CC-ing author of below reply
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Belisko Marek wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>>> None was ?wonderful?. They were valid concerns about my proposal
>>> and I have replied to them how I see it.
>>>
>>> Generally, if you are not in
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> None was ?wonderful?. They were valid concerns about my proposal
>> and I have replied to them how I see it.
>>
>> Generally, if you are not interested in people dedicated and committed to
>> fight for the better solution with (technic
Hi!
> None was ?wonderful?. They were valid concerns about my proposal
> and I have replied to them how I see it.
>
> Generally, if you are not interested in people dedicated and committed to
> fight for the better solution with (technical) arguments and concrete
> proposals
> how it should be i
Hi Peter,
Am 07.05.2015 um 18:46 schrieb Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller :
> Hi Peter,
>
> Am 07.05.2015 um 17:51 schrieb Peter Hurley :
>
>> On 05/07/2015 11:34 AM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>>> Am 07.05.2015 um 16:56 schrieb Peter Hurley :
On 05/07/2015 08:46 AM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller
Hi,
Am 07.05.2015 um 18:18 schrieb Peter Hurley :
> On 05/07/2015 11:11 AM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>>
>> Am 07.05.2015 um 16:30 schrieb Peter Hurley :
>>
>>> On 05/07/2015 08:46 AM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Am 06.05.2015 um 19:18 schrieb Mark Rutland :
> On Wed, May 06,
Hi Peter,
Am 07.05.2015 um 17:51 schrieb Peter Hurley :
> On 05/07/2015 11:34 AM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>> Am 07.05.2015 um 16:56 schrieb Peter Hurley :
>>> On 05/07/2015 08:46 AM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>
>>> Both devicetree and tty/serial can already represent independent co
On 05/07/2015 11:11 AM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>
> Am 07.05.2015 um 16:30 schrieb Peter Hurley :
>
>> On 05/07/2015 08:46 AM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>>> Am 06.05.2015 um 19:18 schrieb Mark Rutland :
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 05:09:20PM +0100, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>
On 05/07/2015 11:34 AM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> Am 07.05.2015 um 16:56 schrieb Peter Hurley :
>> On 05/07/2015 08:46 AM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>> Both devicetree and tty/serial can already represent independent control;
>> what is proposed is a way to express dependent control,
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller
wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Am 05.05.2015 um 21:54 schrieb Peter Hurley :
>
>> Hi Neil,
>>
>> On 03/18/2015 01:58 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
>>> here is version 3 of support for tty-slaves.
>>
>> Is there a v4 of this that I missed?
I'm interested in
On 05/06/2015 09:28 AM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> The key point appears to be how we want to see the serial connection. Is the
> device connected to the uart or the uart to a device?
>
> In OO terminology: „device connects to uart“ vs. „uart has device connected“.
> "d -> u“ vs. "u <- d“.
Am 07.05.2015 um 16:56 schrieb Peter Hurley :
> On 05/07/2015 08:46 AM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>
>> So I don’t think that being able to control the slave is a common property
>> of all UART-slave connections.
>>
>> BTW: the GPS chip we use is doing something without any instructions. I
Am 07.05.2015 um 16:30 schrieb Peter Hurley :
> On 05/07/2015 08:46 AM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>> Am 06.05.2015 um 19:18 schrieb Mark Rutland :
>>> On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 05:09:20PM +0100, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Am 06.05.2015 um 16:15 schrieb Mark Rutland :
>
On 05/07/2015 08:46 AM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> So I don’t think that being able to control the slave is a common property
> of all UART-slave connections.
>
> BTW: the GPS chip we use is doing something without any instructions. It
> starts
> to send NMEA records right after power on.
On 05/07/2015 08:46 AM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> Am 06.05.2015 um 19:18 schrieb Mark Rutland :
>> On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 05:09:20PM +0100, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>>> Am 06.05.2015 um 16:15 schrieb Mark Rutland :
>>>
> No, I am not playing devil’s advocate (which would imp
Hi Mark,
Am 06.05.2015 um 19:18 schrieb Mark Rutland :
> On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 05:09:20PM +0100, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> Am 06.05.2015 um 16:15 schrieb Mark Rutland :
>>
No, I am not playing devil’s advocate (which would imply that I am
doing this
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 05:09:20PM +0100, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Am 06.05.2015 um 16:15 schrieb Mark Rutland :
>
> >> No, I am not playing devil’s advocate (which would imply that I am
> >> doing this
> >> for fun to tease the dog), but I feel I have to be the
Hi Pavel,
Am 06.05.2015 um 16:28 schrieb Pavel Machek :
> On Wed 2015-05-06 13:50:29, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>> Hi Pavel,
>>
>> Am 06.05.2015 um 11:27 schrieb Pavel Machek :
>>
>>> On Wed 2015-05-06 07:19:31, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Hi Peter,
Am 05.05.2015 um 21
Hi Mark,
Am 06.05.2015 um 16:15 schrieb Mark Rutland :
>> No, I am not playing devil’s advocate (which would imply that I am doing
>> this
>> for fun to tease the dog), but I feel I have to be the advocate of
>> future board
>> designers who want to easily import an existing
On Wed 2015-05-06 13:50:29, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> Am 06.05.2015 um 11:27 schrieb Pavel Machek :
>
> > On Wed 2015-05-06 07:19:31, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> >> Hi Peter,
> >>
> >> Am 05.05.2015 um 21:54 schrieb Peter Hurley :
> >>
> >>> Hi Neil,
> >>>
> >>> On
> No, I am not playing devil’s advocate (which would imply that I am doing
> this
> for fun to tease the dog), but I feel I have to be the advocate of
> future board
> designers who want to easily import an existing board DT and overwrite
> device
> tree nodes
Hi Mark,
Am 06.05.2015 um 14:36 schrieb Mark Rutland :
> On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 01:27:03PM +0100, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> Am 06.05.2015 um 14:05 schrieb Peter Hurley :
>>
>>> On 05/06/2015 07:50 AM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
No, I am not playing devil’s ad
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 01:27:03PM +0100, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Am 06.05.2015 um 14:05 schrieb Peter Hurley :
>
> > On 05/06/2015 07:50 AM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> >> No, I am not playing devil’s advocate (which would imply that I am doing
> >> this
> >> for f
Hi Peter,
Am 06.05.2015 um 14:05 schrieb Peter Hurley :
> On 05/06/2015 07:50 AM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>> No, I am not playing devil’s advocate (which would imply that I am doing this
>> for fun to tease the dog), but I feel I have to be the advocate of future
>> board
>> designers wh
On 05/06/2015 07:50 AM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> No, I am not playing devil’s advocate (which would imply that I am doing this
> for fun to tease the dog), but I feel I have to be the advocate of future
> board
> designers who want to easily import an existing board DT and overwrite devic
Hi Pavel,
Am 06.05.2015 um 11:27 schrieb Pavel Machek :
> On Wed 2015-05-06 07:19:31, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> Am 05.05.2015 um 21:54 schrieb Peter Hurley :
>>
>>> Hi Neil,
>>>
>>> On 03/18/2015 01:58 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
here is version 3 of support for tty-slav
Hi Nikolaus,
On 05/06/2015 01:19 AM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> Am 05.05.2015 um 21:54 schrieb Peter Hurley :
>
>> Hi Neil,
>>
>> On 03/18/2015 01:58 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
>>> here is version 3 of support for tty-slaves.
>>
>> Is there a v4 of this that I missed?
>
> We did have a lengthy
On Wed 2015-05-06 07:19:31, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Am 05.05.2015 um 21:54 schrieb Peter Hurley :
>
> > Hi Neil,
> >
> > On 03/18/2015 01:58 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
> >> here is version 3 of support for tty-slaves.
> >
> > Is there a v4 of this that I missed?
>
> We did ha
Hi Peter,
Am 05.05.2015 um 21:54 schrieb Peter Hurley :
> Hi Neil,
>
> On 03/18/2015 01:58 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
>> here is version 3 of support for tty-slaves.
>
> Is there a v4 of this that I missed?
We did have a lengthy discussion about [PATCH 3/3] how to best (1)
represent the slave device
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 02:57:12PM +0100, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 09:54:21AM +0100, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> And we do not write a driver for the w2sg0004 but the regulator inside that
> >> chip.
> >
> > DT describes the hardware stru
Hi,
Am 20.03.2015 um 14:08 schrieb Sebastian Reichel :
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 09:54:21AM +0100, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>> [...]
>> And we do not write a driver for the w2sg0004 but the regulator inside that
>> chip.
>
> DT describes the hardware structure and not the Linux d
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 09:54:21AM +0100, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> [...]
> And we do not write a driver for the w2sg0004 but the regulator inside that
> chip.
DT describes the hardware structure and not the Linux driver
structure.
> You also won’t expect that the omap3 driver hides
Hi,
Am 20.03.2015 um 09:43 schrieb NeilBrown :
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 08:54:35 +0100 "Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller"
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Neil,
>>
>> Am 18.03.2015 um 06:58 schrieb NeilBrown :
>>
>>> Hi again,
>>> here is version 3 of support for tty-slaves.
>>>
>>> This version introduces a new bus-t
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 08:54:35 +0100 "Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller"
wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> Am 18.03.2015 um 06:58 schrieb NeilBrown :
>
> > Hi again,
> > here is version 3 of support for tty-slaves.
> >
> > This version introduces a new bus-type for tty-slaves,
>
> Hm. I am still not convinced that
Hi Neil,
Am 18.03.2015 um 06:58 schrieb NeilBrown :
> Hi again,
> here is version 3 of support for tty-slaves.
>
> This version introduces a new bus-type for tty-slaves,
Hm. I am still not convinced that a tty is a „bus“ and
that this is a solution for a wide-spread problem.
> and causes
> a
34 matches
Mail list logo
