Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.2

2005-04-11 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:50:51AM CEST, I got a letter
where Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> 
> * Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> >   Hello,
> > 
> >   here goes git-pasky-0.2, my set of patches and scripts upon Linus' 
> > git, aimed at human usability and to an extent a SCM-like usage.
> 
> works fine on FC4, i only minor issues: 'git' in the tarball didnt have 
> the x permission.

Sorry, fixed in the tarball. It is in the diffs but I have no git patch
yet to apply the mode changes.

> Also, your scripts assume they are in $PATH.  When 
> trying out a tarball one doesnt usually do a 'make install' but tries
> stuff locally.

Hmm, I think I will need to make something like

exedir=$(dirname $0)

on the top of each script and then do all the git calls with ${exedit}
prepended. That should fix the issue, right?

> Also, 'make install' doesnt seem to install the git script itself, is
> that intentional?

Oops, I actually didn't even notice that there _is_ any install target
in the Makefile already. ;-) I will add the relevant stuff to it.

-- 
Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
98% of the time I am right. Why worry about the other 3%.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.2

2005-04-11 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 04:46:42AM CEST, I got a letter
where Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
> 
> >   Hello,
> > 
> >   here goes git-pasky-0.2, my set of patches and scripts upon
> > Linus' git, aimed at human usability and to an extent a SCM-like usage.
> 
> Incidentally, the git-pasky-base tarball you have up has its checked-out
> tree partway between 0.1 and 0.2, and doesn't compile. (The included HEAD
> version in .dircache is fine, if the user has some way to bootstrap)

Oops, I'm sorry. It appears some diffs just slipped out from the tracked
tree, perhaps I was pulling once when git diff was broken and I didn't
notice it. Now there is a newer tarball there, it is not a pure 0.2
anymore though - if you use the COMMITTER_* env variables, they are now
AUTHOR_*.

-- 
Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
98% of the time I am right. Why worry about the other 3%.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.2

2005-04-11 Thread Ingo Molnar

* Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>   Hello,
> 
>   here goes git-pasky-0.2, my set of patches and scripts upon Linus' 
> git, aimed at human usability and to an extent a SCM-like usage.

works fine on FC4, i only minor issues: 'git' in the tarball didnt have 
the x permission. Also, your scripts assume they are in $PATH. When 
trying out a tarball one doesnt usually do a 'make install' but tries 
stuff locally. Also, 'make install' doesnt seem to install the git 
script itself, is that intentional?

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.2

2005-04-11 Thread Ingo Molnar

* Petr Baudis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   Hello,
 
   here goes git-pasky-0.2, my set of patches and scripts upon Linus' 
 git, aimed at human usability and to an extent a SCM-like usage.

works fine on FC4, i only minor issues: 'git' in the tarball didnt have 
the x permission. Also, your scripts assume they are in $PATH. When 
trying out a tarball one doesnt usually do a 'make install' but tries 
stuff locally. Also, 'make install' doesnt seem to install the git 
script itself, is that intentional?

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.2

2005-04-11 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 04:46:42AM CEST, I got a letter
where Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
 On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
 
Hello,
  
here goes git-pasky-0.2, my set of patches and scripts upon
  Linus' git, aimed at human usability and to an extent a SCM-like usage.
 
 Incidentally, the git-pasky-base tarball you have up has its checked-out
 tree partway between 0.1 and 0.2, and doesn't compile. (The included HEAD
 version in .dircache is fine, if the user has some way to bootstrap)

Oops, I'm sorry. It appears some diffs just slipped out from the tracked
tree, perhaps I was pulling once when git diff was broken and I didn't
notice it. Now there is a newer tarball there, it is not a pure 0.2
anymore though - if you use the COMMITTER_* env variables, they are now
AUTHOR_*.

-- 
Petr Pasky Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
98% of the time I am right. Why worry about the other 3%.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.2

2005-04-11 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:50:51AM CEST, I got a letter
where Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
 
 * Petr Baudis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
Hello,
  
here goes git-pasky-0.2, my set of patches and scripts upon Linus' 
  git, aimed at human usability and to an extent a SCM-like usage.
 
 works fine on FC4, i only minor issues: 'git' in the tarball didnt have 
 the x permission.

Sorry, fixed in the tarball. It is in the diffs but I have no git patch
yet to apply the mode changes.

 Also, your scripts assume they are in $PATH.  When 
 trying out a tarball one doesnt usually do a 'make install' but tries
 stuff locally.

Hmm, I think I will need to make something like

exedir=$(dirname $0)

on the top of each script and then do all the git calls with ${exedit}
prepended. That should fix the issue, right?

 Also, 'make install' doesnt seem to install the git script itself, is
 that intentional?

Oops, I actually didn't even notice that there _is_ any install target
in the Makefile already. ;-) I will add the relevant stuff to it.

-- 
Petr Pasky Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
98% of the time I am right. Why worry about the other 3%.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.2

2005-04-10 Thread Daniel Barkalow
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:

>   Hello,
> 
>   here goes git-pasky-0.2, my set of patches and scripts upon
> Linus' git, aimed at human usability and to an extent a SCM-like usage.

Incidentally, the git-pasky-base tarball you have up has its checked-out
tree partway between 0.1 and 0.2, and doesn't compile. (The included HEAD
version in .dircache is fine, if the user has some way to bootstrap)

-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.2

2005-04-10 Thread Petr Baudis
  Hello,

  here goes git-pasky-0.2, my set of patches and scripts upon
Linus' git, aimed at human usability and to an extent a SCM-like usage.

  If you already have a previous git-pasky version, just git pull pasky
to get it. Otherwise, you can get it from:

http://pasky.or.cz/~pasky/dev/git/

  Please see the README there and/or the parent post for detailed
instructions. You can find the changes from the last announcement
in the ChangeLog (releases have separate commits so you can find them
easily; they are also tagged for purpose of diffing etc).

  This is release contains mostly bugfixes, performance enhancements
(especially w.r.t. git diff), and some merges with Linus (except for
diff-tree, where I merged only the new output format). New features
are trivial - support for tagging and short SHA1 ids; you can use
only the start of the SHA1 hash long enough to be unambiguous.

  My immediate plan is implementing git merge, which I will do tommorow,
if noone will do it before that is. ;-)

  Any feedback/opinions/suggestions/patches (especially patches) are
welcome.

  Have fun,

-- 
Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
98% of the time I am right. Why worry about the other 3%.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.2

2005-04-10 Thread Petr Baudis
  Hello,

  here goes git-pasky-0.2, my set of patches and scripts upon
Linus' git, aimed at human usability and to an extent a SCM-like usage.

  If you already have a previous git-pasky version, just git pull pasky
to get it. Otherwise, you can get it from:

http://pasky.or.cz/~pasky/dev/git/

  Please see the README there and/or the parent post for detailed
instructions. You can find the changes from the last announcement
in the ChangeLog (releases have separate commits so you can find them
easily; they are also tagged for purpose of diffing etc).

  This is release contains mostly bugfixes, performance enhancements
(especially w.r.t. git diff), and some merges with Linus (except for
diff-tree, where I merged only the new output format). New features
are trivial - support for tagging and short SHA1 ids; you can use
only the start of the SHA1 hash long enough to be unambiguous.

  My immediate plan is implementing git merge, which I will do tommorow,
if noone will do it before that is. ;-)

  Any feedback/opinions/suggestions/patches (especially patches) are
welcome.

  Have fun,

-- 
Petr Pasky Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
98% of the time I am right. Why worry about the other 3%.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.2

2005-04-10 Thread Daniel Barkalow
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:

   Hello,
 
   here goes git-pasky-0.2, my set of patches and scripts upon
 Linus' git, aimed at human usability and to an extent a SCM-like usage.

Incidentally, the git-pasky-base tarball you have up has its checked-out
tree partway between 0.1 and 0.2, and doesn't compile. (The included HEAD
version in .dircache is fine, if the user has some way to bootstrap)

-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/