On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 09:00:26AM -0500, you [James Lewis Nance] claimed:
( mrproper == Mr. Proper )
I saw a post from Linus once about this. It is Finnish for "Mr. Clean".
Just to be sure: 'proper' does not mean anything in Finnish (nor Swedish
for that matter AFAIK) it just the
[1.] Upon boot, the 2.4.1 kernel misconfigures one of two 3c509b NICs
installed in my computer as "BNC" rather than "10baseT".
Boot messages for eth0 in kernel 2.2:
eth0: 3c509 at 0x300 tag 1, 10baseT port, address 00 a0 24 e9 8d a1, IRQ 10.
and in 2.4:
eth0: 3c509 at 0x300,
Why not have the /proc/config option but instead of being plain text,
make it binary with a userspace app that can interpret it?
[snip]
You'd have
2.4.3-pre3:110101 . . . . .
I think this is against UNIX/Linux philosophy... Why we wouldn't just
providing all the interface
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 03:20:42PM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
I see gitweb is much more usable (faster) than a few months ago, but
there is one thing a bit problematic: in the history of patches I'm
very often interested in which kernel version of Linus' tree the patch
appeared for
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 08:52:17AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
...
tags
4 days agov2.6.24-rc3 Linux 2.6.24-rc3
2 weeks ago v2.6.24-rc2 Linux 2.6.24-rc2
4 weeks ago v2.6.24-rc1 Linux 2.6.24-rc1
6 weeks ago v2.6.23 Linux 2.6.23
which drives me crazy, because,
kind to
local changes.
Kind regards,
Petr Baudis
diff -ruN git-0.03/gitadd.sh git-devel-clean/gitadd.sh
--- git-0.03/gitadd.sh 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ git-devel-clean/gitadd.sh 2005-04-09 03:17:34.220577000 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+#!/bin/sh
Dear diary, on Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 09:08:59AM CEST, I got a letter
where Randy.Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Sat, 9 Apr 2005 04:53:57 +0200 Petr Baudis wrote:
..snip..
| FWIW, I made few small fixes (to prevent some trivial usage errors to
| cause cache corruption) and added
Hello,
Dear diary, on Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 09:45:52PM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
The good news is, the data structures/indexes haven't changed, but many of
the tools to interface with them have new (and improved!) semantics:
In particular, I
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 03:01:12AM CEST, I got a letter
where Phillip Lougher [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Apr 9, 2005 3:53 AM, Petr Baudis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, I made few small fixes (to prevent some trivial usage errors to
cause cache corruption) and added
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 01:31:10AM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Sat, 9 Apr 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Actually, I guess I wouldn't have to change the format. I could just
extend the existing tree object to be able to point to
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 07:53:40AM CEST, I got a letter
where Christopher Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 12:51:59AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
But I am wondering what your plans are to handle renames---or
does git already represent them?
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 11:28:54AM CEST, I got a letter
where Junio C Hamano [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
CL == Christopher Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
CL On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 12:51:59AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
But I am wondering what your plans are to handle
Hello,
so I released git-pasky-0.1, my set of patches and scripts upon
Linus' git, aimed at human usability and to an extent a SCM-like usage.
You can get it at
http://pasky.or.cz/~pasky/dev/git/git-pasky-base.tar.bz2
and after unpacking and building (make) do
git pull
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 07:45:12PM CEST, I got a letter
where Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
* Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will also need to do more testing on the linux kernel tree.
Committing patch-2.6.7 on 2.6.6 kernel and then diffing
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 09:13:19PM CEST, I got a letter
where Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 08:45:22PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
It turns out to be the forks for doing all the cuts and such what is
bogging it down so awfully (doing diff
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 12:07:37AM CEST, I got a letter
where Luck, Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
..snip..
Hey, I may end up being wrong, and yes, maybe I should have done a
two-level one. The good news is that we can trivially fix it later (even
dynamically - we can make
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 10:38:11PM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
It turns out to be the forks for doing all the cuts and such what is
bogging it down so awfully (doing diff-tree takes 0.48s
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 08:42:53PM CEST, I got a letter
where Christopher Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
I totally agree that odds is really really small.
That is why it is not worthy to handle the case. People hit that
can just add a new line or some thing to avoid it, if
it
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 01:10:58AM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
I currently already do a merge when you track someone's source - it will
throw away your previous HEAD record though
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 11:39:02PM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Can you pull my current repo, which has diff-tree -R that does what the
name suggests, and which should be faster than the
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 01:46:50AM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
(BTW, it would be useful to have a tool which just blindly takes what
you give it on input and throws it to an object
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 01:14:57AM CEST, I got a letter
where Paul Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
Useful explanation - thanks, Linus.
Is this picture and description accurate:
==
working
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 02:20:52AM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
Btw, does anybody have strong opinions on the license? I didn't put in a
COPYING file exactly because I was torn between GPLv2 and OSL2.1.
I'm inclined to go with GPLv2
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 10:38:11PM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
..snip..
Can you pull my current repo, which has diff-tree -R that does what the
name suggests, and which should be faster than the 0.48 sec you see..
Am I just missing
Hello,
here goes git-pasky-0.2, my set of patches and scripts upon
Linus' git, aimed at human usability and to an extent a SCM-like usage.
If you already have a previous git-pasky version, just git pull pasky
to get it. Otherwise, you can get it from:
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 04:46:42AM CEST, I got a letter
where Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
Hello,
here goes git-pasky-0.2, my set of patches and scripts upon
Linus' git, aimed at human usability
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:50:51AM CEST, I got a letter
where Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
* Petr Baudis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
here goes git-pasky-0.2, my set of patches and scripts upon Linus'
git, aimed at human usability and to an extent
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:40:00AM CEST, I got a letter
where Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
* Ingo Molnar:
is there any fundamental problem with going with v2 right now, and then
once v3 is out and assuming it looks ok, all newly copyrightable bits
(new
Hello,
here goes git-pasky-0.3, my set of patches and scripts upon
Linus' git, aimed at human usability and to an extent a SCM-like usage.
If you already have a previous git-pasky version, just git pull pasky
to get it (but see below!!!). Otherwise, you can get it from:
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 05:49:31PM CEST, I got a letter
where Randy.Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 16:38:00 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds wrote:
..snip..
| Yes. Crappy old tree, but it can still read my git.git directory, so you
| can use it to update to
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 08:13:19PM CEST, I got a letter
where Chris Wedgwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 09:01:51AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
I disagree. Yes, the thing is designed to be replicated, so most of
the time the easiest thing to do is
Hello,
please do not trim the cc list so agressively.
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 05:46:38PM CEST, I got a letter
where Adam J. Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
..snip..
Graydon Hoare. (By the way, I would prefer that git just punt to
user level programs for diff and
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 12:40:21AM CEST, I got a letter
where Pedro Larroy [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
Hi
Hello,
I had a quick look at the source of GIT tonight, I'd like to warn you
about the use of hash functions as content indexers.
As probably you are aware, hash
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 03:20:18AM CEST, I got a letter
where Adam J. Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 05:46:38PM CEST, I got a letter
where Adam J. Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
..snip..
Graydon Hoare. (By the way, I would
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 06:05:19AM CEST, I got a letter
where David Eger [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
So with git, *every* changeset is an entire (compressed) copy of the
kernel. Really? Every patch you accept adds 37 MB to your hard disk?
Am I missing something here?
Yes.
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 10:39:40AM CEST, I got a letter
where Geert Uytterhoeven [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
..snip..
Basically, when you look at merge(1) :
SYNOPSIS
merge [ options ] file1 file2 file3
DESCRIPTION
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:47:25PM CEST, I got a letter
where Martin Schlemmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 15:57 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
Hello,
here goes git-pasky-0.3, my set of patches and scripts upon
Linus' git, aimed at human usability
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 03:13:15PM CEST, I got a letter
where Martin Schlemmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 15:02 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:47:25PM CEST, I got a letter
where Martin Schlemmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] told
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 11:50:48AM CEST, I got a letter
where Petr Baudis [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 10:39:40AM CEST, I got a letter
where Geert Uytterhoeven [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
..snip
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:47:05AM CEST, I got a letter
where Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:07:36PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
I'd suggest making it [index] big-endian to make sure the LE weenies don't
forget to byteswap properly.
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:25:04AM CEST, I got a letter
where David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 10:59 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
Theoretically, you are never supposed to share your index if you work
in fully git environment.
Maybe -- if we
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:35:21AM CEST, I got a letter
where Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 03:57:58PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
here goes git-pasky-0.3, my set of patches and scripts upon
Linus' git, aimed at human usability
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:38:52AM CEST, I got a letter
where Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:35:21AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 03:57:58PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
here goes git-pasky-0.3, my set of patches
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:40:31PM CEST, I got a letter
where Oliver Korpilla [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
Hello!
Hello,
I wondered if there is a project or setup that does allow me to build a
GNU/Linux userland including kernel, build environment, basic tools with
a
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 07:01:34PM CEST, I got a letter
where Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
For future reference, git is unhappy if you actually do this, because your
HEAD won't match the (empty) contents of the new directory. The easiest
thing is to cp -r your
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:03:07PM CEST, I got a letter
where Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:35:21AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
I tried this today, applied my patch for BE-LE conversions and
glibc-2.2 compatibility (attached, still
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 08:15:37PM CEST, I got a letter
where Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
hi,
Hello,
I got the terminology mixed up. I guess what I really want to know is,
what are the different types of exploits by which rootkits
(specifically the ones that modify
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 01:33:45PM CEST, I got a letter
where Maciej Soltysiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
Hi,
Hello,
Is there currently a kernel tree that Linus is working ?
I mean, now that we have 2.6.12-rc2 not being
developed with BK, is that code getting fixes and
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 09:15:00PM CEST, I got a letter
where [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
From: Petr Baudis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linus stopped merging stuff to his kernel for few days in order to
develop his (at least temporary) alternative to BK, called git.
See the mailing
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 08:04:37PM CEST, I got a letter
where Igor Shmukler [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
We HAVE to intercept system calls.
Why? What do you need to do?
--
Petr Pasky Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
C++: an octopus made by
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 12:19:01AM CEST, I got a letter
where Steven Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote:
Nice, it looks like the merge of this tree, and my usb tree worked just
fine.
Yup, it all seems to work
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 10:20:47PM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
Pasky? Can you check my latest git stuff, notably read-tree.c and the
changes to git-pull-script?
I've made git merge to use read-tree -m, HTH.
I will probably not buy
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 12:45:02AM CEST, I got a letter
where Junio C Hamano [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
PB == Petr Baudis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
PB I'm wondering if doing
PB if [ $(show-diff) ]; then
PB git diff | git apply
PB else
PB checkout-cache -f -a
PB
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 12:38:17AM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
Just say no to patches.
FYI, I've - per Junio's suggestion - made git merge's fast-forward to
apply show-diff output as a patch instead. This is roughly equal to
doing the
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 01:04:48AM CEST, I got a letter
where Steven Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
Then, the flurry of patching file blah messages, followed by a rather
pregnant pause after the last patching message.
I wasn't complaining about the 4 minutes, just the
Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 02:03:27PM CEST, I got a letter
where Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
You should put this into .git/remotes
linus
rsync://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
(git addremote is preferred for that :-)
Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 09:00:09PM CEST, I got a letter
where Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
Hi!
Hi,
Well, not sure.
I did
git track linus
git cancel
but Makefile still contains -rc2. (Is git cancel right way to check
out the tree?)
Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 11:38:11PM CEST, I got a letter
where Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
Hi!
It seems that someone should write Kernel hacker's guide to
git... Documentation/git.txt seems like good place. I guess I'll do
it.
I've also started writing some
Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 11:55:43PM CEST, I got a letter
where [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
I can't quite see how to manage multiple heads in git. I notice that in
your tree on kernel.org that .git/HEAD is a symlink to heads/master ...
perhaps that is a clue.
I'd like to
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 12:29:07AM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't quite see how to manage multiple heads in git. I notice that in
your tree on kernel.org that .git/HEAD is a
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 01:19:47AM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
So in the long run this issue goes away - we'll just have synchronization
tools that won't get any unnecessary pollution. But in the short run I
actually check my git
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 01:22:01AM CEST, I got a letter
where Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
Hi!
Hi,
You should put this into .git/remotes
linus
rsync://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
(git addremote is
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 01:01:13AM CEST, I got a letter
where [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
But now I need a way to indicate to consumers of the public shared object
data base which HEAD to use.
Perhaps I should just say merge 821376bf15e692941f9235f13a14987009fd0b10
from
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 03:48:35AM CEST, I got a letter
where Inaky Perez-Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
Petr Baudis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've just added to git-pasky a possibility to refer to branches
inside of repositories by a fragment identifier:
rsync
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 04:15:45PM CET, Len Brown wrote:
This header files are part of the linux kernel, and thus of course
available in /usr/include/{asm,linux}.
So you pick up all of the kernel include/linux and include/asm*?
(but exclude include/acpi/, which is as much a kernel header
Hello,
I've released cogito-0.18.2, bringing a couple of bugfixes and a trivial new
feature to cogito-0.18.1. Still nothing too groundshattering.
* cg-log does not follow history across renames anymore; it never really
actually worked and was instead causing problems and random error
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 09:00:26AM -0500, you [James Lewis Nance] claimed:
> >
> > ( mrproper == Mr. Proper )
> >
> > I saw a post from Linus once about this. It is Finnish for "Mr. Clean".
>
> Just to be sure: 'proper' does not mean anything in Finnish (nor Swedish
> for that matter AFAIK)
> > [1.] Upon boot, the 2.4.1 kernel misconfigures one of two 3c509b NICs
> > installed in my computer as "BNC" rather than "10baseT".
>
> > Boot messages for eth0 in kernel 2.2:
> > eth0: 3c509 at 0x300 tag 1, 10baseT port, address 00 a0 24 e9 8d a1, IRQ 10.
> > and in 2.4:
> > eth0:
> Why not have the /proc/config option but instead of being plain text,
> make it binary with a userspace app that can interpret it?
[snip]
> You'd have
> 2.4.3-pre3:110101 . . . . .
>
I think this is against UNIX/Linux philosophy... Why we wouldn't just
providing all the
me dwimmy gitdiff.sh wrapper for tree-diff and
show-diff. At that point I might get my hand on some pull more kind to
local changes.
Kind regards,
Petr Baudis
diff -ruN git-0.03/gitadd.sh git-devel-clean/gitadd.sh
--- git-0.03/gitadd.sh 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0
Dear diary, on Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 09:08:59AM CEST, I got a letter
where "Randy.Dunlap" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Sat, 9 Apr 2005 04:53:57 +0200 Petr Baudis wrote:
..snip..
> | FWIW, I made few small fixes (to prevent some trivial usage errors to
>
Hello,
Dear diary, on Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 09:45:52PM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> The good news is, the data structures/indexes haven't changed, but many of
> the tools to interface with them have new (and improved!) semantics:
>
> In
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 03:01:12AM CEST, I got a letter
where Phillip Lougher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Apr 9, 2005 3:53 AM, Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > FWIW, I made few small fixes (to prevent some trivial usage errors to
&g
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 01:31:10AM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Sat, 9 Apr 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > Actually, I guess I wouldn't have to change the format. I could just
> > extend the existing "tree" object to be able
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 07:53:40AM CEST, I got a letter
where Christopher Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 12:51:59AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> > But I am wondering what your plans are to handle renames---or
> > does git already represent them?
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 11:28:54AM CEST, I got a letter
where Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > "CL" == Christopher Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> CL> On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 12:51:59AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >>
> >> But I am wondering what your
Hello,
so I "released" git-pasky-0.1, my set of patches and scripts upon
Linus' git, aimed at human usability and to an extent a SCM-like usage.
You can get it at
http://pasky.or.cz/~pasky/dev/git/git-pasky-base.tar.bz2
and after unpacking and building (make) do
git pull
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 07:45:12PM CEST, I got a letter
where Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
>
> * Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > I will also need to do more testing on the linux kernel tree.
> > > > Committing patch-2.6.7 on 2.6.6 kernel and
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 09:13:19PM CEST, I got a letter
where Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 08:45:22PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
>
> > It turns out to be the forks for doing all the cuts and such what is
> > bo
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 12:07:37AM CEST, I got a letter
where "Luck, Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
..snip..
> >Hey, I may end up being wrong, and yes, maybe I should have done a
> >two-level one. The good news is that we can trivially fix it later (even
> >dynamically -
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 10:38:11PM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
> >
> > It turns out to be the forks for doing all the cuts and such what is
> > bogging it down so awf
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 08:42:53PM CEST, I got a letter
where Christopher Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> I totally agree that odds is really really small.
> That is why it is not worthy to handle the case. People hit that
> can just add a new line or some thing to avoid it,
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 01:10:58AM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
>
>
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
> >
> > I currently already do a merge when you track someone's source - it will
> > thr
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 11:39:02PM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > Can you pull my current repo, which has "diff-tree -R" that does what the
> > name suggests, and which should be
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 01:46:50AM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
>
>
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
> >
> > (BTW, it would be useful to have a tool which just blindly takes what
> >
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 01:14:57AM CEST, I got a letter
where Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Useful explanation - thanks, Linus.
>
> Is this picture and description accurate:
>
> ==
>
>
> <
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 02:20:52AM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Btw, does anybody have strong opinions on the license? I didn't put in a
> COPYING file exactly because I was torn between GPLv2 and OSL2.1.
>
> I'm inclined to go with
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 10:38:11PM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
..snip..
> Can you pull my current repo, which has "diff-tree -R" that does what the
> name suggests, and which should be faster than the 0.48 sec you see..
Am I just
Hello,
here goes git-pasky-0.2, my set of patches and scripts upon
Linus' git, aimed at human usability and to an extent a SCM-like usage.
If you already have a previous git-pasky version, just git pull pasky
to get it. Otherwise, you can get it from:
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 04:46:42AM CEST, I got a letter
where Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > here goes git-pasky-0.2, my set of patches and scripts upon
> >
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:50:51AM CEST, I got a letter
where Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
>
> * Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > here goes git-pasky-0.2, my set of patches and scripts upon Li
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:40:00AM CEST, I got a letter
where Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> * Ingo Molnar:
>
> > is there any fundamental problem with going with v2 right now, and then
> > once v3 is out and assuming it looks ok, all newly copyrightable bits
>
Hello,
here goes git-pasky-0.3, my set of patches and scripts upon
Linus' git, aimed at human usability and to an extent a SCM-like usage.
If you already have a previous git-pasky version, just git pull pasky
to get it (but see below!!!). Otherwise, you can get it from:
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 05:49:31PM CEST, I got a letter
where "Randy.Dunlap" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 16:38:00 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds wrote:
..snip..
> | Yes. Crappy old tree, but it can still read my git.git directory, so you
> | can use it to
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 08:13:19PM CEST, I got a letter
where Chris Wedgwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 09:01:51AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > I disagree. Yes, the thing is designed to be replicated, so most of
> > the time the easiest thing
Hello,
please do not trim the cc list so agressively.
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 05:46:38PM CEST, I got a letter
where "Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
..snip..
> Graydon Hoare. (By the way, I would prefer that git just punt to
> user level programs for diff
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 12:40:21AM CEST, I got a letter
where Pedro Larroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Hi
Hello,
> I had a quick look at the source of GIT tonight, I'd like to warn you
> about the use of hash functions as content indexers.
>
> As probably you are aware,
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 03:20:18AM CEST, I got a letter
where "Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> >Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 05:46:38PM CEST, I got a letter
> >where "Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> >..snip..
> >> Graydon Hoare. (By
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 06:05:19AM CEST, I got a letter
where David Eger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> So with git, *every* changeset is an entire (compressed) copy of the
> kernel. Really? Every patch you accept adds 37 MB to your hard disk?
>
> Am I missing something here?
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 10:39:40AM CEST, I got a letter
where Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
..snip..
> > Basically, when you look at merge(1) :
> >
> > SYNOPSIS
> >me
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
