Re: [2.6 patch] i386/x86_64 mpparse.c: kill maxcpus

2005-03-20 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 07:01:49PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 12:59:46AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 06:32:03PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 12:12:32AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at

Re: [2.6 patch] i386/x86_64 mpparse.c: kill maxcpus

2005-03-20 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 12:59:46AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 06:32:03PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 12:12:32AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 05:42:34PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > > > > On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at

Re: [2.6 patch] i386/x86_64 mpparse.c: kill maxcpus

2005-03-20 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 06:32:03PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 12:12:32AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 05:42:34PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 08:25:49PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > Do we really need a global

Re: [2.6 patch] i386/x86_64 mpparse.c: kill maxcpus

2005-03-20 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 12:12:32AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 05:42:34PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 08:25:49PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Do we really need a global variable that does only hold the value of > > > NR_CPUS? > > > >

Re: [2.6 patch] i386/x86_64 mpparse.c: kill maxcpus

2005-03-20 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 05:42:34PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 08:25:49PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Do we really need a global variable that does only hold the value of > > NR_CPUS? > > Yes. > > NR_CPUS = compile time > maxcpus = boot command line at runtime. If

Re: [2.6 patch] i386/x86_64 mpparse.c: kill maxcpus

2005-03-20 Thread Dave Jones
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 08:25:49PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Do we really need a global variable that does only hold the value of > NR_CPUS? Yes. NR_CPUS = compile time maxcpus = boot command line at runtime. Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

[2.6 patch] i386/x86_64 mpparse.c: kill maxcpus

2005-03-20 Thread Adrian Bunk
Do we really need a global variable that does only hold the value of NR_CPUS? Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- arch/i386/kernel/mpparse.c |7 +++ arch/i386/mach-visws/mpparse.c |6 ++ arch/x86_64/kernel/mpparse.c |7 +++ 3 files changed, 8

[2.6 patch] i386/x86_64 mpparse.c: kill maxcpus

2005-03-20 Thread Adrian Bunk
Do we really need a global variable that does only hold the value of NR_CPUS? Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- arch/i386/kernel/mpparse.c |7 +++ arch/i386/mach-visws/mpparse.c |6 ++ arch/x86_64/kernel/mpparse.c |7 +++ 3 files changed, 8

Re: [2.6 patch] i386/x86_64 mpparse.c: kill maxcpus

2005-03-20 Thread Dave Jones
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 08:25:49PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: Do we really need a global variable that does only hold the value of NR_CPUS? Yes. NR_CPUS = compile time maxcpus = boot command line at runtime. Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe

Re: [2.6 patch] i386/x86_64 mpparse.c: kill maxcpus

2005-03-20 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 05:42:34PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 08:25:49PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: Do we really need a global variable that does only hold the value of NR_CPUS? Yes. NR_CPUS = compile time maxcpus = boot command line at runtime. If this is how

Re: [2.6 patch] i386/x86_64 mpparse.c: kill maxcpus

2005-03-20 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 12:12:32AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 05:42:34PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 08:25:49PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: Do we really need a global variable that does only hold the value of NR_CPUS? Yes.

Re: [2.6 patch] i386/x86_64 mpparse.c: kill maxcpus

2005-03-20 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 06:32:03PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 12:12:32AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 05:42:34PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 08:25:49PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: Do we really need a global variable that

Re: [2.6 patch] i386/x86_64 mpparse.c: kill maxcpus

2005-03-20 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 12:59:46AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 06:32:03PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 12:12:32AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 05:42:34PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 08:25:49PM

Re: [2.6 patch] i386/x86_64 mpparse.c: kill maxcpus

2005-03-20 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 07:01:49PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 12:59:46AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 06:32:03PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 12:12:32AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 05:42:34PM -0500,