RE: FUSYN and RT

> > > > > /** A fuqueue, a prioritized wait queue usable from > kernel space. */ > > struct fuqueue { > > spinlock_t lock; > > struct plist wlist; > > struct fuqueue_ops *ops; > > }; > > > > Would the above spinlock_t be a raw_spinlock_t?

RE: FUSYN and RT

/** A fuqueue, a prioritized wait queue usable from kernel space. */ struct fuqueue { spinlock_t lock; struct plist wlist; struct fuqueue_ops *ops; }; Would the above spinlock_t be a raw_spinlock_t? This goes back to

Realtime preempt

Ingo, this patch turns off the preemptable BKL when either PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY or PREEMPT_NONE is selected. Signed-off-by: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Index: linux-2.6.10-vaio/lib/Kconfig.RT === ---

Realtime preempt

Ingo, this patch turns off the preemptable BKL when either PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY or PREEMPT_NONE is selected. Signed-off-by: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: linux-2.6.10-vaio/lib/Kconfig.RT === ---

RE: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.11-rc3-V0.7.38-01

Ingo wrote: > > * Sven Dietrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This patch adds a config option to allow you to select > whether timer > > IRQ runs in thread or not. > > this patch only changes xtime_lock back and forth - it does > in no way imp

RE: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.11-rc3-V0.7.38-01

No, this is not in arm. Here is the patch. Index: linux-2.6.10/include/asm-i386/spinlock.h === --- linux-2.6.10.orig/include/asm-i386/spinlock.h 2005-02-11 09:25:39.224240321 + +++ linux-2.6.10/include/asm-i386/spinlock.h

RE: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.11-rc3-V0.7.38-01

No, this is not in arm. Here is the patch. Index: linux-2.6.10/include/asm-i386/spinlock.h === --- linux-2.6.10.orig/include/asm-i386/spinlock.h 2005-02-11 09:25:39.224240321 + +++ linux-2.6.10/include/asm-i386/spinlock.h

RE: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.11-rc3-V0.7.38-01

Ingo wrote: * Sven Dietrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This patch adds a config option to allow you to select whether timer IRQ runs in thread or not. this patch only changes xtime_lock back and forth - it does in no way impact the 'threadedness' of the timer IRQ. (it does

RE: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.11-rc3-V0.7.38-01

Hi George, you may want to use this for reference. This patch adds a config option to allow you to select whether timer IRQ runs in thread or not. I'm not totally happy with the #ifdefs, but it may make witching back and forth easier. Sven > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL

RE: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.11-rc3-V0.7.38-01

Hi George, you may want to use this for reference. This patch adds a config option to allow you to select whether timer IRQ runs in thread or not. I'm not totally happy with the #ifdefs, but it may make witching back and forth easier. Sven -Original Message- From: [EMAIL