I have an interesting issue with the combination of i2c dummy devices,
regmap-irq and domains.
I have been adding device tree support to the palmas mfd driver.
The palmas device has 3 i2c addresses it responds to so it has one
normal i2c device and 2 dummy devices to claim the 2nd/3rd addresses
Tables/Armada70x0/Dsdt.asl#L131
>
> I will appreciate any comments or remarks.
>
Nice work, this looks pretty neat to me, for series.
Reviewed-by: Graeme Gregory
Thanks
Graeme
> Best regards,
> Marcin
>
> Changelog:
> v2 -> v3:
> * 1/7, 2/7
> - Add Rafael's Acked-
that information
> was (or is now) contained at the top of the file in the comments.
>
This is all fine with me.
Acked-by: Graeme Gregory
Thanks
> Cc: Tony Lindgren
> Cc: Lee Jones
> Cc: Graeme Gregory
> Cc: Jorge Eduardo Candelaria
> Cc: linux-o...@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 02:44:10AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:00:16PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>
> > +Common _DSD bindings should be submitted to ASWG to be included in the
> > +document :-
> > +
> >
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 11:40:29AM +0100, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
>
> Firstly provide some useful information about the hardware. It's no good
> wavng your arms at a document that requires agreeing to a giant ARM T
> to get access to. Most of don't work for ARM and we'd have to get our own
>
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 01:22:10AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 September 2014, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> > It sounds like from the discussions in other threads that ARM64 should
> > be following x86 and re-using DT bindings here. In which case there is
> > not
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 03:51:02PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 03:00:03PM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
> > @@ -23,7 +23,11 @@ acpi-y += nvs.o
> >
> > # Power management related
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 04:49:03PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 04:18:51PM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 03:51:02PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 03:00:03PM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> >
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 03:43:36PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> On 09/12/2014 10:00 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > From: Graeme Gregory
> >
> > ACPI 5.1 does not currently support S states for ARM64 hardware but
> > ACPI code will call acpi_target_system_state() for dev
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 04:57:24PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>
>
> On 11/09/14 16:37, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 02:29:34PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> >>Regarding the requests to refactor ACPICA to work better for ARM. I
> >>completely agree that it should be done, but
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 05:17:51PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 01 September 2014 23:06:00 Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> > +/* Configure some sensible defaults for ACPI mode */
> > +static int smsc911x_probe_config_acpi(struct smsc911x_platform_config
> > *config,
> > +
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 05:53:33PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 04:28:54PM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 05:17:51PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Monday 01 September 2014 23:06:00 Hanjun Guo wrote:
> >
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 06:12:48PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 04:06:01PM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > From: Graeme Gregory
> >
> > This is a subset of pl011 UART which does not supprt DMA or baud rate
> > changing.
> >
> > It
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 07:11:44PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 01 September 2014 18:04:47 Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 04:06:00PM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> > > +/* Configure some sensible defaults for ACPI mode */
> > > +static int
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 05:35:29PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 03:57:41PM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > From: Graeme Gregory
> >
> > acpi_wakeup_address is used on x86 as the address bios jumps into
> > when machine wakes up from susp
Added the match table and pointers for ACPI probing to the driver.
This uses the same identifier for virt devices as being used for qemu
ARM64 ACPI support.
http://git.linaro.org/people/shannon.zhao/qemu.git/commit/d0bf1955a3ecbab4b51d46f8c5dda02b7e14a17e
Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:08:00AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Now that the basic ACPI GSI code is irq domain aware, make sure
> that the ACPI support in the GIC doesn't pointlessly deviate from
> the DT path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 17
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:07:55AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> The irqdomain code is not entierely really ACPI friendly, as it has
> some built-in knowledge of the device-tree. Nothing too harmful, but
> enough to scare the ARM ACPI developpers which end up with their own
> version of the square
On some architectures /dev/mem is being removed. For debug/analysis
tools like FWTS/acpidump we therefore need to expose the ACPI root
tables in sysfs like the other tables.
Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory
---
drivers/acpi/sysfs.c | 123 +++
1 file
Hi,
I thought I would send this patch as an RFC. It is something I did when
another linaro engineer was modifying acpica-tools to not require /dev/mem.
It exports the 3 tables that are not currenly exported in sysfs.
Currently I do not think there is any user of this because acpica-tools can
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 09:17:08PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:44:02AM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> > Added the match table and pointers for ACPI probing to the driver.
> >
> > This uses the same identifier for virt devices as being used fo
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 03:09:47PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> The existing BAD_MADT_ENTRY macro only checks that the size of the data
> structure for an MADT subtable matches the length entry in the subtable.
> This is, unfortunately, not reliable. Nor, as it turns out, does it have
> anything to
ompiled for x86 and ia64 with no
> known failures.
>
> Changes for v3:
>-- Reviewed-and-tested-by from Sudeep Holla for arm64 parts
>-- Clearer language in error messages (Graeme Gregory, Timur Tabi)
>-- Double checked that inserting call to bad_madt_entry() into the
>
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 05:33:10PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> From: David Daney
>
> Find out which PHYs belong to which BGX instance in the ACPI way.
>
> Set the MAC address of the device as provided by ACPI tables. This is
> similar to the implementation for devicetree in
>
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 03:42:43PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 03:29:52PM +, Jon Masters wrote:
> > On 01/21/2015 10:23 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > I have some questions for the ACPI and EFI folk:
> > >
> > > 1. When booting with ACPI, are the EFI run-time
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 02:46:35PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2015年01月18日 14:31, Jon Masters wrote:
> >Hi Folks,
> >
> >Sorry for top posting from bed. The mainstream servers will all likely do
> > PCIe but there are several that may not. They should not be excluded. That
> said,
> >if we
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:59:45AM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:47:23AM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On 5 February 2015 at 10:41, Catalin Marinas
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 06:58:14PM +, Mark Salter wrote:
> > >> On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 17:57
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 12:07:20PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:14:43AM +0000, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:59:45AM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:47:23AM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 01:40:33PM +, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 08:45:36PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > When system supporting both DT and ACPI but firmware providing
> > no dtb, we can use this linux,uefi-stub-generated-dtb property
> > to let kernel know that we can try
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 11:18:24PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, February 02, 2015 08:45:33 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > From: Graeme Gregory
> >
> > ACPI 5.1 does not currently support S states for ARM64 hardware but
> > ACPI code will call acpi_target_syst
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 01:17:14PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 30/06/15 12:50, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > Hi Marc,
> >
> > On 06/29/2015 04:39 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >> On 27/06/15 04:52, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> >>> On 06/24/2015 01:38 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 04:34:46PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2014年12月31日 04:13, ashw...@codeaurora.org wrote:
> >Hi Hanjun,
> >
> >Overall the document looks good to us. Some minor clarifications below.
> >
> >>-- Forwarded message --
&g
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 03:05:29PM +, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> Hi Tomasz
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tomasz Nowicki [mailto:t...@semihalf.com]
> > Sent: 22 November 2016 13:58
> > To: liudongdong (C); helg...@kernel.org; a...@arndb.de;
> > raf...@kernel.org;
On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 05:06:31AM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
> Hi Duc, all,
>
> (and changing the subject and trimming/adjusting the CC)
>
> On 12/02/2016 02:39 PM, Duc Dang wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 12:11 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
> >> You're welcome.
> >>
> >> (Unrelated) Note that I
e and configure
> controller registers to select and address the target secondary device.
>
> The quirk will only be applied for X-Gene PCIe MCFG table with
> OEM revison 1, 2, 3 or 4 (PCIe controller v1 and v2 on X-Gene SoCs).
>
> Signed-off-by: Duc Dang
Tested on our Linaro mo
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 12:16:55PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 12:30:19PM +0300, Aleksey Makarov wrote:
> >
> > On 09/05/2016 03:36 PM, Aleksey Makarov wrote:
> > > SBBR mentions SPCR as a mandatory ACPI table. So enable it for ARM64
> > >
> > > Earlycon should be set up
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 12:34:16PM -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 12:16 +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 12:30:19PM +0300, Aleksey Makarov wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 09/05/2016 03:36 PM, Aleksey Makarov wrote:
> > > >
> > > > SBBR mentions SPCR as a
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 04:50:07PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 05:04:07PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > In ARM ACPI systems, IOMMU components are specified through static
> > IORT table entries. In order to create platform devices for the
> > corresponding ARM
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:41:29AM +0100, G Gregory wrote:
> On 19 April 2016 at 11:26, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
> > On 15.04.2016 19:06, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
> >>
> >> Passes 1.x miss PCI enhanced allocation (EA) header for fixed-BARs,
> >> thus these passes should use Cavium-specific config
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 03:16:53AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 11:38:49 AM Graeme Gregory wrote:
> > Call the amba device creation function in the default enumeration path,
> > this is the same location platform devices are probed.
>
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 03:21:47AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 11:38:50 AM Graeme Gregory wrote:
> > In ACPI this device is only defined in SBSA mode so
> > if we are probing from ACPI use this mode.
> >
> > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 10:23:08AM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:
> G Gregory wrote:
> >>>I'm confused by this patch. We already have code like this in
> >>>tty-next, in the form of sbsa_uart_probe():
> >>>
>
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 09:54:43AM +0800, yankejian wrote:
> Add support for getting the PHY devices on an MDIO bus by ACPI.
> Currently many of the ethernet drivers are open coding a solution
> for reading data out of ACPI to find the correct PHY device.
> This patch implements a set of common
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 11:24:20AM +0800, Wang Hongcheng wrote:
> AMD pl330 is a UART DMA device, it shares one ACPI item with UART. So
> a platform device and an acpi device will be created according to
> AMD0020 ACPI dev. And its mem base address must have an offset. As a
> result,
On 22/03/16 21:45, David Daney wrote:
On 03/22/2016 11:48 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
On 03/08/2016 06:59 PM, David Daney wrote:
From: David Daney
v15:
- Make the distance-map node optional (again), if it is not in
the device tree, default values are used.
- Minor
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 11:29:30AM +, Julien Grall wrote:
> Fill up the recently introduced gic_kvm_info with the virtual GIC
> information.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner
> Cc: Jason Cooper
> Cc: Marc Zyngier
>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Add ACPI
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 06:00:31PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> On 04/05/2016 02:56 AM, Charles Garcia-Tobin wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 04/04/2016 23:52, "Mark Rutland" wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 02:44:41PM +0300, Irina Tirdea wrote:
> >>> This is a proposal for adding ACPI
ntroduces a new function acpi_console_check().
> >> This function is called when a new uart is registered at serial_core.c
> >> the same way OF code checks for console. If the registered uart is the
> >> console specified by SPCR table, this function calls
> >&g
MCFG IDs along with custom pci_ops structure and initialization
> call.
>
> As an example, the last patch presents quirk handling mechanism usage for
> ThunderX PEM driver.
>
Series looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Graeme Gregory
> v4 -> v5
> - rebase against v4.8-rc1
&g
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 04:19:14PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 03:26:39PM +0300, Aleksey Makarov wrote:
> >
> > On 06/02/2016 09:02 PM, Aleksey Makarov wrote:
> > >
> > > On 05/20/2016 04:03 PM, Aleksey Makarov wrote:
> >
> > Hi Russell,
> >
> > Can you
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 02:53:20PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 11:04 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, July 01, 2016 04:23:40 PM Will Deacon wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 09:48:02PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> >> > On 2016/6/30 21:27, Rafael J. Wysocki
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 04:45:17PM +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
>
> On 22/02/16 14:46, Aleksey Makarov wrote:
> >From: Leif Lindholm
> >
> >In order to support selecting earlycon via either ACPI or DT, move
> >the decision on whether to attempt ACPI configuration into the
> >early_param
Hi Fu Wei,
Looks ok to me.
Reviewed by: Graeme Gregory
Thanks
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 03:31:19PM +0800, fu@linaro.org wrote:
> From: Fu Wei
>
> This driver bases on linux kernel watchdog framework, and
> use "pretimeout" in the framework. It supports getting ti
As discussed when Shannon Zhao sent a patch to add platform_device support
to pl061 driver. Russel and other maintainers prefered that ACPI learned
how to create AMBA devices rather than converting/adding platform_device
support to AMBA drivers.
In ACPI this device is only defined in SBSA mode so
if we are probing from ACPI use this mode.
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Len Brown
Cc: Russell King
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory
---
drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c | 32 +---
1 file changed
Cc: Russell King
Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory
---
drivers/acpi/Makefile| 1 +
drivers/acpi/acpi_amba.c | 157 +++
include/linux/acpi.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 159 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/acpi_amba.c
diff --git
Call the amba device creation function in the default enumeration path,
this is the same location platform devices are probed.
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Len Brown
Cc: Russell King
Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory
---
drivers/acpi/scan.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 05:45:22PM +0600, Aleksey Makarov wrote:
> 'ARM Server Base Boot Requiremets' [1] mention SPCR
> (Serial Port Console Redirection Table) [2] as a mandatory ACPI table
> that specifies the configuration of serial console.
>
> Parse this table and check if any registered
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 09:01:26AM +, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 05:45:22PM +0600, Aleksey Makarov wrote:
> > 'ARM Server Base Boot Requiremets' [1] mention SPCR
> > (Serial Port Console Redirection Table) [2] as a mandatory ACPI table
> > that specif
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 01:21:01PM +0300, Oleksandr Kozaruk wrote:
> On 06/07/2013 05:44 PM, g...@slimlogic.co.uk wrote:
> >On 2013-06-07 15:36, Mark Brown wrote:
> >>On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 01:53:10PM +0300, Oleksandr Kozaruk wrote:
> >>>From: Graeme Gregory
&g
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:32:44AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 2:13 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> > Did the group conclude that the idea of FDT augmenting ACPI is not feasible
> > ?
>
> I don't think anyone really knows. For example: how to specify a few
> config
Whole series looks good to me.
Acked-by: Graeme Gregory
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 06:34:20PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> This patch series does following:
> - Remove unused member from extcon palmas structure.
> - Fix to support of detecting cable properly with multiple inser
201 - 262 of 262 matches
Mail list logo
