Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

2007-11-21 Thread Petr Baudis
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 08:52:17AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > ... > tags > 4 days agov2.6.24-rc3 Linux 2.6.24-rc3 > 2 weeks ago v2.6.24-rc2 Linux 2.6.24-rc2 > 4 weeks ago v2.6.24-rc1 Linux 2.6.24-rc1 > 6 weeks ago v2.6.23 Linux 2.6.23 > > which drives me crazy,

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

2007-11-21 Thread Petr Baudis
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 08:52:17AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: ... tags 4 days agov2.6.24-rc3 Linux 2.6.24-rc3 2 weeks ago v2.6.24-rc2 Linux 2.6.24-rc2 4 weeks ago v2.6.24-rc1 Linux 2.6.24-rc1 6 weeks ago v2.6.23 Linux 2.6.23 which drives me crazy, because,

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

2007-11-20 Thread Petr Baudis
Hi, On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 03:20:42PM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > I see gitweb is much more usable (faster) than a few months ago, but > there is one thing a bit problematic: in the history of patches I'm > very often interested in which kernel version of Linus' tree the patch > appeared

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

2007-11-20 Thread Petr Baudis
Hi, On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 03:20:42PM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: I see gitweb is much more usable (faster) than a few months ago, but there is one thing a bit problematic: in the history of patches I'm very often interested in which kernel version of Linus' tree the patch appeared for

Re: /usr/include/*/acpi.h

2007-01-04 Thread Petr Baudis
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 04:15:45PM CET, Len Brown wrote: > > > This header files are part of the linux kernel, and thus of course > > > available in /usr/include/{asm,linux}. > > So you pick up all of the kernel include/linux and include/asm*? > (but exclude include/acpi/, which is as much a

Re: /usr/include/*/acpi.h

2007-01-04 Thread Petr Baudis
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 04:15:45PM CET, Len Brown wrote: This header files are part of the linux kernel, and thus of course available in /usr/include/{asm,linux}. So you pick up all of the kernel include/linux and include/asm*? (but exclude include/acpi/, which is as much a kernel header

[ANNOUNCE] Cogito-0.18.2

2006-11-16 Thread Petr Baudis
Hello, I've released cogito-0.18.2, bringing a couple of bugfixes and a trivial new feature to cogito-0.18.1. Still nothing too groundshattering. * cg-log does not follow history across renames anymore; it never really actually worked and was instead causing problems and random error

[ANNOUNCE] Cogito-0.18.2

2006-11-16 Thread Petr Baudis
Hello, I've released cogito-0.18.2, bringing a couple of bugfixes and a trivial new feature to cogito-0.18.1. Still nothing too groundshattering. * cg-log does not follow history across renames anymore; it never really actually worked and was instead causing problems and random error

Re: ia64 git pull

2005-04-21 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 03:48:35AM CEST, I got a letter where Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > >>>>> Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I've just added to git-pasky a possibility to refer to branches &

Re: ia64 git pull

2005-04-21 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 01:01:13AM CEST, I got a letter where [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... > But now I need a way to indicate to consumers of the public shared object > data base which HEAD to use. > > Perhaps I should just say "merge 821376bf15e692941f9235f13a14987009fd0b10 >

Re: Linux 2.6.12-rc3

2005-04-21 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 01:22:01AM CEST, I got a letter where Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > Hi! Hi, > > > > You should put this into .git/remotes > > > > > > > > linus > > > > rsync://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git > > > >

Re: ia64 git pull

2005-04-21 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 01:19:47AM CEST, I got a letter where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > So in the long run this issue goes away - we'll just have synchronization > tools that won't get any unnecessary pollution. But in the short run I > actually check my

Re: ia64 git pull

2005-04-21 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 12:29:07AM CEST, I got a letter where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > I can't quite see how to manage multiple "heads" in git. I notice that in > > your tree on kernel.org that .git/HEAD

Re: ia64 git pull

2005-04-21 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 11:55:43PM CEST, I got a letter where [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... > I can't quite see how to manage multiple "heads" in git. I notice that in > your tree on kernel.org that .git/HEAD is a symlink to heads/master ... > perhaps that is a clue. > > I'd like

Re: Linux 2.6.12-rc3

2005-04-21 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 11:38:11PM CEST, I got a letter where Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > Hi! > > It seems that someone should write "Kernel hacker's guide to > git"... Documentation/git.txt seems like good place. I guess I'll do > it. I've also started writing

Re: Linux 2.6.12-rc3

2005-04-21 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 09:00:09PM CEST, I got a letter where Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > Hi! Hi, > > > Well, not sure. > > > > > > I did > > > > > > git track linus > > > git cancel > > > > > > but Makefile still contains -rc2. (Is "git cancel" right way

Re: Linux 2.6.12-rc3

2005-04-21 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 02:03:27PM CEST, I got a letter where Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > You should put this into .git/remotes > > > > linus > > rsync://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git (git addremote is preferred for

Re: Linux 2.6.12-rc3

2005-04-21 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 02:03:27PM CEST, I got a letter where Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... You should put this into .git/remotes linus rsync://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git (git addremote is preferred for that :-)

Re: Linux 2.6.12-rc3

2005-04-21 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 09:00:09PM CEST, I got a letter where Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... Hi! Hi, Well, not sure. I did git track linus git cancel but Makefile still contains -rc2. (Is git cancel right way to check out the tree?)

Re: Linux 2.6.12-rc3

2005-04-21 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 11:38:11PM CEST, I got a letter where Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... Hi! It seems that someone should write Kernel hacker's guide to git... Documentation/git.txt seems like good place. I guess I'll do it. I've also started writing some

Re: ia64 git pull

2005-04-21 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 11:55:43PM CEST, I got a letter where [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... I can't quite see how to manage multiple heads in git. I notice that in your tree on kernel.org that .git/HEAD is a symlink to heads/master ... perhaps that is a clue. I'd like to

Re: ia64 git pull

2005-04-21 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 12:29:07AM CEST, I got a letter where Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't quite see how to manage multiple heads in git. I notice that in your tree on kernel.org that .git/HEAD is a

Re: ia64 git pull

2005-04-21 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 01:19:47AM CEST, I got a letter where Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... So in the long run this issue goes away - we'll just have synchronization tools that won't get any unnecessary pollution. But in the short run I actually check my git

Re: Linux 2.6.12-rc3

2005-04-21 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 01:22:01AM CEST, I got a letter where Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... Hi! Hi, You should put this into .git/remotes linus rsync://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git (git addremote is

Re: ia64 git pull

2005-04-21 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 01:01:13AM CEST, I got a letter where [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... But now I need a way to indicate to consumers of the public shared object data base which HEAD to use. Perhaps I should just say merge 821376bf15e692941f9235f13a14987009fd0b10 from

Re: ia64 git pull

2005-04-21 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 03:48:35AM CEST, I got a letter where Inaky Perez-Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... Petr Baudis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've just added to git-pasky a possibility to refer to branches inside of repositories by a fragment identifier: rsync

Re: [GIT PATCH] I2C and W1 bugfixes for 2.6.12-rc2

2005-04-19 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 01:04:48AM CEST, I got a letter where Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > Then, the flurry of patching file blah messages, followed by a rather > pregnant pause after the last patching message. > > I wasn't complaining about the 4 minutes, just

Re: [GIT PATCH] I2C and W1 bugfixes for 2.6.12-rc2

2005-04-19 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 12:38:17AM CEST, I got a letter where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > Just say no to patches. FYI, I've - per Junio's suggestion - made git merge's fast-forward to apply show-diff output as a patch instead. This is roughly equal to doing

Re: [GIT PATCH] I2C and W1 bugfixes for 2.6.12-rc2

2005-04-19 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 12:45:02AM CEST, I got a letter where Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > >>>>> "PB" == Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > PB> I'm wondering if doing > > PB> if [ "$(s

Re: [GIT PATCH] I2C and W1 bugfixes for 2.6.12-rc2

2005-04-19 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 10:20:47PM CEST, I got a letter where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > Pasky? Can you check my latest git stuff, notably read-tree.c and the > changes to git-pull-script? I've made git merge to use read-tree -m, HTH. I will probably not

Re: [GIT PATCH] I2C and W1 bugfixes for 2.6.12-rc2

2005-04-19 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 12:19:01AM CEST, I got a letter where Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > >On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote: > > > >>Nice, it looks like the merge of this tree, and my usb tree worked just > >>fine. > > > > > >Yup, it

Re: [GIT PATCH] I2C and W1 bugfixes for 2.6.12-rc2

2005-04-19 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 12:19:01AM CEST, I got a letter where Steven Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... Linus Torvalds wrote: On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote: Nice, it looks like the merge of this tree, and my usb tree worked just fine. Yup, it all seems to work

Re: [GIT PATCH] I2C and W1 bugfixes for 2.6.12-rc2

2005-04-19 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 10:20:47PM CEST, I got a letter where Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... Pasky? Can you check my latest git stuff, notably read-tree.c and the changes to git-pull-script? I've made git merge to use read-tree -m, HTH. I will probably not buy

Re: [GIT PATCH] I2C and W1 bugfixes for 2.6.12-rc2

2005-04-19 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 12:45:02AM CEST, I got a letter where Junio C Hamano [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... PB == Petr Baudis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: PB I'm wondering if doing PB if [ $(show-diff) ]; then PB git diff | git apply PB else PB checkout-cache -f -a PB

Re: [GIT PATCH] I2C and W1 bugfixes for 2.6.12-rc2

2005-04-19 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 12:38:17AM CEST, I got a letter where Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... Just say no to patches. FYI, I've - per Junio's suggestion - made git merge's fast-forward to apply show-diff output as a patch instead. This is roughly equal to doing the

Re: [GIT PATCH] I2C and W1 bugfixes for 2.6.12-rc2

2005-04-19 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 01:04:48AM CEST, I got a letter where Steven Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... Then, the flurry of patching file blah messages, followed by a rather pregnant pause after the last patching message. I wasn't complaining about the 4 minutes, just the

Re: intercepting syscalls

2005-04-15 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 08:04:37PM CEST, I got a letter where Igor Shmukler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > We HAVE to intercept system calls. Why? What do you need to do? -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ C++: an octopus made by

Re: Re: where is current kernel ?

2005-04-15 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 09:15:00PM CEST, I got a letter where [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... > From: Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Linus stopped merging stuff to his kernel for few days in order to > > develop his (at least temporary) alternative to BK,

Re: where is current kernel ?

2005-04-15 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 01:33:45PM CEST, I got a letter where Maciej Soltysiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > Hi, Hello, > Is there currently a kernel tree that Linus is working ? > I mean, now that we have 2.6.12-rc2 not being > developed with BK, is that code getting fixes

Re: Re: Kernel Rootkits

2005-04-15 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 08:15:37PM CEST, I got a letter where Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > hi, Hello, > I got the terminology mixed up. I guess what I really want to know is, > what are the different types of exploits by which rootkits > (specifically the ones that

Re: Re: Kernel Rootkits

2005-04-15 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 08:15:37PM CEST, I got a letter where Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... hi, Hello, I got the terminology mixed up. I guess what I really want to know is, what are the different types of exploits by which rootkits (specifically the ones that modify

Re: where is current kernel ?

2005-04-15 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 01:33:45PM CEST, I got a letter where Maciej Soltysiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... Hi, Hello, Is there currently a kernel tree that Linus is working ? I mean, now that we have 2.6.12-rc2 not being developed with BK, is that code getting fixes and

Re: Re: where is current kernel ?

2005-04-15 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 09:15:00PM CEST, I got a letter where [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... From: Petr Baudis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linus stopped merging stuff to his kernel for few days in order to develop his (at least temporary) alternative to BK, called git. See the mailing

Re: intercepting syscalls

2005-04-15 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 08:04:37PM CEST, I got a letter where Igor Shmukler [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... We HAVE to intercept system calls. Why? What do you need to do? -- Petr Pasky Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ C++: an octopus made by

Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-13 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:03:07PM CEST, I got a letter where Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:35:21AM +0100, Russell King wrote: > > I tried this today, applied my patch for BE<->LE conversions and > > glibc-2.2 compatibility (attached,

Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-13 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 07:01:34PM CEST, I got a letter where Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > For future reference, git is unhappy if you actually do this, because your > HEAD won't match the (empty) contents of the new directory. The easiest > thing is to cp -r

Re: GNU/Linux userland?

2005-04-13 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:40:31PM CEST, I got a letter where Oliver Korpilla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > Hello! Hello, > I wondered if there is a project or setup that does allow me to build a > GNU/Linux userland including kernel, build environment, basic tools with > a

Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-13 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:38:52AM CEST, I got a letter where Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:35:21AM +0100, Russell King wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 03:57:58PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > > > here go

Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-13 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:35:21AM CEST, I got a letter where Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 03:57:58PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > > here goes git-pasky-0.3, my set of patches and scripts upon > > Linus' git, aim

Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-13 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:25:04AM CEST, I got a letter where David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 10:59 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > > Theoretically, you are never supposed to share your index if you work > > in fully git env

Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-13 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:47:05AM CEST, I got a letter where Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:07:36PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > I'd suggest making it [index] big-endian to make sure the LE weenies don't > > forget to byteswap

Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-13 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:47:05AM CEST, I got a letter where Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:07:36PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: I'd suggest making it [index] big-endian to make sure the LE weenies don't forget to byteswap properly.

Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-13 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:25:04AM CEST, I got a letter where David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 10:59 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: Theoretically, you are never supposed to share your index if you work in fully git environment. Maybe -- if we

Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-13 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:35:21AM CEST, I got a letter where Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 03:57:58PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: here goes git-pasky-0.3, my set of patches and scripts upon Linus' git, aimed at human usability

Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-13 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:38:52AM CEST, I got a letter where Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:35:21AM +0100, Russell King wrote: On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 03:57:58PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: here goes git-pasky-0.3, my set of patches

Re: GNU/Linux userland?

2005-04-13 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:40:31PM CEST, I got a letter where Oliver Korpilla [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... Hello! Hello, I wondered if there is a project or setup that does allow me to build a GNU/Linux userland including kernel, build environment, basic tools with a

Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-13 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 07:01:34PM CEST, I got a letter where Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... For future reference, git is unhappy if you actually do this, because your HEAD won't match the (empty) contents of the new directory. The easiest thing is to cp -r your

Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-13 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:03:07PM CEST, I got a letter where Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:35:21AM +0100, Russell King wrote: I tried this today, applied my patch for BE-LE conversions and glibc-2.2 compatibility (attached, still

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: GIT license (Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.1)

2005-04-12 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 11:50:48AM CEST, I got a letter where Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 10:39:40AM CEST, I got a letter > where Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > On Tue, 12 Apr

Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-12 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 03:13:15PM CEST, I got a letter where Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 15:02 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > > Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:47:25PM CEST, I got a letter > > where Mar

Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-12 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:47:25PM CEST, I got a letter where Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 15:57 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > > Hello, > > > > here goes git-pasky-0.3, my set of patches and scripts upon >

Re: Re: Re: Re: GIT license (Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.1)

2005-04-12 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 10:39:40AM CEST, I got a letter where Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote: ..snip.. > > Basically, when you look at merge(1) : > > > > SYNOPSIS > >me

Re: Re: more git updates..

2005-04-12 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 06:05:19AM CEST, I got a letter where David Eger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > So with git, *every* changeset is an entire (compressed) copy of the > kernel. Really? Every patch you accept adds 37 MB to your hard disk? > > Am I missing something here?

Re: Re: more git updates..

2005-04-12 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 06:05:19AM CEST, I got a letter where David Eger [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... So with git, *every* changeset is an entire (compressed) copy of the kernel. Really? Every patch you accept adds 37 MB to your hard disk? Am I missing something here? Yes.

Re: Re: Re: Re: GIT license (Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.1)

2005-04-12 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 10:39:40AM CEST, I got a letter where Geert Uytterhoeven [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote: ..snip.. Basically, when you look at merge(1) : SYNOPSIS merge [ options ] file1 file2 file3 DESCRIPTION

Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-12 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:47:25PM CEST, I got a letter where Martin Schlemmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 15:57 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: Hello, here goes git-pasky-0.3, my set of patches and scripts upon Linus' git, aimed at human usability

Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-12 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 03:13:15PM CEST, I got a letter where Martin Schlemmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 15:02 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:47:25PM CEST, I got a letter where Martin Schlemmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] told

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: GIT license (Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.1)

2005-04-12 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 11:50:48AM CEST, I got a letter where Petr Baudis [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 10:39:40AM CEST, I got a letter where Geert Uytterhoeven [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote: ..snip

Re: Re: Re: GIT license (Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.1)

2005-04-11 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 03:20:18AM CEST, I got a letter where "Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > >Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 05:46:38PM CEST, I got a letter > >where "Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > >..snip.. > >> Graydon Hoare. (By

Re: Call to atention about using hash functions as content indexers (SCM saga)

2005-04-11 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 12:40:21AM CEST, I got a letter where Pedro Larroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > Hi Hello, > I had a quick look at the source of GIT tonight, I'd like to warn you > about the use of hash functions as content indexers. > > As probably you are aware,

Re: Re: GIT license (Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.1)

2005-04-11 Thread Petr Baudis
Hello, please do not trim the cc list so agressively. Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 05:46:38PM CEST, I got a letter where "Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... ..snip.. > Graydon Hoare. (By the way, I would prefer that git just punt to > user level programs for diff

Re: Re: [rfc] git: combo-blobs

2005-04-11 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 08:13:19PM CEST, I got a letter where Chris Wedgwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 09:01:51AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > I disagree. Yes, the thing is designed to be replicated, so most of > > the time the easiest thing

Re: Re: more git updates..

2005-04-11 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 05:49:31PM CEST, I got a letter where "Randy.Dunlap" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 16:38:00 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds wrote: ..snip.. > | Yes. Crappy old tree, but it can still read my git.git directory, so you > | can use it to

[ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-11 Thread Petr Baudis
Hello, here goes git-pasky-0.3, my set of patches and scripts upon Linus' git, aimed at human usability and to an extent a SCM-like usage. If you already have a previous git-pasky version, just git pull pasky to get it (but see below!!!). Otherwise, you can get it from:

Re: Re: GIT license (Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.1)

2005-04-11 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:40:00AM CEST, I got a letter where Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > * Ingo Molnar: > > > is there any fundamental problem with going with v2 right now, and then > > once v3 is out and assuming it looks ok, all newly copyrightable bits >

Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.2

2005-04-11 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:50:51AM CEST, I got a letter where Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > * Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > here goes git-pasky-0.2, my set of patches and scripts upon Li

Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.2

2005-04-11 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 04:46:42AM CEST, I got a letter where Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > here goes git-pasky-0.2, my set of patches and scripts upon > >

Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.2

2005-04-11 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 04:46:42AM CEST, I got a letter where Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote: Hello, here goes git-pasky-0.2, my set of patches and scripts upon Linus' git, aimed at human usability

Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.2

2005-04-11 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:50:51AM CEST, I got a letter where Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... * Petr Baudis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, here goes git-pasky-0.2, my set of patches and scripts upon Linus' git, aimed at human usability and to an extent

Re: Re: GIT license (Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.1)

2005-04-11 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:40:00AM CEST, I got a letter where Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... * Ingo Molnar: is there any fundamental problem with going with v2 right now, and then once v3 is out and assuming it looks ok, all newly copyrightable bits (new

[ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-11 Thread Petr Baudis
Hello, here goes git-pasky-0.3, my set of patches and scripts upon Linus' git, aimed at human usability and to an extent a SCM-like usage. If you already have a previous git-pasky version, just git pull pasky to get it (but see below!!!). Otherwise, you can get it from:

Re: Re: more git updates..

2005-04-11 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 05:49:31PM CEST, I got a letter where Randy.Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 16:38:00 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds wrote: ..snip.. | Yes. Crappy old tree, but it can still read my git.git directory, so you | can use it to update to

Re: Re: [rfc] git: combo-blobs

2005-04-11 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 08:13:19PM CEST, I got a letter where Chris Wedgwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 09:01:51AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: I disagree. Yes, the thing is designed to be replicated, so most of the time the easiest thing to do is

Re: Re: GIT license (Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.1)

2005-04-11 Thread Petr Baudis
Hello, please do not trim the cc list so agressively. Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 05:46:38PM CEST, I got a letter where Adam J. Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... ..snip.. Graydon Hoare. (By the way, I would prefer that git just punt to user level programs for diff and

Re: Call to atention about using hash functions as content indexers (SCM saga)

2005-04-11 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 12:40:21AM CEST, I got a letter where Pedro Larroy [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... Hi Hello, I had a quick look at the source of GIT tonight, I'd like to warn you about the use of hash functions as content indexers. As probably you are aware, hash

Re: Re: Re: GIT license (Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.1)

2005-04-11 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 03:20:18AM CEST, I got a letter where Adam J. Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 05:46:38PM CEST, I got a letter where Adam J. Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... ..snip.. Graydon Hoare. (By the way, I would

[ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.2

2005-04-10 Thread Petr Baudis
Hello, here goes git-pasky-0.2, my set of patches and scripts upon Linus' git, aimed at human usability and to an extent a SCM-like usage. If you already have a previous git-pasky version, just git pull pasky to get it. Otherwise, you can get it from:

Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.1

2005-04-10 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 10:38:11PM CEST, I got a letter where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... ..snip.. > Can you pull my current repo, which has "diff-tree -R" that does what the > name suggests, and which should be faster than the 0.48 sec you see.. Am I just

Re: GIT license (Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.1)

2005-04-10 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 02:20:52AM CEST, I got a letter where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > Btw, does anybody have strong opinions on the license? I didn't put in a > COPYING file exactly because I was torn between GPLv2 and OSL2.1. > > I'm inclined to go with

Re: Re: more git updates..

2005-04-10 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 01:14:57AM CEST, I got a letter where Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > Useful explanation - thanks, Linus. > > Is this picture and description accurate: > > == > > > <

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.1

2005-04-10 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 01:46:50AM CEST, I got a letter where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > > On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote: > > > > (BTW, it would be useful to have a tool which just blindly takes what > >

Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.1

2005-04-10 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 11:39:02PM CEST, I got a letter where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > Can you pull my current repo, which has "diff-tree -R" that does what the > > name suggests, and which should be

Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.1

2005-04-10 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 01:10:58AM CEST, I got a letter where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > > On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote: > > > > I currently already do a merge when you track someone's source - it will > > thr

Re: Re: more git updates..

2005-04-10 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 08:42:53PM CEST, I got a letter where Christopher Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > I totally agree that odds is really really small. > That is why it is not worthy to handle the case. People hit that > can just add a new line or some thing to avoid it,

Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.1

2005-04-10 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 10:38:11PM CEST, I got a letter where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote: > > > > It turns out to be the forks for doing all the cuts and such what is > > bogging it down so awf

Re: RE: more git updates..

2005-04-10 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 12:07:37AM CEST, I got a letter where "Luck, Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... ..snip.. > >Hey, I may end up being wrong, and yes, maybe I should have done a > >two-level one. The good news is that we can trivially fix it later (even > >dynamically -

Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.1

2005-04-10 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 09:13:19PM CEST, I got a letter where Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 08:45:22PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > > > It turns out to be the forks for doing all the cuts and such what is > > bo

Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.1

2005-04-10 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 07:45:12PM CEST, I got a letter where Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > * Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I will also need to do more testing on the linux kernel tree. > > > > Committing patch-2.6.7 on 2.6.6 kernel and

[ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.1

2005-04-10 Thread Petr Baudis
Hello, so I "released" git-pasky-0.1, my set of patches and scripts upon Linus' git, aimed at human usability and to an extent a SCM-like usage. You can get it at http://pasky.or.cz/~pasky/dev/git/git-pasky-base.tar.bz2 and after unpacking and building (make) do git pull

Re: Re: more git updates..

2005-04-10 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 11:28:54AM CEST, I got a letter where Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > "CL" == Christopher Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > CL> On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 12:51:59AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> > >> But I am wondering what your

  1   2   >