* Mathieu Desnoyers:
> I'm unsure whether there are changes I need to do in my rseq patchset, or
> if this is a separate issue that will be fixed separately before glibc 2.31
> is out, which would then update the rseq bits accordingly ?
Someone else (perhaps me) has to fix __libc_multiple_libcs.
- On Sep 11, 2019, at 3:00 PM, carlos car...@redhat.com wrote:
> On 9/11/19 2:26 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Mathieu Desnoyers:
>>
>>> +#ifdef SHARED
>>> + if (rtld_active ())
>>> +{
>>> + /* Register rseq ABI to the kernel. */
>>> + (void) rseq_register_current_thread ();
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 09:54:23PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Carlos O'Donell:
>
> > On 9/11/19 3:08 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> * Carlos O'Donell:
> >>
> >>> It would be easier to merge the patch set if it were just an unconditional
> >>> registration like we do for set_robust_list().
>
* Florian Weimer:
> * Carlos O'Donell:
>
>> On 9/11/19 3:08 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> * Carlos O'Donell:
>>>
It would be easier to merge the patch set if it were just an unconditional
registration like we do for set_robust_list().
>>>
>>> Note that this depends on the in-tree syste
* Carlos O'Donell:
> On 9/11/19 3:08 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Carlos O'Donell:
>>
>>> It would be easier to merge the patch set if it were just an unconditional
>>> registration like we do for set_robust_list().
>>
>> Note that this depends on the in-tree system call numbers list, which I
On 9/11/19 3:08 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Carlos O'Donell:
>
>> It would be easier to merge the patch set if it were just an unconditional
>> registration like we do for set_robust_list().
>
> Note that this depends on the in-tree system call numbers list, which I
> still need to finish accor
* Carlos O'Donell:
> It would be easier to merge the patch set if it were just an unconditional
> registration like we do for set_robust_list().
Note that this depends on the in-tree system call numbers list, which I
still need to finish according to Joseph's specifications.
(We have something t
On 9/11/19 2:26 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Mathieu Desnoyers:
>
>> +#ifdef SHARED
>> + if (rtld_active ())
>> +{
>> + /* Register rseq ABI to the kernel. */
>> + (void) rseq_register_current_thread ();
>> +}
>> +#else
>
> I think this will need *another* check for the inne
* Mathieu Desnoyers:
> +#ifdef SHARED
> + if (rtld_active ())
> +{
> + /* Register rseq ABI to the kernel. */
> + (void) rseq_register_current_thread ();
> +}
> +#else
I think this will need *another* check for the inner libc in an audit
module. See what we do in malloc. __
9 matches
Mail list logo