On 10/16/17 13:26, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 01:18:14PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 10/16/17 13:07, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:58:28PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
Hi Jonathan and Paul,
Please include these fixes before 4.14
On 10/16/17 13:26, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 01:18:14PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 10/16/17 13:07, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:58:28PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
Hi Jonathan and Paul,
Please include these fixes before 4.14
On Sat, 14 Oct 2017 11:17:47 +0300 Konstantin Khlebnikov
wrote:
> >>> pid_t translate_pid(pid_t pid, int source, int target);
> >>>
> >>> This syscall converts pid from source pid-ns into pid in target pid-ns.
> >>> If pid is unreachable from target pid-ns it returns
On Sat, 14 Oct 2017 11:17:47 +0300 Konstantin Khlebnikov
wrote:
> >>> pid_t translate_pid(pid_t pid, int source, int target);
> >>>
> >>> This syscall converts pid from source pid-ns into pid in target pid-ns.
> >>> If pid is unreachable from target pid-ns it returns zero.
> >>>
> >>>
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 1:36 AM, Minas Harutyunyan
wrote:
> On b-plug disconnect should asserted GOTGINT.SesEndDet interrupt.
> According previously sent by you register dump (GHWCFG2 = 0x23affc70)
> your core OTG_MODE=0.
> Bellow fragment from programming guide on
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 1:36 AM, Minas Harutyunyan
wrote:
> On b-plug disconnect should asserted GOTGINT.SesEndDet interrupt.
> According previously sent by you register dump (GHWCFG2 = 0x23affc70)
> your core OTG_MODE=0.
> Bellow fragment from programming guide on Device disconnect:
>
>
Sean Paul writes:
> nit: space before ,
Thanks.
>> +/* Clone the lessor file to create a new file for us */
>> +DRM_DEBUG_LEASE("Allocating lease file\n");
>> +path_get(_file->f_path);
>
> Please forgive the stupid question, but where is this reference given
Sean Paul writes:
> nit: space before ,
Thanks.
>> +/* Clone the lessor file to create a new file for us */
>> +DRM_DEBUG_LEASE("Allocating lease file\n");
>> +path_get(_file->f_path);
>
> Please forgive the stupid question, but where is this reference given
> up?
That's not a
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 4:03 AM, Uwe Kleine-König
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:56:32AM +0200, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 09:17:26 +0200 Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 01:05:38PM +0200, Lothar
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 4:03 AM, Uwe Kleine-König
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:56:32AM +0200, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 09:17:26 +0200 Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 01:05:38PM +0200, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
>> > > diff
On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 10:53 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> --
>
> From: Matt Redfearn
>
>
> [ Upstream commit db8466c581cca1a08b505f1319c3ecd246f16fa8 ]
[...]
There
On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 10:53 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> --
>
> From: Matt Redfearn
>
>
> [ Upstream commit db8466c581cca1a08b505f1319c3ecd246f16fa8 ]
[...]
There was a follow-up to this
On Mon, 2017-10-16 at 22:57 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:26:33AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > I think that this shows that the followed approach does not work,
> > probably because several driver authors do not use sparse. For
> > developers who are not the
On Mon, 2017-10-16 at 22:57 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:26:33AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > I think that this shows that the followed approach does not work,
> > probably because several driver authors do not use sparse. For
> > developers who are not the
On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 05:03:41PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Colin King wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King
> >
> > The structures mlxplat_dev and mlxplat_hotplug are local to the source
> > and do not need to
On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 05:03:41PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Colin King wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King
> >
> > The structures mlxplat_dev and mlxplat_hotplug are local to the source
> > and do not need to be in global scope, so make them static.
> >
> >
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 02:56:08PM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> Some KVM-specific custom MSRs share the guest physical address with the
> hypervisor in early boot. When SEV is active, the shared physical address
> must be mapped with memory encryption attribute cleared so that both
> hypervisor
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 02:56:08PM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> Some KVM-specific custom MSRs share the guest physical address with the
> hypervisor in early boot. When SEV is active, the shared physical address
> must be mapped with memory encryption attribute cleared so that both
> hypervisor
[+cc David, Manish]
Please use a subject line that tells more about what's going on.
"Update quirk" doesn't really convey any useful information.
Something like "Apply Cavium ThunderX ACS quirk only to Root Ports".
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 11:20:39AM -0700, Vadim Lomovtsev wrote:
> This commit
[+cc David, Manish]
Please use a subject line that tells more about what's going on.
"Update quirk" doesn't really convey any useful information.
Something like "Apply Cavium ThunderX ACS quirk only to Root Ports".
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 11:20:39AM -0700, Vadim Lomovtsev wrote:
> This commit
Commit-ID: 97d21003df3e7504c899b1701546f18ff475966f
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/97d21003df3e7504c899b1701546f18ff475966f
Author: mike.tra...@hpe.com
AuthorDate: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 11:32:06 -0500
Committer: Thomas Gleixner
CommitDate: Mon,
Commit-ID: 41e7864ab5ce4ec36e89a9f55d8d9dfe19b0392c
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/41e7864ab5ce4ec36e89a9f55d8d9dfe19b0392c
Author: mike.tra...@hpe.com
AuthorDate: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 11:32:04 -0500
Committer: Thomas Gleixner
CommitDate: Mon,
Commit-ID: 41e7864ab5ce4ec36e89a9f55d8d9dfe19b0392c
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/41e7864ab5ce4ec36e89a9f55d8d9dfe19b0392c
Author: mike.tra...@hpe.com
AuthorDate: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 11:32:04 -0500
Committer: Thomas Gleixner
CommitDate: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 22:50:36 +0200
x86/tsc:
Commit-ID: 97d21003df3e7504c899b1701546f18ff475966f
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/97d21003df3e7504c899b1701546f18ff475966f
Author: mike.tra...@hpe.com
AuthorDate: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 11:32:06 -0500
Committer: Thomas Gleixner
CommitDate: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 22:50:37 +0200
Commit-ID: 9514ececa52e9f1436e7682e98c852d1338b699f
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/9514ececa52e9f1436e7682e98c852d1338b699f
Author: mike.tra...@hpe.com
AuthorDate: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 11:32:03 -0500
Committer: Thomas Gleixner
CommitDate: Mon,
Commit-ID: 9514ececa52e9f1436e7682e98c852d1338b699f
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/9514ececa52e9f1436e7682e98c852d1338b699f
Author: mike.tra...@hpe.com
AuthorDate: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 11:32:03 -0500
Committer: Thomas Gleixner
CommitDate: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 22:50:36 +0200
x86/tsc: Skip
Hi Lorenzo,
Do you have any comments for this patch?
Best regards,
Khuong Dinh
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Khuong Dinh wrote:
> This patch set enables ACPI MSI support for X-Gene PCIe v1 hardware
> and provides the proper MSI driver initialization ordering.
>
>
Commit-ID: 6c66350d0a482892793b888b07c1177fc6d4b344
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/6c66350d0a482892793b888b07c1177fc6d4b344
Author: mike.tra...@hpe.com
AuthorDate: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 11:32:05 -0500
Committer: Thomas Gleixner
CommitDate: Mon,
Hi Lorenzo,
Do you have any comments for this patch?
Best regards,
Khuong Dinh
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Khuong Dinh wrote:
> This patch set enables ACPI MSI support for X-Gene PCIe v1 hardware
> and provides the proper MSI driver initialization ordering.
>
> Signed-off-by: Khuong
Commit-ID: 6c66350d0a482892793b888b07c1177fc6d4b344
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/6c66350d0a482892793b888b07c1177fc6d4b344
Author: mike.tra...@hpe.com
AuthorDate: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 11:32:05 -0500
Committer: Thomas Gleixner
CommitDate: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 22:50:37 +0200
x86/tsc:
On 10/16/2017 02:03 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 10/16/2017 01:32 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>> On 10/16/2017 11:07 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> On Mon 16-10-17 10:43:38, Mike Kravetz wrote:
Just to be clear, the posix standard talks about a typed memory object.
The suggested implementation
On 10/16/2017 02:03 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 10/16/2017 01:32 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>> On 10/16/2017 11:07 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> On Mon 16-10-17 10:43:38, Mike Kravetz wrote:
Just to be clear, the posix standard talks about a typed memory object.
The suggested implementation
Commit-ID: 341102c3ef29c33611586072363cf9982a8bdb77
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/341102c3ef29c33611586072363cf9982a8bdb77
Author: mike.tra...@hpe.com
AuthorDate: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 11:32:02 -0500
Committer: Thomas Gleixner
CommitDate: Mon,
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 03:39:57PM +0530, suni...@techveda.org wrote:
> From: Suniel Mahesh
>
> This fixes the following coccinelle warning:
> WARNING: return of 0/1 in function 'ssi_is_hw_key' with return type bool.
Perhaps
Coccinelle emits WARNING: return of 0/1 in
Commit-ID: 341102c3ef29c33611586072363cf9982a8bdb77
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/341102c3ef29c33611586072363cf9982a8bdb77
Author: mike.tra...@hpe.com
AuthorDate: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 11:32:02 -0500
Committer: Thomas Gleixner
CommitDate: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 22:50:36 +0200
x86/tsc: Add
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 03:39:57PM +0530, suni...@techveda.org wrote:
> From: Suniel Mahesh
>
> This fixes the following coccinelle warning:
> WARNING: return of 0/1 in function 'ssi_is_hw_key' with return type bool.
Perhaps
Coccinelle emits WARNING: return of 0/1 in function 'ssi_is_hw_key'
Hi Harsha,
[auto build test WARNING on v4.14-rc3]
[cannot apply to drm/drm-next next-20171013]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
Hi Harsha,
[auto build test WARNING on v4.14-rc3]
[cannot apply to drm/drm-next next-20171013]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 03:38:11PM +0530, suni...@techveda.org wrote:
> From: Suniel Mahesh
>
> Bool tests don't need comparisons.
This commit log could be a bit longer. You may like to read
Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst (section 2).
> This fixes the
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 03:38:11PM +0530, suni...@techveda.org wrote:
> From: Suniel Mahesh
>
> Bool tests don't need comparisons.
This commit log could be a bit longer. You may like to read
Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst (section 2).
> This fixes the following coccinelle
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 20:49:11 +0530
Sumit Semwal wrote:
> I suspect it should be ok; please do feel free to add my
> Acked-by: Sumit Semwal
> if you wish :)
Done. Thanks!
-- Steve
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 20:49:11 +0530
Sumit Semwal wrote:
> I suspect it should be ok; please do feel free to add my
> Acked-by: Sumit Semwal
> if you wish :)
Done. Thanks!
-- Steve
Am Montag, 16. Oktober 2017, 23:02:06 CEST schrieb Daniel Borkmann:
> On 10/16/2017 10:55 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Am Montag, 16. Oktober 2017, 22:50:43 CEST schrieb Daniel Borkmann:
> >>> struct task_struct *task = current;
> >>>
> >>> + task_lock(task);
> >>>
> >>>
Am Montag, 16. Oktober 2017, 23:02:06 CEST schrieb Daniel Borkmann:
> On 10/16/2017 10:55 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Am Montag, 16. Oktober 2017, 22:50:43 CEST schrieb Daniel Borkmann:
> >>> struct task_struct *task = current;
> >>>
> >>> + task_lock(task);
> >>>
> >>>
Hi Harsha,
[auto build test ERROR on drm/drm-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.14-rc5 next-20171013]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
Hi Harsha,
[auto build test ERROR on drm/drm-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.14-rc5 next-20171013]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
On 10/16/2017 09:24 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
On 10/13, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
On 13.10.2017 19:05, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
I won't insist, but this suggests we should add a new helper,
get_ns_by_fd_type(fd, type), and convert get_net_ns_by_fd() to use it
as well.
That was in v3.
I'll
On 10/16/2017 09:24 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
On 10/13, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
On 13.10.2017 19:05, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
I won't insist, but this suggests we should add a new helper,
get_ns_by_fd_type(fd, type), and convert get_net_ns_by_fd() to use it
as well.
That was in v3.
I'll
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 01:42:46PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> Sean Paul writes:
>
>
> > With these nits fixed,
> > Reviewed-by: Sean Paul
>
> Like this?
>
Perfect, thanks!
Sean
> From 0aa52dd5a0873831c79c14942075354c041e5bed Mon Sep 17
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 01:42:46PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> Sean Paul writes:
>
>
> > With these nits fixed,
> > Reviewed-by: Sean Paul
>
> Like this?
>
Perfect, thanks!
Sean
> From 0aa52dd5a0873831c79c14942075354c041e5bed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Keith Packard
> Date: Mon,
On 10/16/2017 01:32 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 10/16/2017 11:07 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> On Mon 16-10-17 10:43:38, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>>> Just to be clear, the posix standard talks about a typed memory object.
>>> The suggested implementation has one create a connection to the memory
>>>
On 10/16/2017 01:32 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 10/16/2017 11:07 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> On Mon 16-10-17 10:43:38, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>>> Just to be clear, the posix standard talks about a typed memory object.
>>> The suggested implementation has one create a connection to the memory
>>>
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 06:56:31PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> drm_mode_create_lease
>
> Creates a lease for a list of drm mode objects, returning an
> fd for the new drm_master and a 64-bit identifier for the lessee
>
> drm_mode_list_lesees
>
> List the identifiers of the
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 06:56:31PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> drm_mode_create_lease
>
> Creates a lease for a list of drm mode objects, returning an
> fd for the new drm_master and a 64-bit identifier for the lessee
>
> drm_mode_list_lesees
>
> List the identifiers of the
On 10/16/2017 10:55 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
Am Montag, 16. Oktober 2017, 22:50:43 CEST schrieb Daniel Borkmann:
struct task_struct *task = current;
+ task_lock(task);
strncpy(buf, task->comm, size);
+ task_unlock(task);
Wouldn't this potentially lead to a
On 10/16/2017 10:55 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
Am Montag, 16. Oktober 2017, 22:50:43 CEST schrieb Daniel Borkmann:
struct task_struct *task = current;
+ task_lock(task);
strncpy(buf, task->comm, size);
+ task_unlock(task);
Wouldn't this potentially lead to a
Hi Al,
This pull request contains a single patch that allows file systems to
be mounted with i_version. I would really appreciate your forwarding
this patch to Linus.
thanks,
Mimi
---
The following changes since commit 8a5776a5f49812d29fe4b2d0a2d71675c3facf3f:
Linux 4.14-rc4 (2017-10-08
Hi Al,
This pull request contains a single patch that allows file systems to
be mounted with i_version. I would really appreciate your forwarding
this patch to Linus.
thanks,
Mimi
---
The following changes since commit 8a5776a5f49812d29fe4b2d0a2d71675c3facf3f:
Linux 4.14-rc4 (2017-10-08
On Mon 16-10-17 13:32:45, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 10/16/2017 11:07 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > That depends on who is actually going to use the contiguous memory. If
> > we are talking about drivers to communication to the userspace then
> > using driver specific fd with its mmap
On Mon 16-10-17 13:32:45, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 10/16/2017 11:07 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > That depends on who is actually going to use the contiguous memory. If
> > we are talking about drivers to communication to the userspace then
> > using driver specific fd with its mmap
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 10/02/17 20:53, frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Frank Rowand
>>
>> I have found the device tree overlay code to be difficult to read and
>> maintain. This patch series
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 10/02/17 20:53, frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Frank Rowand
>>
>> I have found the device tree overlay code to be difficult to read and
>> maintain. This patch series attempts to improve that situation.
>>
>> The
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 1:07 AM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> It is Rob's choice of which order to take the patches in.
If we have a choice, better to take fixes first so they can be more
easily backported.
Rob
> Either order, it will be a trivial fixup to the
Am Montag, 16. Oktober 2017, 22:50:43 CEST schrieb Daniel Borkmann:
> > struct task_struct *task = current;
> >
> > + task_lock(task);
> >
> > strncpy(buf, task->comm, size);
> >
> > + task_unlock(task);
>
> Wouldn't this potentially lead to a deadlock? E.g. you attach yourself
>
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 1:07 AM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> It is Rob's choice of which order to take the patches in.
If we have a choice, better to take fixes first so they can be more
easily backported.
Rob
> Either order, it will be a trivial fixup to the second patchset
> to go in.
Am Montag, 16. Oktober 2017, 22:50:43 CEST schrieb Daniel Borkmann:
> > struct task_struct *task = current;
> >
> > + task_lock(task);
> >
> > strncpy(buf, task->comm, size);
> >
> > + task_unlock(task);
>
> Wouldn't this potentially lead to a deadlock? E.g. you attach yourself
>
On 10/16/2017 08:18 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
Sadly we cannot use get_task_comm() since bpf_get_current_comm()
allows truncation.
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger
---
kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
On 10/16/2017 08:18 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
Sadly we cannot use get_task_comm() since bpf_get_current_comm()
allows truncation.
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger
---
kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in some cases I placed the "fall through" comment
on its own line, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115108
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in some cases I placed the "fall through" comment
on its own line, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115108
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
On 10/16/2017 09:22 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
[...]
So, I can happily squash 2/3 into 1/3 and resent.
Yeah, please just squash them.
Thanks,
Daniel
On 10/16/2017 09:22 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
[...]
So, I can happily squash 2/3 into 1/3 and resent.
Yeah, please just squash them.
Thanks,
Daniel
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:14:52PM +0200, Florent Revest wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-08-31 at 11:26 +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > I wonder if this should be split into two series; one that sets up
> > anything you may need from KVM, and another one that uses that for
> > UEFI.
> >
> > There's a
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:14:52PM +0200, Florent Revest wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-08-31 at 11:26 +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > I wonder if this should be split into two series; one that sets up
> > anything you may need from KVM, and another one that uses that for
> > UEFI.
> >
> > There's a
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 8:02 PM, wrote:
> From: Frank Rowand
>
> Move more code into of_overlay_apply() so that it does not have
> to be duplicated by each caller of of_overlay_apply().
>
> The test in of_resolve_phandles() that the overlay tree is
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 8:02 PM, wrote:
> From: Frank Rowand
>
> Move more code into of_overlay_apply() so that it does not have
> to be duplicated by each caller of of_overlay_apply().
>
> The test in of_resolve_phandles() that the overlay tree is detached is
> temporarily disabled so that old
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Thomas Meyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> drivers/of/unittest.c fails on UML with a kernel crash.
> The crash is due to of_find_device_by_node() returning NULL:
>
> 841│ /* Test that a missing irq domain returns -EPROBE_DEFER */
> 842│ np =
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Thomas Meyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> drivers/of/unittest.c fails on UML with a kernel crash.
> The crash is due to of_find_device_by_node() returning NULL:
>
> 841│ /* Test that a missing irq domain returns -EPROBE_DEFER */
> 842│ np =
> A minor complaint: all commits are missing "Fixes:" tag.
* Do you require it to be added to the commit messages?
* Would you like to get a finer patch granularity then?
* Do you find any more information missing?
Regards,
Markus
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:14:45PM +0200, Florent Revest wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-08-31 at 11:23 +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> > > index 2ea21da..1d2d3df 100644
> > > --- a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> > > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> > > @@ -772,6
> A minor complaint: all commits are missing "Fixes:" tag.
* Do you require it to be added to the commit messages?
* Would you like to get a finer patch granularity then?
* Do you find any more information missing?
Regards,
Markus
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:14:45PM +0200, Florent Revest wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-08-31 at 11:23 +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> > > index 2ea21da..1d2d3df 100644
> > > --- a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> > > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> > > @@ -772,6
Sean Paul writes:
> With these nits fixed,
> Reviewed-by: Sean Paul
Like this?
From 0aa52dd5a0873831c79c14942075354c041e5bed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Keith Packard
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 13:41:20 -0700
Subject: [PATCH]
Sean Paul writes:
> With these nits fixed,
> Reviewed-by: Sean Paul
Like this?
From 0aa52dd5a0873831c79c14942075354c041e5bed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Keith Packard
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 13:41:20 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] drm: Mark functions requiring idr_mutex. Add lockdep to
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 03:12:36PM +, Vadim Pasternak wrote:
> The patchset modifies x86/mlxcpld-hotplug.c for making it architecture
> independent, renames to mlxreg-hotplug and moves it from
> drivers/platform/x86 folder to new drivers/platform/mellanox folder.
> This modification also
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 03:12:36PM +, Vadim Pasternak wrote:
> The patchset modifies x86/mlxcpld-hotplug.c for making it architecture
> independent, renames to mlxreg-hotplug and moves it from
> drivers/platform/x86 folder to new drivers/platform/mellanox folder.
> This modification also
> -Original Message-
> From: Lee Jones [mailto:lee.jo...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 4:15 PM
> To: Limonciello, Mario
> Cc: rui_f...@realsil.com.cn; gre...@linuxfoundation.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org; de...@driverdev.osuosl.org;
> -Original Message-
> From: Lee Jones [mailto:lee.jo...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 4:15 PM
> To: Limonciello, Mario
> Cc: rui_f...@realsil.com.cn; gre...@linuxfoundation.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org; de...@driverdev.osuosl.org; ricky...@realtek.com;
>
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 06:56:30PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> Attempts to modify un-leased objects are rejected with an error.
> Information returned about unleased objects is modified to make them
> appear unusable and/or disconnected.
>
> Changes for v2 as suggested by Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 06:56:30PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> Attempts to modify un-leased objects are rejected with an error.
> Information returned about unleased objects is modified to make them
> appear unusable and/or disconnected.
>
> Changes for v2 as suggested by Daniel Vetter :
>
>
On 10/16/2017 11:07 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 16-10-17 10:43:38, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>> Just to be clear, the posix standard talks about a typed memory object.
>> The suggested implementation has one create a connection to the memory
>> object to receive a fd, then use mmap as usual to get
On 10/16/2017 11:07 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 16-10-17 10:43:38, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>> Just to be clear, the posix standard talks about a typed memory object.
>> The suggested implementation has one create a connection to the memory
>> object to receive a fd, then use mmap as usual to get
Hi Lothar,
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 7:43 AM, Lothar Waßmann
wrote:
> +/ {
> + aliases {
> + lcdif_24bit_pins_a = _disp0_3;
> + mmc0 =
Is this mmc0 alias really needed here?
I see it inside imx6ul.dtsi, but even inside imx6ul.dtsi:
Hi Lothar,
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 7:43 AM, Lothar Waßmann
wrote:
> +/ {
> + aliases {
> + lcdif_24bit_pins_a = _disp0_3;
> + mmc0 =
Is this mmc0 alias really needed here?
I see it inside imx6ul.dtsi, but even inside imx6ul.dtsi: does it make
sense to have
Hi Linus,
Please pull from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mchehab/linux-media
media/v4.14-2
For the following media core fixes:
- cec: Respond to unregistered initiators, when applicable
- dvb_frontend: only use kref after initialized
and the following driver-specific
Hi Linus,
Please pull from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mchehab/linux-media
media/v4.14-2
For the following media core fixes:
- cec: Respond to unregistered initiators, when applicable
- dvb_frontend: only use kref after initialized
and the following driver-specific
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
---
This code was tested by compilation only (GCC 7.2.0 was used).
Please, verify if the actual intention of the code is to
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
---
This code was tested by compilation only (GCC 7.2.0 was used).
Please, verify if the actual intention of the code is to fall through.
Hello.
On 05.10.2017 02:52, Kees Cook wrote:
> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
> to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
>
> Cc: Alexander Aring
> Cc:
Hello.
On 05.10.2017 02:52, Kees Cook wrote:
> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
> to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
>
> Cc: Alexander Aring
> Cc: Stefan Schmidt
> Cc:
701 - 800 of 2356 matches
Mail list logo