-by: Kevin Corry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Carl Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6.23-rc1/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
===
--- linux-2.6.23-rc1.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
+++ linux-2.6.23-rc1/arch/powerpc/
-by: Kevin Corry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Carl Love [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux-2.6.23-rc1/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
===
--- linux-2.6.23-rc1.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
+++ linux-2.6.23-rc1/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
@@ -212,11
Hi Michael,
On Wed May 2 2007 8:11 pm, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 12:11 -0500, Kevin Corry wrote:
> > Change the powerpc version of topology_init() from an __initcall to
> > a subsys_initcall to match all other architectures.
> >
> > Signed-
Hi Michael,
On Wed May 2 2007 8:11 pm, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 12:11 -0500, Kevin Corry wrote:
Change the powerpc version of topology_init() from an __initcall to
a subsys_initcall to match all other architectures.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Corry [EMAIL PROTECTED
explicitly calls preempt_disable() before getting
the count of online CPUs.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Corry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6.21/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
===
--- linux-2.6.21.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
+++ linux-2.6.2
Change the powerpc version of topology_init() from an __initcall to
a subsys_initcall to match all other architectures.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Corry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6.21/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
===
---
its __initcall routine.
We have been running tests with these patches for the last few weeks on Cell
and Power5 systems without any problems.
Thanks,
--
Kevin Corry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ibm.com/linux/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" i
its __initcall routine.
We have been running tests with these patches for the last few weeks on Cell
and Power5 systems without any problems.
Thanks,
--
Kevin Corry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ibm.com/linux/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body
explicitly calls preempt_disable() before getting
the count of online CPUs.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Corry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux-2.6.21/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
===
--- linux-2.6.21.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
+++ linux-2.6.21
Change the powerpc version of topology_init() from an __initcall to
a subsys_initcall to match all other architectures.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Corry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux-2.6.21/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
===
--- linux
On Thu April 5 2007 6:04 pm, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 14:55 -0500, Kevin Corry wrote:
> > First, the stock 2.6.20 kernel has a prototype in include/linux/smp.h for
> > a function called smp_call_function_single(). However, this routine is
> > onl
On Thu April 5 2007 3:32 pm, Kevin Corry wrote:
> On Thu April 5 2007 3:08 pm, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Thursday 05 April 2007, Kevin Corry wrote:
> > > First, the stock 2.6.20 kernel has a prototype in include/linux/smp.h
> > > for a function called smp_call
On Thu April 5 2007 3:08 pm, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 05 April 2007, Kevin Corry wrote:
> > First, the stock 2.6.20 kernel has a prototype in include/linux/smp.h for
> > a function called smp_call_function_single(). However, this routine is
> > only implemented
problems elsewhere in the powerpc code. I've included the
patch below (after the smp-call-function-single patch). Does anyone know if
this change is safe, or if there was a specific reason that topology_init()
was left as an __initcall() on powerpc?
Thanks for your help!
--
Kevin Corry
[EMAIL
problems elsewhere in the powerpc code. I've included the
patch below (after the smp-call-function-single patch). Does anyone know if
this change is safe, or if there was a specific reason that topology_init()
was left as an __initcall() on powerpc?
Thanks for your help!
--
Kevin Corry
[EMAIL
On Thu April 5 2007 3:08 pm, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday 05 April 2007, Kevin Corry wrote:
First, the stock 2.6.20 kernel has a prototype in include/linux/smp.h for
a function called smp_call_function_single(). However, this routine is
only implemented on i386, x86_64, ia64, and mips
On Thu April 5 2007 3:32 pm, Kevin Corry wrote:
On Thu April 5 2007 3:08 pm, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday 05 April 2007, Kevin Corry wrote:
First, the stock 2.6.20 kernel has a prototype in include/linux/smp.h
for a function called smp_call_function_single(). However, this routine
On Thu April 5 2007 6:04 pm, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 14:55 -0500, Kevin Corry wrote:
First, the stock 2.6.20 kernel has a prototype in include/linux/smp.h for
a function called smp_call_function_single(). However, this routine is
only implemented on i386, x86_64
what we needed. Here's a
different version of Alasdair's patch that changes chunk to 64-bit and uses
do_div().
--
Kevin Corry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://evms.sourceforge.net/
In stripe_map(), change chunk to 64-bit and use do_div to divide and mod by
the number of stripes.
--- diff/drivers/md/dm-st
wing error:
MODPOST
*** Warning: "__udivdi3" [drivers/md/dm-mod.ko] undefined!
*** Warning: "__umoddi3" [drivers/md/dm-mod.ko] undefined!
--
Kevin Corry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://evms.sourceforge.net/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux
[drivers/md/dm-mod.ko] undefined!
*** Warning: __umoddi3 [drivers/md/dm-mod.ko] undefined!
--
Kevin Corry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://evms.sourceforge.net/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http
version of Alasdair's patch that changes chunk to 64-bit and uses
do_div().
--
Kevin Corry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://evms.sourceforge.net/
In stripe_map(), change chunk to 64-bit and use do_div to divide and mod by
the number of stripes.
--- diff/drivers/md/dm-stripe.c 2005-01-21 15:55:02.093379864
22 matches
Mail list logo
