> "Kent" == Kent Overstreet writes:
Kent> I think we should be able to split REQ_DISCARD bios that have a
Kent> payload or REQ_WRITE_SAME bios just fine though - for both of
Kent> those cases, the payload doesn't correspond to a particular
Kent> sector, so just copy the original bvec to the t
Adding Martin to the cc, so he can chime in on WRITE_SAME if I got it
wrong
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 01:30:45PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 14:09:23 -0700 Kent Overstreet
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 04:22:01PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> > > On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:23:43
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 14:09:23 -0700 Kent Overstreet
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 04:22:01PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:23:43 -0700 Kent Overstreet
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:56:39PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Jens,
> > > > this pa
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 04:22:01PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:23:43 -0700 Kent Overstreet
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:56:39PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Jens,
> > > this patch has been sitting in my -next tree for a little while and I was
> > > h
ecial cased in bio_advance() which makes things work out really
> nicely).
>
> > Are you happy with it going in though my 'md' tree, or would you rather
> > take
> > it though your 'block' tree?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > NeilBrown
> >
&g
t; NeilBrown
>
>
> From: Shaohua Li
> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 09:36:03 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] block: makes bio_split support bio without data
>
> discard bio hasn't data attached. We hit a BUG_ON with such bio. This makes
> bio_split works for such bio.
>
&
On 2012-09-28 09:36, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 02:51:54PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 09/24/2012 06:56 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jens,
>>> this patch has been sitting in my -next tree for a little while and I was
>>> hoping for it to go in for the next merge window.
>>>
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 02:51:54PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 09/24/2012 06:56 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jens,
> > this patch has been sitting in my -next tree for a little while and I was
> > hoping for it to go in for the next merge window.
> > It simply allows bio_split() to be used
On 09/24/2012 06:56 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> Hi Jens,
> this patch has been sitting in my -next tree for a little while and I was
> hoping for it to go in for the next merge window.
> It simply allows bio_split() to be used on bios without a payload, such as
> 'discard'.
> Are you happy with
,
> > NeilBrown
> >
> >
> > From: Shaohua Li
> > Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 09:36:03 +1000
> > Subject: [PATCH] block: makes bio_split support bio without data
> >
> > discard bio hasn't data attached. We hit a BUG_ON with such bio. This makes
>
x27;discard'.
> Are you happy with it going in though my 'md' tree, or would you rather take
> it though your 'block' tree?
>
> Thanks,
> NeilBrown
>
>
> From: Shaohua Li
> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 09:36:03 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] block: makes
or would you rather take
it though your 'block' tree?
Thanks,
NeilBrown
From: Shaohua Li
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 09:36:03 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] block: makes bio_split support bio without data
discard bio hasn't data attached. We hit a BUG_ON with such bio. This makes
bio_split
12 matches
Mail list logo
