On 11/8/2016 12:59 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 05/11/16 08:10, Kirti Wankhede wrote:
>> Vendor driver using mediated device framework should use
>> vfio_info_add_capability() to add capabilities.
>> Introduced this function to reduce code duplication in vendor drivers.
>>
>>
On 11/8/2016 12:59 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 05/11/16 08:10, Kirti Wankhede wrote:
>> Vendor driver using mediated device framework should use
>> vfio_info_add_capability() to add capabilities.
>> Introduced this function to reduce code duplication in vendor drivers.
>>
>>
On 08/11/16 10:16, Brian Masney wrote:
> Added Brian Masney's copyright to the header and to the MODULE_AUTHOR
> for all of the staging cleanups that has been done to this driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Masney
> ---
> drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2583.c | 3 ++-
> 1
On 08/11/16 10:16, Brian Masney wrote:
> Added Brian Masney's copyright to the header and to the MODULE_AUTHOR
> for all of the staging cleanups that has been done to this driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Masney
> ---
> drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2583.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2
On 11/8/2016 2:22 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 05/11/16 08:10, Kirti Wankhede wrote:
>> Updated vfio_platform_common.c file to use
>> vfio_set_irqs_validate_and_prepare()
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kirti Wankhede
>> Signed-off-by: Neo Jia
>> Change-Id:
On 11/8/2016 2:22 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 05/11/16 08:10, Kirti Wankhede wrote:
>> Updated vfio_platform_common.c file to use
>> vfio_set_irqs_validate_and_prepare()
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kirti Wankhede
>> Signed-off-by: Neo Jia
>> Change-Id:
Hi!
> > But in that case, what if your patch generation script used a filter to
> > exclude those binary files? No harm to that target audience, and it would
> > actually make them behave better for distro builds. Though that might be
> > counter to the goal of making them disappear entirely. :)
Hi!
> > But in that case, what if your patch generation script used a filter to
> > exclude those binary files? No harm to that target audience, and it would
> > actually make them behave better for distro builds. Though that might be
> > counter to the goal of making them disappear entirely. :)
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 06:57:47AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-08-28 at 22:36 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > reply_cache_stats_operations, of type struct file_operations, is
> > never
> > modified, so declare it as const.
> >
> > Done with the help of Coccinelle.
> >
> >
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 06:57:47AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-08-28 at 22:36 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > reply_cache_stats_operations, of type struct file_operations, is
> > never
> > modified, so declare it as const.
> >
> > Done with the help of Coccinelle.
> >
> >
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> Also, this fixes another bug where machine_check_poll() would clear
> mce.tsc unconditionally even if we requested precise MCP_TIMESTAMP
> logging.
> @@ -713,7 +713,6 @@ bool machine_check_poll(enum mcp_flags flags, mce_banks_t
> *b)
>
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> Also, this fixes another bug where machine_check_poll() would clear
> mce.tsc unconditionally even if we requested precise MCP_TIMESTAMP
> logging.
> @@ -713,7 +713,6 @@ bool machine_check_poll(enum mcp_flags flags, mce_banks_t
> *b)
>
On 2016-11-08 01:16, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
This patch uses the resource-managed to add the devfreq device.
This function will make it easy to handle the devfreq device.
- struct devfreq *devm_devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
struct devfreq_dev_profile
On 2016-11-08 01:16, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
This patch uses the resource-managed to add the devfreq device.
This function will make it easy to handle the devfreq device.
- struct devfreq *devm_devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
struct devfreq_dev_profile
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 03:57:48PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Maxime Ripard
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 10:11:45PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Maxime Ripard
> >>
On Tue, Nov 08 2016, Peter Chen wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 12:25:42PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> 2/ Change all usb phys to register an extcon and to send appropriate
>>notifications. Many already do, but I don't think it is universal.
>>It is probable that the extcon
Salut,
On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 07:15:45AM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 02/11/2016 à 19:14, Maxime Ripard a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 12:53:02PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > > BTW, memory allocation in 'sun4i_layers_init()' looks spurious, especially
> > >
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 03:57:48PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Maxime Ripard
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 10:11:45PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Maxime Ripard
> >> wrote:
> >> > The GR8-EVB comes with a wm8978 codec
On Tue, Nov 08 2016, Peter Chen wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 12:25:42PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> 2/ Change all usb phys to register an extcon and to send appropriate
>>notifications. Many already do, but I don't think it is universal.
>>It is probable that the extcon
Salut,
On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 07:15:45AM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 02/11/2016 à 19:14, Maxime Ripard a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 12:53:02PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > > BTW, memory allocation in 'sun4i_layers_init()' looks spurious, especially
> > >
Hi Tony,
Commit 63fdf6527272 ("ARM: OMAP5: Add basic cpuidle MPU CSWR support")
in the omap tree has no Signed-off-by from you as the committer.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 4:18 AM, Felipe Balbi
wrote:
> John Stultz writes:
>> I had seen some odd behavior with HiKey's usb-gadget interface
>> that I finally seemed to have chased down. Basically every other
>> time I pluged in the OTG port,
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 09:43:24AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can relatively easily reproduce this bug:
> BUG: 'list_empty(>free_vbufs)' is true!
> [ cut here ]
> kernel BUG at /home/latest/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c:130!
> invalid opcode:
Hi Tony,
Commit 63fdf6527272 ("ARM: OMAP5: Add basic cpuidle MPU CSWR support")
in the omap tree has no Signed-off-by from you as the committer.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 4:18 AM, Felipe Balbi
wrote:
> John Stultz writes:
>> I had seen some odd behavior with HiKey's usb-gadget interface
>> that I finally seemed to have chased down. Basically every other
>> time I pluged in the OTG port, the gadget interface would
>> properly initialize.
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 09:43:24AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can relatively easily reproduce this bug:
> BUG: 'list_empty(>free_vbufs)' is true!
> [ cut here ]
> kernel BUG at /home/latest/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c:130!
> invalid opcode:
Specifically a helper for reading the available maximum raw value of a
channel and a helper for forwarding read_avail requests for raw values
from one iio driver to an iio channel that is consumed.
These rather specific helpers are in turn built with generic helpers
making it easy to build more
Specifically a helper for reading the available maximum raw value of a
channel and a helper for forwarding read_avail requests for raw values
from one iio driver to an iio channel that is consumed.
These rather specific helpers are in turn built with generic helpers
making it easy to build more
Acked-by: Rob Herring
Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin
---
.../bindings/iio/adc/envelope-detector.txt | 54 ++
MAINTAINERS| 6 +++
2 files changed, 60 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
Acked-by: Rob Herring
Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin
---
.../bindings/iio/adc/envelope-detector.txt | 54 ++
MAINTAINERS| 6 +++
2 files changed, 60 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
Hi Axel,
[auto build test ERROR on usb/usb-testing]
[also build test ERROR on next-20161108]
[cannot apply to robh/for-next v4.9-rc4]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Axel-Haslam
Hi Axel,
[auto build test ERROR on usb/usb-testing]
[also build test ERROR on next-20161108]
[cannot apply to robh/for-next v4.9-rc4]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Axel-Haslam
On 08/11/16 15:40, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
>> The new mpu3050 driver fails to build if I2C is disabled:
>>
>> drivers/iio/built-in.o: In function `mpu3050_i2c_driver_exit':
>> mpu3050-i2c.c:(.exit.text+0x17f): undefined
On 11/08/2016 08:08 PM, David Lechner wrote:
On 11/8/16 5:26 AM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
Hi David,
+struct uleds_device {
+struct uleds_user_devuser_dev;
+struct led_classdevled_cdev;
+struct mutexmutex;
+enum uleds_statestate;
+wait_queue_head_t
From: Noam Camus
Today we register to plat_smp_ops.clear() method which actually
is acking the IPI.
However this is already taking care by our irqchip driver specifically
by the irq_chip.irq_eoi() method.
This is perfect timing where it should be done and no special handling
On 08/11/16 15:40, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
>> The new mpu3050 driver fails to build if I2C is disabled:
>>
>> drivers/iio/built-in.o: In function `mpu3050_i2c_driver_exit':
>> mpu3050-i2c.c:(.exit.text+0x17f): undefined reference to
On 11/08/2016 08:08 PM, David Lechner wrote:
On 11/8/16 5:26 AM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
Hi David,
+struct uleds_device {
+struct uleds_user_devuser_dev;
+struct led_classdevled_cdev;
+struct mutexmutex;
+enum uleds_statestate;
+wait_queue_head_t
From: Noam Camus
Today we register to plat_smp_ops.clear() method which actually
is acking the IPI.
However this is already taking care by our irqchip driver specifically
by the irq_chip.irq_eoi() method.
This is perfect timing where it should be done and no special handling
is needed at
Hi Will,
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 02:45:59AM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I figured this was a reasonable post to piggy-back on for the LPC minutes
> relating to guest MSIs on arm64.
>
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 10:02:05PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > We can always have QEMU
On 08/11/16 15:39, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
>> The newly added mpu3050 driver has two initializations for the
>> module owner, which causes a warning for 'make W=1':
>>
>> include/linux/export.h:37:21: error: initialized field
On 08/11/16 15:39, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
>> The newly added mpu3050 driver has two initializations for the
>> module owner, which causes a warning for 'make W=1':
>>
>> include/linux/export.h:37:21: error: initialized field overwritten
>>
Hi Will,
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 02:45:59AM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I figured this was a reasonable post to piggy-back on for the LPC minutes
> relating to guest MSIs on arm64.
>
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 10:02:05PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > We can always have QEMU
On 08/11/16 14:01, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Removing a call to the taos_chip_off() makes it unused when CONFIG_PM
> is disabled:
>
> drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2583.c:438:12: error: ‘taos_chip_off’ defined
> but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
>
> This removes all the #ifdef in this file,
On 08/11/16 14:01, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Removing a call to the taos_chip_off() makes it unused when CONFIG_PM
> is disabled:
>
> drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2583.c:438:12: error: ‘taos_chip_off’ defined
> but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
>
> This removes all the #ifdef in this file,
On 11/8/2016 2:16 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 05/11/16 08:10, Kirti Wankhede wrote:
>> Vendor driver using mediated device framework would use same mechnism to
>> validate and prepare IRQs. Introducing this function to reduce code
>> replication in multiple drivers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by:
On 11/8/2016 2:16 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 05/11/16 08:10, Kirti Wankhede wrote:
>> Vendor driver using mediated device framework would use same mechnism to
>> validate and prepare IRQs. Introducing this function to reduce code
>> replication in multiple drivers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by:
On 11/07/2016 11:08 PM, Yuriy Kolerov wrote:
> The first patch fixes misuse of IRQ numbers. In some places of the
> Linux kernel for ARC hardware IRQ numbers are used as virtual IRQ
> numbers and obviously it is wrong.
>
> The second patch forces the kernel to set a simple distribution mode
> for
On 11/07/2016 11:08 PM, Yuriy Kolerov wrote:
> The first patch fixes misuse of IRQ numbers. In some places of the
> Linux kernel for ARC hardware IRQ numbers are used as virtual IRQ
> numbers and obviously it is wrong.
>
> The second patch forces the kernel to set a simple distribution mode
> for
On 08/11/16 14:00, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The regulator changes assigned data to an uninitialized pointer:
>
> drivers/staging/iio/frequency/ad9832.c: In function 'ad9832_probe':
> drivers/staging/iio/frequency/ad9832.c:214:11: error: 'st' may be used
> uninitialized in this function
On 08/11/16 14:00, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The regulator changes assigned data to an uninitialized pointer:
>
> drivers/staging/iio/frequency/ad9832.c: In function 'ad9832_probe':
> drivers/staging/iio/frequency/ad9832.c:214:11: error: 'st' may be used
> uninitialized in this function
On 11/07/2016 11:08 PM, Yuriy Kolerov wrote:
> At first smp_ipi_irq_setup() takes a cpu number and a hwirq number for
> the per core local interrupt line in the root interrupt controller and
> registers an appropriate IPI handler per cpu. However this function tries
> to bind a handler to the
On 11/07/2016 11:08 PM, Yuriy Kolerov wrote:
> At first smp_ipi_irq_setup() takes a cpu number and a hwirq number for
> the per core local interrupt line in the root interrupt controller and
> registers an appropriate IPI handler per cpu. However this function tries
> to bind a handler to the
Em Tue, 8 Nov 2016 10:42:03 -0800
Linus Torvalds escreveu:
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 7:40 AM, Jörg Otte wrote:
> > Since v4.9-rc4 I get following crash in dvb-usb-cinergyT2 module.
>
> Looks like it's commit 5ef8ed0e5608f ("[media]
Em Tue, 8 Nov 2016 10:42:03 -0800
Linus Torvalds escreveu:
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 7:40 AM, Jörg Otte wrote:
> > Since v4.9-rc4 I get following crash in dvb-usb-cinergyT2 module.
>
> Looks like it's commit 5ef8ed0e5608f ("[media] cinergyT2-core: don't
> do DMA on stack"), which movced the
On 11/7/16, 11:53 AM, "Mauricio Faria de Oliveira"
wrote:
>This patchset addresses a couple of errors that might happen during
>PCI device remove (e.g., PCI hotplug, PowerVM DLPAR), which prevent
>the successful removal and re-addition of the adapter to the
On 11/7/16, 11:53 AM, "Mauricio Faria de Oliveira"
wrote:
>This patchset addresses a couple of errors that might happen during
>PCI device remove (e.g., PCI hotplug, PowerVM DLPAR), which prevent
>the successful removal and re-addition of the adapter to the system,
>and cause an oops and/or
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 01:21:47PM -0600, Zhi Li wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Paul Gortmaker
>> > I just noticed this commit now that linux-next is back after the week off.
>> >
>> > This should probably
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 01:21:47PM -0600, Zhi Li wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Paul Gortmaker
>> > I just noticed this commit now that linux-next is back after the week off.
>> >
>> > This should probably use core_param or
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 07:36:45AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi Luis,
>
>
> On 2016-11-07 22:15, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 08:58:38AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > > On 2016-10-31 18:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 05:22:13PM
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 07:36:45AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi Luis,
>
>
> On 2016-11-07 22:15, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 08:58:38AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > > On 2016-10-31 18:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 05:22:13PM
From: Long Li
hv_do_hypercall assumes that we pass a segment from a physically
continuous buffer. Buffer allocated on the stack may not work if
CONFIG_VMAP_STACK=y is set.
Change to use kmalloc to allocate this buffer.
The v2 patch adds locking to access the pre-allocated
From: Long Li
hv_do_hypercall assumes that we pass a segment from a physically
continuous buffer. Buffer allocated on the stack may not work if
CONFIG_VMAP_STACK=y is set.
Change to use kmalloc to allocate this buffer.
The v2 patch adds locking to access the pre-allocated buffer.
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 01:21:47PM -0600, Zhi Li wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Paul Gortmaker
> > I just noticed this commit now that linux-next is back after the week off.
> >
> > This should probably use core_param or setup_param since the Kconfig
> > for this is bool and not
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 01:21:47PM -0600, Zhi Li wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Paul Gortmaker
> > I just noticed this commit now that linux-next is back after the week off.
> >
> > This should probably use core_param or setup_param since the Kconfig
> > for this is bool and not
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, Kyle Huey wrote:
> Intel supports faulting on the CPUID instruction beginning with Ivy Bridge.
> When enabled, the processor will fault on attempts to execute the CPUID
> instruction with CPL>0. Exposing this feature to userspace will allow a
> ptracer to trap and emulate the
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, Kyle Huey wrote:
> Intel supports faulting on the CPUID instruction beginning with Ivy Bridge.
> When enabled, the processor will fault on attempts to execute the CPUID
> instruction with CPL>0. Exposing this feature to userspace will allow a
> ptracer to trap and emulate the
On Thursday 03 November 2016 07:13 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 23:47:29 +0530 Sudip Mukherjee
wrote:
On Friday 21 October 2016 08:59 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2016 23:23:18 +0530 Sudip Mukherjee
wrote:
On Thursday 03 November 2016 07:13 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 23:47:29 +0530 Sudip Mukherjee
wrote:
On Friday 21 October 2016 08:59 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2016 23:23:18 +0530 Sudip Mukherjee
wrote:
Some builds of m32r were failing as it tried to build
Add PCI ID for Intel byt sdio host controller sub-vended by NI.
The controller has different behavior because of the board layout NI
puts it on.
Signed-off-by: Zach Brown
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c | 20
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff
Add PCI ID for Intel byt sdio host controller sub-vended by NI.
The controller has different behavior because of the board layout NI
puts it on.
Signed-off-by: Zach Brown
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c | 20
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git
On some boards, max SDIO frequency is limited by trace lengths and other layout
choices. We would like a way to specify this limitation so the driver can
behave accordingly.
This patch set assumes that the limitation has been reported in an ACPI table
which the driver can check to get the max
On some boards, max SDIO frequency is limited by trace lengths and other layout
choices. We would like a way to specify this limitation so the driver can
behave accordingly.
This patch set assumes that the limitation has been reported in an ACPI table
which the driver can check to get the max
On NI 9037 boards the max SDIO frequency is limited by trace lengths
and other layout choices. The max SDIO frequency is stored in an ACPI
table, as MXFQ.
The driver reads the ACPI entry MXFQ during sdio_probe_slot and sets the
f_max field of the host with it.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Sullivan
On NI 9037 boards the max SDIO frequency is limited by trace lengths
and other layout choices. The max SDIO frequency is stored in an ACPI
table, as MXFQ.
The driver reads the ACPI entry MXFQ during sdio_probe_slot and sets the
f_max field of the host with it.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Sullivan
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 5:44 AM, Thiago Jung Bauermann
wrote:
> From: Mimi Zohar
>
> In preparation for serializing the binary_runtime_measurements, this patch
> maintains the amount of memory required.
>
> Changelog v5:
> - replace
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 5:44 AM, Thiago Jung Bauermann
wrote:
> From: Mimi Zohar
>
> In preparation for serializing the binary_runtime_measurements, this patch
> maintains the amount of memory required.
>
> Changelog v5:
> - replace CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE with architecture CONFIG_HAVE_IMA_KEXEC
This looks messy, weird line wrap??
+/*
+ * Timeout values are based on expecations from host */ #define
+VSS_FREEZE_TIMEOUT (15 * 60)
This looks messy, weird line wrap??
+/*
+ * Timeout values are based on expecations from host */ #define
+VSS_FREEZE_TIMEOUT (15 * 60)
On 08/11/16 20:09, Luca Abeni wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 18:53:09 +
> Juri Lelli wrote:
> [...]
> > > > Also, AFAIU, do_exit() works on current and the TASK_DEAD case is
> > > > handled in finish_task_switch(), so I don't think we are taking
> > > > care of
On 08/11/16 20:09, Luca Abeni wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 18:53:09 +
> Juri Lelli wrote:
> [...]
> > > > Also, AFAIU, do_exit() works on current and the TASK_DEAD case is
> > > > handled in finish_task_switch(), so I don't think we are taking
> > > > care of the "task is dying"
On 11/8/2016 11:16 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 21:56:29 +0530
> Kirti Wankhede wrote:
>
>> On 11/8/2016 5:15 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
>>> On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 02:40:45 +0530
>>> Kirti Wankhede wrote:
>>>
>> ...
On 11/8/2016 11:16 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 21:56:29 +0530
> Kirti Wankhede wrote:
>
>> On 11/8/2016 5:15 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
>>> On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 02:40:45 +0530
>>> Kirti Wankhede wrote:
>>>
>> ...
+int vfio_register_notifier(struct device *dev,
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 09:59:26AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/of/fdt.c: In function 'early_init_dt_scan_memory':
drivers/of/fdt.c:1064:3: error: implicit declaration of function
'memblock_mark_hotplug'
cc1: some warnings being treated as
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 09:59:26AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/of/fdt.c: In function 'early_init_dt_scan_memory':
drivers/of/fdt.c:1064:3: error: implicit declaration of function
'memblock_mark_hotplug'
cc1: some warnings being treated as
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 08:29:49PM +0100, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
>
>
> On 11/08/2016 07:05 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I know what we want to do, but there's some momentous problems that
> >> > need to be solved first.
> > Like what?
>
> The problem is that using
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 08:29:49PM +0100, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
>
>
> On 11/08/2016 07:05 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I know what we want to do, but there's some momentous problems that
> >> > need to be solved first.
> > Like what?
>
> The problem is that using
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 07:40:53PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 11/08/2016, 11:15 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:30:13PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi Greg,
> >>
> >> Today's linux-next merge of the tty tree got a conflict in:
> >>
> >>
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 07:40:53PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 11/08/2016, 11:15 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:30:13PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi Greg,
> >>
> >> Today's linux-next merge of the tty tree got a conflict in:
> >>
> >>
Alignments are exclusive, so 5 modes can be expressed in 3 bits.
Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář
---
arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 23 +--
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
index
Alignments are exclusive, so 5 modes can be expressed in 3 bits.
Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář
---
arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 23 +--
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
index eb74d3b56e1c..14624d6bf112
Internal errors were reported on 16 bit fxsave and fxrstor with ipxe.
Old Intels don't have unrestricted_guest, so we have to emulate them.
The patch takes advantage of the hardware implementation.
Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář
---
v3:
- remove fxsave64 and extra colons at
Internal errors were reported on 16 bit fxsave and fxrstor with ipxe.
Old Intels don't have unrestricted_guest, so we have to emulate them.
The patch takes advantage of the hardware implementation.
Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář
---
v3:
- remove fxsave64 and extra colons at the end of asm to
Move the existing exception handling for inline assembly into a macro
and switch its return values to X86EMUL type.
Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář
---
v2: new
---
arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 34 +++---
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
v2: http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg139681.html
v3 brings compatibility with old compilers and has been compile-tested
with GCC-4.4 on Debian Wheezy, GCC-4.4 on RHEL 6, and GCC-4.1 on RHEL 5.
[4/4] still has the hidden assumption that guest and host CPUID match.
Emulating a guest that does
Needed for FXSAVE and FXRSTOR.
Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář
---
v2: split into a separate patch
---
arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 20
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
index
Move the existing exception handling for inline assembly into a macro
and switch its return values to X86EMUL type.
Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář
---
v2: new
---
arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 34 +++---
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git
v2: http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg139681.html
v3 brings compatibility with old compilers and has been compile-tested
with GCC-4.4 on Debian Wheezy, GCC-4.4 on RHEL 6, and GCC-4.1 on RHEL 5.
[4/4] still has the hidden assumption that guest and host CPUID match.
Emulating a guest that does
Needed for FXSAVE and FXRSTOR.
Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář
---
v2: split into a separate patch
---
arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 20
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
index cbd7b92585bb..eb74d3b56e1c
Hi Florian,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 8:42 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 11/08/2016 11:35 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Currently the renesas-irqc driver uses postcore_initcall().
>>
>> However, the new CPG/MSSR driver uses subsys_initcall(). Hence the
>> IRQC's probe
Hi Florian,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 8:42 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 11/08/2016 11:35 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Currently the renesas-irqc driver uses postcore_initcall().
>>
>> However, the new CPG/MSSR driver uses subsys_initcall(). Hence the
>> IRQC's probe will be deferred, which
501 - 600 of 1918 matches
Mail list logo