Hi Arnaldo,
On 3/18/2021 9:15 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 02:51:42PM -0700, Andi Kleen escreveu:
If you care about not breaking existing scripts, then the output they
get with what they use as command line options must continue to produce
the same output.
It's
Em Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 02:51:42PM -0700, Andi Kleen escreveu:
> > If you care about not breaking existing scripts, then the output they
> > get with what they use as command line options must continue to produce
> > the same output.
>
> It's not clear there are any useful ones (except for tools
> If you care about not breaking existing scripts, then the output they
> get with what they use as command line options must continue to produce
> the same output.
It's not clear there are any useful ones (except for tools that handle
both). It's really hard to parse the previous mess. It's
Em Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 03:02:05PM +0800, Jin Yao escreveu:
> perf-stat has supported the summary mode. But the summary
> lines break the CSV output so it's hard for scripts to parse
> the result.
>
> Before:
>
> # perf stat -x, -I1000 --interval-count 1 --summary
>
perf-stat has supported the summary mode. But the summary
lines break the CSV output so it's hard for scripts to parse
the result.
Before:
# perf stat -x, -I1000 --interval-count 1 --summary
1.001323097,8013.48,msec,cpu-clock,8013483384,100.00,8.013,CPUs utilized
5 matches
Mail list logo
