And now with a response as a bonus...
On Tue 16-01-18 10:26:20, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [Please do not top post. I also think you didn't intend to drop the CC
> list - restored]
>
> On Tue 16-01-18 03:13:31, Robert Rickett wrote:
> > Michal,
> >
> > Although tiny changes like this are minuscul
[Please do not top post. I also think you didn't intend to drop the CC
list - restored]
On Tue 16-01-18 03:13:31, Robert Rickett wrote:
> Michal,
>
> Although tiny changes like this are minuscule, they are relevant to the
> big picture. If developers create a tool that informs contributors of
On Mon 15-01-18 19:17:12, Robert Donald Rickett wrote:
> This is a patch to the memory.c file that fixes the
> "ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible"
> found by the checkpatch.pl tool.
Is this really worth it? The code is not any better readable and it just
adds a churn to the history
This is a patch to the memory.c file that fixes the
"ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible"
found by the checkpatch.pl tool.
Signed-off-by: Robert Donald Rickett
---
mm/memory.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index ca5674
4 matches
Mail list logo