On 09/02/18 13:56, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > On 09/02/18 13:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:51 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
[...]
> >> > My impression is that rate limit
On 09/02/18 13:56, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > On 09/02/18 13:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:51 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
[...]
> >> > My impression is that rate limit helps a lot for CFS, where the "true"
> >> >
Il 09/02/2018 13:56, Rafael J. Wysocki ha scritto:
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
On 09/02/18 13:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:51 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
On 09/02/18 12:37, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On
Il 09/02/2018 13:56, Rafael J. Wysocki ha scritto:
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
On 09/02/18 13:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:51 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
On 09/02/18 12:37, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:26 PM, Juri Lelli
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> On 09/02/18 13:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:51 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
>> > On 09/02/18 12:37, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:26 PM, Juri Lelli
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> On 09/02/18 13:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:51 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
>> > On 09/02/18 12:37, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:26 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
>> >> > On 09/02/18 12:04, Rafael J.
On 09/02/18 13:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:51 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > On 09/02/18 12:37, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:26 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> >> > On 09/02/18 12:04, Rafael J. Wysocki
On 09/02/18 13:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:51 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > On 09/02/18 12:37, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:26 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> >> > On 09/02/18 12:04, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> >> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:53 AM,
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:51 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> On 09/02/18 12:37, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:26 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
>> > On 09/02/18 12:04, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Juri Lelli
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:51 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> On 09/02/18 12:37, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:26 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
>> > On 09/02/18 12:04, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > On
On 09/02/18 12:37, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:26 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > On 09/02/18 12:04, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > On 09/02/18 11:36,
On 09/02/18 12:37, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:26 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > On 09/02/18 12:04, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > On 09/02/18 11:36, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> >> On Friday,
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:26 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> On 09/02/18 12:04, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On 09/02/18 11:36, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> >> On Friday, February 9, 2018
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:26 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> On 09/02/18 12:04, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On 09/02/18 11:36, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> >> On Friday, February 9, 2018 9:02:34 AM CET Claudio Scordino wrote:
>> >> >
On 09/02/18 12:04, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 09/02/18 11:36, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Friday, February 9, 2018 9:02:34 AM CET Claudio Scordino wrote:
> >> > Hi Viresh,
> >> >
> >> > Il 09/02/2018
On 09/02/18 12:04, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 09/02/18 11:36, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Friday, February 9, 2018 9:02:34 AM CET Claudio Scordino wrote:
> >> > Hi Viresh,
> >> >
> >> > Il 09/02/2018 04:51, Viresh Kumar ha
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:01 PM, Claudio Scordino
wrote:
> When the SCHED_DEADLINE scheduling class increases the CPU utilization,
> we should not wait for the rate limit, otherwise we may miss some deadline.
>
> Tests using rt-app on Exynos5422 have shown reductions of
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:01 PM, Claudio Scordino
wrote:
> When the SCHED_DEADLINE scheduling class increases the CPU utilization,
> we should not wait for the rate limit, otherwise we may miss some deadline.
>
> Tests using rt-app on Exynos5422 have shown reductions of about 10% of
> deadline
>
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/02/18 11:36, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Friday, February 9, 2018 9:02:34 AM CET Claudio Scordino wrote:
>> > Hi Viresh,
>> >
>> > Il 09/02/2018 04:51, Viresh Kumar ha scritto:
>> > > On 08-02-18, 18:01,
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/02/18 11:36, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Friday, February 9, 2018 9:02:34 AM CET Claudio Scordino wrote:
>> > Hi Viresh,
>> >
>> > Il 09/02/2018 04:51, Viresh Kumar ha scritto:
>> > > On 08-02-18, 18:01, Claudio Scordino wrote:
Hi,
On 09/02/18 11:36, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, February 9, 2018 9:02:34 AM CET Claudio Scordino wrote:
> > Hi Viresh,
> >
> > Il 09/02/2018 04:51, Viresh Kumar ha scritto:
> > > On 08-02-18, 18:01, Claudio Scordino wrote:
> > >> When the SCHED_DEADLINE scheduling class increases
Hi,
On 09/02/18 11:36, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, February 9, 2018 9:02:34 AM CET Claudio Scordino wrote:
> > Hi Viresh,
> >
> > Il 09/02/2018 04:51, Viresh Kumar ha scritto:
> > > On 08-02-18, 18:01, Claudio Scordino wrote:
> > >> When the SCHED_DEADLINE scheduling class increases
On Friday, February 9, 2018 9:02:34 AM CET Claudio Scordino wrote:
> Hi Viresh,
>
> Il 09/02/2018 04:51, Viresh Kumar ha scritto:
> > On 08-02-18, 18:01, Claudio Scordino wrote:
> >> When the SCHED_DEADLINE scheduling class increases the CPU utilization,
> >> we should not wait for the rate
On Friday, February 9, 2018 9:02:34 AM CET Claudio Scordino wrote:
> Hi Viresh,
>
> Il 09/02/2018 04:51, Viresh Kumar ha scritto:
> > On 08-02-18, 18:01, Claudio Scordino wrote:
> >> When the SCHED_DEADLINE scheduling class increases the CPU utilization,
> >> we should not wait for the rate
On 09-02-18, 09:02, Claudio Scordino wrote:
> If I'm not wrong, at the hardware level we do have a physical rate limit (as
> we cannot trigger a frequency update when there is one already on-going).
> Don't know if this could somehow mitigate such effect.
Yeah, so in the worst case we will start
On 09-02-18, 09:02, Claudio Scordino wrote:
> If I'm not wrong, at the hardware level we do have a physical rate limit (as
> we cannot trigger a frequency update when there is one already on-going).
> Don't know if this could somehow mitigate such effect.
Yeah, so in the worst case we will start
Hi Viresh,
Il 09/02/2018 04:51, Viresh Kumar ha scritto:
On 08-02-18, 18:01, Claudio Scordino wrote:
When the SCHED_DEADLINE scheduling class increases the CPU utilization,
we should not wait for the rate limit, otherwise we may miss some deadline.
Tests using rt-app on Exynos5422 have shown
Hi Viresh,
Il 09/02/2018 04:51, Viresh Kumar ha scritto:
On 08-02-18, 18:01, Claudio Scordino wrote:
When the SCHED_DEADLINE scheduling class increases the CPU utilization,
we should not wait for the rate limit, otherwise we may miss some deadline.
Tests using rt-app on Exynos5422 have shown
On 08-02-18, 18:01, Claudio Scordino wrote:
> When the SCHED_DEADLINE scheduling class increases the CPU utilization,
> we should not wait for the rate limit, otherwise we may miss some deadline.
>
> Tests using rt-app on Exynos5422 have shown reductions of about 10% of
> deadline
> misses for
On 08-02-18, 18:01, Claudio Scordino wrote:
> When the SCHED_DEADLINE scheduling class increases the CPU utilization,
> we should not wait for the rate limit, otherwise we may miss some deadline.
>
> Tests using rt-app on Exynos5422 have shown reductions of about 10% of
> deadline
> misses for
When the SCHED_DEADLINE scheduling class increases the CPU utilization,
we should not wait for the rate limit, otherwise we may miss some deadline.
Tests using rt-app on Exynos5422 have shown reductions of about 10% of deadline
misses for tasks with low RT periods.
The patch applies on top of
When the SCHED_DEADLINE scheduling class increases the CPU utilization,
we should not wait for the rate limit, otherwise we may miss some deadline.
Tests using rt-app on Exynos5422 have shown reductions of about 10% of deadline
misses for tasks with low RT periods.
The patch applies on top of
32 matches
Mail list logo