On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 08:41:43AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 08/30/2013 09:00:35 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >The web site associated with the score architecture in MAINTAINERS
> >is non-functional and available for sale. The last Ack from one
> >of the maintainers was in December 2012. The
On 08/30/2013 09:00:35 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
The web site associated with the score architecture in MAINTAINERS
is non-functional and available for sale. The last Ack from one
of the maintainers was in December 2012. The main maintainer's last
commit was in 2011. The last maintainer pull
On 08/30/2013 09:00:35 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
The web site associated with the score architecture in MAINTAINERS
is non-functional and available for sale. The last Ack from one
of the maintainers was in December 2012. The main maintainer's last
commit was in 2011. The last maintainer pull
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 08:41:43AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
On 08/30/2013 09:00:35 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
The web site associated with the score architecture in MAINTAINERS
is non-functional and available for sale. The last Ack from one
of the maintainers was in December 2012. The main
On 09/02/2013 09:54 PM, Liqin Chen wrote:
2013/9/3 Guenter Roeck mailto:li...@roeck-us.net>>
On 09/02/2013 08:18 AM, Lennox Wu wrote:
Before we start the development of the S+core, Sunplus had licensed
ARM and MIPS. We develop S+core for other reason such as the price.
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 12:54:06PM +0800, Liqin Chen wrote:
> 2013/9/3 Guenter Roeck
>
> > On 09/02/2013 08:18 AM, Lennox Wu wrote:
> >
> >> Before we start the development of the S+core, Sunplus had licensed
> >> ARM and MIPS. We develop S+core for other reason such as the price.
> >> Some
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 12:54:06PM +0800, Liqin Chen wrote:
2013/9/3 Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net
On 09/02/2013 08:18 AM, Lennox Wu wrote:
Before we start the development of the S+core, Sunplus had licensed
ARM and MIPS. We develop S+core for other reason such as the price.
Some
On 09/02/2013 09:54 PM, Liqin Chen wrote:
2013/9/3 Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net mailto:li...@roeck-us.net
On 09/02/2013 08:18 AM, Lennox Wu wrote:
Before we start the development of the S+core, Sunplus had licensed
ARM and MIPS. We develop S+core for other reason such
On 09/02/2013 08:18 AM, Lennox Wu wrote:
Before we start the development of the S+core, Sunplus had licensed
ARM and MIPS. We develop S+core for other reason such as the price.
Some products on the web of Sunplus adopt S+core , for example
the SPV7050.(http://w3.sunplus.com/products/spv7050.asp)
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:18:17PM +0800, Lennox Wu wrote:
> Before we start the development of the S+core, Sunplus had licensed
> ARM and MIPS. We develop S+core for other reason such as the price.
> Some products on the web of Sunplus adopt S+core , for example
> the
Before we start the development of the S+core, Sunplus had licensed
ARM and MIPS. We develop S+core for other reason such as the price.
Some products on the web of Sunplus adopt S+core , for example
the SPV7050.(http://w3.sunplus.com/products/spv7050.asp) These products
could still be bought from
Before we start the development of the S+core, Sunplus had licensed
ARM and MIPS. We develop S+core for other reason such as the price.
Some products on the web of Sunplus adopt S+core , for example
the SPV7050.(http://w3.sunplus.com/products/spv7050.asp) These products
could still be bought from
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:18:17PM +0800, Lennox Wu wrote:
Before we start the development of the S+core, Sunplus had licensed
ARM and MIPS. We develop S+core for other reason such as the price.
Some products on the web of Sunplus adopt S+core , for example
the
On 09/02/2013 08:18 AM, Lennox Wu wrote:
Before we start the development of the S+core, Sunplus had licensed
ARM and MIPS. We develop S+core for other reason such as the price.
Some products on the web of Sunplus adopt S+core , for example
the SPV7050.(http://w3.sunplus.com/products/spv7050.asp)
On 09/01/2013 09:13 PM, Lennox Wu wrote:
Dear all,
Indeed, Sunplus S+core is not a popular architecture and there is no
standalone to be sold so you should not find related news on the
Internet. However, the s+core is adopted by our SoCs and these SoCs
are indeed adopted by some companies, we
On 09/01/2013 09:13 PM, Lennox Wu wrote:
Dear all,
Indeed, Sunplus S+core is not a popular architecture and there is no
standalone to be sold so you should not find related news on the
Internet. However, the s+core is adopted by our SoCs and these SoCs
are indeed adopted by some companies, we
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 08:55:16PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > Maybe this removal request is a bit early, but architecture support seems
> > to have vanished entirely. At the very least this puts interested parties
> > (if there are any) on notice.
>
> AFAICT, this is the least maintained
On Saturday 31 August 2013, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> The web site associated with the score architecture in MAINTAINERS
> is non-functional and available for sale. The last Ack from one
> of the maintainers was in December 2012. The main maintainer's last
> commit was in 2011. The last maintainer
On Saturday 31 August 2013, Guenter Roeck wrote:
The web site associated with the score architecture in MAINTAINERS
is non-functional and available for sale. The last Ack from one
of the maintainers was in December 2012. The main maintainer's last
commit was in 2011. The last maintainer pull
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 08:55:16PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
Maybe this removal request is a bit early, but architecture support seems
to have vanished entirely. At the very least this puts interested parties
(if there are any) on notice.
AFAICT, this is the least maintained
20 matches
Mail list logo
