Re: [PATCH] arm64: add HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT config

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 02:02:18PM -0800, Shi, Yang wrote: > I tried to enable latencytop for arm64 and came across this discussion, so > any plan about when this will get merged into mainline? 4.5 merge window? It's queued in linux-next, so I imagine its heading for 4.5. Will -- To unsubscribe

Re: [PATCH] arm64: add HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT config

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 02:02:18PM -0800, Shi, Yang wrote: > I tried to enable latencytop for arm64 and came across this discussion, so > any plan about when this will get merged into mainline? 4.5 merge window? It's queued in linux-next, so I imagine its heading for 4.5. Will -- To unsubscribe

Re: [PATCH] arm64: add HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT config

Hi folks, I tried to enable latencytop for arm64 and came across this discussion, so any plan about when this will get merged into mainline? 4.5 merge window? Thanks, Yang On 11/10/2015 3:34 AM, Heiko Carstens wrote: From: Will Deacon Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:10:04 + Subject: [PATCH]

Re: [PATCH] arm64: add HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT config

Hi folks, I tried to enable latencytop for arm64 and came across this discussion, so any plan about when this will get merged into mainline? 4.5 merge window? Thanks, Yang On 11/10/2015 3:34 AM, Heiko Carstens wrote: From: Will Deacon Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:10:04

Re: [PATCH] arm64: add HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT config

> From: Will Deacon > Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:10:04 + > Subject: [PATCH] Kconfig: remove HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT > > As illustrated by a3afe70b83fd ("[S390] latencytop s390 support."), > HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT is defined by an architecture to advertise an > implementation of

Re: [PATCH] arm64: add HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT config

> On Nov 10, 2015, at 19:18, Will Deacon wrote: > > Ha, so it does! Patch below. The only non-trivial part was arch/arm/, > which has a dependency on !SMP which I believe is no longer required > as of d5996b2ff0e2 ("ARM: fix /proc/$PID/stack on SMP"). > > Will > > --->8 > > From

Re: [PATCH] arm64: add HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT config

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:01:45PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:05:48AM +, Will Deacon wrote: > > Hi Heiko, > > > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 08:41:24AM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 04:21:10PM +, Will Deacon wrote: > > > > On Sat,

Re: [PATCH] arm64: add HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT config

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:05:48AM +, Will Deacon wrote: > Hi Heiko, > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 08:41:24AM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 04:21:10PM +, Will Deacon wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 12:11:16AM +0800, yalin wang wrote: > > > > i just enable it

Re: [PATCH] arm64: add HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT config

Hi Heiko, On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 08:41:24AM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote: > On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 04:21:10PM +, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 12:11:16AM +0800, yalin wang wrote: > > > i just enable it on ARM64, > > > and it can work, > > > i don’t see some special

Re: [PATCH] arm64: add HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT config

Hi Heiko, On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 08:41:24AM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote: > On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 04:21:10PM +, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 12:11:16AM +0800, yalin wang wrote: > > > i just enable it on ARM64, > > > and it can work, > > > i don’t see some special

Re: [PATCH] arm64: add HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT config

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:01:45PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:05:48AM +, Will Deacon wrote: > > Hi Heiko, > > > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 08:41:24AM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 04:21:10PM +, Will Deacon wrote: > > > > On Sat,

Re: [PATCH] arm64: add HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT config

> On Nov 10, 2015, at 19:18, Will Deacon wrote: > > Ha, so it does! Patch below. The only non-trivial part was arch/arm/, > which has a dependency on !SMP which I believe is no longer required > as of d5996b2ff0e2 ("ARM: fix /proc/$PID/stack on SMP"). > > Will > > --->8 >

Re: [PATCH] arm64: add HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT config

> From: Will Deacon > Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:10:04 + > Subject: [PATCH] Kconfig: remove HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT > > As illustrated by a3afe70b83fd ("[S390] latencytop s390 support."), > HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT is defined by an architecture to advertise an >

Re: [PATCH] arm64: add HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT config

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:05:48AM +, Will Deacon wrote: > Hi Heiko, > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 08:41:24AM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 04:21:10PM +, Will Deacon wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 12:11:16AM +0800, yalin wang wrote: > > > > i just enable it

Re: [PATCH] arm64: add HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT config

On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 04:21:10PM +, Will Deacon wrote: > On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 12:11:16AM +0800, yalin wang wrote: > > i just enable it on ARM64, > > and it can work, > > i don’t see some special requirement to enable this config . > > Right, so why does HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT exist? If

Re: [PATCH] arm64: add HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT config

On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 04:21:10PM +, Will Deacon wrote: > On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 12:11:16AM +0800, yalin wang wrote: > > i just enable it on ARM64, > > and it can work, > > i don’t see some special requirement to enable this config . > > Right, so why does HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT exist? If

Re: [PATCH] arm64: add HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT config

On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 12:11:16AM +0800, yalin wang wrote: > i just enable it on ARM64, > and it can work, > i don’t see some special requirement to enable this config . Right, so why does HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT exist? Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: [PATCH] arm64: add HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT config

i just enable it on ARM64, and it can work, i don’t see some special requirement to enable this config . > On Nov 7, 2015, at 00:05, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 11:57:58PM +0800, yalin wang wrote: >> Add HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT in Kconfig, so that >> we can enable this feature

Re: [PATCH] arm64: add HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT config

On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 11:57:58PM +0800, yalin wang wrote: > Add HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT in Kconfig, so that > we can enable this feature on ARM64 Do you know what the prerequisites for HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT actually are (beyond those explicitly listed as dependencies for CONFIG_LATENCYTOP)?

[PATCH] arm64: add HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT config

Add HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT in Kconfig, so that we can enable this feature on ARM64 Signed-off-by: yalin wang --- arch/arm64/Kconfig | 4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig index 851fe11..782b5bd 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig +++

[PATCH] arm64: add HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT config

Add HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT in Kconfig, so that we can enable this feature on ARM64 Signed-off-by: yalin wang --- arch/arm64/Kconfig | 4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig index 851fe11..782b5bd 100644 ---

Re: [PATCH] arm64: add HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT config

On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 11:57:58PM +0800, yalin wang wrote: > Add HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT in Kconfig, so that > we can enable this feature on ARM64 Do you know what the prerequisites for HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT actually are (beyond those explicitly listed as dependencies for CONFIG_LATENCYTOP)?

Re: [PATCH] arm64: add HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT config

i just enable it on ARM64, and it can work, i don’t see some special requirement to enable this config . > On Nov 7, 2015, at 00:05, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 11:57:58PM +0800, yalin wang wrote: >> Add HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT in Kconfig, so that >> we

Re: [PATCH] arm64: add HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT config

On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 12:11:16AM +0800, yalin wang wrote: > i just enable it on ARM64, > and it can work, > i don’t see some special requirement to enable this config . Right, so why does HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT exist? Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe