Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 07:53:40AM CEST, I got a letter
where Christopher Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 12:51:59AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> > But I am wondering what your plans are to handle renames---or
> > does git already represent them?
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 07:53:40AM CEST, I got a letter
where Christopher Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 12:51:59AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
But I am wondering what your plans are to handle renames---or
does git already represent them?
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 11:28:54AM CEST, I got a letter
where Junio C Hamano [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
CL == Christopher Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
CL On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 12:51:59AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
But I am wondering what your plans are to handle
Hello,
so I released git-pasky-0.1, my set of patches and scripts upon
Linus' git, aimed at human usability and to an extent a SCM-like usage.
You can get it at
http://pasky.or.cz/~pasky/dev/git/git-pasky-base.tar.bz2
and after unpacking and building (make) do
git pull
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 07:45:12PM CEST, I got a letter
where Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
* Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will also need to do more testing on the linux kernel tree.
Committing patch-2.6.7 on 2.6.6 kernel and then diffing
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 09:13:19PM CEST, I got a letter
where Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 08:45:22PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
It turns out to be the forks for doing all the cuts and such what is
bogging it down so awfully (doing diff
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 12:07:37AM CEST, I got a letter
where Luck, Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
..snip..
Hey, I may end up being wrong, and yes, maybe I should have done a
two-level one. The good news is that we can trivially fix it later (even
dynamically - we can make
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 10:38:11PM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
It turns out to be the forks for doing all the cuts and such what is
bogging it down so awfully (doing diff-tree takes 0.48s
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 08:42:53PM CEST, I got a letter
where Christopher Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
I totally agree that odds is really really small.
That is why it is not worthy to handle the case. People hit that
can just add a new line or some thing to avoid it, if
it
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 01:10:58AM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
I currently already do a merge when you track someone's source - it will
throw away your previous HEAD record though
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 11:39:02PM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Can you pull my current repo, which has diff-tree -R that does what the
name suggests, and which should be faster than the
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 01:46:50AM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
(BTW, it would be useful to have a tool which just blindly takes what
you give it on input and throws it to an object
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 01:14:57AM CEST, I got a letter
where Paul Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
Useful explanation - thanks, Linus.
Is this picture and description accurate:
==
working
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 02:20:52AM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
Btw, does anybody have strong opinions on the license? I didn't put in a
COPYING file exactly because I was torn between GPLv2 and OSL2.1.
I'm inclined to go with GPLv2
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 10:38:11PM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
..snip..
Can you pull my current repo, which has diff-tree -R that does what the
name suggests, and which should be faster than the 0.48 sec you see..
Am I just missing
Hello,
here goes git-pasky-0.2, my set of patches and scripts upon
Linus' git, aimed at human usability and to an extent a SCM-like usage.
If you already have a previous git-pasky version, just git pull pasky
to get it. Otherwise, you can get it from:
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 01:31:10AM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Sat, 9 Apr 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > Actually, I guess I wouldn't have to change the format. I could just
> > extend the existing "tree" object to be able
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 03:01:12AM CEST, I got a letter
where Phillip Lougher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Apr 9, 2005 3:53 AM, Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > FWIW, I made few small fixes (to prevent some trivial usage errors to
&g
Hello,
Dear diary, on Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 09:45:52PM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> The good news is, the data structures/indexes haven't changed, but many of
> the tools to interface with them have new (and improved!) semantics:
>
> In
Dear diary, on Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 09:08:59AM CEST, I got a letter
where "Randy.Dunlap" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Sat, 9 Apr 2005 04:53:57 +0200 Petr Baudis wrote:
..snip..
> | FWIW, I made few small fixes (to prevent some trivial usage errors to
>
Dear diary, on Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 09:08:59AM CEST, I got a letter
where Randy.Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Sat, 9 Apr 2005 04:53:57 +0200 Petr Baudis wrote:
..snip..
| FWIW, I made few small fixes (to prevent some trivial usage errors to
| cause cache corruption) and added
Hello,
Dear diary, on Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 09:45:52PM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
The good news is, the data structures/indexes haven't changed, but many of
the tools to interface with them have new (and improved!) semantics:
In particular, I
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 03:01:12AM CEST, I got a letter
where Phillip Lougher [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Apr 9, 2005 3:53 AM, Petr Baudis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, I made few small fixes (to prevent some trivial usage errors to
cause cache corruption) and added
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 01:31:10AM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Sat, 9 Apr 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Actually, I guess I wouldn't have to change the format. I could just
extend the existing tree object to be able to point to
me dwimmy gitdiff.sh wrapper for tree-diff and
show-diff. At that point I might get my hand on some pull more kind to
local changes.
Kind regards,
Petr Baudis
diff -ruN git-0.03/gitadd.sh git-devel-clean/gitadd.sh
--- git-0.03/gitadd.sh 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0
kind to
local changes.
Kind regards,
Petr Baudis
diff -ruN git-0.03/gitadd.sh git-devel-clean/gitadd.sh
--- git-0.03/gitadd.sh 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ git-devel-clean/gitadd.sh 2005-04-09 03:17:34.220577000 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+#!/bin/sh
> Why not have the /proc/config option but instead of being plain text,
> make it binary with a userspace app that can interpret it?
[snip]
> You'd have
> 2.4.3-pre3:110101 . . . . .
>
I think this is against UNIX/Linux philosophy... Why we wouldn't just
providing all the
Why not have the /proc/config option but instead of being plain text,
make it binary with a userspace app that can interpret it?
[snip]
You'd have
2.4.3-pre3:110101 . . . . .
I think this is against UNIX/Linux philosophy... Why we wouldn't just
providing all the interface
> > [1.] Upon boot, the 2.4.1 kernel misconfigures one of two 3c509b NICs
> > installed in my computer as "BNC" rather than "10baseT".
>
> > Boot messages for eth0 in kernel 2.2:
> > eth0: 3c509 at 0x300 tag 1, 10baseT port, address 00 a0 24 e9 8d a1, IRQ 10.
> > and in 2.4:
> > eth0:
[1.] Upon boot, the 2.4.1 kernel misconfigures one of two 3c509b NICs
installed in my computer as "BNC" rather than "10baseT".
Boot messages for eth0 in kernel 2.2:
eth0: 3c509 at 0x300 tag 1, 10baseT port, address 00 a0 24 e9 8d a1, IRQ 10.
and in 2.4:
eth0: 3c509 at 0x300,
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 09:00:26AM -0500, you [James Lewis Nance] claimed:
> >
> > ( mrproper == Mr. Proper )
> >
> > I saw a post from Linus once about this. It is Finnish for "Mr. Clean".
>
> Just to be sure: 'proper' does not mean anything in Finnish (nor Swedish
> for that matter AFAIK)
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 09:00:26AM -0500, you [James Lewis Nance] claimed:
( mrproper == Mr. Proper )
I saw a post from Linus once about this. It is Finnish for "Mr. Clean".
Just to be sure: 'proper' does not mean anything in Finnish (nor Swedish
for that matter AFAIK) it just the
101 - 132 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
