On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Bhumika Goyal wrote:
>> Add const to rfkill_ops structures that are only passed as an argument
>> to the functions rfkill_alloc or samsung_new_rfkill. These
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Bhumika Goyal wrote:
>> Add const to rfkill_ops structures that are only passed as an argument
>> to the functions rfkill_alloc or samsung_new_rfkill. These arguments are
>> of type const, so such structures
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Bhumika Goyal wrote:
> Add const to rfkill_ops structures that are only passed as an argument
> to the functions rfkill_alloc or samsung_new_rfkill. These arguments are
> of type const, so such structures can be annotated with const.
Change is
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Bhumika Goyal wrote:
> Add const to rfkill_ops structures that are only passed as an argument
> to the functions rfkill_alloc or samsung_new_rfkill. These arguments are
> of type const, so such structures can be annotated with const.
Change is fine by me, but
Add const to rfkill_ops structures that are only passed as an argument
to the functions rfkill_alloc or samsung_new_rfkill. These arguments are
of type const, so such structures can be annotated with const.
Signed-off-by: Bhumika Goyal
---
drivers/platform/x86/dell-rbtn.c
Add const to rfkill_ops structures that are only passed as an argument
to the functions rfkill_alloc or samsung_new_rfkill. These arguments are
of type const, so such structures can be annotated with const.
Signed-off-by: Bhumika Goyal
---
drivers/platform/x86/dell-rbtn.c | 2 +-
6 matches
Mail list logo