On Sun, 18 Mar 2007, Lee Revell wrote:
On 3/17/07, Mike Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
P.S. "utter failure" was too harsh. What sticks in my craw is that the
world has to adjust to fit this new scheduler.
I have never seen X run nearly as smooth as our favorite proprietary
OS on simil
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007, Con Kolivas wrote:
There are updated patches for 2.6.20, 2.6.20.2, 2.6.21-rc3 and 2.6.21-rc3-mm2
to bring RSDL up to version 0.30 for download here:
Full patches:
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20-sched-rsdl-0.30.patch
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/st
--- Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Interbench - The Linux Interactivity Benchmark v0.20
>
> http://interbench.kolivas.org
>
> direct download link:
> http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/interbench/interbench-0.20.tar.bz2
>
>
[snip]
> Audio:
> Audio is simulated as a thread that tri
--- Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 00:25 +0100, szonyi calin wrote:
> > --- Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> > Taking into account that nobody responded on lkml nor
> > on alsa (the message was awaiting modderator apr
--- Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>
> Tangent: I would like to see requests-for-testing for FC
> kernels on LKML.
>
> If people announce -ac/-as/-aa/-ck/etc. kernels on LKML, why
> not distro
> kernels?
>
>
Because some people switched to other distribution also
because of the
--- Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 05:15:36PM -0800, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > But when pressed about the issue of speed of development,
> rate of
> > change, feature increase, driver updates, and so on, no one
> else has any
> > clu
--- Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> > Grump. Have all these regressions received the appropriate
> level of
> > visibility on this mailing list?
>
> For the most part these things are usually known about by
> their upstream
> authors. To give an example: ALSA update in 2.6.10 brok
--- Zwane Mwaikambo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Certainly -mm can be the feature tree, but i've noticed that
> not that many
> people run -mm aside from developers. Meaning that a fair
> number of bugs
> seep into Linus' tree before they get attended to. It would
> even be more
> effective
--- "Randy.Dunlap" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>
> Maybe I don't understand? Is someone expecting distro
> quality/stability from kernel.org kernels?
> I don't, but maybe I'm one of those minorities.
>
yes. Some people (like me) would like to use from time to time
some _new_ stable kernel.
--- David Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> back when I was doing PC repair (1.x kernel days) I
> started useing linux
> becouse the boot messages gave me so much info about
> the system (I started
> to keep a Slackware boot/root disk set on hand so
> when faced with a
> customer machine I could
--- Jesse Pollard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> >
> > "This is almost always the result of flakiness in
> your hardware - either
> > RAM (most likely), or motherboard (less likely).
> "
> >
> > I cannot understand
> this. There are man
Hi
we found in logs a oops and here are the results from
ksymoops (2.4.1)
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
virtual address 0004
c012db89
*pde =
Oops: 0002
CPU:0
EIP:0010:[]
Using defaults from ksymoops -t elf32-i386 -a i386
EFLAGS: 00010246
eax:
Hello
My name is Calin
I have a Cx 486/66 with 12 Megs of ram AST computer
gcc 2.95.3, glibc 2.1.3, make 3.79.1 binutils 2.11 ??
Problems:
1. When I try to run multiple (2) compilations on a
2.4.4 kernel usually one
of them dies -- if it's gcc - signal 11 , if it's sh
or rarely make -
segmentati
13 matches
Mail list logo
