> [snip]
> >
> > Hmm, readcd was trying to read 279884 blocks, while cdrecord said it
> > wrote 279882 blocks.
> >
> yes and seems to be always the same:
> with new burned cd I got:
> # ll /MultiCd/cd060213.iso
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3213312 Feb 13 2006 /MultiCd/cd060213.iso
>
> i.e.
[snip]
Hmm, readcd was trying to read 279884 blocks, while cdrecord said it
wrote 279882 blocks.
yes and seems to be always the same:
with new burned cd I got:
# ll /MultiCd/cd060213.iso
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3213312 Feb 13 2006 /MultiCd/cd060213.iso
i.e. 3213312/2048 == 1569
[snip]
Hmm, readcd was trying to read 279884 blocks, while cdrecord said it
wrote 279882 blocks.
yes and seems to be always the same:
with new burned cd I got:
# ll /MultiCd/cd060213.iso
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3213312 Feb 13 2006 /MultiCd/cd060213.iso
i.e. 3213312/2048 == 1569
while:
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 18:35, Joel Soete wrote:
scsi3 : ata_piix
ata1.00: ATA-4, max UDMA/66, 29336832 sectors: LBA
ata1.00: ata1: dev 0 multi count 16
ata1.00: configured for UDMA/33
<...>
scsi 3:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA Q
Hello Lennart,
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 05:35:32PM +, Joel Soete wrote:
A small update:
your patch also works against 2.6.20
but seems that open the door to numerous other pb:
1/ pb to burn cd:
# md5sum cd060213.iso
6a1248783a21722816b972aa9bae9d5e cd060213.iso
Hello Tejun,
Sorry for delay but I was a bit busy this week.
Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello, Joel.
Joel Soete wrote:
A small update:
your patch also works against 2.6.20
Glad to hear that.
but seems that open the door to numerous other pb:
1/ pb to burn cd:
# md5sum cd060213.iso
Hello Tejun,
Sorry for delay but I was a bit busy this week.
Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello, Joel.
Joel Soete wrote:
A small update:
your patch also works against 2.6.20
Glad to hear that.
but seems that open the door to numerous other pb:
1/ pb to burn cd:
# md5sum cd060213.iso
Hello Lennart,
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 05:35:32PM +, Joel Soete wrote:
A small update:
your patch also works against 2.6.20
but seems that open the door to numerous other pb:
1/ pb to burn cd:
# md5sum cd060213.iso
6a1248783a21722816b972aa9bae9d5e cd060213.iso
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 18:35, Joel Soete wrote:
scsi3 : ata_piix
ata1.00: ATA-4, max UDMA/66, 29336832 sectors: LBA
ata1.00: ata1: dev 0 multi count 16
ata1.00: configured for UDMA/33
...
scsi 3:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA QUANTUM FIREBALL
[snip]
Hmm, readcd was trying to read 279884 blocks, while cdrecord said it
wrote 279882 blocks.
yes and seems to be always the same:
with new burned cd I got:
# ll /MultiCd/cd060213.iso
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3213312 Feb 13 2006 /MultiCd/cd060213.iso
i.e. 3213312/2048 == 1569
while:
sdc12 sdc13 sdc14 sdc15 >
sd 3:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sdc
sd 3:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg2 type 0
[snip]
I will try to have a look later.
Cheers,
Joel
Joel Soete wrote:
Tejun Heo wrote:
Please test the attached patch over 2.6.20.
Thanks.
It's already too late so quick
sdc13 sdc14 sdc15
sd 3:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sdc
sd 3:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg2 type 0
[snip]
I will try to have a look later.
Cheers,
Joel
Joel Soete wrote:
Tejun Heo wrote:
Please test the attached patch over 2.6.20.
Thanks.
It's already too late so quick and dirty
Tejun Heo wrote:
Please test the attached patch over 2.6.20.
Thanks.
It's already too late so quick and dirty rebuild of 2.6.20-git6 (failled before
your patch) but now your patch fixe the pb:
[snip]
ata_piix :00:07.1: version 2.00ac7
ata1: PATA max UDMA/33 cmd 0x000101f0 ctl
Tejun Heo wrote:
Please test the attached patch over 2.6.20.
Thanks.
It's already too late so quick and dirty rebuild of 2.6.20-git6 (failled before
your patch) but now your patch fixe the pb:
[snip]
ata_piix :00:07.1: version 2.00ac7
ata1: PATA max UDMA/33 cmd 0x000101f0 ctl
Luming Yu wrote:
Does acpi=off make cdrom work?
Unfortunately not :_(
(for more details I attached a compressed dmesg trace?)
Thanks,
Joel
On 1/27/07, Joel Soete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello all,
I just tested libata with this newest 2.6.20-rc6 but no changes ;-(
An
Hello all,
I just tested libata with this newest 2.6.20-rc6 but no changes ;-(
Any news?
Thanks,
Joel
Joel Soete wrote:
Hello Tejun,
Tejun Heo wrote:
Joel Soete wrote:
Hello Alan, Jeff,
Reading a paper on this new libata, I just want to try but failled yet
for what said
Hello all,
I just tested libata with this newest 2.6.20-rc6 but no changes ;-(
Any news?
Thanks,
Joel
Joel Soete wrote:
Hello Tejun,
Tejun Heo wrote:
Joel Soete wrote:
Hello Alan, Jeff,
Reading a paper on this new libata, I just want to try but failled yet
for what said
Luming Yu wrote:
Does acpi=off make cdrom work?
Unfortunately not :_(
(for more details I attached a compressed dmesg trace?)
Thanks,
Joel
On 1/27/07, Joel Soete [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I just tested libata with this newest 2.6.20-rc6 but no changes ;-(
Any news
Hello Tejun,
Tejun Heo wrote:
Joel Soete wrote:
Hello Alan, Jeff,
Reading a paper on this new libata, I just want to try but failled yet
for what said this thread "ATAPI CDROM" ;_(.
I first test the latest stable 2.6.19.1 without luck, so I also want to
try latest 2.6.20-rc2 unf
Hello Tejun,
Tejun Heo wrote:
Joel Soete wrote:
Hello Alan, Jeff,
Reading a paper on this new libata, I just want to try but failled yet
for what said this thread ATAPI CDROM ;_(.
I first test the latest stable 2.6.19.1 without luck, so I also want to
try latest 2.6.20-rc2 unfortunately
CD-ROM CD-R/RW drive, 768kB Cache, DMA
Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20
[snip]
Joel Soete wrote:
Hello Alan, Jeff,
Reading a paper on this new libata, I just want to try but failled yet
for what said this thread "ATAPI CDROM" ;_(.
I first test the latest stable 2.6.19.1 witho
, DMA
Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20
[snip]
Joel Soete wrote:
Hello Alan, Jeff,
Reading a paper on this new libata, I just want to try but failled yet
for what said this thread ATAPI CDROM ;_(.
I first test the latest stable 2.6.19.1 without luck, so I also want to
try latest 2.6.20-rc2
Hello Alan, Jeff,
Reading a paper on this new libata, I just want to try but failled yet for what said this
thread "ATAPI CDROM" ;_(.
I first test the latest stable 2.6.19.1 without luck, so I also want to try latest 2.6.20-rc2 unfortunately without more
success.
Here it was the test of new
Hello Alan, Jeff,
Reading a paper on this new libata, I just want to try but failled yet for what said this
thread ATAPI CDROM ;_(.
I first test the latest stable 2.6.19.1 without luck, so I also want to try latest 2.6.20-rc2 unfortunately without more
success.
Here it was the test of new
...
>
> If the problem occured with CONFIG_XFS_FS=m I understand what went
> wrong.
>
Yes, it was
> It seems to be correct.
>
> This was a side effect of Roman's fix for the XFS <-> EXPORTFS
> dependency.
>
Thanks a lot,
Joel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
...
If the problem occured with CONFIG_XFS_FS=m I understand what went
wrong.
Yes, it was
It seems to be correct.
This was a side effect of Roman's fix for the XFS - EXPORTFS
dependency.
Thanks a lot,
Joel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
Hello Christoph,
In this part of your patch:
[...]
Index: linux-2.6.10/include/linux/gfp.h
===
--- linux-2.6.10.orig/include/linux/gfp.h 2005-01-21 10:43:59.0
-0800
+++ linux-2.6.10/include/linux/gfp.h2005-01-21
Hello Christoph,
In this part of your patch:
[...]
Index: linux-2.6.10/include/linux/gfp.h
===
--- linux-2.6.10.orig/include/linux/gfp.h 2005-01-21 10:43:59.0
-0800
+++ linux-2.6.10/include/linux/gfp.h2005-01-21
28 matches
Mail list logo
