Re: [Fastboot] [PATCH] [REVIEW] Fix irqpoll on IA64 (timer interrupt != 0)

On 19/03/07, Bernhard Walle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-19 19:29]: > > > > -void > > +int > > register_percpu_irq (ia64_vector vec, struct irqaction *action) > > { > > Each and every function example in Documentation/CodingStyle has the > return type

Re: [Fastboot] [PATCH] [REVIEW] Fix irqpoll on IA64 (timer interrupt != 0)

* Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-19 19:29]: > > > > -void > > +int > > register_percpu_irq (ia64_vector vec, struct irqaction *action) > > { > > Each and every function example in Documentation/CodingStyle has the > return type on the same line as the function name, so why not get >

Re: [Fastboot] [PATCH] [REVIEW] Fix irqpoll on IA64 (timer interrupt != 0)

* Jesper Juhl [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-19 19:29]: -void +int register_percpu_irq (ia64_vector vec, struct irqaction *action) { Each and every function example in Documentation/CodingStyle has the return type on the same line as the function name, so why not get these in-line

Re: [Fastboot] [PATCH] [REVIEW] Fix irqpoll on IA64 (timer interrupt != 0)

On 19/03/07, Bernhard Walle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Jesper Juhl [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-19 19:29]: -void +int register_percpu_irq (ia64_vector vec, struct irqaction *action) { Each and every function example in Documentation/CodingStyle has the return type on the same line