no-op now. Remove usage of the flag.
>
> Cc: Rhyland Klein
> Cc: Thierry Reding
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative
From: Tang Chen
For now, x86 does not support memory-less node. A node without memory
will not be onlined, and the cpus on it will be mapped to the other
online nodes with memory in init_cpu_to_node(). The reason of doing this
is to ensure each cpu has mapped to a node
[Problem]
cpuid <-> nodeid mapping is firstly established at boot time. And workqueue
caches
the mapping in wq_numa_possible_cpumask in wq_numa_init() at boot time.
When doing node online/offline, cpuid <-> nodeid mapping is
established/destroyed,
which means, cpuid <-> nodeid mapping will
On 03/01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This flag is a no-op now. Remove usage of the flag.
>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux
From: Tang Chen
For now, x86 does not support memory-less node. A node without memory
will not be onlined, and the cpus on it will be mapped to the other
online nodes with memory in init_cpu_to_node(). The reason of doing this
is to ensure each cpu has mapped to a node with memory, so that it
[Problem]
cpuid <-> nodeid mapping is firstly established at boot time. And workqueue
caches
the mapping in wq_numa_possible_cpumask in wq_numa_init() at boot time.
When doing node online/offline, cpuid <-> nodeid mapping is
established/destroyed,
which means, cpuid <-> nodeid mapping will
On 03/01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This flag is a no-op now. Remove usage of the flag.
>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
On 03/01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This flag is a no-op now. Remove usage of the flag.
>
> Cc: Robert Jarzmik
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux
From: Gu Zheng
[Problem]
cpuid <-> nodeid mapping is firstly established at boot time. And workqueue
caches
the mapping in wq_numa_possible_cpumask in wq_numa_init() at boot time.
When doing node online/offline, cpuid <-> nodeid mapping is
established/destroyed,
On 03/01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This flag is a no-op now. Remove usage of the flag.
>
> Cc: Robert Jarzmik
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
From: Gu Zheng
[Problem]
cpuid <-> nodeid mapping is firstly established at boot time. And workqueue
caches
the mapping in wq_numa_possible_cpumask in wq_numa_init() at boot time.
When doing node online/offline, cpuid <-> nodeid mapping is
established/destroyed,
which means, cpuid <-> nodeid
On 03/01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This flag is a no-op now. Remove usage of the flag.
>
> Cc: Joachim Eastwood
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux
On 03/01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This flag is a no-op now. Remove usage of the flag.
>
> Cc: Joachim Eastwood
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
On 03/01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This flag is a no-op now. Remove usage of the flag.
>
> Cc: Shawn Guo
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation
From: Gu Zheng
The whole patch-set aims at making cpuid <-> nodeid mapping persistent. So that,
when node online/offline happens, cache based on cpuid <-> nodeid mapping such
as
wq_numa_possible_cpumask will not cause any problem.
It contains 4 steps:
1. Enable apic
On 03/01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This flag is a no-op now. Remove usage of the flag.
>
> Cc: Shawn Guo
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
From: Gu Zheng
The whole patch-set aims at making cpuid <-> nodeid mapping persistent. So that,
when node online/offline happens, cache based on cpuid <-> nodeid mapping such
as
wq_numa_possible_cpumask will not cause any problem.
It contains 4 steps:
1. Enable apic registeration flow to handle
From: Gu Zheng
The whole patch-set aims at making cpuid <-> nodeid mapping persistent. So that,
when node online/offline happens, cache based on cpuid <-> nodeid mapping such
as
wq_numa_possible_cpumask will not cause any problem.
It contains 4 steps:
1. Enable apic
From: Gu Zheng
The whole patch-set aims at making cpuid <-> nodeid mapping persistent. So that,
when node online/offline happens, cache based on cpuid <-> nodeid mapping such
as
wq_numa_possible_cpumask will not cause any problem.
It contains 4 steps:
1. Enable apic registeration flow to handle
From: Gu Zheng
The whole patch-set aims at making cpuid <-> nodeid mapping persistent. So that,
when node online/offline happens, cache based on cpuid <-> nodeid mapping such
as
wq_numa_possible_cpumask will not cause any problem.
It contains 4 steps:
1. Enable apic
From: Gu Zheng
The whole patch-set aims at making cpuid <-> nodeid mapping persistent. So that,
when node online/offline happens, cache based on cpuid <-> nodeid mapping such
as
wq_numa_possible_cpumask will not cause any problem.
It contains 4 steps:
1. Enable apic registeration flow to handle
On 03/01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This flag is a no-op now. Remove usage of the flag.
>
> Cc: James Liao
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux
On 03/01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This flag is a no-op now. Remove usage of the flag.
>
> Cc: James Liao
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
On 03/01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This flag is a no-op now. Remove usage of the flag.
>
> Cc: Leo Yan
> Cc: Bintian Wang
> Cc: Zhangfei Gao
> Cc: Haojian Zhuang
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
On 03/01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This flag is a no-op now. Remove usage of the flag.
>
> Cc: Leo Yan
> Cc: Bintian Wang
> Cc: Zhangfei Gao
> Cc: Haojian Zhuang
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a
301 - 400 of 2170 matches
Mail list logo