Re: [PATCH] doc: cgroup: correct the wrong information about measure of memory pressure

2019-02-21 Thread Yang Shi




On 2/19/19 2:45 AM, 禹舟键 wrote:

Hi TeJun
I've built the 5.0.0-rc6 kernel with psi option, but I cannot find any
cgroup.controllers when I mounted cgroup2.

[root@bogon /]# uname -r
[root@bogon /]# 5.0.0-rc6+
[root@bogon /]# mount -t cgroup2 none cgroup2/
[root@bogon /]# cat cgroup2/cgroup.controllers
[root@bogon /]
[root@bogon /]# cat cgroup2/cgroup.subtree_control
[root@bogon /]#

What's wrong with this kernel? Or maybe I lost some mount option?


I'm not sure what you did before you mounted cgroup2, but if you have 
legacy controllers mounted, you have to unmount them, otherwise 
cgroup.controllers would show up as empty. Or you can pass 
"cgroup_no_v1=" in your kernel parameter.


Yang



Thanks
Yuzhoujian

Tejun Heo  于2019年2月19日周二 上午10:32写道:

On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 08:56:04AM +0800, Yang Shi wrote:

Since PSI has implemented some kind of measure of memory pressure, the
statement about lack of such measure is not true anymore.

Cc: Tejun Heo 
Cc: Johannes Weiner 
Cc: Jonathan Corbet 
Signed-off-by: Yang Shi 
---
  Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst | 3 +--
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst 
b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
index 7bf3f12..9a92013 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
@@ -1310,8 +1310,7 @@ network to a file can use all available memory but can 
also operate as
  performant with a small amount of memory.  A measure of memory
  pressure - how much the workload is being impacted due to lack of
  memory - is necessary to determine whether a workload needs more
-memory; unfortunately, memory pressure monitoring mechanism isn't
-implemented yet.
+memory.

Maybe refer to PSI?

Thanks.

--
tejun




Re: [PATCH] doc: cgroup: correct the wrong information about measure of memory pressure

2019-02-19 Thread Yang Shi




On 2/18/19 1:05 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:

On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 08:56:04AM +0800, Yang Shi wrote:

Since PSI has implemented some kind of measure of memory pressure, the
statement about lack of such measure is not true anymore.

Cc: Tejun Heo 
Cc: Johannes Weiner 
Cc: Jonathan Corbet 
Signed-off-by: Yang Shi 
---
  Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst | 3 +--
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst 
b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
index 7bf3f12..9a92013 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
@@ -1310,8 +1310,7 @@ network to a file can use all available memory but can 
also operate as
  performant with a small amount of memory.  A measure of memory
  pressure - how much the workload is being impacted due to lack of
  memory - is necessary to determine whether a workload needs more
-memory; unfortunately, memory pressure monitoring mechanism isn't
-implemented yet.
+memory.

Maybe refer to PSI?


I thought so too, but the above "memory.pressure" has already referred 
to PSI. So, I was not sure if we should duplicate PSI information.


Thanks,
Yang



Thanks.





Re: [PATCH] doc: cgroup: correct the wrong information about measure of memory pressure

2019-02-19 Thread 禹舟键
Hi TeJun
I've built the 5.0.0-rc6 kernel with psi option, but I cannot find any
cgroup.controllers when I mounted cgroup2.

[root@bogon /]# uname -r
[root@bogon /]# 5.0.0-rc6+
[root@bogon /]# mount -t cgroup2 none cgroup2/
[root@bogon /]# cat cgroup2/cgroup.controllers
[root@bogon /]
[root@bogon /]# cat cgroup2/cgroup.subtree_control
[root@bogon /]#

What's wrong with this kernel? Or maybe I lost some mount option?

Thanks
Yuzhoujian

Tejun Heo  于2019年2月19日周二 上午10:32写道:
>
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 08:56:04AM +0800, Yang Shi wrote:
> > Since PSI has implemented some kind of measure of memory pressure, the
> > statement about lack of such measure is not true anymore.
> >
> > Cc: Tejun Heo 
> > Cc: Johannes Weiner 
> > Cc: Jonathan Corbet 
> > Signed-off-by: Yang Shi 
> > ---
> >  Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst | 3 +--
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst 
> > b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> > index 7bf3f12..9a92013 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> > @@ -1310,8 +1310,7 @@ network to a file can use all available memory but 
> > can also operate as
> >  performant with a small amount of memory.  A measure of memory
> >  pressure - how much the workload is being impacted due to lack of
> >  memory - is necessary to determine whether a workload needs more
> > -memory; unfortunately, memory pressure monitoring mechanism isn't
> > -implemented yet.
> > +memory.
>
> Maybe refer to PSI?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> tejun


Re: [PATCH] doc: cgroup: correct the wrong information about measure of memory pressure

2019-02-18 Thread Tejun Heo
On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 08:56:04AM +0800, Yang Shi wrote:
> Since PSI has implemented some kind of measure of memory pressure, the
> statement about lack of such measure is not true anymore.
> 
> Cc: Tejun Heo 
> Cc: Johannes Weiner 
> Cc: Jonathan Corbet 
> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi 
> ---
>  Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst 
> b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> index 7bf3f12..9a92013 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> @@ -1310,8 +1310,7 @@ network to a file can use all available memory but can 
> also operate as
>  performant with a small amount of memory.  A measure of memory
>  pressure - how much the workload is being impacted due to lack of
>  memory - is necessary to determine whether a workload needs more
> -memory; unfortunately, memory pressure monitoring mechanism isn't
> -implemented yet.
> +memory.

Maybe refer to PSI?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun


[PATCH] doc: cgroup: correct the wrong information about measure of memory pressure

2019-02-15 Thread Yang Shi
Since PSI has implemented some kind of measure of memory pressure, the
statement about lack of such measure is not true anymore.

Cc: Tejun Heo 
Cc: Johannes Weiner 
Cc: Jonathan Corbet 
Signed-off-by: Yang Shi 
---
 Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst 
b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
index 7bf3f12..9a92013 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
@@ -1310,8 +1310,7 @@ network to a file can use all available memory but can 
also operate as
 performant with a small amount of memory.  A measure of memory
 pressure - how much the workload is being impacted due to lack of
 memory - is necessary to determine whether a workload needs more
-memory; unfortunately, memory pressure monitoring mechanism isn't
-implemented yet.
+memory.
 
 
 Memory Ownership
-- 
1.8.3.1